Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Limits of Fourth Amendment Protections in Private Automated Hash-Based Monitoring: United States v. Rosenschein

Limits of Fourth Amendment Protections in Private Automated Hash-Based Monitoring: United States v. Rosenschein

Date: May 13, 2025
Limits of Fourth Amendment Protections in Private Automated Hash-Based Monitoring: United States v. Rosenschein Introduction United States v. Rosenschein (10th Cir. 2025) addresses whether...
Reaffirmation of the Rehaif Standard: Knowledge of Felony Status Under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) in United States v. Berris

Reaffirmation of the Rehaif Standard: Knowledge of Felony Status Under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) in United States v. Berris

Date: May 13, 2025
Reaffirmation of the Rehaif Standard: Knowledge of Felony Status Under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) in United States v. Berris Introduction United States v. Berris, 10th Cir. No. 24-8065 (May 12, 2025),...
Clarifying Threats and Interrogations Under Section 8(a)(1): Employer Predictions vs. Coercive Conduct

Clarifying Threats and Interrogations Under Section 8(a)(1): Employer Predictions vs. Coercive Conduct

Date: May 13, 2025
Clarifying Threats and Interrogations Under Section 8(a)(1): Employer Predictions vs. Coercive Conduct 1. Introduction In 3484, Inc.; 3486, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board (10th Cir. May 12,...
NEPA Hard Look Requirement: Prohibiting Arbitrary Agency Departures from Model‐Based Risk Assessments

NEPA Hard Look Requirement: Prohibiting Arbitrary Agency Departures from Model‐Based Risk Assessments

Date: May 10, 2025
NEPA Hard Look Requirement: Prohibiting Arbitrary Agency Departures from Model‐Based Risk Assessments Introduction In WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. Forest Service, 10th Cir. No. 24-1187 (May 9, 2025),...
Mandating the Jones Balancing Test Under Rule 32.1(b)(2)(C) in Supervised Release Revocation Hearings

Mandating the Jones Balancing Test Under Rule 32.1(b)(2)(C) in Supervised Release Revocation Hearings

Date: May 9, 2025
Mandating the Jones Balancing Test Under Rule 32.1(b)(2)(C) in Supervised Release Revocation Hearings Introduction This commentary examines the Tenth Circuit’s decision in United States v. Martinez,...
Establishing Internet-Use Controls in Supervised Release: Prior Authorization & Monitoring-Software Conditions Upheld in United States v. Kornacki

Establishing Internet-Use Controls in Supervised Release: Prior Authorization & Monitoring-Software Conditions Upheld in United States v. Kornacki

Date: May 9, 2025
Establishing Internet-Use Controls in Supervised Release: Prior Authorization & Monitoring-Software Conditions Upheld in United States v. Kornacki Introduction United States v. Kornacki, decided May...
Standards for Prior-Authorization and Monitoring-Software Conditions on Internet-Capable Devices in Supervised Release

Standards for Prior-Authorization and Monitoring-Software Conditions on Internet-Capable Devices in Supervised Release

Date: May 9, 2025
Standards for Prior-Authorization and Monitoring-Software Conditions on Internet-Capable Devices in Supervised Release 1. Introduction This commentary examines the Tenth Circuit’s decision in United...
Enforcing Tailored Internet Restrictions in Supervised Release: United States v. Kornacki (10th Cir. 2025)

Enforcing Tailored Internet Restrictions in Supervised Release: United States v. Kornacki (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: May 9, 2025
Enforcing Tailored Internet Restrictions in Supervised Release: United States v. Kornacki (10th Cir. 2025) Introduction United States v. Kornacki, decided May 8, 2025 by the Tenth Circuit, addresses...
United States v. Kristich: Affirmation of the Three-Step Compassionate Release Framework and Appellate Waiver Principles

United States v. Kristich: Affirmation of the Three-Step Compassionate Release Framework and Appellate Waiver Principles

Date: May 9, 2025
United States v. Kristich: Affirmation of the Three-Step Compassionate Release Framework and Appellate Waiver Principles Introduction United States v. Kristich, decided May 8, 2025, by the Tenth...
Ensuring Personal Jurisdiction and Deliberate Indifference Standards in §1983 Actions: Guébara v. Bascue

Ensuring Personal Jurisdiction and Deliberate Indifference Standards in §1983 Actions: Guébara v. Bascue

Date: May 9, 2025
Ensuring Personal Jurisdiction and Deliberate Indifference Standards in §1983 Actions: Guébara v. Bascue Introduction Guebara v. Bascue is a 2025 decision of the United States Court of Appeals for...
Allowing Employer’s Interested-Witness Evidence at Summary Judgment in Discrimination Cases: New Rule in Mauldin v. Wormuth

Allowing Employer’s Interested-Witness Evidence at Summary Judgment in Discrimination Cases: New Rule in Mauldin v. Wormuth

Date: May 7, 2025
Allowing Employer’s Interested-Witness Evidence at Summary Judgment in Discrimination Cases: New Rule in Mauldin v. Wormuth Introduction Mauldin v. Wormuth (10th Cir. May 6, 2025) is a landmark...
Extension of Doyle: Prohibition on Using Post-Arrest Partial Silence for Impeachment

Extension of Doyle: Prohibition on Using Post-Arrest Partial Silence for Impeachment

Date: May 7, 2025
Extension of Doyle: Prohibition on Using Post-Arrest Partial Silence for Impeachment Introduction Case: United States v. Ward Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Date: May 6, 2025...
RFRA’s Express‐Authorization Exception to Consular Nonreviewability: Judicial Review of Visa Decisions

RFRA’s Express‐Authorization Exception to Consular Nonreviewability: Judicial Review of Visa Decisions

Date: May 7, 2025
RFRA’s Express‐Authorization Exception to Consular Nonreviewability: Judicial Review of Visa Decisions Introduction In Calvary Albuquerque Inc. v. Rubio (10th Cir. 2025), a New Mexico church...
Discretionary Denial of § 3582(c)(2) Sentence Reduction for Violent Child-Abuse Offenses After Amendment 821

Discretionary Denial of § 3582(c)(2) Sentence Reduction for Violent Child-Abuse Offenses After Amendment 821

Date: May 6, 2025
Discretionary Denial of § 3582(c)(2) Sentence Reduction for Violent Child-Abuse Offenses After Amendment 821 Introduction United States v. Rose, No. 24-7079 (10th Cir. May 5, 2025), addresses whether...
Fonte v. Memorial Hospital: Incorporation of Wyoming’s Governmental Claims Act Notice Requirement into EMTALA Actions

Fonte v. Memorial Hospital: Incorporation of Wyoming’s Governmental Claims Act Notice Requirement into EMTALA Actions

Date: May 6, 2025
Fonte v. Memorial Hospital: Incorporation of Wyoming’s Governmental Claims Act Notice Requirement into EMTALA Actions Introduction Fonte v. Memorial Hospital of Laramie County is a decision of the...
Preservation and Waiver of Procedural Reasonableness Challenges in Sentencing Appeals: United States v. Fuller

Preservation and Waiver of Procedural Reasonableness Challenges in Sentencing Appeals: United States v. Fuller

Date: May 6, 2025
Preservation and Waiver of Procedural Reasonableness Challenges in Sentencing Appeals: United States v. Fuller Introduction United States v. Fuller, decided May 5, 2025 by the Tenth Circuit,...
Qualified Immunity Denied for Unlawful Arrest and Excessive Force: The Pre-Shooting Conduct Standard in Ibarra v. Lee

Qualified Immunity Denied for Unlawful Arrest and Excessive Force: The Pre-Shooting Conduct Standard in Ibarra v. Lee

Date: May 6, 2025
Qualified Immunity Denied for Unlawful Arrest and Excessive Force: The Pre-Shooting Conduct Standard in Ibarra v. Lee Introduction Ibarra v. Lee, decided May 5, 2025 by the Tenth Circuit, clarifies...
Clarifying COA Requirements and Ineffective Assistance Analysis under §2255: United States v. Guzman-Dominguez

Clarifying COA Requirements and Ineffective Assistance Analysis under §2255: United States v. Guzman-Dominguez

Date: May 3, 2025
Clarifying COA Requirements and Ineffective Assistance Analysis under §2255: United States v. Guzman-Dominguez Introduction United States v. Guzman-Dominguez, decided by the Tenth Circuit on May 2,...
Evidence‐Based Requirement for “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D): Consideration of Intra‐Country Relocation

Evidence‐Based Requirement for “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D): Consideration of Intra‐Country Relocation

Date: May 3, 2025
Evidence‐Based Requirement for “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D): Consideration of Intra‐Country Relocation Introduction Herrera-Arellano v. Garland is an...
AdHealth, Ltd. v. PorterCare Adventist Health Systems: Unambiguous Definition of “Medical Incident” Limits Coverage to Individual Patient Claims

AdHealth, Ltd. v. PorterCare Adventist Health Systems: Unambiguous Definition of “Medical Incident” Limits Coverage to Individual Patient Claims

Date: May 3, 2025
AdHealth, Ltd. v. PorterCare Adventist Health Systems: Unambiguous Definition of “Medical Incident” Limits Coverage to Individual Patient Claims 1. Introduction In AdHealth, Limited v. PorterCare...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert