Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

view Case Commentaries

Reaffirming Broad Discretion to Weigh Prior Sentences in Upward Variances: United States v. Carmel Linot (11th Cir. 2025)

Reaffirming Broad Discretion to Weigh Prior Sentences in Upward Variances: United States v. Carmel Linot (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Reaffirming Broad Discretion to Weigh Prior Sentences in Upward Variances Under § 3553(a): United States v. Carmel Linot Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Date: October 24, 2025...
Guidelines as Starting Point; Public Protection as Dominant Factor: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Substantial Upward Variance for §1470 Despite Mandatory §2260A Term

Guidelines as Starting Point; Public Protection as Dominant Factor: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Substantial Upward Variance for §1470 Despite Mandatory §2260A Term

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Guidelines as Starting Point; Public Protection as Dominant Factor: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Substantial Upward Variance for §1470 Despite Mandatory §2260A Term Introduction In United States v. Imran...
Third Circuit Declines En Banc Review, Leaving Intact Anderson–Burdick Invalidation of Pennsylvania’s Mail‑In Ballot Date Requirement Despite New State Notice‑and‑Cure Mandate

Third Circuit Declines En Banc Review, Leaving Intact Anderson–Burdick Invalidation of Pennsylvania’s Mail‑In Ballot Date Requirement Despite New State Notice‑and‑Cure Mandate

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Third Circuit Declines En Banc Review, Leaving Intact Anderson–Burdick Invalidation of Pennsylvania’s Mail‑In Ballot Date Requirement Despite New State Notice‑and‑Cure Mandate Case: Bette Eakin v....
Parker v. NJMVC: Essential Eligibility Controls Title II and §504; No Pre‑Deprivation Hearing Required for Safety‑Driven CDL Passenger/School‑Bus Endorsement Revocations

Parker v. NJMVC: Essential Eligibility Controls Title II and §504; No Pre‑Deprivation Hearing Required for Safety‑Driven CDL Passenger/School‑Bus Endorsement Revocations

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Parker v. NJMVC: Essential Eligibility Controls Title II and §504; No Pre‑Deprivation Hearing Required for Safety‑Driven CDL Passenger/School‑Bus Endorsement Revocations Introduction In a...
Post-Answer Rule 12(b)(6) Motions Permissible as Rule 12(c); Preliminary-Injunction Denials Do Not Make Amendment Futile — Oxford House, Inc. v. Township of North Bergen (3d Cir. 2025)

Post-Answer Rule 12(b)(6) Motions Permissible as Rule 12(c); Preliminary-Injunction Denials Do Not Make Amendment Futile — Oxford House, Inc. v. Township of North Bergen (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Post-Answer Rule 12(b)(6) Motions Permissible as Rule 12(c); Preliminary-Injunction Denials Do Not Make Amendment Futile — Oxford House, Inc. v. Township of North Bergen (3d Cir. 2025) Introduction...
United States v. Hernandez-Adame: Fifth Circuit Confirms that “Entry” Under § 1326 Requires Freedom from Official Restraint, but Treats It as a Definitional Concept Within Trial Courts’ Instructional Discretion

United States v. Hernandez-Adame: Fifth Circuit Confirms that “Entry” Under § 1326 Requires Freedom from Official Restraint, but Treats It as a Definitional Concept Within Trial Courts’ Instructional Discretion

Date: Oct 28, 2025
United States v. Hernandez-Adame: Fifth Circuit Confirms that “Entry” Under § 1326 Requires Freedom from Official Restraint, but Treats It as a Definitional Concept Within Trial Courts’ Instructional...
No Federal Power to Compel Arbitration of Ongoing State Probate Asset Proceedings: The Sixth Circuit’s “Look‑Through plus In‑Rem” Bar under FAA § 4

No Federal Power to Compel Arbitration of Ongoing State Probate Asset Proceedings: The Sixth Circuit’s “Look‑Through plus In‑Rem” Bar under FAA § 4

Date: Oct 28, 2025
No Federal Power to Compel Arbitration of Ongoing State Probate Asset Proceedings: The Sixth Circuit’s “Look‑Through plus In‑Rem” Bar under FAA § 4 Introduction In Amos C. Johnson, M.D., and Johnson...
No Clearly Established Right of Public Access to Quasi‑Judicial Tax Hearings: Sixth Circuit Grants Qualified Immunity in Hicks v. Crowley

No Clearly Established Right of Public Access to Quasi‑Judicial Tax Hearings: Sixth Circuit Grants Qualified Immunity in Hicks v. Crowley

Date: Oct 28, 2025
No Clearly Established Right of Public Access to Quasi‑Judicial Tax Hearings: Sixth Circuit Grants Qualified Immunity in Hicks v. Crowley Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Date:...
Effective Preventive Measures Defeat Constructive Notice: Sixth Circuit Affirms No Duty Absent Foreseeability of a “General Condition” in Tennessee Premises Liability

Effective Preventive Measures Defeat Constructive Notice: Sixth Circuit Affirms No Duty Absent Foreseeability of a “General Condition” in Tennessee Premises Liability

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Effective Preventive Measures Defeat Constructive Notice: Sixth Circuit Affirms No Duty Absent Foreseeability of a “General Condition” in Tennessee Premises Liability Introduction In Patrick Penn &...
Kosher Complaints Must Follow Prison Verification Rules; Sporadic Errors Do Not Clearly Violate Free Exercise: Sixth Circuit Affirms Qualified Immunity in Blanton v. Histed

Kosher Complaints Must Follow Prison Verification Rules; Sporadic Errors Do Not Clearly Violate Free Exercise: Sixth Circuit Affirms Qualified Immunity in Blanton v. Histed

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Kosher Complaints Must Follow Prison Verification Rules; Sporadic Errors Do Not Clearly Violate Free Exercise: Sixth Circuit Affirms Qualified Immunity in Blanton v. Histed Court: United States Court...
Payment Logistics, Not Testing Frequency: Fourth Circuit Clarifies Permissible Probation Roles in Drug-Testing Conditions on Supervised Release

Payment Logistics, Not Testing Frequency: Fourth Circuit Clarifies Permissible Probation Roles in Drug-Testing Conditions on Supervised Release

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Payment Logistics, Not Testing Frequency: Fourth Circuit Clarifies Permissible Probation Roles in Drug-Testing Conditions on Supervised Release Introduction In United States v. Kevin Jamal Jones, No....
Tenth Circuit Clarifies: Post‑Judgment Discovery That Attacks the Merits Is a Successive § 2254 Petition Requiring § 2244(b) Authorization and a COA

Tenth Circuit Clarifies: Post‑Judgment Discovery That Attacks the Merits Is a Successive § 2254 Petition Requiring § 2244(b) Authorization and a COA

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Tenth Circuit Clarifies: Post‑Judgment Discovery That Attacks the Merits Is a Successive § 2254 Petition Requiring § 2244(b) Authorization and a COA Introduction In Johnson v. Patton, No. 25-6084...
Deliberate Indifference to Prolonged Loss of Potable Water Can Shock the Conscience: First Circuit Revives Morovis Water Crisis Suit

Deliberate Indifference to Prolonged Loss of Potable Water Can Shock the Conscience: First Circuit Revives Morovis Water Crisis Suit

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Deliberate Indifference to Prolonged Loss of Potable Water Can Shock the Conscience: First Circuit Revives Morovis Water Crisis Suit Introduction In Maldonado-González v. Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer...
United States v. Castillo: No Outrageous Misconduct for U.S.-Led Foreign Arrests; Pen Register Metadata Is Non‑Hearsay

United States v. Castillo: No Outrageous Misconduct for U.S.-Led Foreign Arrests; Pen Register Metadata Is Non‑Hearsay

Date: Oct 28, 2025
United States v. Castillo: No Outrageous Misconduct for U.S.-Led Foreign Arrests; Pen Register Metadata Is Non‑Hearsay Introduction In United States v. Castillo, the First Circuit affirmed the...
Triple Waiver and No-Prejudice Variance: The First Circuit’s Reinforcement of Preservation Rules in United States v. Paredes

Triple Waiver and No-Prejudice Variance: The First Circuit’s Reinforcement of Preservation Rules in United States v. Paredes

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Triple Waiver and No-Prejudice Variance: The First Circuit’s Reinforcement of Preservation Rules in United States v. Paredes Introduction This commentary analyzes the First Circuit’s unpublished...
Edwards v. Lane: Idaho Supreme Court Confirms Abuse-of-Discretion Review for Trustee Removal and Strict Appellate Briefing Requirements (with Fee-Shifting for Frivolous Appeals)

Edwards v. Lane: Idaho Supreme Court Confirms Abuse-of-Discretion Review for Trustee Removal and Strict Appellate Briefing Requirements (with Fee-Shifting for Frivolous Appeals)

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Edwards v. Lane: Abuse-of-Discretion Review Governs Trustee Removal; Appellate Waiver for Inadequate Briefing Triggers Fees Court: Idaho Supreme Court | Date: October 23, 2025 | Docket No.: 51237...
Sentencing courts retain authority to impose incarceration fees after the 2022 amendment to KRS 441.265; evidentiary limits on a defendant’s case-in-chief must still be assessed for harmlessness; “bare-bones” but differentiating jury instructions satisfy unanimity

Sentencing courts retain authority to impose incarceration fees after the 2022 amendment to KRS 441.265; evidentiary limits on a defendant’s case-in-chief must still be assessed for harmlessness; “bare-bones” but differentiating jury instructions satisfy unanimity

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Sentencing courts retain authority to impose incarceration fees after the 2022 amendment to KRS 441.265; evidentiary limits on a defendant’s case-in-chief must still be assessed for harmlessness;...
Mistaken Belief of Authorization Negates Burglary Mens Rea: The Kentucky Supreme Court’s Unpublished Decision in McVey

Mistaken Belief of Authorization Negates Burglary Mens Rea: The Kentucky Supreme Court’s Unpublished Decision in McVey

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Mistaken Belief of Authorization Negates Burglary Mens Rea: The Kentucky Supreme Court’s Unpublished Decision in McVey Case: Charles J. McVey v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Court: Supreme Court of...
ALJs Must Certify the Correct Workers’ Compensation Carrier After a Changed Exposure Date: Insurers Have Standing Without Formal Joinder and Statutory Duties Trump Equitable Defenses

ALJs Must Certify the Correct Workers’ Compensation Carrier After a Changed Exposure Date: Insurers Have Standing Without Formal Joinder and Statutory Duties Trump Equitable Defenses

Date: Oct 28, 2025
ALJs Must Certify the Correct Workers’ Compensation Carrier After a Changed Exposure Date: Insurers Have Standing Without Formal Joinder and Statutory Duties Trump Equitable Defenses Introduction In...
Perkins v. North American Stainless: Kentucky Supreme Court Adopts a Three‑Prong Test for Workers’ Compensation Claims Involving Communicable Diseases

Perkins v. North American Stainless: Kentucky Supreme Court Adopts a Three‑Prong Test for Workers’ Compensation Claims Involving Communicable Diseases

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Perkins v. North American Stainless: Kentucky Supreme Court Adopts a Three‑Prong Test for Workers’ Compensation Claims Involving Communicable Diseases Introduction In Estate of Kyle Perkins by Megan...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert