Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

view Case Commentaries

Experience-Based Premium Rates and Private Fee Awards: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Lodestar Flexibility and Rejects Excessive Fines Challenge in Sanctions-Fee Case

Experience-Based Premium Rates and Private Fee Awards: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Lodestar Flexibility and Rejects Excessive Fines Challenge in Sanctions-Fee Case

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Experience-Based Premium Rates and Private Fee Awards: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Lodestar Flexibility and Rejects Excessive Fines Challenge in Sanctions-Fee Case Introduction In Spencer Sheehan v. Big...
Seriousness Over Statistical Averages: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Broad District Court Discretion Under § 3553(a) in Child‑Pornography Sentencing

Seriousness Over Statistical Averages: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Broad District Court Discretion Under § 3553(a) in Child‑Pornography Sentencing

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Seriousness Over Statistical Averages: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Broad District Court Discretion Under § 3553(a) in Child‑Pornography Sentencing Case: United States v. Jonathon Fernandez‑Herak, Nos....
Eleventh Circuit reaffirms discretion to prioritize offense seriousness over national sentencing averages under § 3553(a), upholding a below‑Guidelines sentence for child‑pornography distribution

Eleventh Circuit reaffirms discretion to prioritize offense seriousness over national sentencing averages under § 3553(a), upholding a below‑Guidelines sentence for child‑pornography distribution

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Eleventh Circuit reaffirms discretion to prioritize offense seriousness over national sentencing averages under § 3553(a), upholding a below‑Guidelines sentence for child‑pornography distribution...
No Safe Harbor in Broad, Circular “Professional” Groups: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Non‑Cognizability of Gang‑Targeted Professionals and Reiterates that Credibility Alone Does Not Compel Asylum

No Safe Harbor in Broad, Circular “Professional” Groups: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Non‑Cognizability of Gang‑Targeted Professionals and Reiterates that Credibility Alone Does Not Compel Asylum

Date: Aug 31, 2025
No Safe Harbor in Broad, Circular “Professional” Groups: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Non‑Cognizability of Gang‑Targeted Professionals and Reiterates that Credibility Alone Does Not Compel Asylum Case:...
Sixth Circuit: Seeking a Merits Dismissal Before Invoking Arbitration Constitutes FAA “Default,” Extinguishing the Right to Arbitrate

Sixth Circuit: Seeking a Merits Dismissal Before Invoking Arbitration Constitutes FAA “Default,” Extinguishing the Right to Arbitrate

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Sixth Circuit: Seeking a Merits Dismissal Before Invoking Arbitration Constitutes FAA “Default,” Extinguishing the Right to Arbitrate Introduction This published decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies: Neutral COVID-19 Vaccination Attestation Is Not an ADA “Medical Inquiry,” and Termination for Noncompliance with a Generally Applicable Vaccine Policy Does Not State ADA Retaliation

Tenth Circuit Clarifies: Neutral COVID-19 Vaccination Attestation Is Not an ADA “Medical Inquiry,” and Termination for Noncompliance with a Generally Applicable Vaccine Policy Does Not State ADA Retaliation

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Tenth Circuit Clarifies: Neutral COVID-19 Vaccination Attestation Is Not an ADA “Medical Inquiry,” and Termination for Noncompliance with a Generally Applicable Vaccine Policy Does Not State ADA...
Parental Orchestration Is Not a Shield: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms Broad Discretion to Transfer Juveniles to Adult Court Where Dangerousness Outweighs Amenability to Treatment

Parental Orchestration Is Not a Shield: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms Broad Discretion to Transfer Juveniles to Adult Court Where Dangerousness Outweighs Amenability to Treatment

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Parental Orchestration Is Not a Shield: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms Broad Discretion to Transfer Juveniles to Adult Court Where Dangerousness Outweighs Amenability to Treatment Case: United States v....
Counsel of Choice Is Not Absolute: Tenth Circuit Denies COA Where Indigent Defendant Sought Eleventh-Hour Substitution Without Showing Retained Counsel

Counsel of Choice Is Not Absolute: Tenth Circuit Denies COA Where Indigent Defendant Sought Eleventh-Hour Substitution Without Showing Retained Counsel

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Counsel of Choice Is Not Absolute: Tenth Circuit Denies COA Where Indigent Defendant Sought Eleventh-Hour Substitution Without Showing Retained Counsel Introduction In United States v. Laskey, No....
No Innocent Construction for Accusations of POA Self‑Dealing; Employee Admissions Admissible to Prove Abuse of Qualified Privilege; Estate-Administrator Access Falls Within PIPA’s Good‑Faith Exception

No Innocent Construction for Accusations of POA Self‑Dealing; Employee Admissions Admissible to Prove Abuse of Qualified Privilege; Estate-Administrator Access Falls Within PIPA’s Good‑Faith Exception

Date: Aug 31, 2025
No Innocent Construction for Accusations of POA Self‑Dealing; Employee Admissions Admissible to Prove Abuse of Qualified Privilege; Estate-Administrator Access Falls Within PIPA’s Good‑Faith...
Intended Loss Includes Pre‑Scheme Funds Placed at Risk; No Investor‑by‑Investor Tracing Required, and Restitution May Cover All Scheme Victims — United States v. Miller (7th Cir. 2025)

Intended Loss Includes Pre‑Scheme Funds Placed at Risk; No Investor‑by‑Investor Tracing Required, and Restitution May Cover All Scheme Victims — United States v. Miller (7th Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Intended Loss Includes Pre‑Scheme Funds Placed at Risk; No Investor‑by‑Investor Tracing Required, and Restitution May Cover All Scheme Victims — United States v. Miller (7th Cir. 2025) Introduction...
Toward the “Vanishing Point”: First Circuit Clarifies Minimal Weight for Structural Conflicts When Administrators Mitigate Bias and Provide Reasoned Explanations under ERISA — Commentary on Bernitz v. USAble Life

Toward the “Vanishing Point”: First Circuit Clarifies Minimal Weight for Structural Conflicts When Administrators Mitigate Bias and Provide Reasoned Explanations under ERISA — Commentary on Bernitz v. USAble Life

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Toward the “Vanishing Point”: First Circuit Clarifies Minimal Weight for Structural Conflicts When Administrators Mitigate Bias and Provide Reasoned Explanations under ERISA — Commentary on Bernitz...
Implicit Compliance with Adm.Code 4121-3-34(D)(3)(i): Hearing Officers Need Not Itemize Every Psychological Restriction in PTD Orders

Implicit Compliance with Adm.Code 4121-3-34(D)(3)(i): Hearing Officers Need Not Itemize Every Psychological Restriction in PTD Orders

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Implicit Compliance with Adm.Code 4121-3-34(D)(3)(i): Hearing Officers Need Not Itemize Every Psychological Restriction in PTD Orders Introduction In State ex rel. Urban v. Wano Expiditing, Inc.,...
No Ex Post Facto Relief Where Duty Pre‑Existed 2007 SVORA: Waiver by Unconditional Plea and Direct‑Appeal Bar Reaffirmed (Benton v. State, Mont. 2025) – Nonprecedential

No Ex Post Facto Relief Where Duty Pre‑Existed 2007 SVORA: Waiver by Unconditional Plea and Direct‑Appeal Bar Reaffirmed (Benton v. State, Mont. 2025) – Nonprecedential

Date: Aug 31, 2025
No Ex Post Facto Relief Where Duty Pre‑Existed 2007 SVORA: Waiver by Unconditional Plea and Direct‑Appeal Bar Reaffirmed Benton v. State, 2025 MT 191N (Mont. Aug. 26, 2025) — Memorandum opinion,...
Girasole v. Paws Up: Inherent Risk Defines Duty—No Liability Without Atypical Hazards or Statutory Exception Under Montana’s Equine Activities Act

Girasole v. Paws Up: Inherent Risk Defines Duty—No Liability Without Atypical Hazards or Statutory Exception Under Montana’s Equine Activities Act

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Girasole v. Paws Up: Inherent Risk Defines Duty—No Liability Without Atypical Hazards or Statutory Exception Under Montana’s Equine Activities Act Introduction In Girasole v. Paws Up, the Supreme...
Logical Inferences Must Be Record‑Rooted: Montana Supreme Court Clarifies the “Some Evidence” Threshold for Self‑Defense Jury Instructions in State v. Holcomb (2025 MT 190)

Logical Inferences Must Be Record‑Rooted: Montana Supreme Court Clarifies the “Some Evidence” Threshold for Self‑Defense Jury Instructions in State v. Holcomb (2025 MT 190)

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Logical Inferences Must Be Record‑Rooted: Montana Supreme Court Clarifies the “Some Evidence” Threshold for Self‑Defense Jury Instructions in State v. Holcomb (2025 MT 190) Introduction In State v....
Email Notice Counts: Montana Supreme Court Clarifies PFO Notice “Given” Need Not Be Filed by the Omnibus Deadline and Minor Tardiness Does Not Mandate Reversal Absent Prejudice

Email Notice Counts: Montana Supreme Court Clarifies PFO Notice “Given” Need Not Be Filed by the Omnibus Deadline and Minor Tardiness Does Not Mandate Reversal Absent Prejudice

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Email Notice Counts: Montana Supreme Court Clarifies PFO Notice “Given” Need Not Be Filed by the Omnibus Deadline and Minor Tardiness Does Not Mandate Reversal Absent Prejudice Case Comment: State v....
State v. Jacques (Conn. 2025): No Second Probable Cause Hearing After Appellate Reversal; Medical Memory Loss Does Not Defeat Confrontation or Whelan; Clarified Reliability Gatekeeping for Jailhouse Informants

State v. Jacques (Conn. 2025): No Second Probable Cause Hearing After Appellate Reversal; Medical Memory Loss Does Not Defeat Confrontation or Whelan; Clarified Reliability Gatekeeping for Jailhouse Informants

Date: Aug 31, 2025
State v. Jacques: Probable Cause Survives Appellate Suppression; Medical Memory Loss Does Not Bar Confrontation or Whelan; Reliability Threshold for Jailhouse Informants Affirmed Introduction In...
When the Record Is Not Enough: Hawai‘i Supreme Court Requires an EA as a Matter of Law for HEPA Exemptions Not Supported on the Face of the Agency Record

When the Record Is Not Enough: Hawai‘i Supreme Court Requires an EA as a Matter of Law for HEPA Exemptions Not Supported on the Face of the Agency Record

Date: Aug 31, 2025
When the Record Is Not Enough: Hawai‘i Supreme Court Requires an EA as a Matter of Law for HEPA Exemptions Not Supported on the Face of the Agency Record Introduction In Ke Kauhulu O Mānā v. Board of...
Post-Bruen Challenges to Pistol Permit Denials: Second Circuit Reaffirms Absolute Judicial Immunity and Eleventh Amendment Limits on Suits Against State Judges

Post-Bruen Challenges to Pistol Permit Denials: Second Circuit Reaffirms Absolute Judicial Immunity and Eleventh Amendment Limits on Suits Against State Judges

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Post-Bruen Challenges to Pistol Permit Denials: Second Circuit Reaffirms Absolute Judicial Immunity and Eleventh Amendment Limits on Suits Against State Judges Introduction This commentary analyzes...
Terminal-Only Mandates Are ANCA “Access Restrictions” Even If Valid Under the ADA’s Proprietor Exception: Commentary on Delux Public Charter v. County of Westchester (2d Cir. 2025, Summary Order)

Terminal-Only Mandates Are ANCA “Access Restrictions” Even If Valid Under the ADA’s Proprietor Exception: Commentary on Delux Public Charter v. County of Westchester (2d Cir. 2025, Summary Order)

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Terminal-Only Mandates Are ANCA “Access Restrictions” Even If Valid Under the ADA’s Proprietor Exception In Delux Public Charter v. County of Westchester, the Second Circuit (by summary order) held...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert