Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

tennessee-supreme-court-affirms-defendant&amp Case Commentaries

No Limitations Period for Denaturalization; Non‑Shepard Evidence May Establish Statutory‑Period Timing

No Limitations Period for Denaturalization; Non‑Shepard Evidence May Establish Statutory‑Period Timing

Date: Nov 7, 2025
No Limitations Period for Denaturalization; Non‑Shepard Evidence May Establish Statutory‑Period Timing Introduction In United States v. Lazaro Prat, the Eleventh Circuit affirmed a district court...
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms: No § 3582(c)(2) Reduction Below the Amended Guideline Range Absent Substantial Assistance; Non‑Binding Rule 11(c)(1)(B) Recommendations Do Not Control Retroactive Guideline Calculations

Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms: No § 3582(c)(2) Reduction Below the Amended Guideline Range Absent Substantial Assistance; Non‑Binding Rule 11(c)(1)(B) Recommendations Do Not Control Retroactive Guideline Calculations

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms: No § 3582(c)(2) Reduction Below the Amended Guideline Range Absent Substantial Assistance; Non‑Binding Rule 11(c)(1)(B) Recommendations Do Not Control Retroactive...
Obvious Venue Omissions as Ineffective Appellate Assistance and Narrowing of the Concurrent Sentence Doctrine for Non‑Life § 2255 Petitioners: Purcell v. United States (2d Cir. 2025)

Obvious Venue Omissions as Ineffective Appellate Assistance and Narrowing of the Concurrent Sentence Doctrine for Non‑Life § 2255 Petitioners: Purcell v. United States (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Obvious Venue Omissions as Ineffective Appellate Assistance and Narrowing of the Concurrent Sentence Doctrine for Non‑Life § 2255 Petitioners Commentary on Purcell v. United States, No. 23-6985-pr...
Keck v. Bonn: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms AEDPA–Strickland “Double Deference,” Making Expert-Selection Strategy Virtually Unassailable on Federal Habeas

Keck v. Bonn: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms AEDPA–Strickland “Double Deference,” Making Expert-Selection Strategy Virtually Unassailable on Federal Habeas

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Keck v. Bonn: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms AEDPA–Strickland “Double Deference,” Making Expert-Selection Strategy Virtually Unassailable on Federal Habeas Introduction In Allen W. Keck v. Dale Bonn, the...
Sparse Arbitration Awards Can Support Defensive Nonmutual Collateral Estoppel: Sixth Circuit Bars Relitigation Against a Nonparty Reinsurer

Sparse Arbitration Awards Can Support Defensive Nonmutual Collateral Estoppel: Sixth Circuit Bars Relitigation Against a Nonparty Reinsurer

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Sparse Arbitration Awards Can Support Defensive Nonmutual Collateral Estoppel: Sixth Circuit Bars Relitigation Against a Nonparty Reinsurer Introduction In Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company v. Swiss...
When NIH Data-Use Violations, Not Speech, Drive Discipline: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Lemaster’s Causation Framework and Same‑Decision Defense in Academic Retaliation Claims

When NIH Data-Use Violations, Not Speech, Drive Discipline: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Lemaster’s Causation Framework and Same‑Decision Defense in Academic Retaliation Claims

Date: Nov 7, 2025
When NIH Data-Use Violations, Not Speech, Drive Discipline: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Lemaster’s Causation Framework and Same‑Decision Defense in Academic Retaliation Claims Introduction This...
Motive, Not Mere Linkage: Territorial/Economic Threats Do Not Establish the Nexus for Asylum or Withholding in the Sixth Circuit

Motive, Not Mere Linkage: Territorial/Economic Threats Do Not Establish the Nexus for Asylum or Withholding in the Sixth Circuit

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Motive, Not Mere Linkage: Territorial/Economic Threats Do Not Establish the Nexus for Asylum or Withholding in the Sixth Circuit Introduction In Elvia Romero Morales v. Bondi, No. 25-3195 (6th Cir....
Taylor Does Not Reach § 2113 Attempted Bank Robbery; Vowell Controls Waiver Analysis Over Portis in § 2255 Cases

Taylor Does Not Reach § 2113 Attempted Bank Robbery; Vowell Controls Waiver Analysis Over Portis in § 2255 Cases

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Taylor Does Not Reach § 2113 Attempted Bank Robbery; Vowell Controls Waiver Analysis Over Portis in § 2255 Cases Introduction In Melvin R. Hill v. United States, No. 23-3665 (6th Cir. Nov. 4, 2025)...
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Timeliness for Rule 60(b)(4) Motions and Confirms Bankruptcy Courts’ Final Authority over Barton-Aligned Trustee-Duty Claims

Sixth Circuit Clarifies Timeliness for Rule 60(b)(4) Motions and Confirms Bankruptcy Courts’ Final Authority over Barton-Aligned Trustee-Duty Claims

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Timeliness for Rule 60(b)(4) Motions and Confirms Bankruptcy Courts’ Final Authority over Barton-Aligned Trustee-Duty Claims Introduction In Michael Edward Tindall v. Samuel...
Form AO 247 Is Enough: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Minimal-Explanation Denials of Amendment 821 Motions When the Original Sentencing Record Addresses § 3553(a)

Form AO 247 Is Enough: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Minimal-Explanation Denials of Amendment 821 Motions When the Original Sentencing Record Addresses § 3553(a)

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Form AO 247 Is Enough: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Minimal-Explanation Denials of Amendment 821 Motions When the Original Sentencing Record Addresses § 3553(a) Introduction In United States v. Gerald...
Form AO 247 Is Sufficient: Sixth Circuit Upholds Denial of Amendment 821 Sentence Reduction Where Original Sentencing Reasons Demonstrate Ongoing Danger (United States v. Bass)

Form AO 247 Is Sufficient: Sixth Circuit Upholds Denial of Amendment 821 Sentence Reduction Where Original Sentencing Reasons Demonstrate Ongoing Danger (United States v. Bass)

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Form AO 247 Is Sufficient: Sixth Circuit Upholds Denial of Amendment 821 Sentence Reduction Where Original Sentencing Reasons Demonstrate Ongoing Danger (United States v. Bass) Introduction In United...
“Contents” Means “Any Property”: Sixth Circuit Holds Michigan’s Pre‑2013 Arson of a Dwelling or Its Contents Is Generic Arson and a “Crime of Violence” Under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2

“Contents” Means “Any Property”: Sixth Circuit Holds Michigan’s Pre‑2013 Arson of a Dwelling or Its Contents Is Generic Arson and a “Crime of Violence” Under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2

Date: Nov 7, 2025
“Contents” Means “Any Property”: Sixth Circuit Holds Michigan’s Pre‑2013 Arson of a Dwelling or Its Contents Is Generic Arson and a “Crime of Violence” Under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2 Case: United States v....
No § 3E1.1 Reduction for Post‑Sentencing Remorse After Trial: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Acceptance‑of‑Responsibility Is Timely and Process‑Focused; Rehabilitation Belongs Under § 3553(a)

No § 3E1.1 Reduction for Post‑Sentencing Remorse After Trial: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Acceptance‑of‑Responsibility Is Timely and Process‑Focused; Rehabilitation Belongs Under § 3553(a)

Date: Nov 7, 2025
No § 3E1.1 Reduction for Post‑Sentencing Remorse After Trial: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Acceptance‑of‑Responsibility Is Timely and Process‑Focused; Rehabilitation Belongs Under § 3553(a) Introduction...
Unadopted CPSC Proposals and “Sight‑Unseen” Expert Opinions Are Out: Sixth Circuit Affirms Robust Rule 403/702 Gatekeeping and Harmless Rule 26 Violation in a Modified-ROV Products Trial

Unadopted CPSC Proposals and “Sight‑Unseen” Expert Opinions Are Out: Sixth Circuit Affirms Robust Rule 403/702 Gatekeeping and Harmless Rule 26 Violation in a Modified-ROV Products Trial

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Unadopted CPSC Proposals and “Sight‑Unseen” Expert Opinions Are Out: Sixth Circuit Affirms Robust Rule 403/702 Gatekeeping and Harmless Rule 26 Violation in a Modified-ROV Products Trial Case:...
Burke v. Pitts: Tenth Circuit Constrains “Blatant Contradiction” Review and Reaffirms Clearly Established Limits on No‑Warning Tasers and Deadly Force Against Unarmed Suspects

Burke v. Pitts: Tenth Circuit Constrains “Blatant Contradiction” Review and Reaffirms Clearly Established Limits on No‑Warning Tasers and Deadly Force Against Unarmed Suspects

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Burke v. Pitts: Tenth Circuit Constrains “Blatant Contradiction” Review and Reaffirms Clearly Established Limits on No‑Warning Tasers and Deadly Force Against Unarmed Suspects Introduction In Burke...
Tenth Circuit Bars Reliance on Bodycam/Dashcam Videos at Rule 12(b)(6) and Reaffirms Garner as Clearly Establishing the Unlawfulness of Shooting an Unarmed, Fleeing Suspect

Tenth Circuit Bars Reliance on Bodycam/Dashcam Videos at Rule 12(b)(6) and Reaffirms Garner as Clearly Establishing the Unlawfulness of Shooting an Unarmed, Fleeing Suspect

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Tenth Circuit Bars Reliance on Bodycam/Dashcam Videos at Rule 12(b)(6) and Reaffirms Garner as Clearly Establishing the Unlawfulness of Shooting an Unarmed, Fleeing Suspect Introduction In Fuqua v....
Klingler v. Bridges: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms AEDPA “Double Deference” and Requires Proof of Indian Status to Defeat State Criminal Jurisdiction

Klingler v. Bridges: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms AEDPA “Double Deference” and Requires Proof of Indian Status to Defeat State Criminal Jurisdiction

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Klingler v. Bridges: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms AEDPA “Double Deference” and Requires Proof of Indian Status to Defeat State Criminal Jurisdiction Introduction This commentary analyzes the Tenth...
No Policy from a Single Incident: Tenth Circuit Clarifies Plausibility Pleading for Title VII Disparate-Impact Claims Based on Criminal-Record Screening

No Policy from a Single Incident: Tenth Circuit Clarifies Plausibility Pleading for Title VII Disparate-Impact Claims Based on Criminal-Record Screening

Date: Nov 7, 2025
No Policy from a Single Incident: Tenth Circuit Clarifies Plausibility Pleading for Title VII Disparate-Impact Claims Based on Criminal-Record Screening Introduction In Lawrence v. Nightingale...
No Presumption Against Upward Variances: Tenth Circuit Affirms Use of Uncharged Domestic-Violence Conduct in § 3553(a) Analysis

No Presumption Against Upward Variances: Tenth Circuit Affirms Use of Uncharged Domestic-Violence Conduct in § 3553(a) Analysis

Date: Nov 7, 2025
No Presumption Against Upward Variances: Tenth Circuit Affirms Use of Uncharged Domestic-Violence Conduct in § 3553(a) Analysis Case: United States v. Bright, No. 24-6238 (10th Cir. Nov. 4, 2025)...
United States v. Johnson: No Plain Error in Admitting Law‑Enforcement Incident Reports via Rule 803(6); Specific Theories Required to Preserve 404(b)/403 Objections; § 3553(a)(6) Satisfied by Record‑Based Justification in ACA Sentences

United States v. Johnson: No Plain Error in Admitting Law‑Enforcement Incident Reports via Rule 803(6); Specific Theories Required to Preserve 404(b)/403 Objections; § 3553(a)(6) Satisfied by Record‑Based Justification in ACA Sentences

Date: Nov 7, 2025
United States v. Johnson: No Plain Error in Admitting Law‑Enforcement Incident Reports via Rule 803(6); Specific Theories Required to Preserve 404(b)/403 Objections; § 3553(a)(6) Satisfied by...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert