Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

strict-standards-for-successive-habeas-petitions-reinforced-in-in-re-ivan-abner-cantu Case Commentaries

Foreign Providers, Same Channel: First Circuit Holds that
           Medicare Act Exhaustion Applies to Overseas Hospitals’ State-Law
           Claims Against Medicare Advantage Organizations

Foreign Providers, Same Channel: First Circuit Holds that Medicare Act Exhaustion Applies to Overseas Hospitals’ State-Law Claims Against Medicare Advantage Organizations

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Foreign Providers, Same Channel: First Circuit Holds that Medicare Act Exhaustion Applies to Overseas Hospitals’ State-Law Claims Against Medicare Advantage Organizations Introduction Hospital...
Foreign Providers Must Exhaust Medicare Advantage Remedies Before Suing: The First Circuit Speaks in Hospital Quirurgica Del Sur v. Martin's Point Health Care

Foreign Providers Must Exhaust Medicare Advantage Remedies Before Suing: The First Circuit Speaks in Hospital Quirurgica Del Sur v. Martin's Point Health Care

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Foreign Providers Must Exhaust Medicare Advantage Remedies Before Suing: Hospital Quirurgica Del Sur v. Martin's Point Health Care 1. Introduction In Hospital Amerimed Cancún S.A. de C.V. & Hospital...
Extending Absolute Quasi-Judicial Immunity to Court-Appointed Receivers: Commentary on Suny v. KCP Advisory Group, LLC

Extending Absolute Quasi-Judicial Immunity to Court-Appointed Receivers: Commentary on Suny v. KCP Advisory Group, LLC

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Extending Absolute Quasi-Judicial Immunity to Court-Appointed Receivers: Commentary on Suny v. KCP Advisory Group, LLC (1st Cir. 2025) Introduction In Suny v. KCP Advisory Group, LLC, No. 23-1800...
No Sua Sponte Duty to Re-Offer Plea Withdrawal & Minor Supervised-Release Misstatements Do Not Invalidate Guilty Pleas – A Commentary on United States v. Morales-Ortiz

No Sua Sponte Duty to Re-Offer Plea Withdrawal & Minor Supervised-Release Misstatements Do Not Invalidate Guilty Pleas – A Commentary on United States v. Morales-Ortiz

Date: Aug 25, 2025
No Sua Sponte Duty to Re-Offer Plea Withdrawal & Minor Supervised-Release Misstatements Do Not Invalidate Guilty Pleas Commentary on United States v. Morales-Ortiz, 104 F.4th ___ (1st Cir. 2025) 1....
Delaware Supreme Court Extends Rite Aid’s “Specific-and-Individualized Injury” Test to Property Damage and Endorsements – Commentary on In re CVS Opioid Insurance Litigation (2025)

Delaware Supreme Court Extends Rite Aid’s “Specific-and-Individualized Injury” Test to Property Damage and Endorsements – Commentary on In re CVS Opioid Insurance Litigation (2025)

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Delaware Supreme Court Extends Rite Aid’s “Specific-and-Individualized Injury” Test to Property Damage and Endorsements Introduction In In re CVS Opioid Insurance Litigation, No. 482, 2024 (Aug. 18,...
Smith v. State: Defining the Limits of “Counsel Abandonment” and Pro-Se Filings in Idaho Post-Conviction Practice

Smith v. State: Defining the Limits of “Counsel Abandonment” and Pro-Se Filings in Idaho Post-Conviction Practice

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Smith v. State: Defining the Limits of “Counsel Abandonment” and Pro-Se Filings in Idaho Post-Conviction Practice 1. Introduction The Idaho Supreme Court’s 2025 decision in Smith v. State, Docket No....
“Beyond Propensity”: State v. Montero and the New Latitude for Admitting Uncharged Sexual-Misconduct Evidence under R.I. R. Evid. 404(b)

“Beyond Propensity”: State v. Montero and the New Latitude for Admitting Uncharged Sexual-Misconduct Evidence under R.I. R. Evid. 404(b)

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“Beyond Propensity”: State v. Montero and the New Latitude for Admitting Uncharged Sexual-Misconduct Evidence under R.I. R. Evid. 404(b) Introduction In State v. Miguel Montero, No. 2023-92-C.A....
Collins v. Northeast Grocery, Inc.: Second Circuit Implements Cunningham and Lowers the Pleading Bar for ERISA §1106(a) Prohibited-Transaction Claims

Collins v. Northeast Grocery, Inc.: Second Circuit Implements Cunningham and Lowers the Pleading Bar for ERISA §1106(a) Prohibited-Transaction Claims

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Collins v. Northeast Grocery, Inc.: Second Circuit Implements Cunningham and Lowers the Pleading Bar for ERISA §1106(a) Prohibited-Transaction Claims 1. Introduction On 18 August 2025 the United...
United States v. Perryman – Second Circuit Clarifies Use of “Intended Loss” Under § 2X1.1 in Conspiracy-Based Health-Care Fraud Sentencing

United States v. Perryman – Second Circuit Clarifies Use of “Intended Loss” Under § 2X1.1 in Conspiracy-Based Health-Care Fraud Sentencing

Date: Aug 25, 2025
United States v. Perryman – Second Circuit Clarifies Use of “Intended Loss” Under § 2X1.1 in Conspiracy-Based Health-Care Fraud Sentencing Introduction In United States v. Perryman, No. 24-1729-cr...
“No Injury, No Standing” – The Second Circuit Mandates Individualized Loss for ERISA 401(k) Plaintiffs in Collins v. Northeast Grocery, LLC

“No Injury, No Standing” – The Second Circuit Mandates Individualized Loss for ERISA 401(k) Plaintiffs in Collins v. Northeast Grocery, LLC

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“No Injury, No Standing” – The Second Circuit Mandates Individualized Loss for ERISA 401(k) Plaintiffs in Collins v. Northeast Grocery, LLC 1. Introduction The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second...
Accrual-Point and Jurisdictional Deference under 28 U.S.C. § 2467: A Commentary on In Re Enforcement of Philippine Forfeiture Judgment

Accrual-Point and Jurisdictional Deference under 28 U.S.C. § 2467: A Commentary on In Re Enforcement of Philippine Forfeiture Judgment

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Accrual-Point and Jurisdictional Deference under 28 U.S.C. § 2467 – Commentary on In Re Enforcement of Philippine Forfeiture Judgment, 24-185(L) (2d Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction On 18 August 2025 the...
Kellogg v. Nichols: The Second Circuit Bars § 1983 Declaratory and Injunctive Relief Against State Judges Serving as Firearms Licensing Officers

Kellogg v. Nichols: The Second Circuit Bars § 1983 Declaratory and Injunctive Relief Against State Judges Serving as Firearms Licensing Officers

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Kellogg v. Nichols: The Second Circuit Bars § 1983 Declaratory and Injunctive Relief Against State Judges Serving as Firearms Licensing Officers 1. Introduction Kellogg v. Nichols, No. 23-8093-cv (2d...
“Proximity-and-Accessibility” as the Determinative Nexus & Plain-Error Limits on Predicate Switching: An In-Depth Commentary on United States v. Prawl (2d Cir. 2025)

“Proximity-and-Accessibility” as the Determinative Nexus & Plain-Error Limits on Predicate Switching: An In-Depth Commentary on United States v. Prawl (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“Proximity-and-Accessibility” as the Determinative Nexus & Plain-Error Limits on Predicate Switching: A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Prawl (2d Cir. 2025) Introduction United States v....
Visionary v. Bank OZK (11th Cir. 2025): Unchallenged Alternative Grounds and the FAA’s Deferential Standard Secure Arbitral Awards

Visionary v. Bank OZK (11th Cir. 2025): Unchallenged Alternative Grounds and the FAA’s Deferential Standard Secure Arbitral Awards

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Visionary v. Bank OZK (11th Cir. 2025): Unchallenged Alternative Grounds and the FAA’s Deferential Standard Secure Arbitral Awards Introduction The Eleventh Circuit’s unpublished decision in The...
“One Text Is Enough” – The Eleventh Circuit Confirms that a Single Explicit Age Disclosure Can Sustain §2422(b) and §2423(b) Convictions

“One Text Is Enough” – The Eleventh Circuit Confirms that a Single Explicit Age Disclosure Can Sustain §2422(b) and §2423(b) Convictions

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“One Text Is Enough” – The Eleventh Circuit Confirms that a Single Explicit Age Disclosure Can Sustain §2422(b) and §2423(b) Convictions 1. Introduction In United States v. Dustin Hatcher (11th Cir....
“Progressive-Discipline Deviations and Imperfect Investigations Are Insufficient to Prove ADA Pretext” — Commentary on Christina Grasty v. DaVita Inc., 3d Cir. (2025)

“Progressive-Discipline Deviations and Imperfect Investigations Are Insufficient to Prove ADA Pretext” — Commentary on Christina Grasty v. DaVita Inc., 3d Cir. (2025)

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“Progressive-Discipline Deviations and Imperfect Investigations Are Insufficient to Prove ADA Pretext” A Detailed Commentary on Christina Grasty v. DaVita Inc., United States Court of Appeals for the...
“Intent-to-Evade” Without the Taxpayer:  Third Circuit Opens § 6501(c)(1) to Any Actor’s Fraud

“Intent-to-Evade” Without the Taxpayer: Third Circuit Opens § 6501(c)(1) to Any Actor’s Fraud

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Intent-to-Evade Without the Taxpayer: Murrin v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue and the New Scope of § 6501(c)(1) I. Introduction In Stephanie Murrin v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, No. 24-2037...
“A Harmless Drag Show? No Such Ban.” – Spectrum WT v. Wendler and the Fifth Circuit’s Recognition of Drag Shows as First-Amendment-Protected Expression in Designated Public Forums

“A Harmless Drag Show? No Such Ban.” – Spectrum WT v. Wendler and the Fifth Circuit’s Recognition of Drag Shows as First-Amendment-Protected Expression in Designated Public Forums

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“A Harmless Drag Show? No Such Ban.” – Spectrum WT v. Wendler and the Fifth Circuit’s Recognition of Drag Shows as First-Amendment-Protected Expression in Designated Public Forums Introduction...
Securing the Scene:  United States v. Claude Coleman and the Sixth Circuit’s Dual Clarifications on Officer-Safety Detentions and Career-Offender Predicates

Securing the Scene: United States v. Claude Coleman and the Sixth Circuit’s Dual Clarifications on Officer-Safety Detentions and Career-Offender Predicates

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Securing the Scene: United States v. Claude Coleman and the Sixth Circuit’s Dual Clarifications on Officer-Safety Detentions and Career-Offender Predicates Introduction United States v. Claude...

        Seventh Circuit Clarifies that § 2260A Applies Even When the “Minor” Is an Undercover Agent:
        Christopher v. United States (2025)

Seventh Circuit Clarifies that § 2260A Applies Even When the “Minor” Is an Undercover Agent: Christopher v. United States (2025)

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“Involving a Minor” Encompasses Fictitious Minors Under § 2260A: A Comprehensive Commentary on Charles W. Christopher v. United States, 23-2976 (7th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction Charles W. Christopher,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert