Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

strict-standards-for-successive-habeas-petitions-reinforced-in-in-re-ivan-abner-cantu Case Commentaries

Fourth Circuit Holds that Alleged Structural Defects in Agency Adjudication Do Not Automatically Establish Irreparable Harm for Injunctive Relief – Comment on Joe Manis v. USDA

Fourth Circuit Holds that Alleged Structural Defects in Agency Adjudication Do Not Automatically Establish Irreparable Harm for Injunctive Relief – Comment on Joe Manis v. USDA

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Fourth Circuit Holds that Alleged Structural Defects in Agency Adjudication Do Not Automatically Establish Irreparable Harm for Injunctive Relief Commentary on Joe Manis v. U.S. Department of...
“Exposure-as-Injury”: The Fourth Circuit Confirms Medical-Monitoring Costs Alone Confer Article III Standing and Reins in Over-Zealous Daubert Gatekeeping

“Exposure-as-Injury”: The Fourth Circuit Confirms Medical-Monitoring Costs Alone Confer Article III Standing and Reins in Over-Zealous Daubert Gatekeeping

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“Exposure-as-Injury”: The Fourth Circuit Confirms Medical-Monitoring Costs Alone Confer Article III Standing and Reins in Over-Zealous Daubert Gatekeeping 1. Introduction Lee Ann Sommerville, a South...
United States v. Benton: Fourth Circuit Re-tools Harmless-Error Review for Unaddressed Mitigating Arguments at Sentencing

United States v. Benton: Fourth Circuit Re-tools Harmless-Error Review for Unaddressed Mitigating Arguments at Sentencing

Date: Aug 25, 2025
United States v. Benton: Fourth Circuit Re-tools Harmless-Error Review for Unaddressed Mitigating Arguments at Sentencing 1. Introduction In United States v. Cedric Lee Benton (Nos. 24-4029 &...
United States v. Benton: Clarifying Harmless-Error Review When Sentencing Courts Omit Discussion of Mitigating Arguments

United States v. Benton: Clarifying Harmless-Error Review When Sentencing Courts Omit Discussion of Mitigating Arguments

Date: Aug 25, 2025
United States v. Benton: Clarifying Harmless-Error Review When Sentencing Courts Omit Discussion of Mitigating Arguments 1. Introduction United States v. Cedric Lee Benton, Nos. 24-4029/4030 (4th...
Reaffirming § 922(g)(5) Post-Bruen & Refining Reasonable-Suspicion Stops: A Commentary on United States v. Murillo-Lopez (4th Cir. 2025)

Reaffirming § 922(g)(5) Post-Bruen & Refining Reasonable-Suspicion Stops: A Commentary on United States v. Murillo-Lopez (4th Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Reaffirming § 922(g)(5) Post-Bruen & Refining Reasonable-Suspicion Stops: Commentary on United States v. Herbert Murillo-Lopez, 90 F.4th 4302 (4th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction The Fourth Circuit’s...
Reaffirming the “Sever-and-Remand” Doctrine for Defective Appeal Waivers and Sentencing Errors – Comment on United States v. Shoun Wright, Jr.

Reaffirming the “Sever-and-Remand” Doctrine for Defective Appeal Waivers and Sentencing Errors – Comment on United States v. Shoun Wright, Jr.

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Reaffirming the “Sever-and-Remand” Doctrine for Defective Appeal Waivers and Sentencing Errors – Comment on United States v. Shoun Wright, Jr. Introduction The Fourth Circuit’s unpublished decision...
“The Central-Thesis Explanation” Standard after United States v. Terriwanna Carmichael

“The Central-Thesis Explanation” Standard after United States v. Terriwanna Carmichael

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“The Central-Thesis Explanation” Standard after United States v. Terriwanna Carmichael 1. Introduction The Fourth Circuit’s unpublished decision in United States v. Terriwanna Carmichael, No. 24-4337...
Beyond Poverty Guidelines: Knight v. OPM Establishes the “Surplus-Income” Test for In-Forma-Pauperis Eligibility

Beyond Poverty Guidelines: Knight v. OPM Establishes the “Surplus-Income” Test for In-Forma-Pauperis Eligibility

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Beyond Poverty Guidelines: Knight v. OPM Establishes the “Surplus-Income” Test for In-Forma-Pauperis Eligibility Introduction Knight v. Office of Personnel Management (Knight v. OPM), decided by the...
“Prove It or Lose It” – United States v. Hight and the Modern Standard for Trial Continuances & Waiver of Plain-Error Review

“Prove It or Lose It” – United States v. Hight and the Modern Standard for Trial Continuances & Waiver of Plain-Error Review

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“Prove It or Lose It” – United States v. Hight and the Modern Standard for Trial Continuances & Waiver of Plain-Error Review 1. Introduction On 18 August 2025 the United States Court of Appeals for...
“Cost-Saving Alone Is Not a Rational Basis” – First Circuit Denies Sovereign Immunity and Clarifies Equal Protection Limits on State Disability-Service Allocations

“Cost-Saving Alone Is Not a Rational Basis” – First Circuit Denies Sovereign Immunity and Clarifies Equal Protection Limits on State Disability-Service Allocations

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“Cost-Saving Alone Is Not a Rational Basis” – First Circuit Denies Sovereign Immunity and Clarifies Equal Protection Limits on State Disability-Service Allocations 1. Introduction McKenna v. Maine...
“Truthful-but-Misleading” Communications, Limited Proximate Cause, and Line-and-Scope Constraints: The New Framework from Flickinger v. King (Ala. 2025)

“Truthful-but-Misleading” Communications, Limited Proximate Cause, and Line-and-Scope Constraints: The New Framework from Flickinger v. King (Ala. 2025)

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“Truthful-but-Misleading” Communications, Limited Proximate Cause, and Line-and-Scope Constraints: The Alabama Supreme Court’s New Framework for Tortious Interference in Flickinger v. King (2025)...
Supreme Court of Alabama Clarifies Enforceability of Text-Message Settlements: Definiteness and the Mirror-Image Rule Remain Paramount

Supreme Court of Alabama Clarifies Enforceability of Text-Message Settlements: Definiteness and the Mirror-Image Rule Remain Paramount

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Supreme Court of Alabama Clarifies Enforceability of Text-Message Settlements: Definiteness and the Mirror-Image Rule Remain Paramount Introduction In iWTNS, Inc.; Leveraged, LLC; and Bradley Lewis...
Escrow Is Not an Operating Account: First Department Clarifies Rule 1.15 and Rejects Preclusive Effect of Vacated Admonition (Matter of Edelman, 2025)

Escrow Is Not an Operating Account: First Department Clarifies Rule 1.15 and Rejects Preclusive Effect of Vacated Admonition (Matter of Edelman, 2025)

Date: Aug 22, 2025
Escrow Is Not an Operating Account: First Department Clarifies Rule 1.15 and Rejects Preclusive Effect of Vacated Admonition Introduction This commentary examines the Appellate Division, First...
No Stayed Probationary Suspensions and Narrow Nunc Pro Tunc Relief in Reciprocal Discipline: Commentary on Matter of Barocas (2025 NY Slip Op 04750)

No Stayed Probationary Suspensions and Narrow Nunc Pro Tunc Relief in Reciprocal Discipline: Commentary on Matter of Barocas (2025 NY Slip Op 04750)

Date: Aug 22, 2025
No Stayed Probationary Suspensions and Narrow Nunc Pro Tunc Relief in Reciprocal Discipline: Matter of Barocas (2025 NY Slip Op 04750) Introduction In Matter of Barocas (2025 NY Slip Op 04750), the...
The Excessive Fines Clause Meets Executive Law § 63(12): Appellate Division Vacates Disgorgement, Affirms Injunctive Remedies in People v. Trump

The Excessive Fines Clause Meets Executive Law § 63(12): Appellate Division Vacates Disgorgement, Affirms Injunctive Remedies in People v. Trump

Date: Aug 22, 2025
The Excessive Fines Clause Meets Executive Law § 63(12): Appellate Division Vacates Disgorgement, Affirms Injunctive Remedies in People v. Trump Introduction People v. Trump, 2025 NY Slip Op 04756...
Self-Created Stress Is Not Mitigation for Escrow Misappropriation: Second Department Reaffirms Strict Fiduciary Standards in Matter of Bachu

Self-Created Stress Is Not Mitigation for Escrow Misappropriation: Second Department Reaffirms Strict Fiduciary Standards in Matter of Bachu

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Self-Created Stress Is Not Mitigation for Escrow Misappropriation: Second Department Reaffirms Strict Fiduciary Standards in Matter of Bachu Introduction In Matter of Bachu (2025 NY Slip Op 04721),...
No Reset by Discontinuance or “Deceleration”: Second Department Applies FAPA Retroactively to Time‑Bar Mortgage Foreclosure (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Salko)

No Reset by Discontinuance or “Deceleration”: Second Department Applies FAPA Retroactively to Time‑Bar Mortgage Foreclosure (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Salko)

Date: Aug 21, 2025
No Reset by Discontinuance or “Deceleration”: Second Department Applies FAPA Retroactively to Time‑Bar Mortgage Foreclosure Introduction In Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Salko (2025 NY Slip Op 04743),...
Totality-of-Circumstances Standard and Respondent’s Burden at 22 NYCRR 1240.12(c)(3)(iii) Hearings: Six-Month Suspension for Repeated DWI Convictions, Probation Violations, and Failure to Report (Matter of Thwaites)

Totality-of-Circumstances Standard and Respondent’s Burden at 22 NYCRR 1240.12(c)(3)(iii) Hearings: Six-Month Suspension for Repeated DWI Convictions, Probation Violations, and Failure to Report (Matter of Thwaites)

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Totality-of-Circumstances Standard and Respondent’s Burden at 22 NYCRR 1240.12(c)(3)(iii) Hearings: Six-Month Suspension for Repeated DWI Convictions, Probation Violations, and Failure to Report...
Second Department Extends ABC Law § 55‑c “Good Cause” Protections to Oral and Implied Beer Distribution Agreements

Second Department Extends ABC Law § 55‑c “Good Cause” Protections to Oral and Implied Beer Distribution Agreements

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Second Department Extends ABC Law § 55‑c “Good Cause” Protections to Oral and Implied Beer Distribution Agreements Case: Oak Beverages, Inc. v. D.G. Yuengling & Son, Inc. (2025 NYSlipOp 04730) —...
DHCR Legal Rent as the Measure of Use-and-Occupancy and Strict Rent‑Stabilization Notice Compliance for Ejectment: Commentary on Esposito v. Larig (2025 NY Slip Op 04704)

DHCR Legal Rent as the Measure of Use-and-Occupancy and Strict Rent‑Stabilization Notice Compliance for Ejectment: Commentary on Esposito v. Larig (2025 NY Slip Op 04704)

Date: Aug 21, 2025
DHCR Legal Rent as the Measure of Use-and-Occupancy and Strict Rent‑Stabilization Notice Compliance for Ejectment: Commentary on Esposito v. Larig (2025 NY Slip Op 04704) Introduction Esposito v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert