Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

second-circuit-defines-&amp Case Commentaries

United States v. Gianatasio: Plain‑Error Limits on Challenging Sentencing Reliance on Self‑Incriminating Admissions and JSIN Data

United States v. Gianatasio: Plain‑Error Limits on Challenging Sentencing Reliance on Self‑Incriminating Admissions and JSIN Data

Date: Nov 7, 2025
United States v. Gianatasio: Plain‑Error Limits on Challenging Sentencing Reliance on Self‑Incriminating Admissions and JSIN Data Introduction In United States v. Gianatasio, No. 23-1631 (1st Cir....
Silence Is Not Ambiguity: Wyoming High Court Holds Written Judgment Cannot Supply a Probation Length Omitted at Sentencing

Silence Is Not Ambiguity: Wyoming High Court Holds Written Judgment Cannot Supply a Probation Length Omitted at Sentencing

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Silence Is Not Ambiguity: Wyoming High Court Holds Written Judgment Cannot Supply a Probation Length Omitted at Sentencing Introduction In James D. Van Winter v. State of Wyoming, 2025 WY 119 (Wyo....
Silence Is Conflict: Wyoming Supreme Court Requires Probation Length Be Orally Pronounced; Written Judgment Cannot Supply Missing Term

Silence Is Conflict: Wyoming Supreme Court Requires Probation Length Be Orally Pronounced; Written Judgment Cannot Supply Missing Term

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Silence Is Conflict: Wyoming Supreme Court Requires Probation Length Be Orally Pronounced; Written Judgment Cannot Supply Missing Term Introduction In James D. Van Winter v. The State of Wyoming,...
Automatic Suspension and “Prior Discipline” for Attorney-Registration Noncompliance under Gov.Bar R. VI: The Supreme Court of Ohio’s 2025 Administrative Order

Automatic Suspension and “Prior Discipline” for Attorney-Registration Noncompliance under Gov.Bar R. VI: The Supreme Court of Ohio’s 2025 Administrative Order

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Automatic Suspension and “Prior Discipline” for Attorney-Registration Noncompliance under Gov.Bar R. VI: The Supreme Court of Ohio’s 2025 Administrative Order Citation: 11/04/2025 Administrative...
Self‑Serving Affidavits Cannot Overcome One’s Own Confirmation Receipts: Clarifying Proof Standards in Ohio Public‑Records Mandamus

Self‑Serving Affidavits Cannot Overcome One’s Own Confirmation Receipts: Clarifying Proof Standards in Ohio Public‑Records Mandamus

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Self‑Serving Affidavits Cannot Overcome One’s Own Confirmation Receipts: Clarifying Proof Standards in Ohio Public‑Records Mandamus Introduction In State ex rel. Clark v. Department of Rehabilitation...
No Late Respondent Evidence and No Deflecting Public-Records Duties: The Ohio Supreme Court’s Mandamus Blueprint in State ex rel. Howard v. Shuler

No Late Respondent Evidence and No Deflecting Public-Records Duties: The Ohio Supreme Court’s Mandamus Blueprint in State ex rel. Howard v. Shuler

Date: Nov 7, 2025
No Late Respondent Evidence and No Deflecting Public-Records Duties: The Ohio Supreme Court’s Mandamus Blueprint in State ex rel. Howard v. Shuler Introduction In State ex rel. Howard v. Shuler,...
Asmelash v. State: Harmless-Error Review Governs Denial of Juror Requests to Replay Admitted Video; No Strickland Prejudice from Uncalled, Contradicted Alibi Witness

Asmelash v. State: Harmless-Error Review Governs Denial of Juror Requests to Replay Admitted Video; No Strickland Prejudice from Uncalled, Contradicted Alibi Witness

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Asmelash v. State: Harmless-Error Review Governs Denial of Juror Requests to Replay Admitted Video; No Strickland Prejudice from Uncalled, Contradicted Alibi Witness Introduction In Asmelash v. State...
Georgia Supreme Court Reaffirms Default-Based Disbarment for Client Abandonment; Misrepresentation to Client Alone Supports Rule 8.4(a)(4)

Georgia Supreme Court Reaffirms Default-Based Disbarment for Client Abandonment; Misrepresentation to Client Alone Supports Rule 8.4(a)(4)

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Georgia Supreme Court Reaffirms Default-Based Disbarment for Client Abandonment; Misrepresentation to Client Alone Supports Rule 8.4(a)(4) Introduction In In the Matter of Brian Joel Aplin (S25Y0795,...
Silence Is Admission: Georgia High Court Reaffirms Presumptive Disbarment for Knowing Client Abandonment and Non‑Cooperation, with Restitution as a Readmission Prerequisite

Silence Is Admission: Georgia High Court Reaffirms Presumptive Disbarment for Knowing Client Abandonment and Non‑Cooperation, with Restitution as a Readmission Prerequisite

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Silence Is Admission: Georgia High Court Reaffirms Presumptive Disbarment for Knowing Client Abandonment and Non‑Cooperation, with Restitution as a Readmission Prerequisite Court: Supreme Court of...
Merits-First Discipline: Georgia Supreme Court Holds It an Abuse of Discretion to Enter Default When a Timely Answer Was Misfiled but Promptly Corrected

Merits-First Discipline: Georgia Supreme Court Holds It an Abuse of Discretion to Enter Default When a Timely Answer Was Misfiled but Promptly Corrected

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Merits-First Discipline: Georgia Supreme Court Holds It an Abuse of Discretion to Enter Default When a Timely Answer Was Misfiled but Promptly Corrected Case: In the Matter of Herald J.A. Alexander,...
Merritt v. State: Georgia Supreme Court reinforces preservation requirements for shackling and Brady claims and upholds strategic non‑objection under Strickland

Merritt v. State: Georgia Supreme Court reinforces preservation requirements for shackling and Brady claims and upholds strategic non‑objection under Strickland

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Merritt v. State: Georgia Supreme Court reinforces preservation requirements for shackling and Brady claims and upholds strategic non‑objection under Strickland Introduction In Merritt v. State,...
Stitts v. State: No Plain Error in Omitting Accomplice-Corroboration Instruction Where Independent Evidence Strongly Implicates the Accused

Stitts v. State: No Plain Error in Omitting Accomplice-Corroboration Instruction Where Independent Evidence Strongly Implicates the Accused

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Stitts v. State: No Plain Error in Omitting Accomplice-Corroboration Instruction Where Independent Evidence Strongly Implicates the Accused Introduction In Stitts v. State, decided November 4, 2025,...
Comparative Negligence in Jail-Custody Cases: Estate of Mabee v. Wheatland County Confirms “Special Circumstances” as the Exception

Comparative Negligence in Jail-Custody Cases: Estate of Mabee v. Wheatland County Confirms “Special Circumstances” as the Exception

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Comparative Negligence in Jail-Custody Cases: Estate of Mabee v. Wheatland County Confirms “Special Circumstances” as the Exception Introduction In Estate of Mabee v. Wheatland County, 2025 MT 252,...
“Illusion of Choice” and Strict Compliance in Montana Civil Commitments: No Waiver of the Five‑Day Hearing or Qualified Evaluation Requirements Absent Knowing, Voluntary Consent (Matter of J.L.O.)

“Illusion of Choice” and Strict Compliance in Montana Civil Commitments: No Waiver of the Five‑Day Hearing or Qualified Evaluation Requirements Absent Knowing, Voluntary Consent (Matter of J.L.O.)

Date: Nov 7, 2025
“Illusion of Choice” and Strict Compliance in Montana Civil Commitments: No Waiver of the Five‑Day Hearing or Qualified Evaluation Requirements Absent Knowing, Voluntary Consent Introduction In...
Broad Titles, Liberal Construction: “Vaccination Status” Encompasses EUA/Trial‑Vaccine Mandate Bans Under Montana’s Article V, § 11(3)

Broad Titles, Liberal Construction: “Vaccination Status” Encompasses EUA/Trial‑Vaccine Mandate Bans Under Montana’s Article V, § 11(3)

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Broad Titles, Liberal Construction: “Vaccination Status” Encompasses EUA/Trial‑Vaccine Mandate Bans Under Montana’s Article V, § 11(3) Introduction In Netzer, Krautter & Brown, P.C. and Donald L....
Experts Are Not Automatically Exempt from Sequestration; Presumption of Vindictiveness Bars Increased Sentences Based on Appeal or Lack of Remorse — Commentary on State v. Grimshaw, 2025 MT 250

Experts Are Not Automatically Exempt from Sequestration; Presumption of Vindictiveness Bars Increased Sentences Based on Appeal or Lack of Remorse — Commentary on State v. Grimshaw, 2025 MT 250

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Experts Are Not Automatically Exempt from Sequestration; Presumption of Vindictiveness Bars Increased Sentences Based on Appeal or Lack of Remorse — Commentary on State v. Grimshaw, 2025 MT 250 Case:...
Resentencing Required When a District Court Exceeds the Statutory Maximum—Even with a Fully Suspended Term (State v. S. Foster, 2025 MT 255N)

Resentencing Required When a District Court Exceeds the Statutory Maximum—Even with a Fully Suspended Term (State v. S. Foster, 2025 MT 255N)

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Resentencing Required When a District Court Exceeds the Statutory Maximum—Even with a Fully Suspended Term (State v. S. Foster, 2025 MT 255N) Court: Supreme Court of Montana Date: November 4, 2025...
State v. Ellis: Open-Driveway Encounters—No Search When Evidence Is Voluntarily Produced, and Miranda Not Required During Noncustodial Driveway Questioning

State v. Ellis: Open-Driveway Encounters—No Search When Evidence Is Voluntarily Produced, and Miranda Not Required During Noncustodial Driveway Questioning

Date: Nov 7, 2025
State v. Ellis: Open-Driveway Encounters—No Search When Evidence Is Voluntarily Produced, and Miranda Not Required During Noncustodial Driveway Questioning Introduction In State v. Z. Ellis, 2025 MT...
Closing the Oglesby Loop and Limiting FOIA’s Law-Enforcement Exemptions: Third Circuit Bars “Federalization” of State Task Forces and Narrows 7(D) and 7(E) in Viola v. DOJ

Closing the Oglesby Loop and Limiting FOIA’s Law-Enforcement Exemptions: Third Circuit Bars “Federalization” of State Task Forces and Narrows 7(D) and 7(E) in Viola v. DOJ

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Closing the Oglesby Loop and Limiting FOIA’s Law-Enforcement Exemptions: Third Circuit Bars “Federalization” of State Task Forces and Narrows 7(D) and 7(E) in Viola v. DOJ Introduction In a...
Closing the Oglesby Loop and Recalibrating FOIA Proof: Third Circuit Tightens Exemption 7(D) and 7(E), Sets a Trial‑Exhibit Disclosure Presumption, and Limits FOIA’s Reach Over State Task Forces

Closing the Oglesby Loop and Recalibrating FOIA Proof: Third Circuit Tightens Exemption 7(D) and 7(E), Sets a Trial‑Exhibit Disclosure Presumption, and Limits FOIA’s Reach Over State Task Forces

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Closing the Oglesby Loop and Recalibrating FOIA Proof: Third Circuit Tightens Exemption 7(D) and 7(E), Sets a Trial‑Exhibit Disclosure Presumption, and Limits FOIA’s Reach Over State Task Forces...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert