Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

restricting-general-jurisdiction:-second-circuit&amp Case Commentaries

People v. Reaves: New York Tightens Admissibility of Rap Lyrics—Qualified Expertise, Specific Nexus, and Molineux Balancing Required

People v. Reaves: New York Tightens Admissibility of Rap Lyrics—Qualified Expertise, Specific Nexus, and Molineux Balancing Required

Date: Sep 26, 2025
People v. Reaves: New York Tightens Admissibility of Rap Lyrics—Qualified Expertise, Specific Nexus, and Molineux Balancing Required Introduction In People v. Reaves, 2025 NY Slip Op 05107 (App Div,...
Second Department Clarifies: Waiving a Deficiency Judgment Does Not Eliminate the Borrower as a Necessary Party in Foreclosure

Second Department Clarifies: Waiving a Deficiency Judgment Does Not Eliminate the Borrower as a Necessary Party in Foreclosure

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Second Department Clarifies: Waiving a Deficiency Judgment Does Not Eliminate the Borrower as a Necessary Party in Foreclosure Introduction In Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB v. Loubriel, 2025...
Eligibility Confirmation Under §16.63 Is Not Newly Discovered Evidence: Florida Supreme Court Tightens Successive Mitigation and Post‑Warrant Records Practice in Capital Cases

Eligibility Confirmation Under §16.63 Is Not Newly Discovered Evidence: Florida Supreme Court Tightens Successive Mitigation and Post‑Warrant Records Practice in Capital Cases

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Eligibility Confirmation Under §16.63 Is Not Newly Discovered Evidence: Florida Supreme Court Tightens Successive Mitigation and Post‑Warrant Records Practice in Capital Cases Introduction In Victor...
Second Circuit reaffirms: Gang defection is not “political opinion” and CAT relief demands individualized proof and government acquiescence

Second Circuit reaffirms: Gang defection is not “political opinion” and CAT relief demands individualized proof and government acquiescence

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Second Circuit reaffirms: Gang defection is not “political opinion” and CAT relief demands individualized proof and government acquiescence Introduction In Ramirez Alvarado v. Bondi (No. 21-6603,...
Umarov v. Bondi: Second Circuit Reaffirms Nonreviewability of BIA’s Sua Sponte Reopening and Declines to Treat Pereira/Niz‑Chavez Eligibility as Exceptional

Umarov v. Bondi: Second Circuit Reaffirms Nonreviewability of BIA’s Sua Sponte Reopening and Declines to Treat Pereira/Niz‑Chavez Eligibility as Exceptional

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Umarov v. Bondi: Second Circuit Reaffirms Nonreviewability of BIA’s Sua Sponte Reopening and Declines to Treat Pereira/Niz‑Chavez Eligibility as Exceptional Introduction In a nonprecedential summary...
Signing ICC Terms of Reference as “Clear and Unmistakable” Delegation of Arbitrability: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Confirmation Against a Non‑Signatory Under the New York Convention

Signing ICC Terms of Reference as “Clear and Unmistakable” Delegation of Arbitrability: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Confirmation Against a Non‑Signatory Under the New York Convention

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Signing ICC Terms of Reference as “Clear and Unmistakable” Delegation of Arbitrability: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Confirmation Against a Non‑Signatory Under the New York Convention Introduction This...
No Industry Standard, No Immunity: Eleventh Circuit Holds Standard of Care and Causation Are Jury Questions in Negligent-Work Exclusion vs. “Equipment Breakdown” Coverage Disputes

No Industry Standard, No Immunity: Eleventh Circuit Holds Standard of Care and Causation Are Jury Questions in Negligent-Work Exclusion vs. “Equipment Breakdown” Coverage Disputes

Date: Sep 26, 2025
No Industry Standard, No Immunity: Eleventh Circuit Holds Standard of Care and Causation Are Jury Questions in Negligent-Work Exclusion vs. “Equipment Breakdown” Coverage Disputes Introduction This...
EEZs Are Part of the “High Seas” and Congress May Define “Stateless” Broadly Under the MDLEA: Eleventh Circuit Affirms in United States v. Guzman‑Javier

EEZs Are Part of the “High Seas” and Congress May Define “Stateless” Broadly Under the MDLEA: Eleventh Circuit Affirms in United States v. Guzman‑Javier

Date: Sep 26, 2025
EEZs Are Part of the “High Seas” and Congress May Define “Stateless” Broadly Under the MDLEA United States v. Carlos Guzman‑Javier (and Consolidated Appeals) Introduction In this unpublished,...
Probable Cause Does Not Automatically Trigger Miranda Custody; Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms § 922(g)(1)’s Constitutionality After Bruen and Rahimi

Probable Cause Does Not Automatically Trigger Miranda Custody; Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms § 922(g)(1)’s Constitutionality After Bruen and Rahimi

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Probable Cause Does Not Automatically Trigger Miranda Custody; Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms § 922(g)(1)’s Constitutionality After Bruen and Rahimi Introduction In United States v. Ernell Shaw, No....
EEZs Count as “High Seas,” and Congress May Define “Vessels Without Nationality” for MDLEA Purposes: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA Jurisdiction and No‑Nexus Rule in United States v. Cueto‑Sanchez

EEZs Count as “High Seas,” and Congress May Define “Vessels Without Nationality” for MDLEA Purposes: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA Jurisdiction and No‑Nexus Rule in United States v. Cueto‑Sanchez

Date: Sep 26, 2025
EEZs Count as “High Seas,” and Congress May Define “Vessels Without Nationality” for MDLEA Purposes: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA Jurisdiction and No‑Nexus Rule in United States v. Cueto‑Sanchez...
EEZs Are “High Seas” Under the Felonies Clause; MDLEA’s Expanded “Vessel Without Nationality” Definition and No‑Nexus Rule Reaffirmed

EEZs Are “High Seas” Under the Felonies Clause; MDLEA’s Expanded “Vessel Without Nationality” Definition and No‑Nexus Rule Reaffirmed

Date: Sep 26, 2025
EEZs Are “High Seas” Under the Felonies Clause; MDLEA’s Expanded “Vessel Without Nationality” Definition and No‑Nexus Rule Reaffirmed Introduction In this consolidated, unpublished per curiam...
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Title VII Pleading: Time‑Barred Incidents Can Bolster Plausibility and Plaintiffs Need Not Name Comparators; Medical Leave Does Not Break Retaliation Causation

Sixth Circuit Clarifies Title VII Pleading: Time‑Barred Incidents Can Bolster Plausibility and Plaintiffs Need Not Name Comparators; Medical Leave Does Not Break Retaliation Causation

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Title VII Pleading: Time‑Barred Incidents Can Bolster Plausibility and Plaintiffs Need Not Name Comparators; Medical Leave Does Not Break Retaliation Causation Case: Ashraf...
Failure to Argue Plain Error Waives New Appellate Issues—Even for Pro Se Prisoners: A Tenth Circuit Reaffirmation in Rhodes v. Wyoming Department of Corrections

Failure to Argue Plain Error Waives New Appellate Issues—Even for Pro Se Prisoners: A Tenth Circuit Reaffirmation in Rhodes v. Wyoming Department of Corrections

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Failure to Argue Plain Error Waives New Appellate Issues—Even for Pro Se Prisoners: A Tenth Circuit Reaffirmation in Rhodes v. Wyoming Department of Corrections Introduction This commentary analyzes...
Control and Knowledge as Gatekeepers: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies That Staffing Firms Have No Standalone Duty to Investigate Client Motives Under Title VII

Control and Knowledge as Gatekeepers: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies That Staffing Firms Have No Standalone Duty to Investigate Client Motives Under Title VII

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Control and Knowledge as Gatekeepers: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies That Staffing Firms Have No Standalone Duty to Investigate Client Motives Under Title VII Introduction In Emily Vincent v. ATI...
Preserving Johnson-Based AEDPA Timeliness Arguments: Seventh Circuit Affirms Forfeiture and Emphasizes Deference on Sentencing-Reliance Claims

Preserving Johnson-Based AEDPA Timeliness Arguments: Seventh Circuit Affirms Forfeiture and Emphasizes Deference on Sentencing-Reliance Claims

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Preserving Johnson-Based AEDPA Timeliness Arguments: Seventh Circuit Affirms Forfeiture and Emphasizes Deference on Sentencing-Reliance Claims Case: Devin Seats v. Mindi Nurse (Warden) — United...
No Rule 408 Shield for Pre-Litigation Status Emails; Missing-Witness Instruction Narrowed for Foreign, Non-Employee Witnesses — NHC LLC v. Centaur Construction Co.

No Rule 408 Shield for Pre-Litigation Status Emails; Missing-Witness Instruction Narrowed for Foreign, Non-Employee Witnesses — NHC LLC v. Centaur Construction Co.

Date: Sep 26, 2025
No Rule 408 Shield for Pre-Litigation Status Emails; Missing-Witness Instruction Narrowed for Foreign, Non-Employee Witnesses Case: NHC LLC v. Centaur Construction Company Inc., et al. Court: United...
No-Reasonable-Attorney Foreshadowing Standard: Seventh Circuit narrows Strickland deficiency for missed categorical-approach arguments in Elion v. United States

No-Reasonable-Attorney Foreshadowing Standard: Seventh Circuit narrows Strickland deficiency for missed categorical-approach arguments in Elion v. United States

Date: Sep 26, 2025
No-Reasonable-Attorney Foreshadowing Standard: Seventh Circuit narrows Strickland deficiency for missed categorical-approach arguments Introduction In Otis R. Elion v. United States, No. 24-3014 (7th...
Mandamus Is Not a Shortcut Around Nonfinal Custody Orders: State ex rel. Conomy v. Fuller (2025-Ohio-4411)

Mandamus Is Not a Shortcut Around Nonfinal Custody Orders: State ex rel. Conomy v. Fuller (2025-Ohio-4411)

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Mandamus Is Not a Shortcut Around Nonfinal Custody Orders: State ex rel. Conomy v. Fuller Introduction In State ex rel. Conomy v. Fuller, 2025-Ohio-4411, the Supreme Court of Ohio reaffirmed core...
In Reopened Appeals, Appellants Must Brief Deficiency and Prejudice: No Presumption of Ineffective Assistance Under App.R. 26(B)

In Reopened Appeals, Appellants Must Brief Deficiency and Prejudice: No Presumption of Ineffective Assistance Under App.R. 26(B)

Date: Sep 26, 2025
In Reopened Appeals, Appellants Must Brief Deficiency and Prejudice: No Presumption of Ineffective Assistance Under App.R. 26(B) Introduction In State v. Clark, Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-4410, the...
Constructive Discharge in Alaska Whistleblower Cases Is an Objective, Position-Specific Inquiry (Nonprecedential Clarification)

Constructive Discharge in Alaska Whistleblower Cases Is an Objective, Position-Specific Inquiry (Nonprecedential Clarification)

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Constructive Discharge in Alaska Whistleblower Cases Is an Objective, Position-Specific Inquiry (Nonprecedential Clarification) Court: Supreme Court of the State of Alaska (Memorandum Opinion and...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert