Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

reaffirmation-of-&amp Case Commentaries

Settlement Payments After a Short‑Form Merger Are “Under” the Merger Contract for § 483 Imputed Interest; Minority Assent Not Required (Third Circuit)

Settlement Payments After a Short‑Form Merger Are “Under” the Merger Contract for § 483 Imputed Interest; Minority Assent Not Required (Third Circuit)

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Settlement Payments After a Short‑Form Merger Are “Under” the Merger Contract for § 483 Imputed Interest; Minority Assent Not Required Case: Charles G. Berwind Trust v. Commissioner of Internal...
“Under” Means “Authorized By”: Third Circuit Holds Short‑Form Merger Plans Are “Contracts” for § 483 and Imputes Interest to Later Settlement Payments

“Under” Means “Authorized By”: Third Circuit Holds Short‑Form Merger Plans Are “Contracts” for § 483 and Imputes Interest to Later Settlement Payments

Date: Nov 2, 2025
“Under” Means “Authorized By”: Third Circuit Holds Short‑Form Merger Plans Are “Contracts” for § 483 and Imputes Interest to Later Settlement Payments Introduction In a precedential decision with...
Section 483 Applies to Deferred Settlement Payments Authorized by Short‑Form Merger Plans: Third Circuit Defines “Under” and Confirms Merger Plans as “Contracts” Without Minority Assent

Section 483 Applies to Deferred Settlement Payments Authorized by Short‑Form Merger Plans: Third Circuit Defines “Under” and Confirms Merger Plans as “Contracts” Without Minority Assent

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Section 483 Applies to Deferred Settlement Payments Authorized by Short‑Form Merger Plans: Third Circuit Defines “Under” and Confirms Merger Plans as “Contracts” Without Minority Assent Court: U.S....
Settlement Payments Fixing Price After a Short‑Form Merger Are “Under” the Merger for IRC §483; Short‑Form Merger Agreements Are “Contracts” Despite Minority Non‑Assent

Settlement Payments Fixing Price After a Short‑Form Merger Are “Under” the Merger for IRC §483; Short‑Form Merger Agreements Are “Contracts” Despite Minority Non‑Assent

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Settlement Payments Fixing Price After a Short‑Form Merger Are “Under” the Merger for IRC §483; Short‑Form Merger Agreements Are “Contracts” Despite Minority Non‑Assent Introduction In Estate of...
“Under” Means “Authorized By”: Third Circuit Holds § 483 Imputes Interest to Settlement Payments That Satisfy Obligations Created by a Short‑Form Merger Agreement—Minority Assent Not Required

“Under” Means “Authorized By”: Third Circuit Holds § 483 Imputes Interest to Settlement Payments That Satisfy Obligations Created by a Short‑Form Merger Agreement—Minority Assent Not Required

Date: Nov 2, 2025
“Under” Means “Authorized By”: Third Circuit Holds § 483 Imputes Interest to Settlement Payments That Satisfy Obligations Created by a Short‑Form Merger Agreement—Minority Assent Not Required Case:...
Section 3553(a) as an Independent, Dispositive Ground for Denying Compassionate Release; No Stay Pending Supreme Court Review of Amendment 814 Issues; Proper Post-Conviction Vehicles After Rivers v. Guerrero

Section 3553(a) as an Independent, Dispositive Ground for Denying Compassionate Release; No Stay Pending Supreme Court Review of Amendment 814 Issues; Proper Post-Conviction Vehicles After Rivers v. Guerrero

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Section 3553(a) as an Independent, Dispositive Ground for Denying Compassionate Release; No Stay Pending Supreme Court Review of Amendment 814 Issues; Proper Post-Conviction Vehicles After Rivers v....
Meaningful Access, Not Physical Access: Fifth Circuit Upholds Courthouse Restrictions, Declines Bivens Expansion, and Rejects ADA Title II Claims Against Federal Courts

Meaningful Access, Not Physical Access: Fifth Circuit Upholds Courthouse Restrictions, Declines Bivens Expansion, and Rejects ADA Title II Claims Against Federal Courts

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Meaningful Access, Not Physical Access: Fifth Circuit Upholds Courthouse Restrictions, Declines Bivens Expansion, and Rejects ADA Title II Claims Against Federal Courts Case: Garces v. Biery, No....
Stays Do Not Suspend Compliance: Fifth Circuit Affirms Dismissal With Prejudice and Rejects PACER/Pro Se Excuses as “Excusable Neglect”

Stays Do Not Suspend Compliance: Fifth Circuit Affirms Dismissal With Prejudice and Rejects PACER/Pro Se Excuses as “Excusable Neglect”

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Stays Do Not Suspend Compliance: Fifth Circuit Affirms Dismissal With Prejudice and Rejects PACER/Pro Se Excuses as “Excusable Neglect” Introduction In Miller v. Ohio Security Insurance, No. 24-30740...
Adoption-by-Reference After Diggles: Rule 32 Verification Is a Prerequisite to Imposing Discretionary Supervised-Release Conditions

Adoption-by-Reference After Diggles: Rule 32 Verification Is a Prerequisite to Imposing Discretionary Supervised-Release Conditions

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Adoption-by-Reference After Diggles: Rule 32 Verification Is a Prerequisite to Imposing Discretionary Supervised-Release Conditions Introduction In United States v. Rivera-Hernandez, No. 25-20022...
Direct Threat, Not Diagnostic Perfection: Fifth Circuit Endorses FMCSA-Guided, File-Review Assessments for Safety-Critical Rail Jobs and Tightens Proof of Reassignment under the ADA

Direct Threat, Not Diagnostic Perfection: Fifth Circuit Endorses FMCSA-Guided, File-Review Assessments for Safety-Critical Rail Jobs and Tightens Proof of Reassignment under the ADA

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Direct Threat, Not Diagnostic Perfection: Fifth Circuit Endorses FMCSA-Guided, File-Review Assessments for Safety-Critical Rail Jobs and Tightens Proof of Reassignment under the ADA Introduction In...
Fourth Circuit Confirms No Financial-Distress Prerequisite for Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction: En Banc Rehearing Denied in Bestwall (Texas Two‑Step Context)

Fourth Circuit Confirms No Financial-Distress Prerequisite for Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction: En Banc Rehearing Denied in Bestwall (Texas Two‑Step Context)

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Fourth Circuit Confirms No Financial-Distress Prerequisite for Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction: En Banc Rehearing Denied in Bestwall (Texas Two‑Step Context) Introduction In Bestwall LLC v. Official...
Ruelas v. State: Nevada Clarifies that Motive-to-Lie Inquiries Are Not Vouching and Endorses Mid‑Trial Date‑Range Amendments Absent Prejudice

Ruelas v. State: Nevada Clarifies that Motive-to-Lie Inquiries Are Not Vouching and Endorses Mid‑Trial Date‑Range Amendments Absent Prejudice

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Ruelas v. State: Nevada Clarifies that Motive-to-Lie Inquiries Are Not Vouching and Endorses Mid‑Trial Date‑Range Amendments Absent Prejudice Court: Supreme Court of Nevada Date: October 30, 2025...
Shelton v. State: Nevada Supreme Court narrows res gestae to same‑transaction events and reaffirms mandatory limiting instructions for identity-based other‑acts evidence (harmless error applied)

Shelton v. State: Nevada Supreme Court narrows res gestae to same‑transaction events and reaffirms mandatory limiting instructions for identity-based other‑acts evidence (harmless error applied)

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Shelton v. State: Nevada Supreme Court narrows res gestae to same‑transaction events and reaffirms mandatory limiting instructions for identity-based other‑acts evidence (harmless error applied)...
Utah Supreme Court Confirms Borrowers Can Contractually Waive Rule 69B(d)’s “Highest-Price” Parceling Requirement and Pyper-Based Equitable Relief

Utah Supreme Court Confirms Borrowers Can Contractually Waive Rule 69B(d)’s “Highest-Price” Parceling Requirement and Pyper-Based Equitable Relief

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Utah Supreme Court Confirms Borrowers Can Contractually Waive Rule 69B(d)’s “Highest-Price” Parceling Requirement and Pyper-Based Equitable Relief Introduction In Talisker Partnership v. Midtown...
No Cure by Removal: Second Circuit Applies Derivative Jurisdiction to FIRREA Removals When State Courts Lack Subject-Matter Jurisdiction

No Cure by Removal: Second Circuit Applies Derivative Jurisdiction to FIRREA Removals When State Courts Lack Subject-Matter Jurisdiction

Date: Nov 1, 2025
No Cure by Removal: Second Circuit Applies Derivative Jurisdiction to FIRREA Removals When State Courts Lack Subject-Matter Jurisdiction Case: Panos v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, No....
No Per Se Rule: Intoxication Does Not Automatically Invalidate Consent; Apparent Authority Can Validate a Roommate-Consent Search — United States v. Boone (2d Cir. 2025) [Summary Order]

No Per Se Rule: Intoxication Does Not Automatically Invalidate Consent; Apparent Authority Can Validate a Roommate-Consent Search — United States v. Boone (2d Cir. 2025) [Summary Order]

Date: Nov 1, 2025
No Per Se Rule: Intoxication Does Not Automatically Invalidate Consent; Apparent Authority Can Validate a Roommate-Consent Search — United States v. Boone (2d Cir. 2025) [Summary Order] Court: U.S....
Off‑Campus Social Media Speech Is Protected Absent Safety-Based Threats: Reaction-Driven “Disruption” Alone Cannot Justify Discipline (Leroy v. Livingston Manor CSD)

Off‑Campus Social Media Speech Is Protected Absent Safety-Based Threats: Reaction-Driven “Disruption” Alone Cannot Justify Discipline (Leroy v. Livingston Manor CSD)

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Off‑Campus Social Media Speech Is Protected Absent Safety-Based Threats: Reaction-Driven “Disruption” Alone Cannot Justify Discipline Leroy v. Livingston Manor Central School District, No. 24-1241...
Santiago v. Fischer: Second Circuit Requires Admission of “Impediments” Evidence to Prove Causation and Punitive Liability in Earley PRS Cases; Qualified Immunity Remains Unavailable Post-Earley

Santiago v. Fischer: Second Circuit Requires Admission of “Impediments” Evidence to Prove Causation and Punitive Liability in Earley PRS Cases; Qualified Immunity Remains Unavailable Post-Earley

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Santiago v. Fischer: Second Circuit Requires Admission of “Impediments” Evidence to Prove Causation and Punitive Liability in Earley PRS Cases; Qualified Immunity Remains Unavailable Post-Earley...
Venue Errors Do Not Defeat Judicial Immunity: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Transfer and Dismissal in Ibhar Al Mheid v. Minchew

Venue Errors Do Not Defeat Judicial Immunity: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Transfer and Dismissal in Ibhar Al Mheid v. Minchew

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Venue Errors Do Not Defeat Judicial Immunity: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Transfer and Dismissal in Ibhar Al Mheid v. Minchew Introduction In Ibhar Al Mheid v. Katy Minchew et al., No. 24-11930 (11th...
Waiver Under Rule 72(a) Bars Appellate Review; “Stray Remarks” and Non‑Comparable Exchanges Do Not Sustain § 1981 Retail Discrimination Claims — Harris v. Bath & Body Works (11th Cir. 2025)

Waiver Under Rule 72(a) Bars Appellate Review; “Stray Remarks” and Non‑Comparable Exchanges Do Not Sustain § 1981 Retail Discrimination Claims — Harris v. Bath & Body Works (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Waiver Under Rule 72(a) Bars Appellate Review; “Stray Remarks” and Non‑Comparable Exchanges Do Not Sustain § 1981 Retail Discrimination Claims — Harris v. Bath & Body Works (11th Cir. 2025) Court:...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert