Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

new-precedent-on... Case Commentaries

United States v. Lamborn (Tony Le): Fourth Circuit Adopts Motion‑Cutoff Rule for Speedy Trial Act and Confirms Non‑Retroactivity of the Acquitted‑Conduct Guideline Amendment

United States v. Lamborn (Tony Le): Fourth Circuit Adopts Motion‑Cutoff Rule for Speedy Trial Act and Confirms Non‑Retroactivity of the Acquitted‑Conduct Guideline Amendment

Date: Nov 21, 2025
United States v. Lamborn (Tony Le): Fourth Circuit Adopts Motion‑Cutoff Rule for Speedy Trial Act and Confirms Non‑Retroactivity of the Acquitted‑Conduct Guideline Amendment I. Introduction This...
Relevant Conduct, Willful Blindness, and Supervised Release Conditions in Firearms Conspiracies: United States v. Wilson Che Fonguh (4th Cir. 2025)

Relevant Conduct, Willful Blindness, and Supervised Release Conditions in Firearms Conspiracies: United States v. Wilson Che Fonguh (4th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 21, 2025
Relevant Conduct, Willful Blindness, and Supervised Release Conditions in Firearms Conspiracies: United States v. Wilson Che Fonguh (4th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction The Fourth Circuit’s published...
United States v. Tita: Circumstantial Knowledge, Pinkerton Liability, and Supervised Release Conditions in a Firearms Smuggling Conspiracy

United States v. Tita: Circumstantial Knowledge, Pinkerton Liability, and Supervised Release Conditions in a Firearms Smuggling Conspiracy

Date: Nov 21, 2025
United States v. Tita: Circumstantial Knowledge, Pinkerton Liability, and Supervised Release Conditions in a Firearms Smuggling Conspiracy I. Introduction In United States v. Tita (consolidated with...
United States v. Yoo: Limiting Speedy Trial Act Dismissals to Pre‑Motion Delay and Enforcing Oral Pronouncement of Supervised Release Conditions

United States v. Yoo: Limiting Speedy Trial Act Dismissals to Pre‑Motion Delay and Enforcing Oral Pronouncement of Supervised Release Conditions

Date: Nov 21, 2025
United States v. Yoo: Limiting Speedy Trial Act Dismissals to Pre‑Motion Delay and Enforcing Oral Pronouncement of Supervised Release Conditions I. Introduction The Fourth Circuit’s published...
State v. Munford: Police Exploitation as a Prerequisite to Intoxication-Based Involuntariness Claims and the Treatment of Tampering with Evidence Tied to Multiple Felonies

State v. Munford: Police Exploitation as a Prerequisite to Intoxication-Based Involuntariness Claims and the Treatment of Tampering with Evidence Tied to Multiple Felonies

Date: Nov 21, 2025
State v. Munford: Police Exploitation as a Prerequisite to Intoxication-Based Involuntariness Claims and the Treatment of Tampering with Evidence Tied to Multiple Felonies I. Introduction In State v....
Reaffirming Strict Standards for Fundamental and Harmless Error in New Mexico: Commentary on State v. Hayhurst

Reaffirming Strict Standards for Fundamental and Harmless Error in New Mexico: Commentary on State v. Hayhurst

Date: Nov 21, 2025
Reaffirming Strict Standards for Fundamental and Harmless Error in New Mexico: Commentary on State v. Hayhurst I. Introduction The New Mexico Supreme Court’s unpublished decision in State v....
When Long‑Standing Unwritten Medicaid Practices Become Binding Policy: Commentary on Hattiesburg Medical Park Management Corp. v. Mississippi Division of Medicaid

When Long‑Standing Unwritten Medicaid Practices Become Binding Policy: Commentary on Hattiesburg Medical Park Management Corp. v. Mississippi Division of Medicaid

Date: Nov 21, 2025
When Long‑Standing Unwritten Medicaid Practices Become Binding Policy: Commentary on Hattiesburg Medical Park Management Corp. v. Mississippi Division of Medicaid I. Introduction In Hattiesburg...
Rejecting the Workers’ Compensation “Going-and-Coming” Rule in Arkansas Respondeat Superior: Commentary on Skala v. Comfort Systems USA, Inc., 2025 Ark. 183

Rejecting the Workers’ Compensation “Going-and-Coming” Rule in Arkansas Respondeat Superior: Commentary on Skala v. Comfort Systems USA, Inc., 2025 Ark. 183

Date: Nov 21, 2025
Rejecting the Workers’ Compensation “Going-and-Coming” Rule in Arkansas Respondeat Superior: Commentary on Skala v. Comfort Systems USA, Inc., 2025 Ark. 183 I. Introduction In Skala v. Comfort...

        Reaffirming Nonhearsay Course-of-Conduct Statements and Strict Preservation of Cumulative Error:
        Commentary on Kevasia Tate v. State of Arkansas (2025 Ark. 186)

Reaffirming Nonhearsay Course-of-Conduct Statements and Strict Preservation of Cumulative Error: Commentary on Kevasia Tate v. State of Arkansas (2025 Ark. 186)

Date: Nov 21, 2025
Reaffirming Nonhearsay Course-of-Conduct Statements and Strict Preservation of Cumulative Error: Commentary on Kevasia Tate v. State of Arkansas, 2025 Ark. 186 I. Introduction The Arkansas Supreme...
Extending State Public Defender Duties to All Penal Facilities: Commentary on Kortney Lee Elzey v. State of Indiana

Extending State Public Defender Duties to All Penal Facilities: Commentary on Kortney Lee Elzey v. State of Indiana

Date: Nov 21, 2025
Extending State Public Defender Duties to All Penal Facilities: Commentary on Kortney Lee Elzey v. State of Indiana I. Introduction The Indiana Supreme Court’s decision in Kortney Lee Elzey v. State...
“Any Person” Includes High Public Officials: Justice Dougherty’s Dissent on the Waiver of Official Immunity under Pennsylvania’s Wiretap Act

“Any Person” Includes High Public Officials: Justice Dougherty’s Dissent on the Waiver of Official Immunity under Pennsylvania’s Wiretap Act

Date: Nov 20, 2025
“Any Person” Includes High Public Officials: Justice Dougherty’s Dissent on the Waiver of Official Immunity under Pennsylvania’s Wiretap Act I. Introduction This commentary examines Justice Kevin...
High-Value Undertakings and Lis Pendens in Fraudulent Real Estate Transfers: Commentary on American Premium Realty Group, LLC v. 37-19 Realty, Inc.

High-Value Undertakings and Lis Pendens in Fraudulent Real Estate Transfers: Commentary on American Premium Realty Group, LLC v. 37-19 Realty, Inc.

Date: Nov 20, 2025
High-Value Undertakings and Lis Pendens in Fraudulent Real Estate Transfers: Commentary on American Premium Realty Group, LLC v. 37-19 Realty, Inc., 2025 NY Slip Op 06301 (2d Dep’t) I. Introduction...
Maida v. Diocese of Brooklyn: Waiver of Clergy, Physician, and Psychologist Privileges and Disclosure of Other Victims in Child Victims Act Discovery

Maida v. Diocese of Brooklyn: Waiver of Clergy, Physician, and Psychologist Privileges and Disclosure of Other Victims in Child Victims Act Discovery

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Maida v. Diocese of Brooklyn: Waiver of Clergy, Physician, and Psychologist Privileges and Disclosure of Other Victims in Child Victims Act Discovery I. Introduction The Appellate Division, Second...
Self-Dealing with a Vulnerable Client Under a Power of Attorney Warrants Disbarment: Commentary on Matter of Galarza (2025)

Self-Dealing with a Vulnerable Client Under a Power of Attorney Warrants Disbarment: Commentary on Matter of Galarza (2025)

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Self-Dealing with a Vulnerable Client Under a Power of Attorney Warrants Disbarment: Commentary on Matter of Galarza, 2025 NY Slip Op 06318 (2d Dep’t) I. Introduction Matter of Galarza is a...
No Duty to Defend in Employer‑Initiated Inspector General Investigations under New York Public Officers Law § 18: Commentary on Matter of Khader v. City of Yonkers

No Duty to Defend in Employer‑Initiated Inspector General Investigations under New York Public Officers Law § 18: Commentary on Matter of Khader v. City of Yonkers

Date: Nov 20, 2025
No Duty to Defend in Employer‑Initiated Inspector General Investigations under New York Public Officers Law § 18: Commentary on Matter of Khader v. City of Yonkers, 2025 NY Slip Op 06321 (2d Dep’t)...
Judicial Non‑Delegation in Therapeutic Supervised Parenting Time: Commentary on Matter of McCook v. Delbrune

Judicial Non‑Delegation in Therapeutic Supervised Parenting Time: Commentary on Matter of McCook v. Delbrune

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Judicial Non‑Delegation in Therapeutic Supervised Parenting Time: Commentary on Matter of McCook v. Delbrune I. Introduction The Appellate Division, Second Department’s decision in Matter of McCook...
People v. Torres: Course-of-Investigation Testimony, Jury Note Procedure, and the Modern Harmless-Error Framework in New York Criminal Appeals

People v. Torres: Course-of-Investigation Testimony, Jury Note Procedure, and the Modern Harmless-Error Framework in New York Criminal Appeals

Date: Nov 20, 2025
People v. Torres: Course-of-Investigation Testimony, Jury Note Procedure, and the Modern Harmless-Error Framework in New York Criminal Appeals I. Introduction People v. Torres, 2025 NY Slip Op 06341...
Limits on Vacating Foreclosure Judgments After Trial Period Plans: Commentary on U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v. Belizaire

Limits on Vacating Foreclosure Judgments After Trial Period Plans: Commentary on U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v. Belizaire

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Limits on Vacating Foreclosure Judgments After Trial Period Plans: Commentary on U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v. Belizaire I. Introduction This commentary examines the Appellate Division, Second...
Acorn Investments, LLC v. Elsaesser: Clarifying the Narrow Commercial-Transaction Exception to the Non‑Assignability of Legal Malpractice Claims in Idaho

Acorn Investments, LLC v. Elsaesser: Clarifying the Narrow Commercial-Transaction Exception to the Non‑Assignability of Legal Malpractice Claims in Idaho

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Acorn Investments, LLC v. Elsaesser: Clarifying the Narrow Commercial-Transaction Exception to the Non‑Assignability of Legal Malpractice Claims in Idaho I. Introduction The Idaho Supreme Court’s...
Primacy of Idaho’s “Just and Reasonable” Mandate Over Multi‑State Allocation Protocols: Commentary on PacifiCorp v. Idaho Public Utilities Commission

Primacy of Idaho’s “Just and Reasonable” Mandate Over Multi‑State Allocation Protocols: Commentary on PacifiCorp v. Idaho Public Utilities Commission

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Primacy of Idaho’s “Just and Reasonable” Mandate Over Multi‑State Allocation Protocols: Commentary on PacifiCorp v. Idaho Public Utilities Commission I. Introduction The Idaho Supreme Court’s...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert