Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
State v. Frandsen: Idaho Supreme Court Refines Juror Impartiality, Victim Text Evidence, and Forensic Interviewer Testimony I. Introduction In State v. Frandsen, Docket No. 50878 (Idaho Dec. 19,...
Clear and Convincing Evidence and Reasonable Visibility: Alaska Refines Easement by Estoppel and Prescriptive Easement Doctrine in Koponen v. Romanov I. Introduction The Alaska Supreme Court’s...
Limited Safe Harbor Under Ala. Code § 34‑3‑62 and Unilateral Post‑Settlement Fee Increases: Commentary on Blevins v. Alabama State Bar I. Introduction The Supreme Court of Alabama’s decision in Jerry...
Dendy v. Ryan: Clean Hands as a Bar to the Relative‑Hardship Defense in Restrictive Covenant Enforcement I. Introduction In Dendy v. Ryan, decided on December 19, 2025, the Supreme Court of Alabama...
Laborde v. Citizens Bank, N.A.: Limiting the First‑Breach Doctrine and Clarifying Pleading Standards in Alabama Foreclosure Litigation I. Introduction In Laborde v. Citizens Bank, N.A., decided on...
United States v. Harris: Probable Cause from Lane-Change Violations and Marijuana Odor in the Post-Hemp Era I. Introduction In United States v. Michael Harris, No. 24-5944 (6th Cir. Dec. 19, 2025)...
Finality, FSIA Immunity, and the One‑Year Bar: American Telecom Co., L.L.C. v. Republic of Lebanon (6th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction This unpublished decision of the United States Court of Appeals for...
Digital Forensics Experts, Rule 16 Disclosures, and Rule 414 Evidence from Unallocated Space: Commentary on United States v. Eby (6th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction In United States v. Richard Eby, No....
Safety-Based Termination After Workplace Firearm and Suicide Threat: ADA and KCRA Analysis in Deryck Huelett v. Louisville Paving Co. I. Introduction The Sixth Circuit’s unpublished decision in...
Immediate Awards of SSI Benefits After Agency Confession of Error: Commentary on Hicks v. Commissioner of Social Security (6th Cir. Dec. 19, 2025) Note: The opinion commented on here is designated...
United States v. Barnes: Limits on Withdrawing Guilty Pleas for Alleged Plea‑Stage Ineffective Assistance and Deference to Sentencing Findings I. Introduction The Sixth Circuit’s unpublished decision...
Disclosing Research Misconduct Findings Is Not a Constitutional Due Process Violation: Commentary on Pichiorri v. Burghes I. Introduction This Sixth Circuit opinion, recommended for publication, sits...
No Federal Liberty Interest in Tennessee Parole Release Dates Even After Grant of Parole: A Comprehensive Commentary on Hester v. Chester County, 24-5800 (6th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction The Sixth...
United States v. Clay: Limiting Healthcare-Fraud Restitution to Actual Loss and Enforcing MVRA Apportionment I. Introduction In United States v. Kevin Clay, Nos. 23‑3923/24‑3038 (6th Cir. Dec. 19,...
Excluding Medically Necessary Claims from MVRA Restitution and Constraining Apportionment by Plea Agreement: Commentary on United States v. Clay I. Introduction In United States v. Kevin Clay, Nos....
Equitable ERISA Surcharge Claims and Arbitration Carve‑Outs: A Commentary on Aramark Services v. Aetna Life Insurance Co. I. Introduction The Fifth Circuit’s decision in Aramark Services v. Aetna...
Limiting Younger Abstention and Clarifying Judicial vs. Administrative Immunity: Commentary on Bivings v. Paprzycki (10th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction The Tenth Circuit’s nonprecedential order and...
United States v. Griffin & Robertson: Zero‑Point Offender Eligibility, Grouping of Fraud Schemes, and Limits on Forfeiture for Financial Aid Fraud I. Introduction This First Circuit decision arises...
United States v. Griffin & Robertson: Traceable Proceeds, Zero-Point Offenders, and Sentencing in Federal Fraud Prosecutions I. Introduction United States v. Griffin (consolidated appeals of United...
“Traceable” Proceeds, Zero-Point Offenders, and Sentencing Disparity: A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Robertson (1st Cir. Dec. 19, 2025) I. Introduction United States v. Robertson is a...