Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

new-precedent-on... Case Commentaries

State v. Frandsen: Idaho Supreme Court Refines Juror Impartiality, Victim Text Evidence, and Forensic Interviewer Testimony

State v. Frandsen: Idaho Supreme Court Refines Juror Impartiality, Victim Text Evidence, and Forensic Interviewer Testimony

Date: Dec 21, 2025
State v. Frandsen: Idaho Supreme Court Refines Juror Impartiality, Victim Text Evidence, and Forensic Interviewer Testimony I. Introduction In State v. Frandsen, Docket No. 50878 (Idaho Dec. 19,...
Clear and Convincing Evidence and Reasonable Visibility: Alaska Refines Easement by Estoppel and Prescriptive Easement Doctrine in Koponen v. Romanov

Clear and Convincing Evidence and Reasonable Visibility: Alaska Refines Easement by Estoppel and Prescriptive Easement Doctrine in Koponen v. Romanov

Date: Dec 21, 2025
Clear and Convincing Evidence and Reasonable Visibility: Alaska Refines Easement by Estoppel and Prescriptive Easement Doctrine in Koponen v. Romanov I. Introduction The Alaska Supreme Court’s...
Limited Safe Harbor Under Ala. Code § 34‑3‑62 and Unilateral Post‑Settlement Fee Increases: Commentary on Blevins v. Alabama State Bar

Limited Safe Harbor Under Ala. Code § 34‑3‑62 and Unilateral Post‑Settlement Fee Increases: Commentary on Blevins v. Alabama State Bar

Date: Dec 21, 2025
Limited Safe Harbor Under Ala. Code § 34‑3‑62 and Unilateral Post‑Settlement Fee Increases: Commentary on Blevins v. Alabama State Bar I. Introduction The Supreme Court of Alabama’s decision in Jerry...
Dendy v. Ryan: Clean Hands as a Bar to the Relative‑Hardship Defense in Restrictive Covenant Enforcement

Dendy v. Ryan: Clean Hands as a Bar to the Relative‑Hardship Defense in Restrictive Covenant Enforcement

Date: Dec 21, 2025
Dendy v. Ryan: Clean Hands as a Bar to the Relative‑Hardship Defense in Restrictive Covenant Enforcement I. Introduction In Dendy v. Ryan, decided on December 19, 2025, the Supreme Court of Alabama...
Laborde v. Citizens Bank, N.A.: Limiting the First‑Breach Doctrine and Clarifying Pleading Standards in Alabama Foreclosure Litigation

Laborde v. Citizens Bank, N.A.: Limiting the First‑Breach Doctrine and Clarifying Pleading Standards in Alabama Foreclosure Litigation

Date: Dec 21, 2025
Laborde v. Citizens Bank, N.A.: Limiting the First‑Breach Doctrine and Clarifying Pleading Standards in Alabama Foreclosure Litigation I. Introduction In Laborde v. Citizens Bank, N.A., decided on...
United States v. Harris: Probable Cause from Lane-Change Violations and Marijuana Odor in the Post-Hemp Era

United States v. Harris: Probable Cause from Lane-Change Violations and Marijuana Odor in the Post-Hemp Era

Date: Dec 21, 2025
United States v. Harris: Probable Cause from Lane-Change Violations and Marijuana Odor in the Post-Hemp Era I. Introduction In United States v. Michael Harris, No. 24-5944 (6th Cir. Dec. 19, 2025)...
Finality, FSIA Immunity, and the One‑Year Bar: American Telecom Co., L.L.C. v. Republic of Lebanon (6th Cir. 2025)

Finality, FSIA Immunity, and the One‑Year Bar: American Telecom Co., L.L.C. v. Republic of Lebanon (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Dec 21, 2025
Finality, FSIA Immunity, and the One‑Year Bar: American Telecom Co., L.L.C. v. Republic of Lebanon (6th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction This unpublished decision of the United States Court of Appeals for...
Digital Forensics Experts, Rule 16 Disclosures, and Rule 414 Evidence from Unallocated Space: Commentary on United States v. Eby (6th Cir. 2025)

Digital Forensics Experts, Rule 16 Disclosures, and Rule 414 Evidence from Unallocated Space: Commentary on United States v. Eby (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Dec 21, 2025
Digital Forensics Experts, Rule 16 Disclosures, and Rule 414 Evidence from Unallocated Space: Commentary on United States v. Eby (6th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction In United States v. Richard Eby, No....
Safety-Based Termination After Workplace Firearm and Suicide Threat: ADA and KCRA Analysis in Huelett v. Louisville Paving Co.

Safety-Based Termination After Workplace Firearm and Suicide Threat: ADA and KCRA Analysis in Huelett v. Louisville Paving Co.

Date: Dec 21, 2025
Safety-Based Termination After Workplace Firearm and Suicide Threat: ADA and KCRA Analysis in Deryck Huelett v. Louisville Paving Co. I. Introduction The Sixth Circuit’s unpublished decision in...
Immediate Awards of SSI Benefits After Agency Confession of Error: Commentary on Hicks v. Commissioner of Social Security (6th Cir. 2025)

Immediate Awards of SSI Benefits After Agency Confession of Error: Commentary on Hicks v. Commissioner of Social Security (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Dec 21, 2025
Immediate Awards of SSI Benefits After Agency Confession of Error: Commentary on Hicks v. Commissioner of Social Security (6th Cir. Dec. 19, 2025) Note: The opinion commented on here is designated...
United States v. Barnes: Limits on Withdrawing Guilty Pleas for Alleged Plea‑Stage Ineffective Assistance and Deference to Sentencing Findings

United States v. Barnes: Limits on Withdrawing Guilty Pleas for Alleged Plea‑Stage Ineffective Assistance and Deference to Sentencing Findings

Date: Dec 21, 2025
United States v. Barnes: Limits on Withdrawing Guilty Pleas for Alleged Plea‑Stage Ineffective Assistance and Deference to Sentencing Findings I. Introduction The Sixth Circuit’s unpublished decision...
Disclosing Research Misconduct Findings Is Not a Constitutional Due Process Violation: Commentary on Pichiorri v. Burghes

Disclosing Research Misconduct Findings Is Not a Constitutional Due Process Violation: Commentary on Pichiorri v. Burghes

Date: Dec 21, 2025
Disclosing Research Misconduct Findings Is Not a Constitutional Due Process Violation: Commentary on Pichiorri v. Burghes I. Introduction This Sixth Circuit opinion, recommended for publication, sits...
No Federal Liberty Interest in Tennessee Parole Release Dates: Commentary on Hester v. Chester County

No Federal Liberty Interest in Tennessee Parole Release Dates: Commentary on Hester v. Chester County

Date: Dec 21, 2025
No Federal Liberty Interest in Tennessee Parole Release Dates Even After Grant of Parole: A Comprehensive Commentary on Hester v. Chester County, 24-5800 (6th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction The Sixth...
United States v. Clay: Limiting Healthcare-Fraud Restitution to Actual Loss and Enforcing MVRA Apportionment

United States v. Clay: Limiting Healthcare-Fraud Restitution to Actual Loss and Enforcing MVRA Apportionment

Date: Dec 21, 2025
United States v. Clay: Limiting Healthcare-Fraud Restitution to Actual Loss and Enforcing MVRA Apportionment I. Introduction In United States v. Kevin Clay, Nos. 23‑3923/24‑3038 (6th Cir. Dec. 19,...
Excluding Medically Necessary Claims from MVRA Restitution and Constraining Apportionment by Plea Agreement: Commentary on United States v. Clay

Excluding Medically Necessary Claims from MVRA Restitution and Constraining Apportionment by Plea Agreement: Commentary on United States v. Clay

Date: Dec 21, 2025
Excluding Medically Necessary Claims from MVRA Restitution and Constraining Apportionment by Plea Agreement: Commentary on United States v. Clay I. Introduction In United States v. Kevin Clay, Nos....
Equitable ERISA Surcharge Claims and Arbitration Carve‑Outs: A Commentary on Aramark Services v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.

Equitable ERISA Surcharge Claims and Arbitration Carve‑Outs: A Commentary on Aramark Services v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.

Date: Dec 21, 2025
Equitable ERISA Surcharge Claims and Arbitration Carve‑Outs: A Commentary on Aramark Services v. Aetna Life Insurance Co. I. Introduction The Fifth Circuit’s decision in Aramark Services v. Aetna...
Limiting Younger Abstention and Clarifying Judicial vs. Administrative Immunity: Commentary on Bivings v. Paprzycki (10th Cir. 2025)

Limiting Younger Abstention and Clarifying Judicial vs. Administrative Immunity: Commentary on Bivings v. Paprzycki (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Dec 20, 2025
Limiting Younger Abstention and Clarifying Judicial vs. Administrative Immunity: Commentary on Bivings v. Paprzycki (10th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction The Tenth Circuit’s nonprecedential order and...
United States v. Griffin & Robertson: Zero‑Point Offender Eligibility, Grouping of Fraud Schemes, and Limits on Forfeiture for Financial Aid Fraud

United States v. Griffin & Robertson: Zero‑Point Offender Eligibility, Grouping of Fraud Schemes, and Limits on Forfeiture for Financial Aid Fraud

Date: Dec 20, 2025
United States v. Griffin & Robertson: Zero‑Point Offender Eligibility, Grouping of Fraud Schemes, and Limits on Forfeiture for Financial Aid Fraud I. Introduction This First Circuit decision arises...
United States v. Griffin & Robertson: Traceable Proceeds, Zero-Point Offenders, and Sentencing in Federal Fraud Prosecutions

United States v. Griffin & Robertson: Traceable Proceeds, Zero-Point Offenders, and Sentencing in Federal Fraud Prosecutions

Date: Dec 20, 2025
United States v. Griffin & Robertson: Traceable Proceeds, Zero-Point Offenders, and Sentencing in Federal Fraud Prosecutions I. Introduction United States v. Griffin (consolidated appeals of United...
Tracing Fraud Proceeds and Policing Sentencing Disparity: Commentary on United States v. Robertson

Tracing Fraud Proceeds and Policing Sentencing Disparity: Commentary on United States v. Robertson

Date: Dec 20, 2025
“Traceable” Proceeds, Zero-Point Offenders, and Sentencing Disparity: A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Robertson (1st Cir. Dec. 19, 2025) I. Introduction United States v. Robertson is a...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert