Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

federal Case Commentaries

“Beyond Miller”: The Fourth Circuit Declines to Extend Juvenile-Sentencing Protections to 18-Year-Old Offenders and Clarifies Evidentiary & Joinder Standards in Large-Scale VICAR Prosecutions – A Commentary on United States v. Duglas Ferrera (2025)

“Beyond Miller”: The Fourth Circuit Declines to Extend Juvenile-Sentencing Protections to 18-Year-Old Offenders and Clarifies Evidentiary & Joinder Standards in Large-Scale VICAR Prosecutions – A Commentary on United States v. Duglas Ferrera (2025)

Date: Aug 19, 2025
“Beyond Miller”: The Fourth Circuit Declines to Extend Juvenile-Sentencing Protections to 18-Year-Old Offenders and Clarifies Evidentiary & Joinder Standards in Large-Scale VICAR Prosecutions – A...
No Safe Harbor in Fear: Fourth Circuit Narrows Duress Defence in Gang-Related VICAR Prosecutions

No Safe Harbor in Fear: Fourth Circuit Narrows Duress Defence in Gang-Related VICAR Prosecutions

Date: Aug 19, 2025
No Safe Harbor in Fear: Fourth Circuit Narrows Duress Defence in Gang-Related VICAR Prosecutions 1. Introduction United States v. Elmer Martinez (consolidated appeals Nos. 22-4745, 22-4746, 23-4005,...
United States v. Martinez (2025): Fourth Circuit Defines the Outer Limits of the Duress Defence in VICAR Murders and Clarifies Knock-and-Talk Doctrine

United States v. Martinez (2025): Fourth Circuit Defines the Outer Limits of the Duress Defence in VICAR Murders and Clarifies Knock-and-Talk Doctrine

Date: Aug 19, 2025
United States v. Martinez (4th Cir. 2025): Clarifying the Boundaries of Duress under 18 U.S.C. § 1959, the Admissibility of Gang-Violence Evidence, and the Proper Scope of Knock-and-Talk Searches...

Fourth Circuit Narrows “Gang-Duress” and Confirms Admissibility of Expert Gang Testimony after Crawford:
A Commentary on United States v. Pablo Velasco Barrera (2025)

Fourth Circuit Narrows “Gang-Duress” and Confirms Admissibility of Expert Gang Testimony after Crawford: A Commentary on United States v. Pablo Velasco Barrera (2025)

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Fourth Circuit Narrows “Gang-Duress” and Confirms Admissibility of Expert Gang Testimony after Crawford A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Pablo Velasco Barrera, 92 F.4th ___ (4th Cir....
“No Safe Harbor in Gang Coercion” – The Fourth Circuit’s Definitive Limits on Duress, Evidence, and Sentencing in United States v. Ronald Contreras (2025)

“No Safe Harbor in Gang Coercion” – The Fourth Circuit’s Definitive Limits on Duress, Evidence, and Sentencing in United States v. Ronald Contreras (2025)

Date: Aug 18, 2025
“No Safe Harbor in Gang Coercion” – The Fourth Circuit’s Definitive Limits on Duress, Evidence, and Sentencing in United States v. Ronald Contreras (2025) 1. Introduction United States v. Ronald...
United States v. Crawford: Clarifying the Obstruction-of-Justice Enhancement and Reaffirming Limits on “Reasonable Doubt” Definitions

United States v. Crawford: Clarifying the Obstruction-of-Justice Enhancement and Reaffirming Limits on “Reasonable Doubt” Definitions

Date: Aug 18, 2025
United States v. Crawford: Clarifying the Obstruction-of-Justice Enhancement and Reaffirming Limits on “Reasonable Doubt” Definitions 1. Introduction United States v. Stephen C. Crawford, No. 24-4243...
Rivas de Nolasco v. Bondi: The Fourth Circuit Affirms § 1252(b)(1) as a Non-Jurisdictional Claims-Processing Rule and Reinforces Nexus Standards for Particular Social Group Claims

Rivas de Nolasco v. Bondi: The Fourth Circuit Affirms § 1252(b)(1) as a Non-Jurisdictional Claims-Processing Rule and Reinforces Nexus Standards for Particular Social Group Claims

Date: Aug 18, 2025
Rivas de Nolasco v. Bondi: The Fourth Circuit Affirms § 1252(b)(1) as a Non-Jurisdictional Claims-Processing Rule and Reinforces Nexus Standards for Particular Social Group Claims Introduction In...
United States v. McCoy: The Tenth Circuit Clarifies “Incapacitation” and Cumulative-Circumstance Analysis under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)

United States v. McCoy: The Tenth Circuit Clarifies “Incapacitation” and Cumulative-Circumstance Analysis under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)

Date: Aug 18, 2025
United States v. McCoy: The Tenth Circuit Clarifies “Incapacitation” and Cumulative-Circumstance Analysis under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) Introduction United States v. McCoy, No. 25-6039 (10th Cir....
Clarifying the Evidentiary Burden for Asserting Lawful Permanent Resident Status in Removal Proceedings – Commentary on Dynza Mackey v. Attorney General (3d Cir. 2025)

Clarifying the Evidentiary Burden for Asserting Lawful Permanent Resident Status in Removal Proceedings – Commentary on Dynza Mackey v. Attorney General (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 18, 2025
Clarifying the Evidentiary Burden for Asserting Lawful Permanent Resident Status in Removal Proceedings – Commentary on Dynza Mackey v. Attorney General of the United States (3d Cir. 2025) 1....
“Taylor Post-Shinn Doctrine” – The Third Circuit Narrows Rule 60(b)(6) Habeas Relief and Clarifies ‘Reasonable Time’ Post-Martinez

“Taylor Post-Shinn Doctrine” – The Third Circuit Narrows Rule 60(b)(6) Habeas Relief and Clarifies ‘Reasonable Time’ Post-Martinez

Date: Aug 18, 2025
“Taylor Post-Shinn Doctrine” – The Third Circuit Narrows Rule 60(b)(6) Habeas Relief and Clarifies ‘Reasonable Time’ Post-Martinez Introduction In Paul Gamboa Taylor v. Commissioner of Pennsylvania...
Muniz v. United States (3d Cir. 2025): The Administrative-Remedy Bar to New Bivens Actions

Muniz v. United States (3d Cir. 2025): The Administrative-Remedy Bar to New Bivens Actions

Date: Aug 18, 2025
Muniz v. United States (3d Cir. 2025): The Administrative-Remedy Bar to New Bivens Actions 1. Introduction Rolando Muniz, a federal inmate, sought damages after an allegedly avoidable toe amputation...
Montiel Rubio v. Bondi: The Fifth Circuit Fortifies the “Voluntary-Return” Rule in Asylum, Withholding, and CAT Proceedings

Montiel Rubio v. Bondi: The Fifth Circuit Fortifies the “Voluntary-Return” Rule in Asylum, Withholding, and CAT Proceedings

Date: Aug 18, 2025
Montiel Rubio v. Bondi: The Fifth Circuit Fortifies the “Voluntary-Return” Rule in Asylum, Withholding, and CAT Proceedings Introduction In Montiel Rubio v. Bondi, decided 13 August 2025, the United...
Beyond the Sanctuary: Defining the Limits of Texas’s Religious-Services Clause on Public Lands

Beyond the Sanctuary: Defining the Limits of Texas’s Religious-Services Clause on Public Lands

Date: Aug 18, 2025
Beyond the Sanctuary: Defining the Limits of Texas’s Religious-Services Clause on Public Lands 1. Introduction Perez v. City of San Antonio, No. 23-50746 (5th Cir. Aug. 13, 2025) is a sweeping...
“Harmless” Guideline Miscalculations after United States v. Abercrombie: When a Clear Crime-of-Violence Error Is Not Plain Error Requiring Vacatur

“Harmless” Guideline Miscalculations after United States v. Abercrombie: When a Clear Crime-of-Violence Error Is Not Plain Error Requiring Vacatur

Date: Aug 18, 2025
“Harmless” Guideline Miscalculations after United States v. Abercrombie: Fifth Circuit Clarifies When Clear Crime–of–Violence Errors Do Not Satisfy the Plain-Error Standard Introduction The Fifth...
Seventh Circuit Clarifies the Post-Shinn Landscape: No Rhines Stay, No § 3599 Funding, and Limited Competency Stays When State Procedures Foreclose Relief

Seventh Circuit Clarifies the Post-Shinn Landscape: No Rhines Stay, No § 3599 Funding, and Limited Competency Stays When State Procedures Foreclose Relief

Date: Aug 18, 2025
Seventh Circuit Clarifies the Post-Shinn Landscape: No Rhines Stay, No § 3599 Funding, and Limited Competency Stays When State Procedures Foreclose Relief 1. Introduction Jeffrey Alan Weisheit,...
“Arguable Probable Cause” Solidified: Tentative Identifications, Qualified Immunity, and the Limits of Fabricated-Evidence Claims after Mack v. City of Chicago

“Arguable Probable Cause” Solidified: Tentative Identifications, Qualified Immunity, and the Limits of Fabricated-Evidence Claims after Mack v. City of Chicago

Date: Aug 18, 2025
“Arguable Probable Cause” Solidified: Tentative Identifications, Qualified Immunity, and the Limits of Fabricated-Evidence Claims after Mack v. City of Chicago I. Introduction The Seventh Circuit’s...
Reaffirming Stinson Deference: Career-Offender Status & Controlled-Substance Conspiracies after United States v. Deon Pugh

Reaffirming Stinson Deference: Career-Offender Status & Controlled-Substance Conspiracies after United States v. Deon Pugh

Date: Aug 18, 2025
Reaffirming Stinson Deference: Career-Offender Status & Controlled-Substance Conspiracies after United States v. Deon Pugh Introduction On 13 August 2025 the Seventh Circuit delivered a significant...
Reaffirming the Owens Doctrine: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Confrontation and Authentication Standards in United States v. Diaz

Reaffirming the Owens Doctrine: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Confrontation and Authentication Standards in United States v. Diaz

Date: Aug 18, 2025
Reaffirming the Owens Doctrine: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Confrontation and Authentication Standards in United States v. Diaz Introduction On 13 August 2025 the United States Court of Appeals for the...
“Beyond the Subpoena Power” – Seventh Circuit Defines Rule 15
            Unavailability and Clarifies Waiver of Confrontation Rights
            in United States v. Shawn Baldwin

“Beyond the Subpoena Power” – Seventh Circuit Defines Rule 15 Unavailability and Clarifies Waiver of Confrontation Rights in United States v. Shawn Baldwin

Date: Aug 18, 2025
“Beyond the Subpoena Power” – Seventh Circuit Defines Rule 15 Unavailability and Clarifies Waiver of Confrontation Rights Commentary on United States v. Shawn Baldwin, No. 21-2925 (7th Cir. 2025) 1....
Fourth Circuit Confirms Fifth-Amendment Right to Effective Retained Counsel in Removal Proceedings: Commentary on Sulma Guandique-De Romero v. Pamela Bondi

Fourth Circuit Confirms Fifth-Amendment Right to Effective Retained Counsel in Removal Proceedings: Commentary on Sulma Guandique-De Romero v. Pamela Bondi

Date: Aug 18, 2025
Fourth Circuit Confirms Fifth-Amendment Right to Effective Retained Counsel in Removal Proceedings (Sulma Guandique-De Romero v. Pamela Bondi, 24-1154, decided 13 Aug 2025) Introduction The published...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert