Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Fifth Circuit Rejects Cat’s Paw Liability for Municipalities Under Monell: Headcount Rule Governs §1981/§1983 Claims Against Multi‑Member Bodies Introduction In Jones v. City of Hutto, the United...
"Answer Only What Confuses the Jury": Fourth Circuit Upholds Concise, Accurate Judicial Responses to Deliberation Questions in United States v. Brito (Unpublished) Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for...
“Because of” Means But-For: Fourth Circuit Clarifies Causation for Federal Hate Crimes and Cabins Mental-Health Evidence Under the IDRA Introduction In United States v. Marian Hudak, the Fourth...
“Convicted Felon” Accusations Are Defamation Per Se; Party‑Opponent Statements in Affidavits Can Defeat Summary Judgment — Lewis v. Jolley (Wyo. 2025) Introduction In Brian C. Lewis v. Rebecca Lyn...
Partition in Kind Prevails: Montana Supreme Court Reaffirms Authority to Modify Referees’ Plans and Impose Reciprocal Easements under the UPHPA Introduction In Barce v. Filler (Supreme Court of...
“Public Repute” Means Community, Not Bureaucracy: Montana Supreme Court Reaffirms Common‑Law Marriage Even Where Partners Marked “Single” on Official Forms Introduction In Estate of Hudson, 2025 MT...
Reasonable Efforts Are Fact-Dependent and Need Not Be Herculean; ICPC Omission Alone Does Not Defeat Reunification Efforts: Montana Supreme Court Affirms Termination of Parental Rights in Matter of...
Reaffirmation That Guardianship Need Not Be Considered Once Statutory Grounds for Termination Are Met, and That the 15-of-22-Month Presumption Governs Best-Interest Analysis — Matter of P.M.L.O....
Montana Supreme Court Bars Compelled Two‑Way Video Appearance After Valid Waiver; Successive Commitment Petitions Not Barred by Preclusion — Matter of T.W. (2025 MT 225) Introduction In Matter of...
Nonprecedential Affirmance of HRC Retaliation Dismissals: Rebutted Presumption and Harmless Procedural Error Under MAPA Case: Vaccaro v. Three Forks Area Ambulance Service, 2025 MT 230N (Mont. Oct....
Post-Habeas Removal of Illegal Restitution Is Not a Resentencing: The Oral–Written Sentence Rule Does Not Apply — Woods v. Wead (Mont. 2025) Introduction In Woods v. Wead (Mont. Oct. 7, 2025), the...
Misaligned Debtor–Trustee Interests Preclude Res Judicata Against Chapter 7 Trustees; Claim Objections Under Rule 3007 Are Timely Absent Court-Set Deadlines Commentary on Myer's Lawn Care Services,...
Second Circuit Confirms Special-Needs Authority to Search a Parolee’s Cellphone, Distinguishing Riley When the Device Is Unauthorized Introduction In United States v. Smurphat (No. 24-1707, 2d Cir....
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies: Post-Representation Privacy Torts Are Outside Narrow Retainer Arbitration Clauses; “Confidential Arbitration” Is Not a Duty of Confidentiality Introduction In Janet L....
§ 46504 Requires Only General Intent: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms No Need to Prove Intent to Intimidate or to Interfere, and Clarifies that “Knowingly” Attaches to Conduct (United States v. Olvera)...
EEZ Equals “High Seas” for MDLEA; § 70502(d)(1)(C) Constitutional; No Nexus Requirement: Eleventh Circuit Summarily Affirms in United States v. Feyber De Avila (Consolidated) Introduction In a...
EEZ Counts as “High Seas,” MDLEA Needs No U.S. Nexus, and “Stateless Vessel” Definition Is Not Cabined by International Law: Eleventh Circuit’s Summary Affirmance in United States v. Santiago, De...
EEZs Are “High Seas” for Felonies Clause; MDLEA’s Stateless‑Vessel Definition Upheld; No Nexus Requirement Case: United States v. Wallyst Rochist Ulloa (consolidated with United States v. Ramon...
No Nexus for Intrafamilial Land Disputes: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Personal-Motive Bar and Treats Nexus as a Factual Finding in Asylum Claims Introduction In Masud Ahmed v. Pamela Bondi, the United...