Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Montana Case Commentaries

“Rebutting the Fit-Parent Presumption” – Grandchild Visitation of A.L.U. (2025 MT 131)

“Rebutting the Fit-Parent Presumption” – Grandchild Visitation of A.L.U. (2025 MT 131)

Date: Jun 25, 2025
“Rebutting the Fit-Parent Presumption” – Grandchild Visitation of A.L.U. (Supreme Court of Montana, 2025 MT 131) Introduction In In re the Grandparent–Grandchild Visitation of A.L.U., 2025 MT 131,...
Harris Estate v. Reilly: Montana Supreme Court Requires Sanctions for Last-Minute Voluntary Dismissals under Rule 41(a)(2)

Harris Estate v. Reilly: Montana Supreme Court Requires Sanctions for Last-Minute Voluntary Dismissals under Rule 41(a)(2)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Harris Estate v. Reilly: Montana Supreme Court Requires Sanctions for Last-Minute Voluntary Dismissals under Rule 41(a)(2) Introduction In Estate of William Harris III v. Reilly, 2025 MT 126, the...
Knudsen v. University of Montana: 2025 MT 125 – Clarifying the Use of Regulatory Compliance Experts and the Scope of a University’s Fiduciary Duty

Knudsen v. University of Montana: 2025 MT 125 – Clarifying the Use of Regulatory Compliance Experts and the Scope of a University’s Fiduciary Duty

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Knudsen v. University of Montana: 2025 MT 125 – Clarifying the Use of Regulatory Compliance Experts and the Scope of a University’s Fiduciary Duty 1. Introduction Knudsen v. University of Montana...
Caldwell v. Caldwell: Judicial Duty to Verify Property Valuations Despite Parties’ Settlement Agreements

Caldwell v. Caldwell: Judicial Duty to Verify Property Valuations Despite Parties’ Settlement Agreements

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Caldwell v. Caldwell: Judicial Duty to Verify Property Valuations Despite Parties’ Settlement Agreements 1. Introduction In Marriage of: Caldwell, 2025 MT 127N, the Supreme Court of Montana addressed...
“Similar Means Similar”:  The Majority-Outcome Test for Out-of-State DUI Enhancements after State v. Lapointe

“Similar Means Similar”: The Majority-Outcome Test for Out-of-State DUI Enhancements after State v. Lapointe

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“Similar Means Similar”: The Majority-Outcome Test for Out-of-State DUI Enhancements after State v. Lapointe Introduction In State v. C. Lapointe, 2025 MT 124, the Supreme Court of Montana confronted...
Forcible-Felony Instruction as a De Facto “Defense-of-Others” Charge: Commentary on State v. C. Rossbach (2025)

Forcible-Felony Instruction as a De Facto “Defense-of-Others” Charge: Commentary on State v. C. Rossbach (2025)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Forcible-Felony Instruction as a De Facto “Defense-of-Others” Charge: A Comprehensive Commentary on State v. C. Rossbach, 2025 MT 128N Introduction State v. Cavey Little Rossbach, 2025 MT 128N, is a...
“Evasive-Driving Particularized Suspicion” – A Commentary on State v. H. Herzog (2025 MT 123)

“Evasive-Driving Particularized Suspicion” – A Commentary on State v. H. Herzog (2025 MT 123)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“Evasive-Driving Particularized Suspicion”: The Montana Supreme Court’s Refinement of Reasonable Suspicion in State v. Halie Maria Herzog 1. Introduction On 17 June 2025 the Supreme Court of Montana...
State v. Hunt (2025): Prosecutorial “Door-Opening” Limits Re-affirmed and Particularized Suspicion Refined

State v. Hunt (2025): Prosecutorial “Door-Opening” Limits Re-affirmed and Particularized Suspicion Refined

Date: Jun 20, 2025
State v. Hunt (2025 MT 122): Prosecutorial “Door-Opening” Limits Re-affirmed and Particularized Suspicion Refined Introduction The Supreme Court of Montana’s decision in State v. Nicole Lee Hunt,...
“Reaffirming Armstrong”: Montana’s Supreme Court Confirms Viability-Based Abortion Protection and Strict-Scrutiny Review Under the State Privacy Clause

“Reaffirming Armstrong”: Montana’s Supreme Court Confirms Viability-Based Abortion Protection and Strict-Scrutiny Review Under the State Privacy Clause

Date: Jun 11, 2025
“Reaffirming Armstrong” Montana’s Supreme Court Confirms Viability-Based Abortion Protection and Strict-Scrutiny Review Under the State Privacy Clause 1. Introduction On 9 June 2025 the Supreme Court...
Clarifying Maintenance Expenditures under §25-13-802: Exclusion of Personal Property Cleanup Costs in Redemption Actions

Clarifying Maintenance Expenditures under §25-13-802: Exclusion of Personal Property Cleanup Costs in Redemption Actions

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Clarifying Maintenance Expenditures under §25-13-802: Exclusion of Personal Property Cleanup Costs in Redemption Actions Introduction This memorandum opinion arises from a long-running feud over a...
Compelling Administrative Action: Mandamus to Enforce Board’s Duty to Review Petroleum Tank Cleanup Claims

Compelling Administrative Action: Mandamus to Enforce Board’s Duty to Review Petroleum Tank Cleanup Claims

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Compelling Administrative Action: Mandamus to Enforce Board’s Duty to Review Petroleum Tank Cleanup Claims Introduction Cascade County v. Montana Petroleum Tank Release Compensation Board (2025 MT...
Estate of Neal v. 8th Jud Dist Ct: Limiting Probate Notice to “Good Cause” under § 72-1-301(2), MCA

Estate of Neal v. 8th Jud Dist Ct: Limiting Probate Notice to “Good Cause” under § 72-1-301(2), MCA

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Estate of Neal v. Eighth Judicial District Court: Limiting Probate Notice to “Good Cause” under § 72-1-301(2), MCA Introduction In Estate of Neal v. Eighth Judicial District Court, 2025 MT __, the...
Defining Supervisory Control: Limits and Criteria in Montana Appellate Procedure

Defining Supervisory Control: Limits and Criteria in Montana Appellate Procedure

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Defining Supervisory Control: Limits and Criteria in Montana Appellate Procedure Introduction This commentary examines the Supreme Court of Montana’s Order in Jing v. 13th Judicial District Court, OP...
Independent Termination of Parental Rights Under MCA §41-3-609

Independent Termination of Parental Rights Under MCA §41-3-609

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Independent Termination of Parental Rights Under MCA §41-3-609 Introduction This commentary examines the Supreme Court of Montana’s decision in Matter of B.J.B., YINC (2025 MT 116), which clarifies...
Affirmation of Active Efforts and Good Cause Deviation Under the Indian Child Welfare Act in Matter of P.E.W.

Affirmation of Active Efforts and Good Cause Deviation Under the Indian Child Welfare Act in Matter of P.E.W.

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Affirmation of Active Efforts and Good Cause Deviation Under the Indian Child Welfare Act in Matter of P.E.W., YINC (2025 MT 114) Introduction Matter of P.E.W., decided by the Supreme Court of...
No Duty to “Catch” Skiers Beyond MSRA’s Inherent Risks — Mullee v. Winter Sports, Inc.

No Duty to “Catch” Skiers Beyond MSRA’s Inherent Risks — Mullee v. Winter Sports, Inc.

Date: Jun 10, 2025
No Duty to “Catch” Skiers Beyond MSRA’s Inherent Risks Introduction Mullee v. Winter Sports, Inc., 2025 MT 113, is a Supreme Court of Montana decision clarifying the limits of a ski operator’s...
Limitations on Pretrial Credit and Evidence-Tampering Conspiracy in Prison Escape Cases

Limitations on Pretrial Credit and Evidence-Tampering Conspiracy in Prison Escape Cases

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Limitations on Pretrial Credit and Evidence-Tampering Conspiracy in Prison Escape Cases Introduction State of Montana v. Darren Charles DeMarie (2025 MT 115) arises from a bench trial in Powell...
Clarifying the Elements and Limits of Intimidation: State v. T. Dellar

Clarifying the Elements and Limits of Intimidation: State v. T. Dellar

Date: May 28, 2025
Clarifying the Elements and Limits of Intimidation: State v. T. Dellar Introduction State of Montana v. Tommy Jonathan Seth Dellar, decided May 27, 2025, by the Supreme Court of Montana, establishes...
Application of the Plain View Doctrine to Flashlight‐Illuminated Vehicle Searches and Multiple UPIS Convictions

Application of the Plain View Doctrine to Flashlight‐Illuminated Vehicle Searches and Multiple UPIS Convictions

Date: May 28, 2025
Application of the Plain View Doctrine to Flashlight‐Illuminated Vehicle Searches and Multiple UPIS Convictions Introduction State v. Roberts, 2025 MT 110 (Mont. 2025), presents two interrelated...
Automatic Dismissal of Youth Court Petitions under M. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1) and Supervisory Control Authority

Automatic Dismissal of Youth Court Petitions under M. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1) and Supervisory Control Authority

Date: May 28, 2025
Automatic Dismissal of Youth Court Petitions under M. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1) and Supervisory Control Authority Introduction This commentary examines the Supreme Court of Montana’s decision in Z.M.L. v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert