Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Michigan Case Commentaries

Clarifying the “Compelling Reason” Standard for Psychological Examinations of Complainants

Clarifying the “Compelling Reason” Standard for Psychological Examinations of Complainants

Date: May 10, 2025
Clarifying the “Compelling Reason” Standard for Psychological Examinations of Complainants 1. Introduction In People of the State of Michigan v. Jason Lee Fedewa (Sup. Ct. Mich., May 9, 2025), the...
No Clarification of the “Compelling Reason” Standard to Compel Complainant Psychological Exams; Cavanagh, C.J., Dissent Urges Doctor-Recommended MMPI as Adequate Nexus

No Clarification of the “Compelling Reason” Standard to Compel Complainant Psychological Exams; Cavanagh, C.J., Dissent Urges Doctor-Recommended MMPI as Adequate Nexus

Date: May 10, 2025
No Clarification of the “Compelling Reason” Standard to Compel Complainant Psychological Exams; Cavanagh, C.J., Dissent Urges Doctor-Recommended MMPI as Adequate Nexus Introduction This commentary...
As-Is Clauses and Mutual Mistake in Property Settlements: Title vs. Physical Condition

As-Is Clauses and Mutual Mistake in Property Settlements: Title vs. Physical Condition

Date: May 10, 2025
As-Is Clauses and Mutual Mistake in Property Settlements: Title vs. Physical Condition Introduction In Soho Land Development, Inc. v. Oakland County Treasurer, Michigan Supreme Court No. 168022 (May...
No larceny-by-conversion for contractor deposits absent specific earmarking or trust: People v. Clinton (Mich. 2025)

No larceny-by-conversion for contractor deposits absent specific earmarking or trust: People v. Clinton (Mich. 2025)

Date: May 8, 2025
No larceny-by-conversion for contractor deposits absent specific earmarking or trust: People v. Clinton (Mich. 2025) Introduction In People of the State of Michigan v. Christopher Robert Clinton, the...
Clarification of Larceny by Conversion in Construction Deposits: Title and Possession Principles

Clarification of Larceny by Conversion in Construction Deposits: Title and Possession Principles

Date: May 8, 2025
Clarification of Larceny by Conversion in Construction Deposits: Title and Possession Principles Introduction This commentary examines the Michigan Supreme Court’s decision in People of the State of...
Ensuring Reliability in CSAAS-Based Expert Testimony: Daubert Compliance under MRE 702

Ensuring Reliability in CSAAS-Based Expert Testimony: Daubert Compliance under MRE 702

Date: May 3, 2025
Ensuring Reliability in CSAAS-Based Expert Testimony: Daubert Compliance under MRE 702 Introduction The Michigan Supreme Court’s May 2, 2025 order in People of the State of Michigan v. Juan Jose Del...
Ensuring Voluntary Admissions in Child Protective Plea Hearings: Obligatory Record Completeness and Advisements

Ensuring Voluntary Admissions in Child Protective Plea Hearings: Obligatory Record Completeness and Advisements

Date: May 3, 2025
Ensuring Voluntary Admissions in Child Protective Plea Hearings: Obligatory Record Completeness and Advisements Introduction In the matter In re T. Hewitt, Minor, the Michigan Supreme Court, by a...
Reaffirming Ferranti: Plea Colloquies Must Be Knowing, Voluntary, and Accurately Recorded—Heightened Scrutiny Where Domestic Violence May Influence a Parent’s Admission (In re T. Hewitt, Mich. 2025)

Reaffirming Ferranti: Plea Colloquies Must Be Knowing, Voluntary, and Accurately Recorded—Heightened Scrutiny Where Domestic Violence May Influence a Parent’s Admission (In re T. Hewitt, Mich. 2025)

Date: May 3, 2025
Reaffirming Ferranti: Plea Colloquies Must Be Knowing, Voluntary, and Accurately Recorded—Heightened Scrutiny Where Domestic Violence May Influence a Parent’s Admission (In re T. Hewitt, Mich. 2025)...
Del Cid: Concurring Opinion Signals No Per Se Admissibility of CSAAS‑Type Testimony Under MRE 702

Del Cid: Concurring Opinion Signals No Per Se Admissibility of CSAAS‑Type Testimony Under MRE 702

Date: May 3, 2025
Del Cid: Concurring Opinion Signals No Per Se Admissibility of CSAAS‑Type Testimony Under MRE 702 Introduction In People of the State of Michigan v. Juan Jose Del Cid, the Michigan Supreme Court...
Inclusion of Common Law within “Law” under Michigan’s Whistleblowers’ Protection Act

Inclusion of Common Law within “Law” under Michigan’s Whistleblowers’ Protection Act

Date: Apr 15, 2025
Inclusion of Common Law within “Law” under Michigan’s Whistleblowers’ Protection Act 1. Introduction This commentary examines the Supreme Court of Michigan’s decision in James Stefanski v. Saginaw...
Clarifying “Able to Provide Support” in Michigan Child‐Protective Jurisdiction under MCL 712A.2(b)

Clarifying “Able to Provide Support” in Michigan Child‐Protective Jurisdiction under MCL 712A.2(b)

Date: Apr 15, 2025
Clarifying “Able to Provide Support” in Michigan Child‐Protective Jurisdiction under MCL 712A.2(b) 1. Introduction In In re D. V. Lange, Minor (Mich 2025), the Michigan Supreme Court resolved a...
Extension of Parks: Individualized Sentencing Required Before LWOP for 19- and 20-Year-Old First-Degree Murderers

Extension of Parks: Individualized Sentencing Required Before LWOP for 19- and 20-Year-Old First-Degree Murderers

Date: Apr 11, 2025
Extension of Parks: Individualized Sentencing Required Before LWOP for 19- and 20-Year-Old First-Degree Murderers Introduction This commentary examines the Michigan Supreme Court’s April 10, 2025...
Extension of Proportionality Protections: Individualized LWOP Sentencing for 19- and 20-Year-Old First-Degree Murder Offenders

Extension of Proportionality Protections: Individualized LWOP Sentencing for 19- and 20-Year-Old First-Degree Murder Offenders

Date: Apr 11, 2025
Extension of Proportionality Protections: Individualized LWOP Sentencing for 19- and 20-Year-Old First-Degree Murder Offenders Introduction In People of Michigan v. Montario Marquise Taylor and...
Proportionality-Based Prohibition of Mandatory Life-Without-Parole for 19- and 20-Year-Old First-Degree Murder Defendants

Proportionality-Based Prohibition of Mandatory Life-Without-Parole for 19- and 20-Year-Old First-Degree Murder Defendants

Date: Apr 11, 2025
Proportionality-Based Prohibition of Mandatory Life-Without-Parole for 19- and 20-Year-Old First-Degree Murder Defendants Introduction In People v Taylor and People v Czarnecki, the Michigan Supreme...
Extending Proportionality and Individualized Sentencing to 19- and 20-Year-Old First-Degree Murderers

Extending Proportionality and Individualized Sentencing to 19- and 20-Year-Old First-Degree Murderers

Date: Apr 11, 2025
Extending Proportionality and Individualized Sentencing to 19- and 20-Year-Old First-Degree Murderers Introduction The cases People v. Czarnecki (Docket No. 166654) and People v. Taylor (Docket No....
No Garnishment for Insurer Bad-Faith Claims: Michigan Supreme Court Confines Garnishment to MCR 3.101(G)(1) and Disapproves Rutter v King

No Garnishment for Insurer Bad-Faith Claims: Michigan Supreme Court Confines Garnishment to MCR 3.101(G)(1) and Disapproves Rutter v King

Date: Apr 5, 2025
No Garnishment for Insurer Bad-Faith Claims: Michigan Supreme Court Confines Garnishment to MCR 3.101(G)(1) and Disapproves Rutter v King Introduction In Darnell Hairston v. Josh LKU, Zeeland Farm...
Liquidation Requirement for Garnishment: Bad-Faith Refusal to Settle Claims Cannot Be Garnisheed

Liquidation Requirement for Garnishment: Bad-Faith Refusal to Settle Claims Cannot Be Garnisheed

Date: Apr 5, 2025
Liquidation Requirement for Garnishment: Bad-Faith Refusal to Settle Claims Cannot Be Garnisheed Introduction Hairston v. LKU, 166473 (Mich. 2025), presents a dispute over whether an unresolved claim...
Odor of Marijuana Is a Factor—but Not Probable Cause—for Vehicle Searches in Michigan: People v. Armstrong

Odor of Marijuana Is a Factor—but Not Probable Cause—for Vehicle Searches in Michigan: People v. Armstrong

Date: Apr 3, 2025
Odor of Marijuana Is a Factor—but Not Probable Cause—for Vehicle Searches in Michigan: People v. Armstrong Introduction In People of Michigan v. Jeffery Scott Armstrong, the Michigan Supreme Court...
No Retroactive Tolling of the One‑Year‑Back Rule: Michigan Supreme Court Limits MCL 500.3145(3) to PIP Claims Accruing After June 11, 2019

No Retroactive Tolling of the One‑Year‑Back Rule: Michigan Supreme Court Limits MCL 500.3145(3) to PIP Claims Accruing After June 11, 2019

Date: Apr 2, 2025
No Retroactive Tolling of the One‑Year‑Back Rule: Michigan Supreme Court Limits MCL 500.3145(3) to PIP Claims Accruing After June 11, 2019 Case: Spine Specialists of Michigan, P.C. v. MemberSelect...
Parks Goes Retroactive: Michigan Overrules Carp and Makes Mandatory LWOP for 18‑Year‑Olds Unconstitutional on Collateral Review

Parks Goes Retroactive: Michigan Overrules Carp and Makes Mandatory LWOP for 18‑Year‑Olds Unconstitutional on Collateral Review

Date: Apr 2, 2025
Parks Goes Retroactive: Michigan Overrules Carp and Makes Mandatory LWOP for 18‑Year‑Olds Unconstitutional on Collateral Review Case: People of Michigan v. John Antonio Poole Court: Supreme Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert