Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Michigan Case Commentaries

Certification Is Not a Vehicle to Revisit Settled Law: Michigan Supreme Court Declines to Answer Federal Certified Question on the Medical-Malpractice Damages Cap

Certification Is Not a Vehicle to Revisit Settled Law: Michigan Supreme Court Declines to Answer Federal Certified Question on the Medical-Malpractice Damages Cap

Date: Jul 4, 2025
Certification Is Not a Vehicle to Revisit Settled Law: Michigan Supreme Court Declines to Answer Federal Certified Question on the Medical-Malpractice Damages Cap Introduction This commentary...
Cumulative Conveyances Trigger Uncapping: Michigan Supreme Court Endorses Gross-Transfer Counting for Entity-Owned Property Under MCL 211.27a(6)(h)

Cumulative Conveyances Trigger Uncapping: Michigan Supreme Court Endorses Gross-Transfer Counting for Entity-Owned Property Under MCL 211.27a(6)(h)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Cumulative Conveyances Trigger Uncapping: Michigan Supreme Court Endorses Gross-Transfer Counting for Entity-Owned Property Under MCL 211.27a(6)(h) Introduction In Resort Properties Co-Operative v....
Policies Issued After June 11, 2019 Must Step Up to $250,000/$500,000 Bodily Injury Minimums After July 1, 2020: The Michigan Supreme Court’s Textual Re-Reading of MCL 500.3009 in Bonter v. Progressive

Policies Issued After June 11, 2019 Must Step Up to $250,000/$500,000 Bodily Injury Minimums After July 1, 2020: The Michigan Supreme Court’s Textual Re-Reading of MCL 500.3009 in Bonter v. Progressive

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Policies Issued After June 11, 2019 Must Step Up to $250,000/$500,000 Bodily Injury Minimums After July 1, 2020: The Michigan Supreme Court’s Textual Re-Reading of MCL 500.3009 in Bonter v....
Michigan Narrows Election-Interference Statute to Intentional Falsehoods About Voting Requirements or Procedures; Denial of Leave Leaves “Vote-by-Mail” as a Covered Procedure

Michigan Narrows Election-Interference Statute to Intentional Falsehoods About Voting Requirements or Procedures; Denial of Leave Leaves “Vote-by-Mail” as a Covered Procedure

Date: Jun 28, 2025
Michigan Narrows Election-Interference Statute to Intentional Falsehoods About Voting Requirements or Procedures; Denial of Leave Leaves “Vote-by-Mail” as a Covered Procedure Introduction This...
Refining Electoral Speech Crimes: The Michigan Supreme Court’s Narrow Construction of MCL 168.932(a) and Its Unsettled First-Amendment Boundaries

Refining Electoral Speech Crimes: The Michigan Supreme Court’s Narrow Construction of MCL 168.932(a) and Its Unsettled First-Amendment Boundaries

Date: Jun 28, 2025
Refining Electoral Speech Crimes: The Michigan Supreme Court’s Narrow Construction of MCL 168.932(a) and Its Unsettled First-Amendment Boundaries 1. Introduction The consolidated matters of People of...
Within-Guidelines Sentences Are Not Inherently Reasonable: Welch, J., Urges Limits on Speculative Conduct and a Meaningful Proportionality Review in People v. McSorley

Within-Guidelines Sentences Are Not Inherently Reasonable: Welch, J., Urges Limits on Speculative Conduct and a Meaningful Proportionality Review in People v. McSorley

Date: Jun 21, 2025
Within-Guidelines Sentences Are Not Inherently Reasonable: Welch, J., Urges Limits on Speculative Conduct and a Meaningful Proportionality Review in People v. McSorley Introduction In People of...

        Posey Has Teeth: Substantive Unreasonableness and the Limits of the “Presumption of Proportionality” for
        Within-Guidelines Sentences – Comment on People v. McSorley

Posey Has Teeth: Substantive Unreasonableness and the Limits of the “Presumption of Proportionality” for Within-Guidelines Sentences – Comment on People v. McSorley

Date: Jun 21, 2025
Posey Has Teeth: Substantive Unreasonableness and the Limits of the “Presumption of Proportionality” for Within-Guidelines Sentences – Comment on People of Michigan v. Troy Cameron McSorley 1....
McDuffie-Connor v. Neal: Post-Accident Mechanical Findings as Evidence & the Re-Empowered Role of the Fact-Finder in Michigan Negligence Litigation

McDuffie-Connor v. Neal: Post-Accident Mechanical Findings as Evidence & the Re-Empowered Role of the Fact-Finder in Michigan Negligence Litigation

Date: Jun 18, 2025
McDuffie-Connor v. Neal: Post-Accident Mechanical Findings as Evidence & the Re-Empowered Role of the Fact-Finder in Michigan Negligence Litigation 1. Introduction In Estate of William Howard...
Embedded Objects as Sidewalk Defects: Kenneth Mann v. City of Detroit and the Expansion of Municipal Liability under MCL 691.1402a

Embedded Objects as Sidewalk Defects: Kenneth Mann v. City of Detroit and the Expansion of Municipal Liability under MCL 691.1402a

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Embedded Objects as Sidewalk Defects: Kenneth Mann v. City of Detroit (Mich. 2025) Introduction In Kenneth Mann v. City of Detroit, the Michigan Supreme Court addressed whether a metal sign-post stub...
Executive Impoundment Triggers UBAA Accrual; Ordinance-Based Funding for Independent Counsel Is “Permitted by Law”

Executive Impoundment Triggers UBAA Accrual; Ordinance-Based Funding for Independent Counsel Is “Permitted by Law”

Date: Jun 17, 2025
Executive Impoundment Triggers UBAA Accrual; Ordinance-Based Funding for Independent Counsel Is “Permitted by Law” Introduction In Macomb County Prosecutor v. Macomb County Executive, the Michigan...
“Law” Includes Local Ordinances: The Michigan Supreme Court’s Re-calibration of County Separation-of-Powers in Hackel v. Macomb County Board of Commissioners

“Law” Includes Local Ordinances: The Michigan Supreme Court’s Re-calibration of County Separation-of-Powers in Hackel v. Macomb County Board of Commissioners

Date: Jun 17, 2025
“Law” Includes Local Ordinances: The Michigan Supreme Court’s Re-calibration of County Separation-of-Powers in Hackel v. Macomb County Board of Commissioners Introduction In Mark A. Hackel v. Macomb...
County Charter Ordinances as “Law” for Independent Counsel & the 60-Day UBAA Clock: Commentary on Macomb County Prosecutor v. Macomb County Executive (2025)

County Charter Ordinances as “Law” for Independent Counsel & the 60-Day UBAA Clock: Commentary on Macomb County Prosecutor v. Macomb County Executive (2025)

Date: Jun 17, 2025
County Charter Ordinances as “Law” Authorizing Independent Counsel & the Trigger of the 60-Day UBAA Suit Period: An In-Depth Commentary on Macomb County Prosecutor v. Macomb County Executive (Mich....
Post‑Crash Equipment Evidence Can Defeat Summary Disposition; Spoliation Sanctions Require Explicit Findings on Materiality and Pre‑Suit Preservation Duty

Post‑Crash Equipment Evidence Can Defeat Summary Disposition; Spoliation Sanctions Require Explicit Findings on Materiality and Pre‑Suit Preservation Duty

Date: Jun 12, 2025
Post‑Crash Equipment Evidence Can Defeat Summary Disposition; Spoliation Sanctions Require Explicit Findings on Materiality and Pre‑Suit Preservation Duty Introduction This commentary examines the...
Embedded Objects as “Defects in the Sidewalk”: Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies MCL 691.1402a in Mann v. City of Detroit

Embedded Objects as “Defects in the Sidewalk”: Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies MCL 691.1402a in Mann v. City of Detroit

Date: Jun 12, 2025
Embedded Objects as “Defects in the Sidewalk”: Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies MCL 691.1402a in Mann v. City of Detroit Case: Kenneth Mann v. City of Detroit Court: Michigan Supreme Court Date: June...
Fraudulent Concealment by Unnecessary Surgery — A New Reading Emerge in Woodford v. Castro

Fraudulent Concealment by Unnecessary Surgery — A New Reading Emerge in Woodford v. Castro

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Fraudulent Concealment by Unnecessary Surgery — A New Reading Emerge in Woodford v. Castro 1. Introduction This commentary analyses the Michigan Supreme Court’s order in Tracie Woodford v. Dan J....
No Separate Post-Treatment Concealment, No Tolling: Fraudulent-Concealment Tolling Narrowly Applied in Michigan Medical Malpractice After Woodford v. Castro

No Separate Post-Treatment Concealment, No Tolling: Fraudulent-Concealment Tolling Narrowly Applied in Michigan Medical Malpractice After Woodford v. Castro

Date: Jun 7, 2025
No Separate Post-Treatment Concealment, No Tolling: Fraudulent-Concealment Tolling Narrowly Applied in Michigan Medical Malpractice After Woodford v. Castro Introduction This commentary analyzes the...
Discretion to Apply Former Court Rules Under MCR 1.102: Reinstating Case-Evaluation Sanctions

Discretion to Apply Former Court Rules Under MCR 1.102: Reinstating Case-Evaluation Sanctions

Date: May 28, 2025
Discretion to Apply Former Court Rules Under MCR 1.102: Reinstating Case-Evaluation Sanctions Introduction In Giorgio Webster v. Dr. Jeffrey Osguthorpe, the Michigan Supreme Court addressed whether a...
Sherrill: Proper Burden Allocation in Plain-Error Review of Unpreserved Public-Trial Right Claims

Sherrill: Proper Burden Allocation in Plain-Error Review of Unpreserved Public-Trial Right Claims

Date: May 17, 2025
Sherrill: Proper Burden Allocation in Plain-Error Review of Unpreserved Public-Trial Right Claims Introduction In People of the State of Michigan v. Allen Michael Sherrill (SC: 167769; May 16, 2025),...
Reaffirming Davis: Prosecutor Bears the Burden to Rebut Serious-Effect Presumption in Forfeited Public-Trial Claims

Reaffirming Davis: Prosecutor Bears the Burden to Rebut Serious-Effect Presumption in Forfeited Public-Trial Claims

Date: May 17, 2025
Reaffirming Davis: Prosecutor Bears the Burden to Rebut Serious-Effect Presumption in Forfeited Public-Trial Claims Introduction In People of Michigan v. Allen Michael Sherrill, the Michigan Supreme...
“As‑Is” Disclaimers Do Not Shift the Risk of Unknown Title Nonexistence: Mutual Mistake and Rescission After Condominium Reversion under MCL 559.167

“As‑Is” Disclaimers Do Not Shift the Risk of Unknown Title Nonexistence: Mutual Mistake and Rescission After Condominium Reversion under MCL 559.167

Date: May 10, 2025
“As‑Is” Disclaimers Do Not Shift the Risk of Unknown Title Nonexistence: Mutual Mistake and Rescission After Condominium Reversion under MCL 559.167 Introduction In Soho Land Development, Inc. v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert