Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Occasion Means More Than Time Stamps: Third Circuit Vacates §4B1.5(b) Pattern Enhancement and Remands to Assess Whether a Prior Assault Was a Separate Occasion

Occasion Means More Than Time Stamps: Third Circuit Vacates §4B1.5(b) Pattern Enhancement and Remands to Assess Whether a Prior Assault Was a Separate Occasion

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Occasion Means More Than Time Stamps: Third Circuit Vacates §4B1.5(b) Pattern Enhancement and Remands to Assess Whether a Prior Assault Was a Separate Occasion Case: United States v. Jeffrey Colin...
Hybrid Restitution Under the MVRA: Third Circuit Endorses Flexible Crediting and Rejects Blanket “Sheets” Rule in United States v. Shvets

Hybrid Restitution Under the MVRA: Third Circuit Endorses Flexible Crediting and Rejects Blanket “Sheets” Rule in United States v. Shvets

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Hybrid Restitution Under the MVRA: Third Circuit Endorses Flexible Crediting and Rejects Blanket “Sheets” Rule in United States v. Shvets Introduction In United States v. Natalya Shvets, the Third...
When Parties Waive Appeals, Even Erroneous Sealing Orders Stand: Third Circuit Holds Indefinite Post‑Judgment Sealing Orders Are Final Collateral Orders but Unreviewable by a Waiving Party

When Parties Waive Appeals, Even Erroneous Sealing Orders Stand: Third Circuit Holds Indefinite Post‑Judgment Sealing Orders Are Final Collateral Orders but Unreviewable by a Waiving Party

Date: Sep 28, 2025
When Parties Waive Appeals, Even Erroneous Sealing Orders Stand: The Third Circuit Confirms Indefinite Post‑Judgment Sealing Orders Are Final Collateral Orders but Unreviewable by a Waiving Party...
Reaffirming Sovereign and Judicial Immunity and Plausibility Pleading in Domestic‑Relations–Adjunct RICO/§ 1983 Suits: Fake v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (3d Cir. 2025)

Reaffirming Sovereign and Judicial Immunity and Plausibility Pleading in Domestic‑Relations–Adjunct RICO/§ 1983 Suits: Fake v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 28, 2025
Reaffirming Sovereign and Judicial Immunity and Plausibility Pleading in Domestic‑Relations–Adjunct RICO/§ 1983 Suits: Fake v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (3d Cir. 2025) Note: This Third Circuit...
Post-Deprivation Prison Grievance Procedures Satisfy Due Process for Temporarily Withheld Inmate Funds; Supervisory Liability Requires Personal Involvement, Not Grievance Denials (Bell v. Superintendent Benner Township SCI)

Post-Deprivation Prison Grievance Procedures Satisfy Due Process for Temporarily Withheld Inmate Funds; Supervisory Liability Requires Personal Involvement, Not Grievance Denials (Bell v. Superintendent Benner Township SCI)

Date: Sep 28, 2025
Post-Deprivation Prison Grievance Procedures Satisfy Due Process for Temporarily Withheld Inmate Funds; Supervisory Liability Requires Personal Involvement, Not Grievance Denials Introduction This...
Actual Fraud or Nothing: Market-Tested Sale Findings and Appellate Record Limits Defeat § 1144 Revocation in Virgin Orbit

Actual Fraud or Nothing: Market-Tested Sale Findings and Appellate Record Limits Defeat § 1144 Revocation in Virgin Orbit

Date: Sep 28, 2025
Actual Fraud or Nothing: Market-Tested Sale Findings and Appellate Record Limits Defeat § 1144 Revocation in Virgin Orbit Introduction This commentary analyzes the Third Circuit’s non-precedential...
CAFA Amount in Controversy Fixed at Filing—Even If Federal Claims Are Later Dismissed; Third Circuit Reaffirms Panzarella’s “Use” Requirement for TCPA ATDS Liability

CAFA Amount in Controversy Fixed at Filing—Even If Federal Claims Are Later Dismissed; Third Circuit Reaffirms Panzarella’s “Use” Requirement for TCPA ATDS Liability

Date: Sep 28, 2025
CAFA Amount in Controversy Fixed at Filing—Even If Federal Claims Are Later Dismissed; Third Circuit Reaffirms Panzarella’s “Use” Requirement for TCPA ATDS Liability Introduction In Michael Anthony...
No Continuing Violation for FDCPA Suits Based on Debt-Collection Litigation; Post-Complaint Filings Do Not Restart the One-Year Clock

No Continuing Violation for FDCPA Suits Based on Debt-Collection Litigation; Post-Complaint Filings Do Not Restart the One-Year Clock

Date: Sep 27, 2025
No Continuing Violation for FDCPA Suits Based on Debt-Collection Litigation; Post-Complaint Filings Do Not Restart the One-Year Clock Case: Helisha Moore v. Cohn, Lifland, Pearlman, Hermann & Knoph...
No Exhaustion Without Sworn Proof: Third Circuit Reinforces Declaration Requirement in PLRA Disputes (Payne v. Gourley)

No Exhaustion Without Sworn Proof: Third Circuit Reinforces Declaration Requirement in PLRA Disputes (Payne v. Gourley)

Date: Sep 26, 2025
No Exhaustion Without Sworn Proof: Third Circuit Reinforces Declaration Requirement in PLRA Disputes Commentary on Payne v. Gourley, No. 25-1765 (3d Cir. Sept. 24, 2025) (nonprecedential)...
Acceptance of Responsibility Cannot Be Denied Based Solely on Pre‑Notice Arrest Conduct: Third Circuit Vacates Sentence in United States v. Guerrero Grimaldos

Acceptance of Responsibility Cannot Be Denied Based Solely on Pre‑Notice Arrest Conduct: Third Circuit Vacates Sentence in United States v. Guerrero Grimaldos

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Acceptance of Responsibility Cannot Be Denied Based Solely on Pre‑Notice Arrest Conduct: Third Circuit Vacates Sentence in United States v. Guerrero Grimaldos Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the...
Third Circuit: Rule 11 Reaches Attached “Dispute Letters” and Removed Complaints; Inherent-Power Sanctions Extend to Prelitigation Schemes to Manufacture FDCPA Claims

Third Circuit: Rule 11 Reaches Attached “Dispute Letters” and Removed Complaints; Inherent-Power Sanctions Extend to Prelitigation Schemes to Manufacture FDCPA Claims

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Third Circuit: Rule 11 Reaches Attached “Dispute Letters” and Removed Complaints; Inherent-Power Sanctions Extend to Prelitigation Schemes to Manufacture FDCPA Claims Introduction In a precedential...
No State-Created Danger Without Direct But-For Causation: Third Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment and Tightens Rule 56(d) Discovery in Estate of Lagano v. BCPO

No State-Created Danger Without Direct But-For Causation: Third Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment and Tightens Rule 56(d) Discovery in Estate of Lagano v. BCPO

Date: Sep 25, 2025
No State-Created Danger Without Direct But-For Causation: Third Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment and Tightens Rule 56(d) Discovery in Estate of Lagano v. BCPO Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the...
Reaffirming Divisibility by Drug Identity: The Third Circuit Holds Pennsylvania PWID Remains a Controlled-Substance “Element” Offense for INA Removability

Reaffirming Divisibility by Drug Identity: The Third Circuit Holds Pennsylvania PWID Remains a Controlled-Substance “Element” Offense for INA Removability

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Reaffirming Divisibility by Drug Identity: The Third Circuit Holds Pennsylvania PWID Remains a Controlled-Substance “Element” Offense for INA Removability Introduction In Jose Miguel German Santos v....
Liberal Construction of Notices of Appeal and Qualified Immunity for Executing Facially Valid Warrants: Commentary on Pinkney v. Meadville

Liberal Construction of Notices of Appeal and Qualified Immunity for Executing Facially Valid Warrants: Commentary on Pinkney v. Meadville

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Liberal Construction of Notices of Appeal and Qualified Immunity for Executing Facially Valid Warrants: Commentary on Pinkney v. Meadville Note: This Third Circuit disposition is designated not...
Rule 11 Reaches Attached Pre‑Suit Letters and Post‑Removal Advocacy; Inherent Power Sanctions Pre‑Suit Deception: Sofaly v. Portfolio Recovery Associates

Rule 11 Reaches Attached Pre‑Suit Letters and Post‑Removal Advocacy; Inherent Power Sanctions Pre‑Suit Deception: Sofaly v. Portfolio Recovery Associates

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Rule 11 Reaches Attached Pre‑Suit Letters and Post‑Removal Advocacy; Inherent Power Sanctions Pre‑Suit Deception: Sofaly v. Portfolio Recovery Associates Introduction In Robert Sofaly v. Portfolio...
"Hours Paid" Means Compensated Hours, Not Overtime-Inflated Hours: Third Circuit Clarifies CBA Contribution Bases Under ERISA § 515

"Hours Paid" Means Compensated Hours, Not Overtime-Inflated Hours: Third Circuit Clarifies CBA Contribution Bases Under ERISA § 515

Date: Sep 24, 2025
"Hours Paid" Means Compensated Hours, Not Overtime-Inflated Hours: Third Circuit Clarifies CBA Contribution Bases Under ERISA § 515 Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (not...
"Hours Paid" Means Compensated Hours, Not Overtime Multipliers: The Third Circuit’s Textual Clarification for ERISA Multiemployer Contributions

"Hours Paid" Means Compensated Hours, Not Overtime Multipliers: The Third Circuit’s Textual Clarification for ERISA Multiemployer Contributions

Date: Sep 24, 2025
"Hours Paid" Means Compensated Hours, Not Overtime Multipliers: The Third Circuit’s Textual Clarification for ERISA Multiemployer Contributions Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (Not...
Anchoring Criminal History to the Offense of Conviction: Third Circuit Rejects Relevant-Conduct Start Date for §4A1.2(e) Look-Back in United States v. Josey

Anchoring Criminal History to the Offense of Conviction: Third Circuit Rejects Relevant-Conduct Start Date for §4A1.2(e) Look-Back in United States v. Josey

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Anchoring Criminal History to the Offense of Conviction: Third Circuit Rejects Relevant-Conduct Start Date for §4A1.2(e) Look-Back in United States v. Josey Introduction In a precedential opinion...
Unsworn Statements Cannot Create Fact Disputes, But May Prompt Rule 56(e) Cure Orders: Third Circuit’s Precedential Clarification in Lauria v. Lieb

Unsworn Statements Cannot Create Fact Disputes, But May Prompt Rule 56(e) Cure Orders: Third Circuit’s Precedential Clarification in Lauria v. Lieb

Date: Sep 13, 2025
Unsworn Statements Cannot Create Fact Disputes, But May Prompt Rule 56(e) Cure Orders: The Third Circuit’s Precedential Clarification in Lauria v. Lieb Introduction In a precedential opinion, the...
No Qualified Immunity for Malicious Prosecution Built on Manufactured Evidence: Third Circuit’s Evans v. City of Newark

No Qualified Immunity for Malicious Prosecution Built on Manufactured Evidence: Third Circuit’s Evans v. City of Newark

Date: Sep 13, 2025
No Qualified Immunity for Malicious Prosecution Built on Manufactured Evidence Evans v. City of Newark (3d Cir. Sept. 12, 2025) Introduction In a precedential decision, the United States Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert