Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Relabeling Benefits as “Equity” Won’t Save a § 502(a)(3) Claim; § 105(a) Statements Need Not Include Vesting Date for Terminated Participants

Relabeling Benefits as “Equity” Won’t Save a § 502(a)(3) Claim; § 105(a) Statements Need Not Include Vesting Date for Terminated Participants

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Relabeling Benefits as “Equity” Won’t Save a § 502(a)(3) Claim; § 105(a) Statements Need Not Include Vesting Date for Terminated Participants Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third...
Proximity Is Not Probable Cause: The Third Circuit Affirms a Nexus Requirement for Warrantless Automobile Searches When Contraband Departs in a One-Way Transfer

Proximity Is Not Probable Cause: The Third Circuit Affirms a Nexus Requirement for Warrantless Automobile Searches When Contraband Departs in a One-Way Transfer

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Proximity Is Not Probable Cause: The Third Circuit Affirms a Nexus Requirement for Warrantless Automobile Searches When Contraband Departs in a One-Way Transfer Introduction In United States v. Diaz...
Proration Compelled: Third Circuit Holds First Step Act’s “for each year” Requires Pro-Rated Good-Conduct Time for Partial-Year Sentences

Proration Compelled: Third Circuit Holds First Step Act’s “for each year” Requires Pro-Rated Good-Conduct Time for Partial-Year Sentences

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Proration Compelled: Third Circuit Holds First Step Act’s “for each year” Requires Pro-Rated Good-Conduct Time for Partial-Year Sentences Introduction In a precedential opinion, the U.S. Court of...
No Outsourcing Escape Hatch: Third Circuit Holds States Remain Liable Under ADA Title II and the Rehabilitation Act for Prison Services Run by Private Contractors

No Outsourcing Escape Hatch: Third Circuit Holds States Remain Liable Under ADA Title II and the Rehabilitation Act for Prison Services Run by Private Contractors

Date: Oct 10, 2025
No Outsourcing Escape Hatch: States Remain Liable Under ADA Title II and the Rehabilitation Act for Prison Services Run by Private Contractors Introduction In a precedential opinion with sweeping...
Accessible Eviction Notice Required: Third Circuit Revives ADA/§504 Claims and Limits Quasi‑Judicial Immunity for Constables

Accessible Eviction Notice Required: Third Circuit Revives ADA/§504 Claims and Limits Quasi‑Judicial Immunity for Constables

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Accessible Eviction Notice Required: Third Circuit Revives ADA/§504 Claims and Limits Quasi‑Judicial Immunity for Constables Introduction In William Murphy v. State of Delaware Justices of the Peace,...
TCPA’s “Any Person” Robocall Ban Does Not Reach State Legislators Performing Legitimate Official Functions: Third Circuit Sets a Federalism-Grounded Limitation

TCPA’s “Any Person” Robocall Ban Does Not Reach State Legislators Performing Legitimate Official Functions: Third Circuit Sets a Federalism-Grounded Limitation

Date: Oct 10, 2025
TCPA’s “Any Person” Robocall Ban Does Not Reach State Legislators Performing Legitimate Official Functions Commentary on Andrew R. Perrong v. Matthew Bradford, No. 24-1925 (3d Cir. Oct. 6, 2025)...
No Review Means No Review: Third Circuit Holds IRA § 1320f-7(2) Bars Challenges to CMS’s Product-Grouping and Other Steps in Drug Selection, and Upholds Guidance-Only Implementation Through 2028

No Review Means No Review: Third Circuit Holds IRA § 1320f-7(2) Bars Challenges to CMS’s Product-Grouping and Other Steps in Drug Selection, and Upholds Guidance-Only Implementation Through 2028

Date: Oct 10, 2025
No Review Means No Review: Third Circuit Holds IRA § 1320f-7(2) Bars Challenges to CMS’s Product-Grouping and Other Steps in Drug Selection, and Upholds Guidance-Only Implementation Through 2028...
Including Profit in an Automaker’s “Destination Charge” Is Not Deceptive Under the NJCFA, and Manufacturers Owe No Disclosure Duty for Pass-Through Fees

Including Profit in an Automaker’s “Destination Charge” Is Not Deceptive Under the NJCFA, and Manufacturers Owe No Disclosure Duty for Pass-Through Fees

Date: Oct 5, 2025
Including Profit in an Automaker’s “Destination Charge” Is Not Deceptive Under the NJCFA, and Manufacturers Owe No Disclosure Duty for Pass-Through Fees Introduction In BCR Carpentry LLC v. FCA US...
“Claim-and-Denial” Ripeness Rule for Takings Challenges to Pennsylvania’s Unclaimed Property Custody

“Claim-and-Denial” Ripeness Rule for Takings Challenges to Pennsylvania’s Unclaimed Property Custody

Date: Oct 5, 2025
“Claim-and-Denial” Ripeness Rule for Takings Challenges to Pennsylvania’s Unclaimed Property Custody Case: Brian Dillow v. Treasurer of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Court: United States Court of...
Judicial Participation, Accurate Sentencing Warnings, and Time‑Limited Plea Offers Do Not Alone Render a Plea Involuntary: Commentary on Devine v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (3d Cir. 2025)

Judicial Participation, Accurate Sentencing Warnings, and Time‑Limited Plea Offers Do Not Alone Render a Plea Involuntary: Commentary on Devine v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 5, 2025
Judicial Participation, Accurate Sentencing Warnings, and Time‑Limited Plea Offers Do Not Alone Render a Plea Involuntary Introduction This commentary examines the Third Circuit’s non-precedential...
Mailing, Not Receipt, Triggers FTCA’s Six‑Month Deadline; COVID-Era Office Mail Protocols Do Not Justify Equitable Tolling

Mailing, Not Receipt, Triggers FTCA’s Six‑Month Deadline; COVID-Era Office Mail Protocols Do Not Justify Equitable Tolling

Date: Oct 5, 2025
Mailing, Not Receipt, Triggers FTCA’s Six‑Month Deadline; COVID-Era Office Mail Protocols Do Not Justify Equitable Tolling Case: Margarita Marshall v. United States Post Office, United States Postal...
United States v. Vargas: Contextual Use of Informant Recordings Does Not Implicate the Confrontation Clause; Compulsory Process Requires a Plausible Showing of Favorability

United States v. Vargas: Contextual Use of Informant Recordings Does Not Implicate the Confrontation Clause; Compulsory Process Requires a Plausible Showing of Favorability

Date: Oct 5, 2025
United States v. Vargas: Contextual Use of Informant Recordings Does Not Implicate the Confrontation Clause; Compulsory Process Requires a Plausible Showing of Favorability Introduction This...
United States v. Malcolm: Third Circuit affirms upward variance based on uncharged robberies and jail misconduct, clarifying § 924(c)/Guidelines interplay

United States v. Malcolm: Third Circuit affirms upward variance based on uncharged robberies and jail misconduct, clarifying § 924(c)/Guidelines interplay

Date: Oct 5, 2025
United States v. Malcolm: Third Circuit affirms upward variance based on uncharged robberies and jail misconduct, clarifying § 924(c)/Guidelines interplay Note: This Third Circuit disposition is “not...
Brown v. Monsalud: Third Circuit Reaffirms That Medical Treatment Disagreements Are Not Actionable Under ADA Title II and Do Not Constitute Eighth Amendment Deliberate Indifference

Brown v. Monsalud: Third Circuit Reaffirms That Medical Treatment Disagreements Are Not Actionable Under ADA Title II and Do Not Constitute Eighth Amendment Deliberate Indifference

Date: Oct 4, 2025
Brown v. Monsalud: Third Circuit Reaffirms That Medical Treatment Disagreements Are Not Actionable Under ADA Title II and Do Not Constitute Eighth Amendment Deliberate Indifference Court: United...
Statutory Maximum as the Guidelines Sentence: Third Circuit Enforces Appeal Waiver and Approves Consecutive Stacking Under U.S.S.G. §§ 5G1.1(a) and 5G1.2(d) in an Anders Appeal

Statutory Maximum as the Guidelines Sentence: Third Circuit Enforces Appeal Waiver and Approves Consecutive Stacking Under U.S.S.G. §§ 5G1.1(a) and 5G1.2(d) in an Anders Appeal

Date: Oct 4, 2025
Statutory Maximum as the Guidelines Sentence: Third Circuit Enforces Appeal Waiver and Approves Consecutive Stacking Under U.S.S.G. §§ 5G1.1(a) and 5G1.2(d) in an Anders Appeal Introduction In United...
Conspiracy Is Not Enough: Third Circuit Requires PSC Analysis to Include the Object Offense’s Elements

Conspiracy Is Not Enough: Third Circuit Requires PSC Analysis to Include the Object Offense’s Elements

Date: Oct 4, 2025
Conspiracy Is Not Enough: Third Circuit Requires PSC Analysis to Include the Object Offense’s Elements Case: Jayeola Amos v. Attorney General United States of America (No. 22-2095) Court: United...
Reaffirming the Post-Ruan, Post-Burrage Framework: No Proximate Cause or Mens Rea for § 841(b)(1)(C) “Death Results”; Miranda Errors May Be Harmless

Reaffirming the Post-Ruan, Post-Burrage Framework: No Proximate Cause or Mens Rea for § 841(b)(1)(C) “Death Results”; Miranda Errors May Be Harmless

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Reaffirming the Post-Ruan, Post-Burrage Framework: No Proximate Cause or Mens Rea for § 841(b)(1)(C) “Death Results”; Miranda Errors May Be Harmless Introduction This nonprecedential Third Circuit...
Third Circuit Endorses the “Integral Use of Fire” Standard for 18 U.S.C. § 844(h)(1) in Insurance-Fraud Schemes: United States v. Randolph

Third Circuit Endorses the “Integral Use of Fire” Standard for 18 U.S.C. § 844(h)(1) in Insurance-Fraud Schemes: United States v. Randolph

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Third Circuit Endorses the “Integral Use of Fire” Standard for 18 U.S.C. § 844(h)(1) in Insurance-Fraud Schemes: United States v. Randolph Decision: United States v. Lashaumba O. Randolph, No....
Strict Liability Persists for § 841(b)(1)(C) “Death Results” After Ruan; No Need to Identify the Specific Fatal Bag When All Sources Trace to Defendants

Strict Liability Persists for § 841(b)(1)(C) “Death Results” After Ruan; No Need to Identify the Specific Fatal Bag When All Sources Trace to Defendants

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Strict Liability Persists for § 841(b)(1)(C) “Death Results” After Ruan; No Need to Identify the Specific Fatal Bag When All Sources Trace to Defendants United States v. Jeremy Edward Johnson; United...
Investigating Grand Jury Presentments Create Prima Facie Probable Cause in § 1983 False Arrest and Malicious Prosecution Claims—Omission of Exculpatory Evidence Does Not Rebut the Presumption

Investigating Grand Jury Presentments Create Prima Facie Probable Cause in § 1983 False Arrest and Malicious Prosecution Claims—Omission of Exculpatory Evidence Does Not Rebut the Presumption

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Investigating Grand Jury Presentments Create Prima Facie Probable Cause in § 1983 False Arrest and Malicious Prosecution Claims—Omission of Exculpatory Evidence Does Not Rebut the Presumption Case:...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert