Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

“Circumstantial Tax Liability Evidence & Voir-Dire Discretion” – A Commentary on United States v. Jonathan Michael (3d Cir. 2025)

“Circumstantial Tax Liability Evidence & Voir-Dire Discretion” – A Commentary on United States v. Jonathan Michael (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 12, 2025
“Circumstantial Tax Liability Evidence & Voir-Dire Discretion” A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Jonathan Michael, 71 F.4th ___ (3d Cir. 2025) Introduction The Third Circuit’s...
Frazier v. Kuhn: Third Circuit Reaffirms that Alternative Religious Accommodations Defeat Likelihood of Success for Prisoner Preliminary Injunctions

Frazier v. Kuhn: Third Circuit Reaffirms that Alternative Religious Accommodations Defeat Likelihood of Success for Prisoner Preliminary Injunctions

Date: Jul 12, 2025
Frazier v. Kuhn: Third Circuit Reaffirms that Alternative Religious Accommodations Defeat Likelihood of Success for Prisoner Preliminary Injunctions 1. Introduction In Jasper Frazier v. Victoria L....
“No Grievance, No Federal Claim” – Third Circuit Clarifies that Temporary Grievance Filing Restrictions Do Not Excuse PLRA Exhaustion (Jackson v. Knapp, 2025)

“No Grievance, No Federal Claim” – Third Circuit Clarifies that Temporary Grievance Filing Restrictions Do Not Excuse PLRA Exhaustion (Jackson v. Knapp, 2025)

Date: Jul 12, 2025
“No Grievance, No Federal Claim” – Third Circuit Clarifies that Temporary Grievance Filing Restrictions Do Not Excuse PLRA Exhaustion (Commentary on Rhonshawn Jackson v. Knapp, 24-3183, 3d Cir. July...
“From Molestation-Pornography Nexus to Counsel Performance” – United States v. Galletta and the Expansive Reach of the Good-Faith Exception

“From Molestation-Pornography Nexus to Counsel Performance” – United States v. Galletta and the Expansive Reach of the Good-Faith Exception

Date: Jul 12, 2025
“From Molestation-Pornography Nexus to Counsel Performance” – United States v. Galletta and the Expansive Reach of the Good-Faith Exception 1. Introduction The Third Circuit’s not-precedential...
Clarifying the Wealth-Versus-Family Nexus in Persecution Claims – A Commentary on Wilde Olivares-Arteaga v. Attorney General (3d Cir. 2025)

Clarifying the Wealth-Versus-Family Nexus in Persecution Claims – A Commentary on Wilde Olivares-Arteaga v. Attorney General (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 12, 2025
Clarifying the Wealth-Versus-Family Nexus in Persecution Claims A Detailed Commentary on Wilde Olivares-Arteaga v. Attorney General United States, 3d Cir. July 9 2025 1. Introduction Wilde Daniel...
“Same-Day Medical Emergencies & Last-Chance Agreements” — The Third Circuit’s Guidance on FMLA Notice in Walker v. SEPTA

“Same-Day Medical Emergencies & Last-Chance Agreements” — The Third Circuit’s Guidance on FMLA Notice in Walker v. SEPTA

Date: Jul 11, 2025
“Same-Day Medical Emergencies & Last-Chance Agreements” — The Third Circuit’s Guidance on FMLA Notice in Walker v. SEPTA Introduction The Third Circuit’s non-precedential opinion in Isaiah Walker v....
Presence-Only Standing & Non-Element Evidence: Third Circuit Narrows Fourth Amendment Standing and Constructive Amendment in § 1956(h) Conspiracies – Commentary on United States v. Alan Womack (3d Cir. 2025)

Presence-Only Standing & Non-Element Evidence: Third Circuit Narrows Fourth Amendment Standing and Constructive Amendment in § 1956(h) Conspiracies – Commentary on United States v. Alan Womack (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 11, 2025
Presence-Only Standing & Non-Element Evidence: Third Circuit Narrows Fourth Amendment Standing and Constructive Amendment in § 1956(h) Conspiracies – Commentary on United States v. Womack (3d Cir....

        Clarifying “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” and Domestic Relocation under CAT:
        A Commentary on Perez-Gonzalez v. Attorney General, 2025

Clarifying “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” and Domestic Relocation under CAT: A Commentary on Perez-Gonzalez v. Attorney General, 2025

Date: Jul 10, 2025
Clarifying “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” and Domestic Relocation under CAT: A Comprehensive Commentary on Jose Leopoldo Perez-Gonzalez v. Attorney General, United States (3d Cir. 2025)...
“Proving Under-Payment, Not Merely Under-Valuation” – The Third Circuit’s New Predominance Benchmark in Drummond v. Progressive

“Proving Under-Payment, Not Merely Under-Valuation” – The Third Circuit’s New Predominance Benchmark in Drummond v. Progressive

Date: Jul 10, 2025
“Proving Under-Payment, Not Merely Under-Valuation” – The Third Circuit’s New Predominance Benchmark in Drummond v. Progressive 1. Introduction The Third Circuit’s precedential opinion in Leon...
Regulatory Background Checks & Municipal Liability: Lessons from Teo Johnson v. City of Clifton (3d Cir. 2025)

Regulatory Background Checks & Municipal Liability: Lessons from Teo Johnson v. City of Clifton (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 10, 2025
Regulatory Background Checks & Municipal Liability: Teo Johnson v. City of Clifton and the Third Circuit’s Clarification of §1983 Limits Introduction In Teo Johnson v. City of Clifton, No. 23-2550...
“Curtilage Reviewed Anew” – United States v. Ronell Moses, Jr. and the Third Circuit’s Shift to De-Novo Curtilage Review

“Curtilage Reviewed Anew” – United States v. Ronell Moses, Jr. and the Third Circuit’s Shift to De-Novo Curtilage Review

Date: Jul 5, 2025
“Curtilage Reviewed Anew” – United States v. Ronell Moses, Jr. and the Third Circuit’s Shift to De-Novo Curtilage Review 1. Introduction United States v. Ronell Moses, Jr., No. 23-3078 (3d Cir. July...
United States v. Sanchez-LaPorte: Reaffirming the Enforceability of Appeal Waivers in Anders Appeals

United States v. Sanchez-LaPorte: Reaffirming the Enforceability of Appeal Waivers in Anders Appeals

Date: Jul 4, 2025
United States v. Sanchez-LaPorte: Reaffirming the Enforceability of Appeal Waivers in Anders Appeals Introduction United States v. Pedro Sanchez-LaPorte (3d Cir. July 2, 2025) is an unpublished...
Hackman v. InductEV: The Third Circuit Reinforces Evidentiary Specificity and Record-Citation Duties in Pro Se Employment Discrimination Appeals

Hackman v. InductEV: The Third Circuit Reinforces Evidentiary Specificity and Record-Citation Duties in Pro Se Employment Discrimination Appeals

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Hackman v. InductEV: The Third Circuit Reinforces Evidentiary Specificity and Record-Citation Duties in Pro Se Employment Discrimination Appeals 1. Introduction Assata Acey Hackman, a former...

        “Deceit by Definition” – Third Circuit Holds that a Conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 287 Is
        Categorically an Aggravated Felony Involving Deceit and Bars a Retroactive INA § 212(h) Waiver

“Deceit by Definition” – Third Circuit Holds that a Conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 287 Is Categorically an Aggravated Felony Involving Deceit and Bars a Retroactive INA § 212(h) Waiver

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“Deceit by Definition” – Third Circuit Holds that a Conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 287 Is Categorically an Aggravated Felony Involving Deceit and Bars a Retroactive INA § 212(h) Waiver 1. Introduction...
Third Circuit Abolishes “Subordination” and “Animus” Tests for Asylum Nexus and Re-focuses CAT Acquiescence on State Capability – Commentary on Hector Tipan Lopez v. Attorney General (3d Cir. 2025)

Third Circuit Abolishes “Subordination” and “Animus” Tests for Asylum Nexus and Re-focuses CAT Acquiescence on State Capability – Commentary on Hector Tipan Lopez v. Attorney General (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Third Circuit Abolishes “Subordination” and “Animus” Tests for Asylum Nexus and Re-focuses CAT Acquiescence on State Capability Commentary on Hector Tipan Lopez v. Attorney General of the United...
The “Rosa Rule” – 404(b) Floodgates and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel under Strickland

The “Rosa Rule” – 404(b) Floodgates and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel under Strickland

Date: Jul 3, 2025
The “Rosa Rule” – 404(b) Floodgates and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel under Strickland Introduction In Kelvin Rosa v. Administrator East Jersey State Prison, the United States Court of Appeals...

        “Any Removal Proceedings” Includes IJ Review of Negative Reasonable-Fear Findings:
        The Third Circuit Recognises a Statutory Right to Counsel Under 8 U.S.C. §1362

“Any Removal Proceedings” Includes IJ Review of Negative Reasonable-Fear Findings: The Third Circuit Recognises a Statutory Right to Counsel Under 8 U.S.C. §1362

Date: Jun 29, 2025
“Any Removal Proceedings” Includes IJ Review of Negative Reasonable-Fear Findings: The Third Circuit Recognises a Statutory Right to Counsel Under 8 U.S.C. § 1362 1. Introduction In Adalberto...
“Made-Available” Value & the Meaning of “Clear-Sailing”: A Comprehensive Commentary on In re Wawa, Inc. Data Security Litigation (3d Cir. 2025)

“Made-Available” Value & the Meaning of “Clear-Sailing”: A Comprehensive Commentary on In re Wawa, Inc. Data Security Litigation (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 29, 2025
“Made-Available” Value & the Meaning of “Clear-Sailing” A Comprehensive Commentary on In re Wawa, Inc. Data Security Litigation (3d Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction The Third Circuit’s precedential opinion...
“Speak Now or Lose Later” – The Third Circuit’s Firm Stance on Appellate Forfeiture and FTCA Timeliness in Manivannan v. Department of Energy

“Speak Now or Lose Later” – The Third Circuit’s Firm Stance on Appellate Forfeiture and FTCA Timeliness in Manivannan v. Department of Energy

Date: Jun 27, 2025
“Speak Now or Lose Later” – The Third Circuit’s Firm Stance on Appellate Forfeiture and FTCA Timeliness in Manivannan v. Department of Energy 1. Introduction Ayyakkannu Manivannan, a former materials...
Clarifying the Threshold for Court-Appointed Counsel and Pleading Specificity in Pro Se Litigation: A Commentary on Weems v. City of Philadelphia (3d Cir. 2025)

Clarifying the Threshold for Court-Appointed Counsel and Pleading Specificity in Pro Se Litigation: A Commentary on Weems v. City of Philadelphia (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 27, 2025
Clarifying the Threshold for Court-Appointed Counsel and Pleading Specificity in Pro Se Litigation: A Commentary on Weems v. City of Philadelphia (3d Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction Weems v. City of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert