Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

Ireland Case Commentaries

Materiality as the Gateway under s.146B: Non‑material alterations to SID permissions need no EIA/AA or public participation and may be adopted mid‑litigation without objective bias

Materiality as the Gateway under s.146B: Non‑material alterations to SID permissions need no EIA/AA or public participation and may be adopted mid‑litigation without objective bias

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Materiality as the Gateway under s.146B: Non‑material alterations to SID permissions need no EIA/AA or public participation and may be adopted mid‑litigation without objective bias Introduction This...
Planning Conditions as Standard-and-Fallback, Harmless Error, and Curative Amendments: Commentary on Rural Residents Wind Aware v An Coimisiún Pleanála [2025] IEHC 600

Planning Conditions as Standard-and-Fallback, Harmless Error, and Curative Amendments: Commentary on Rural Residents Wind Aware v An Coimisiún Pleanála [2025] IEHC 600

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Planning Conditions as Standard-and-Fallback, Harmless Error, and Curative Amendments in SID Consents: Commentary on Rural Residents Wind Aware & Ors v An Coimisiún Pleanála & Ors [2025] IEHC 600...
When a fundamental EIA public‑notice breach does not trigger certiorari: the “phase‑two cure” discretion in North Westmeath Turbine Action Group v An Bord Pleanála [2025] IEHC 608

When a fundamental EIA public‑notice breach does not trigger certiorari: the “phase‑two cure” discretion in North Westmeath Turbine Action Group v An Bord Pleanála [2025] IEHC 608

Date: Nov 11, 2025
When a fundamental EIA public‑notice breach does not trigger certiorari: the “phase‑two cure” discretion in North Westmeath Turbine Action Group v An Bord Pleanála [2025] IEHC 608 Introduction This...
No Exceptional Point: Section 5 of the 2000 Act Encompasses Section 50 Refoulement Opinions; Article 15(c) Not Required at Refoulement Stage

No Exceptional Point: Section 5 of the 2000 Act Encompasses Section 50 Refoulement Opinions; Article 15(c) Not Required at Refoulement Stage

Date: Nov 11, 2025
No Exceptional Point: Section 5 of the 2000 Act Encompasses Section 50 Refoulement Opinions; Article 15(c) Not Required at Refoulement Stage Introduction This ruling of the High Court of Ireland...
No Waiver Without Actual Knowledge: Probation Compliance Cannot Cure In Absentia Defects under s.45 (Minister for Justice v Nistor [2025] IEHC 609)

No Waiver Without Actual Knowledge: Probation Compliance Cannot Cure In Absentia Defects under s.45 (Minister for Justice v Nistor [2025] IEHC 609)

Date: Nov 11, 2025
No Waiver Without Actual Knowledge: Probation Compliance Cannot Cure In Absentia Defects under s.45 Commentary on Minister for Justice v Nistor [2025] IEHC 609 (High Court of Ireland, 5 November...
Genuine belief that proceedings were served, absent unusual external factors, is “mere inadvertence” and does not satisfy the Order 8 r.1(4) “special circumstances” gateway

Genuine belief that proceedings were served, absent unusual external factors, is “mere inadvertence” and does not satisfy the Order 8 r.1(4) “special circumstances” gateway

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Genuine belief that proceedings were served, absent unusual external factors, is “mere inadvertence” and does not satisfy the Order 8 r.1(4) “special circumstances” gateway Commentary on Hadnett v...
Insurer Indemnity Third‑Party Notices in the Circuit Court: No Section 27 Time Imperative and a “Manifestly Bound to Fail” Threshold on Set‑Aside

Insurer Indemnity Third‑Party Notices in the Circuit Court: No Section 27 Time Imperative and a “Manifestly Bound to Fail” Threshold on Set‑Aside

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Insurer Indemnity Third‑Party Notices in the Circuit Court: No Section 27 Time Imperative and a “Manifestly Bound to Fail” Threshold on Set‑Aside Introduction Foley v 360 Degrees Complete Maintenance...
‘Inactivity’ Means No Procedural Steps and Cumulative Periods Count: The High Court’s Primor–Kirwan Roadmap in Doyle v Commissioner of An Garda Síochána [2025] IEHC 591

‘Inactivity’ Means No Procedural Steps and Cumulative Periods Count: The High Court’s Primor–Kirwan Roadmap in Doyle v Commissioner of An Garda Síochána [2025] IEHC 591

Date: Nov 11, 2025
‘Inactivity’ Means No Procedural Steps and Cumulative Periods Count: The High Court’s Primor–Kirwan Roadmap in Doyle v Commissioner of An Garda Síochána [2025] IEHC 591 Introduction This High Court...
Reason-Giving as a Gateway to Statutory Appeals: Inadequate Labour Court Reasons Make s.46 Appeal an Inadequate Alternative Remedy

Reason-Giving as a Gateway to Statutory Appeals: Inadequate Labour Court Reasons Make s.46 Appeal an Inadequate Alternative Remedy

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Reason-Giving as a Gateway to Statutory Appeals: Inadequate Labour Court Reasons Make s.46 Appeal an Inadequate Alternative Remedy Introduction In Arkins & Anor v Labour Court [2025] IEHC 605, the...
Hyland v Commissioner of An Garda Síochána: Section 9 Is a Retention Rule, Not a Use Rule — Lawful Knowledge from a Search Warrant May Ground Garda Disciplinary Action (Subject to Privacy Proportionality)

Hyland v Commissioner of An Garda Síochána: Section 9 Is a Retention Rule, Not a Use Rule — Lawful Knowledge from a Search Warrant May Ground Garda Disciplinary Action (Subject to Privacy Proportionality)

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Hyland v Commissioner of An Garda Síochána: Section 9 Is a Retention Rule, Not a Use Rule — Lawful Knowledge from a Search Warrant May Ground Garda Disciplinary Action (Subject to Privacy...
Collateral Challenges Do Not Pause Costs or Well‑Charging Relief: Structured application of LSRA 2015 s.168–169 and RSC O.61 r.12 in a de novo Circuit appeal — Commentary on Gaffney & Anor v Gaffney & Anor [No. 2] [2025] IEHC 602

Collateral Challenges Do Not Pause Costs or Well‑Charging Relief: Structured application of LSRA 2015 s.168–169 and RSC O.61 r.12 in a de novo Circuit appeal — Commentary on Gaffney & Anor v Gaffney & Anor [No. 2] [2025] IEHC 602

Date: Nov 11, 2025
Collateral Challenges Do Not Pause Costs or Well‑Charging Relief: Structured application of LSRA 2015 s.168–169 and RSC O.61 r.12 in a de novo Circuit appeal — Commentary on Gaffney & Anor v Gaffney...
Timeliness Over Administrative Convenience in AIE Appeals: High Court affirms implied power to remit but refers the governing “timeliness” standard to the CJEU

Timeliness Over Administrative Convenience in AIE Appeals: High Court affirms implied power to remit but refers the governing “timeliness” standard to the CJEU

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Timeliness Over Administrative Convenience in AIE Appeals: High Court affirms implied power to remit but refers the governing “timeliness” standard to the CJEU Case: People Over Wind v Commissioner...
Affidavit Candour and a Two‑Tranche Approach to Costs in Moot Delay Judicial Reviews: M (A Minor) v Minister for Foreign Affairs [2025] IEHC 581

Affidavit Candour and a Two‑Tranche Approach to Costs in Moot Delay Judicial Reviews: M (A Minor) v Minister for Foreign Affairs [2025] IEHC 581

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Affidavit Candour and a Two‑Tranche Approach to Costs in Moot Delay Judicial Reviews: M (A Minor) v Minister for Foreign Affairs [2025] IEHC 581 Introduction This commentary examines the High Court...
Contextual Discovery in Deed Interpretation: Ordering Antecedent and Chain‑of‑Title Materials Despite Parties’ Claims of Unambiguity

Contextual Discovery in Deed Interpretation: Ordering Antecedent and Chain‑of‑Title Materials Despite Parties’ Claims of Unambiguity

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Contextual Discovery in Deed Interpretation: Ordering Antecedent and Chain‑of‑Title Materials Despite Parties’ Claims of Unambiguity Introduction In Murray & Anor v Goldstein Property ICAV [2025]...
Accrual by “Real and Meaningfully Measurable Loss” in Solicitor‑Negligence-for-Delay and Validity of Firm‑Named Appearances: High Threshold for Strike‑Out under Amended Order 19

Accrual by “Real and Meaningfully Measurable Loss” in Solicitor‑Negligence-for-Delay and Validity of Firm‑Named Appearances: High Threshold for Strike‑Out under Amended Order 19

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Accrual by “Real and Meaningfully Measurable Loss” in Solicitor‑Negligence‑for‑Delay and Validity of Firm‑Named Appearances: High Threshold for Strike‑Out under Amended Order 19 Case: Killeen v...
Firm-Signed Appearances Are Valid Under Order 12 RSC; Limitation Defences Rarely Suited to Strike-Out in Solicitor Negligence: Commentary on Killeen v Higgins [2025] IEHC 582

Firm-Signed Appearances Are Valid Under Order 12 RSC; Limitation Defences Rarely Suited to Strike-Out in Solicitor Negligence: Commentary on Killeen v Higgins [2025] IEHC 582

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Firm-Signed Appearances Are Valid Under Order 12 RSC; Limitation Defences Rarely Suited to Strike-Out in Solicitor Negligence Introduction This commentary analyzes the High Court of Ireland’s...
High Court confirms “special circumstances” are required to set aside a default judgment obtained in default of appearance: Hussien v Dunleavy Meats [2025] IEHC 586

High Court confirms “special circumstances” are required to set aside a default judgment obtained in default of appearance: Hussien v Dunleavy Meats [2025] IEHC 586

Date: Nov 7, 2025
“Special circumstances” are now integral to setting aside default judgments under Order 13: Commentary on Hussien v Dunleavy Meats Unlimited Company [2025] IEHC 586 Introduction In Hussien v Dunleavy...
Affidavit Cross‑Examination in Judicial Review Requires a Material, Necessity‑Linked Factual Conflict: CSNA Company Ltd v Minister for Health [2025] IEHC 594

Affidavit Cross‑Examination in Judicial Review Requires a Material, Necessity‑Linked Factual Conflict: CSNA Company Ltd v Minister for Health [2025] IEHC 594

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Affidavit Cross‑Examination in Judicial Review Requires a Material, Necessity‑Linked Factual Conflict: CSNA Company Ltd v Minister for Health [2025] IEHC 594 Introduction This High Court judgment...
Article 40.4.2 Does Not Permit Class‑Wide Habeas: Specificity and Case‑Focus Required — Commentary on McGreal v Minister for Justice [2025] IEHC 597

Article 40.4.2 Does Not Permit Class‑Wide Habeas: Specificity and Case‑Focus Required — Commentary on McGreal v Minister for Justice [2025] IEHC 597

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Article 40.4.2 Does Not Permit Class‑Wide Habeas: Specificity and Case‑Focus Required Case: McGreal v The Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration & Ors [2025] IEHC 597 (High Court of...
Post‑Abatement Stigma Damages in Nuisance: High Court recognises market‑value loss where injunction requires ongoing engagement and verification

Post‑Abatement Stigma Damages in Nuisance: High Court recognises market‑value loss where injunction requires ongoing engagement and verification

Date: Nov 5, 2025
Post‑Abatement Stigma Damages in Nuisance: High Court recognises market‑value loss where injunction requires ongoing engagement and verification Introduction This commentary examines the Irish High...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert