Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

Ireland Case Commentaries

“Haul Before You Cross”: Irish High Court imposes a duty of care on trawler operators over known submarine cables and affirms cost‑of‑repair damages without proof of payment — Virgin Media Wholesale Ltd v The Lida Suzanna [2025] IEHC 493

“Haul Before You Cross”: Irish High Court imposes a duty of care on trawler operators over known submarine cables and affirms cost‑of‑repair damages without proof of payment — Virgin Media Wholesale Ltd v The Lida Suzanna [2025] IEHC 493

Date: Sep 25, 2025
“Haul Before You Cross”: A New Irish Admiralty Benchmark on Fishermen’s Duties to Subsea Cables and Cost‑of‑Repair Damages Introduction In Virgin Media Wholesale Ltd v Owners and All Persons Claiming...
Open justice first: High Court sets exacting, evidence-specific test for permanent confidentiality orders and judgment redactions in patent litigation

Open justice first: High Court sets exacting, evidence-specific test for permanent confidentiality orders and judgment redactions in patent litigation

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Open justice first: High Court sets exacting, evidence-specific test for permanent confidentiality orders and judgment redactions in patent litigation Introduction In Sandoz AG & Rowex Ltd v Bayer...
Section 50 IPA 2015 is not a Second Protection Assessment: No Duty to Re‑Run Article 15(c) or Article 8 ECHR at Refoulement Stage Absent New Material

Section 50 IPA 2015 is not a Second Protection Assessment: No Duty to Re‑Run Article 15(c) or Article 8 ECHR at Refoulement Stage Absent New Material

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Section 50 IPA 2015 is not a Second Protection Assessment: No Duty to Re‑Run Article 15(c) or Article 8 ECHR at Refoulement Stage Absent New Material Introduction In M v Minister for Justice, Home...
Litigation Restraint Orders as a Discretionary Factor in Extending Time for Judicial Review: Commentary on Leahy & Ors v Medical Council of Ireland & Ors [2025] IEHC 503

Litigation Restraint Orders as a Discretionary Factor in Extending Time for Judicial Review: Commentary on Leahy & Ors v Medical Council of Ireland & Ors [2025] IEHC 503

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Litigation Restraint Orders as a Discretionary Factor in Extending Time for Judicial Review: Commentary on Leahy & Ors v Medical Council of Ireland & Ors [2025] IEHC 503 Introduction This commentary...
Late IPAT Appeals Do Not Halt Deportation: High Court refuses injunctions despite arguable challenge to Regulation 4(5) and clarifies Regulation 4(2) notice duty

Late IPAT Appeals Do Not Halt Deportation: High Court refuses injunctions despite arguable challenge to Regulation 4(5) and clarifies Regulation 4(2) notice duty

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Late IPAT Appeals Do Not Halt Deportation: High Court refuses injunctions despite arguable challenge to Regulation 4(5) and clarifies Regulation 4(2) notice duty Introduction This commentary analyses...
Farrell & Ors v PIAB & Ors: Costs for Parked Parallel Challenges Following Lead‑Case Success under s.169 LSRA 2015

Farrell & Ors v PIAB & Ors: Costs for Parked Parallel Challenges Following Lead‑Case Success under s.169 LSRA 2015

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Farrell & Ors v PIAB & Ors: Costs for Parked Parallel Challenges Following Lead‑Case Success under s.169 LSRA 2015 Court: High Court of Ireland | Neutral Citation: [2025] IEHC 504 | Date: 17...
No Automatic Abuse of Process from Repeated Possession Suits: Res judicata requires a merits decision and costs compliance preserves the right to re‑commence

No Automatic Abuse of Process from Repeated Possession Suits: Res judicata requires a merits decision and costs compliance preserves the right to re‑commence

Date: Sep 18, 2025
No Automatic Abuse of Process from Repeated Possession Suits: Res judicata requires a merits decision and costs compliance preserves the right to re‑commence Introduction This commentary examines the...
Exclusivity, Authority, and Electronic “Writing” in Land Deals: IEHC clarifies that internal awareness of rival bids is not a breach; ostensible authority requires reasonable reliance; metadata is not a signature for s.51

Exclusivity, Authority, and Electronic “Writing” in Land Deals: IEHC clarifies that internal awareness of rival bids is not a breach; ostensible authority requires reasonable reliance; metadata is not a signature for s.51

Date: Sep 16, 2025
Exclusivity, Authority, and Electronic “Writing” in Land Deals New clarifications from the High Court of Ireland: (i) mere internal awareness and discussion of a rival bid during an exclusivity...
Inherent Jurisdiction to Compel Special Criminal Court Transcripts for Use in Criminal Appeals: “Necessary to Do Justice” and “No Relevant Legal Prejudice” Clarified (Keogh v Special Criminal Court)

Inherent Jurisdiction to Compel Special Criminal Court Transcripts for Use in Criminal Appeals: “Necessary to Do Justice” and “No Relevant Legal Prejudice” Clarified (Keogh v Special Criminal Court)

Date: Sep 13, 2025
Inherent Jurisdiction to Compel Special Criminal Court Transcripts for Use in Criminal Appeals: “Necessary to Do Justice” and “No Relevant Legal Prejudice” Clarified Case: Keogh v Special Criminal...
No Decision, No Chenchooliah: Prematurity and Separation of Powers in Irish Removal/Deportation Procedure

No Decision, No Chenchooliah: Prematurity and Separation of Powers in Irish Removal/Deportation Procedure

Date: Sep 13, 2025
No Decision, No Chenchooliah: Prematurity and Separation of Powers in Irish Removal/Deportation Procedure Case Comment on M v Minister for Justice [2025] IEHC 494 (High Court, 12 September 2025)...
Active Verification, Flexible Evidence, and Non‑Fettered Discretion in Irish Employment Visa Decisions: Commentary on Masood v Minister for Justice [2025] IEHC 485

Active Verification, Flexible Evidence, and Non‑Fettered Discretion in Irish Employment Visa Decisions: Commentary on Masood v Minister for Justice [2025] IEHC 485

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Active Verification, Flexible Evidence, and Non‑Fettered Discretion in Irish Employment Visa Decisions: Commentary on Masood v Minister for Justice [2025] IEHC 485 Introduction This High Court...
Out-of-time judicial review dismissals operate as res judicata: High Court strikes out collateral plenary challenge; “continuing breach” and Greendale fraud arguments rejected

Out-of-time judicial review dismissals operate as res judicata: High Court strikes out collateral plenary challenge; “continuing breach” and Greendale fraud arguments rejected

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Out-of-time judicial review dismissals operate as res judicata: High Court strikes out collateral plenary challenge; “continuing breach” and Greendale fraud arguments rejected Introduction In Browne...
Liberty to Apply Is for Working Out, Not Rewriting: Limits on Post‑Judgment Clarification and Retrospective Time Extension in Point Village Development Ltd v Dunnes Stores [2025] IEHC 480

Liberty to Apply Is for Working Out, Not Rewriting: Limits on Post‑Judgment Clarification and Retrospective Time Extension in Point Village Development Ltd v Dunnes Stores [2025] IEHC 480

Date: Sep 9, 2025
Liberty to Apply Is for Working Out, Not Rewriting: Limits on Post‑Judgment Clarification and Retrospective Time Extension in Point Village Development Ltd v Dunnes Stores [2025] IEHC 480...
Automatic Statutory Substitution under Section 41 of the Central Bank Act 1971: No Court Order Required; Collateral Challenges Struck Out and Injunction Undertakings Discharged — Commentary on KBC Bank NV v Smith & Ors [2025] IEHC 481

Automatic Statutory Substitution under Section 41 of the Central Bank Act 1971: No Court Order Required; Collateral Challenges Struck Out and Injunction Undertakings Discharged — Commentary on KBC Bank NV v Smith & Ors [2025] IEHC 481

Date: Sep 9, 2025
Automatic Statutory Substitution under Section 41 of the Central Bank Act 1971: No Court Order Required; Collateral Challenges Struck Out and Injunction Undertakings Discharged Introduction This...
Implicit Criminal-Proceedings Leverage as “Unambiguous Impropriety”: High Court admits WPSATC correspondence — QPQ Limited v Schute [2025] IEHC 474

Implicit Criminal-Proceedings Leverage as “Unambiguous Impropriety”: High Court admits WPSATC correspondence — QPQ Limited v Schute [2025] IEHC 474

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Implicit Criminal‑Proceedings Leverage as “Unambiguous Impropriety”: High Court Admits WPSATC Correspondence QPQ Limited v Schute (Approved) [2025] IEHC 474, High Court of Ireland, Commercial List...
Ageing‑Out Does Not Create Sentencing Prejudice: Jurisdiction‑First under s.75 Children Act and Non‑application of s.13 Criminal Law Act 1976 to Children Detention Schools

Ageing‑Out Does Not Create Sentencing Prejudice: Jurisdiction‑First under s.75 Children Act and Non‑application of s.13 Criminal Law Act 1976 to Children Detention Schools

Date: Sep 4, 2025
Ageing‑Out Does Not Create Sentencing Prejudice: Jurisdiction‑First under s.75 Children Act and Non‑application of s.13 Criminal Law Act 1976 to Children Detention Schools Case: K (Aged Out Child) v...
“Payment disputes” under s.6 of the Construction Contracts Act 2013 are confined to contractual payments; common‑law termination damages are not adjudicable — and planning irregularities do not render construction contracts void

“Payment disputes” under s.6 of the Construction Contracts Act 2013 are confined to contractual payments; common‑law termination damages are not adjudicable — and planning irregularities do not render construction contracts void

Date: Sep 4, 2025
“Payment disputes” under s.6 of the Construction Contracts Act 2013 are confined to contractual payments; common‑law termination damages are not adjudicable — and planning irregularities do not...
Judicial Review Is Not a Shortcut to Halt Pending Prosecutions: High Court Reaffirms Exceptional Nature of Prohibition and Routes Wrongful-Arrest Grievances to Plenary Actions

Judicial Review Is Not a Shortcut to Halt Pending Prosecutions: High Court Reaffirms Exceptional Nature of Prohibition and Routes Wrongful-Arrest Grievances to Plenary Actions

Date: Aug 27, 2025
Judicial Review Is Not a Shortcut to Halt Pending Prosecutions: High Court Reaffirms Exceptional Nature of Prohibition and Routes Wrongful-Arrest Grievances to Plenary Actions Decision commented on:...
No Shortcut to Trial: LSRA observations do not shift the plaintiff’s burden and a defendant’s pleaded case must be taken at its highest on strike‑out motions (Monarca v Hayes Solicitors LLP [2025] IEHC 472)

No Shortcut to Trial: LSRA observations do not shift the plaintiff’s burden and a defendant’s pleaded case must be taken at its highest on strike‑out motions (Monarca v Hayes Solicitors LLP [2025] IEHC 472)

Date: Aug 27, 2025
No Shortcut to Trial: LSRA observations do not shift the plaintiff’s burden and a defendant’s pleaded case must be taken at its highest on strike‑out motions Commentary on Monarca v Hayes Solicitors...
Finality Means Final: High Court reaffirms s.39 Courts of Justice Act 1936 applies to interlocutory and procedural orders on Circuit appeals; possession granted notwithstanding securitisation and transfer challenges

Finality Means Final: High Court reaffirms s.39 Courts of Justice Act 1936 applies to interlocutory and procedural orders on Circuit appeals; possession granted notwithstanding securitisation and transfer challenges

Date: Aug 27, 2025
“Finality Means Final” on Circuit Appeals: The High Court confirms s.39 CJA 1936 forecloses later attacks on its appellate orders and grants possession despite securitisation and transfer objections...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert