Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

state Case Commentaries

“Repainting as Notice” –  Gass v. County of Rockland (2025):  Constructive Notice Triggered by Routine Road-Marking Maintenance

“Repainting as Notice” – Gass v. County of Rockland (2025): Constructive Notice Triggered by Routine Road-Marking Maintenance

Date: Jun 26, 2025
“Repainting as Notice” – Gass v. County of Rockland (2025): Constructive Notice Triggered by Routine Road-Marking Maintenance 1. Introduction Gass v. County of Rockland, 2025 NY Slip Op 03796,...
Strategic Delay Is Not Excusable: Rhode Island Supreme Court Fortifies Trial-Court Power to Dismiss Appeals for Intentional Non-Compliance with Transcript Deadlines

Strategic Delay Is Not Excusable: Rhode Island Supreme Court Fortifies Trial-Court Power to Dismiss Appeals for Intentional Non-Compliance with Transcript Deadlines

Date: Jun 26, 2025
Strategic Delay Is Not Excusable: Rhode Island Supreme Court Fortifies Trial-Court Power to Dismiss Appeals for Intentional Non-Compliance with Transcript Deadlines 1. Introduction The Rhode Island...
Milus v. Sun Valley Company: Clarifying the Standard of Care and the Assumption-of-Risk Bar under Idaho’s Ski Area Liability Act

Milus v. Sun Valley Company: Clarifying the Standard of Care and the Assumption-of-Risk Bar under Idaho’s Ski Area Liability Act

Date: Jun 26, 2025
Milus v. Sun Valley Company: Clarifying the Standard of Care and the Assumption-of-Risk Bar under Idaho’s Ski Area Liability Act Introduction On 25 June 2025 the Idaho Supreme Court issued its...
Unrecorded, Yet Unquestionably Public: Jutila v. Shoshone County Clarifies Idaho’s Road-Creation Rules and the Scope of “Public-Interest” Validation

Unrecorded, Yet Unquestionably Public: Jutila v. Shoshone County Clarifies Idaho’s Road-Creation Rules and the Scope of “Public-Interest” Validation

Date: Jun 26, 2025
Unrecorded, Yet Unquestionably Public: Jutila v. Shoshone County Clarifies Idaho’s Road-Creation Rules and the Scope of “Public-Interest” Validation Introduction In Jutila v. County of Shoshone, No....
Maliah-Dupass v. Dupass: Refined Rules on Disability Pensions, Educational Add-Ons, and Enhanced-Earnings Claims

Maliah-Dupass v. Dupass: Refined Rules on Disability Pensions, Educational Add-Ons, and Enhanced-Earnings Claims

Date: Jun 26, 2025
Maliah-Dupass v. Dupass (2025) — Refined Rules on Disability Pensions, Educational Add-Ons, and Enhanced-Earnings Claims 1. Introduction Maliah-Dupass v. Dupass, 2025 NY Slip Op 03801, is a Second...
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Stern (2025): Clarifying the Dual-Burden Framework for RPAPL §1304 Compliance in Mortgage-Foreclosure Summary-Judgment Motions

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Stern (2025): Clarifying the Dual-Burden Framework for RPAPL §1304 Compliance in Mortgage-Foreclosure Summary-Judgment Motions

Date: Jun 26, 2025
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Stern (2025): Clarifying the Dual-Burden Framework for RPAPL §1304 Compliance in Mortgage-Foreclosure Summary-Judgment Motions Introduction The Second Department’s...
Synchronizing Compliance: Deutsche Bank v. Goetz Establishes a Zero-Tolerance Timeline for RPAPL 1304 & 1306 in New York Foreclosures

Synchronizing Compliance: Deutsche Bank v. Goetz Establishes a Zero-Tolerance Timeline for RPAPL 1304 & 1306 in New York Foreclosures

Date: Jun 26, 2025
Synchronizing Compliance: Deutsche Bank v. Goetz Establishes a Zero-Tolerance Timeline for RPAPL 1304 & 1306 in New York Foreclosures Introduction On 25 June 2025, the Appellate Division, Second...
The Reinforced “Four-Corners” Doctrine: Wisconsin Supreme Court Re-limits the Governor’s Partial-Veto Power (Wisconsin State Legislature v. DPI, 2025 WI 27)

The Reinforced “Four-Corners” Doctrine: Wisconsin Supreme Court Re-limits the Governor’s Partial-Veto Power (Wisconsin State Legislature v. DPI, 2025 WI 27)

Date: Jun 26, 2025
The Reinforced “Four-Corners” Doctrine: Wisconsin Supreme Court Re-limits the Governor’s Partial-Veto Power Commentary on Wisconsin State Legislature v. Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction,...
Clarifying the Admissibility of Lay Non-Eyewitness Identification Testimony: A Commentary on People v. Cannon (2025)

Clarifying the Admissibility of Lay Non-Eyewitness Identification Testimony: A Commentary on People v. Cannon (2025)

Date: Jun 26, 2025
Clarifying the Admissibility of Lay Non-Eyewitness Identification Testimony: A Commentary on People v. Cannon (2025 NY Slip Op 03814) 1. Introduction People v. Cannon (2025) presented the New York...
Assistant Superintendents Are “School Officers”: Aideyan v. Mount Vernon City School District (2025) and Its Precedential Reach

Assistant Superintendents Are “School Officers”: Aideyan v. Mount Vernon City School District (2025) and Its Precedential Reach

Date: Jun 26, 2025
Assistant Superintendents Are “School Officers”: Aideyan v. Mount Vernon City School District (2025) and Its Precedential Reach Introduction A retaining-wall collapse and subsequent flooding sparked...
Affirmation of Zero Child Support in Cases of Equal Income and Equal Physical Custody under Alaska Civil Rule 90.3

Affirmation of Zero Child Support in Cases of Equal Income and Equal Physical Custody under Alaska Civil Rule 90.3

Date: Jun 26, 2025
Affirmation of Zero Child Support in Cases of Equal Income and Equal Physical Custody under Alaska Civil Rule 90.3 1. Introduction In Joseph Vann Riggs III v. Amber Dawn Mason-Riggs, the Supreme...
Stay Requests That Only Pause Litigation Are NOT “Proceedings”: Commentary on Emilio Paredes v. Azachorok, Inc.

Stay Requests That Only Pause Litigation Are NOT “Proceedings”: Commentary on Emilio Paredes v. Azachorok, Inc.

Date: Jun 26, 2025
Stay Requests That Only Pause Litigation Are NOT “Proceedings” Under Alaska Civil Rule 41(e) Introduction In Emilio Paredes v. Azachorok, Inc. & Azachorok Contract Services, LLC, the Alaska Supreme...
“Improvidently Granted” Dismissals Must Be Explained:  A Commentary on Scot Van Oudenhoven v. Wisconsin DOJ, 2025 WI 25

“Improvidently Granted” Dismissals Must Be Explained: A Commentary on Scot Van Oudenhoven v. Wisconsin DOJ, 2025 WI 25

Date: Jun 25, 2025
“Improvidently Granted” Dismissals Must Be Explained: The Wisconsin Supreme Court’s Continuing Debate in Scot Van Oudenhoven v. Wisconsin Department of Justice, 2025 WI 25 1. Introduction The...
“Speculation Is Not a Fact” – The Montana Supreme Court’s Clarification of Due-Process Limits on Victim-Impact Statements in State v. C. Jacob

“Speculation Is Not a Fact” – The Montana Supreme Court’s Clarification of Due-Process Limits on Victim-Impact Statements in State v. C. Jacob

Date: Jun 25, 2025
“Speculation Is Not a Fact” – The Montana Supreme Court’s Clarification of Due-Process Limits on Victim-Impact Statements in State v. C. Jacob I. Introduction On 24 June 2025, the Supreme Court of...
Transparency in “Improvidently Granted” Dismissals:  Van Oudenhoven v. Wisconsin DOJ

Transparency in “Improvidently Granted” Dismissals: Van Oudenhoven v. Wisconsin DOJ

Date: Jun 25, 2025
Transparency in “Improvidently Granted” Dismissals: Van Oudenhoven v. Wisconsin Department of Justice Introduction In Scot Van Oudenhoven v. Wisconsin Department of Justice, 2025 WI 25, the Wisconsin...
“Participants, Not Accessories” – The Refined Scope of Felony-Murder Liability under § 53a-54c after State v. Hinton (2025)

“Participants, Not Accessories” – The Refined Scope of Felony-Murder Liability under § 53a-54c after State v. Hinton (2025)

Date: Jun 25, 2025
“Participants, Not Accessories” – The Refined Scope of Felony-Murder Liability under § 53a-54c after State v. Hinton (Conn. 2025) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of Connecticut, in State v. Hinton,...
State v. Matthews: Re-defining the Weight of Officer Testimony versus Dash-Cam Evidence in Particularized Suspicion Analysis

State v. Matthews: Re-defining the Weight of Officer Testimony versus Dash-Cam Evidence in Particularized Suspicion Analysis

Date: Jun 25, 2025
State v. Matthews: Re-defining the Weight of Officer Testimony versus Dash-Cam Evidence in Particularized Suspicion Analysis Introduction State v. T. Matthews, 2025 MT 129, presented the Montana...
“Merits-Blind” Class Certification in Wisconsin – Commentary on Nicole McDaniel v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections, 2025 WI 24

“Merits-Blind” Class Certification in Wisconsin – Commentary on Nicole McDaniel v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections, 2025 WI 24

Date: Jun 25, 2025
“Merits-Blind” Class Certification in Wisconsin – Commentary on Nicole McDaniel v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections, 2025 WI 24 I. Introduction The Supreme Court of Wisconsin’s decision in Nicole...
Waiver-by-Mootness:  The Montana Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction After Insurer’s Post-Payment “Reservation of Rights”  (Commentary on Perea v. AmTrust Ins., 2025 MT 130)

Waiver-by-Mootness: The Montana Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction After Insurer’s Post-Payment “Reservation of Rights” (Commentary on Perea v. AmTrust Ins., 2025 MT 130)

Date: Jun 25, 2025
Waiver-by-Mootness: The Montana Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction After Insurer’s Post-Payment “Reservation of Rights” Commentary on Perea v. AmTrust Insurance Co., 2025 MT 130 Introduction Perea...
“No Live Case, No Power to Hear”:  Hawkins v. State (2025) and the Jurisdictional Pre-Condition for Interlocutory Appeals from the Montana Tax Appeal Board

“No Live Case, No Power to Hear”: Hawkins v. State (2025) and the Jurisdictional Pre-Condition for Interlocutory Appeals from the Montana Tax Appeal Board

Date: Jun 25, 2025
“No Live Case, No Power to Hear”: Hawkins v. State, 2025 MT 134 — Cementing the Rule that District Court Interlocutory Jurisdiction under § 15-2-305, MCA, Requires an Active MTAB Proceeding...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert