Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

state Case Commentaries

Parental Dishonesty and Court-Order Noncompliance as Material Change in Custody Modifications: Stephens v. Buell

Parental Dishonesty and Court-Order Noncompliance as Material Change in Custody Modifications: Stephens v. Buell

Date: May 1, 2025
Parental Dishonesty and Court-Order Noncompliance as Material Change in Custody Modifications: Stephens v. Buell Introduction Stephens v. Buell, decided April 30, 2025 by the Idaho Supreme Court,...
Deane v. Tracer (2025): Histopathological Proof as a Shield Against Summary Judgment in Foreign-Object Malpractice Claims

Deane v. Tracer (2025): Histopathological Proof as a Shield Against Summary Judgment in Foreign-Object Malpractice Claims

Date: May 1, 2025
Deane v. Tracer (2025): Histopathological Proof as a Shield Against Summary Judgment in Foreign-Object Malpractice Claims 1. Introduction Deane v. Tracer, 237 A.D.3d 1156 (2d Dep’t 2025) addresses...
Loera Precedent: Victim Seat-Belt Evidence Irrelevant to DUI Vehicular Homicide Causation

Loera Precedent: Victim Seat-Belt Evidence Irrelevant to DUI Vehicular Homicide Causation

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Loera Precedent: Victim Seat-Belt Evidence Irrelevant to DUI Vehicular Homicide Causation Introduction The Montana Supreme Court’s decision in State v. Loera, 2025 MT 84, clarifies two important...
Judicial Limits on Post-Plea Charge Modification: State v. Partain

Judicial Limits on Post-Plea Charge Modification: State v. Partain

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Judicial Limits on Post-Plea Charge Modification: State v. Partain Introduction The Supreme Court of Montana’s decision in State v. Partain (2025 MT 83) addresses fundamental questions about the...
Expanded Underinsured Motorist Coverage for Permissive Users under WV Code § 33-6-31(c)

Expanded Underinsured Motorist Coverage for Permissive Users under WV Code § 33-6-31(c)

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Expanded Underinsured Motorist Coverage for Permissive Users under WV Code § 33-6-31(c) Introduction Erie Insurance Property & Casualty Company v. James Skylar Cooper presents a significant dispute...
Affirming Absolute Litigation Privilege and the Doctrine of Mootness: RI Supreme Court in Evoqua v. Moriarty

Affirming Absolute Litigation Privilege and the Doctrine of Mootness: RI Supreme Court in Evoqua v. Moriarty

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Affirming Absolute Litigation Privilege and the Doctrine of Mootness: RI Supreme Court in Evoqua v. Moriarty Introduction Evoqua Water Technologies LLC and its affiliate Neptune-Benson sued their...
Fully Deferred Suspension for Failure to Cooperate with Disciplinary Investigations Under Rules 8.1(c), 8.4(a) and 8.4(d)

Fully Deferred Suspension for Failure to Cooperate with Disciplinary Investigations Under Rules 8.1(c), 8.4(a) and 8.4(d)

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Fully Deferred Suspension for Failure to Cooperate with Disciplinary Investigations Under Rules 8.1(c), 8.4(a) and 8.4(d) Introduction In In Re: Timothy A. Meche, 2025-B-0229 (La. 4/29/25), the...
Defining Qualifying Preexisting Disabilities and Eliminating Load Factors in PTD Claims Under RSMo § 287.220.3

Defining Qualifying Preexisting Disabilities and Eliminating Load Factors in PTD Claims Under RSMo § 287.220.3

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Defining Qualifying Preexisting Disabilities and Eliminating Load Factors in PTD Claims Under RSMo § 287.220.3 Introduction This commentary examines the Supreme Court of Missouri’s en banc decision...
Per‑Plaintiff Apportionment Required: Oklahoma Supreme Court Mandates Apportioned Offers of Judgment Under 12 O.S. § 1101.1(A)

Per‑Plaintiff Apportionment Required: Oklahoma Supreme Court Mandates Apportioned Offers of Judgment Under 12 O.S. § 1101.1(A)

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Per‑Plaintiff Apportionment Required: Oklahoma Supreme Court Mandates Apportioned Offers of Judgment Under 12 O.S. § 1101.1(A) Introduction In Lunn v. Continental Motors, Inc., 2025 OK 29, 568 P.3d...
Second Injury Fund PTD: Preexisting Occupational Diseases Are Not “Compensable Injuries” Under § 287.220.3(2)(a)a(ii)

Second Injury Fund PTD: Preexisting Occupational Diseases Are Not “Compensable Injuries” Under § 287.220.3(2)(a)a(ii)

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Second Injury Fund PTD: Preexisting Occupational Diseases Are Not “Compensable Injuries” Under § 287.220.3(2)(a)a(ii) Introduction Treasurer v. Penney (Mo. banc Apr. 29, 2025) addresses a recurring...
Knowledge of Suit vs. Notice of Service: Texas Supreme Court Clarifies Craddock’s First Element in Default Divorce Cases

Knowledge of Suit vs. Notice of Service: Texas Supreme Court Clarifies Craddock’s First Element in Default Divorce Cases

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Knowledge of Suit vs. Notice of Service: Texas Supreme Court Clarifies Craddock’s First Element in Default Divorce Cases I. Introduction In Jenna Tabakman v. Gary Tabakman, the Supreme Court of Texas...
Ex Post Facto Limits on Retroactive SVORA Amendments: Upholding Pre-2007 Registration Requirements

Ex Post Facto Limits on Retroactive SVORA Amendments: Upholding Pre-2007 Registration Requirements

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Ex Post Facto Limits on Retroactive SVORA Amendments: Upholding Pre-2007 Registration Requirements Introduction Clark v. State, 2025 MT 87, is a decision of the Supreme Court of Montana addressing...
Reaffirming Prevailing-Party Status Through Judicially Sanctioned Relief in Post-Judgment Family Law Proceedings

Reaffirming Prevailing-Party Status Through Judicially Sanctioned Relief in Post-Judgment Family Law Proceedings

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Reaffirming Prevailing-Party Status Through Judicially Sanctioned Relief in Post-Judgment Family Law Proceedings Introduction In the Supreme Court of Tennessee’s October 4, 2023 session, Vanessa...
Clarifying the Standards for Postsentencing Standing Criminal Protective Orders under § 53a-40e

Clarifying the Standards for Postsentencing Standing Criminal Protective Orders under § 53a-40e

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Clarifying the Standards for Postsentencing Standing Criminal Protective Orders under § 53a-40e Introduction The Supreme Court of Connecticut’s decision in State v. Mieles, 345 Conn. ___ (2025),...
Baseline Suspension for Lawyer Negligence, Communication Failures, and Fee Misconduct Established in In Re: Louviere

Baseline Suspension for Lawyer Negligence, Communication Failures, and Fee Misconduct Established in In Re: Louviere

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Baseline Suspension for Lawyer Negligence, Communication Failures, and Fee Misconduct Established in In Re: Louviere Introduction In In Re: Drew M. Louviere, the Supreme Court of Louisiana addressed...
Sentencing Errors Are Not Jurisdictional: Missouri Habeas Cannot Revive Procedurally Defaulted “Excess Sentence” Claims (Overruling Zinna/Osowski/Merriweather)

Sentencing Errors Are Not Jurisdictional: Missouri Habeas Cannot Revive Procedurally Defaulted “Excess Sentence” Claims (Overruling Zinna/Osowski/Merriweather)

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Sentencing Errors Are Not Jurisdictional: Missouri Habeas Cannot Revive Procedurally Defaulted “Excess Sentence” Claims (Overruling Zinna/Osowski/Merriweather) 1. Introduction In Branson v. Shewmaker...
Establishing Uniform Procedural Deadlines for Delayed Appeals in the Ohio Supreme Court

Establishing Uniform Procedural Deadlines for Delayed Appeals in the Ohio Supreme Court

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Establishing Uniform Procedural Deadlines for Delayed Appeals in the Ohio Supreme Court Introduction On April 29, 2025, the Supreme Court of Ohio issued its case announcements (2025-Ohio-1483),...
Preserving the Status Quo: Prevailing-Party Attorney Fees for Defending Nonsuited Post-Divorce Petitions under Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-103(c)

Preserving the Status Quo: Prevailing-Party Attorney Fees for Defending Nonsuited Post-Divorce Petitions under Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-103(c)

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Preserving the Status Quo: Prevailing-Party Attorney Fees for Defending Nonsuited Post-Divorce Petitions under Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-103(c) Introduction In Vanessa Colley v. John S. Colley, III, the...
Reciprocal Discipline and the Duty to Protect Minors’ Confidentiality: Unsealed Juvenile Pleadings and Extrajudicial Dissemination as Rule 8.4(d) Misconduct — State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. Boyd, 2025 OK 30

Reciprocal Discipline and the Duty to Protect Minors’ Confidentiality: Unsealed Juvenile Pleadings and Extrajudicial Dissemination as Rule 8.4(d) Misconduct — State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. Boyd, 2025 OK 30

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Reciprocal Discipline and the Duty to Protect Minors’ Confidentiality: Unsealed Juvenile Pleadings and Extrajudicial Dissemination as Rule 8.4(d) Misconduct — State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Association...
Strict Construction Excludes Occupational Diseases from Preexisting Disabilities under Section 287.220.3(2)(a)(ii)

Strict Construction Excludes Occupational Diseases from Preexisting Disabilities under Section 287.220.3(2)(a)(ii)

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Strict Construction Excludes Occupational Diseases from Preexisting Disabilities under Section 287.220.3(2)(a)(ii) Introduction In Treasurer of the State of Missouri – Custodian of the Second Injury...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert