Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

second-circuit-defines-& Case Commentaries

Legislative Privilege Is Personal: Fifth Circuit Dismisses Appeal and Clarifies Conjunctive Test for Non‑Party Appellate Standing

Legislative Privilege Is Personal: Fifth Circuit Dismisses Appeal and Clarifies Conjunctive Test for Non‑Party Appellate Standing

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Legislative Privilege Is Personal: Fifth Circuit Dismisses Appeal and Clarifies Conjunctive Test for Non‑Party Appellate Standing Introduction In Arnold v. Barbers Hill Independent School District,...
When Rule 15, Not Rule 16, Governs Leave to Amend—and Why IRF Preadmission “Process” Allegations Don’t State FCA Fraud: Commentary on Gentry v. Encompass Health

When Rule 15, Not Rule 16, Governs Leave to Amend—and Why IRF Preadmission “Process” Allegations Don’t State FCA Fraud: Commentary on Gentry v. Encompass Health

Date: Nov 7, 2025
When Rule 15, Not Rule 16, Governs Leave to Amend—and Why IRF Preadmission “Process” Allegations Don’t State FCA Fraud: Commentary on Gentry v. Encompass Health Introduction This Fifth Circuit...
Post-Termination Return Trumps Qualified Persons: Fifth Circuit Clarifies Protective Orders Permit Return of Protected Information to the Producing Party’s Counsel

Post-Termination Return Trumps Qualified Persons: Fifth Circuit Clarifies Protective Orders Permit Return of Protected Information to the Producing Party’s Counsel

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Post-Termination Return Trumps Qualified Persons: Fifth Circuit Clarifies Protective Orders Permit Return of Protected Information to the Producing Party’s Counsel Introduction This consolidated...
Specific Post‑Termination Return Clauses Control: Fifth Circuit Clarifies That Protective Orders Do Not Bar Returning Protected Material to the Producing Party

Specific Post‑Termination Return Clauses Control: Fifth Circuit Clarifies That Protective Orders Do Not Bar Returning Protected Material to the Producing Party

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Specific Post‑Termination Return Clauses Control: Fifth Circuit Clarifies That Protective Orders Do Not Bar Returning Protected Material to the Producing Party Introduction In Ocwen Loan Servicing,...
Disclaimers Don’t Cure a Breach: Fifth Circuit Holds That Prosecutorial Advocacy for an Above‑Guidelines Sentence Violates a Plea Agreement Even Without a Formal Variance Request

Disclaimers Don’t Cure a Breach: Fifth Circuit Holds That Prosecutorial Advocacy for an Above‑Guidelines Sentence Violates a Plea Agreement Even Without a Formal Variance Request

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Disclaimers Don’t Cure a Breach: Fifth Circuit Holds That Prosecutorial Advocacy for an Above‑Guidelines Sentence Violates a Plea Agreement Even Without a Formal Variance Request Introduction In...
Presentment Is Jurisdictional and Dismissal Must Be Without Prejudice: The Fifth Circuit’s FTCA Clarification and Strict Limitations Enforcement in Williams v. United States

Presentment Is Jurisdictional and Dismissal Must Be Without Prejudice: The Fifth Circuit’s FTCA Clarification and Strict Limitations Enforcement in Williams v. United States

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Presentment Is Jurisdictional and Dismissal Must Be Without Prejudice: The Fifth Circuit’s FTCA Clarification and Strict Limitations Enforcement in Williams v. United States Introduction In Williams...
Rule 33 Is Not § 2255: Sixth Circuit Requires a “Modicum of Evidence” for New‑Trial Evidentiary Hearings and Reaffirms the “Foolishness” Deliberate‑Ignorance Instruction After Ruan

Rule 33 Is Not § 2255: Sixth Circuit Requires a “Modicum of Evidence” for New‑Trial Evidentiary Hearings and Reaffirms the “Foolishness” Deliberate‑Ignorance Instruction After Ruan

Date: Nov 5, 2025
Rule 33 Is Not § 2255: Sixth Circuit Requires a “Modicum of Evidence” for New‑Trial Evidentiary Hearings and Reaffirms the “Foolishness” Deliberate‑Ignorance Instruction After Ruan Case: United...
Res judicata reaffirmed: Second Circuit bars fourth federal suit challenging NYC Campaign Finance Board clawback and cautions vexatious filers with potential leave‑to‑file sanctions

Res judicata reaffirmed: Second Circuit bars fourth federal suit challenging NYC Campaign Finance Board clawback and cautions vexatious filers with potential leave‑to‑file sanctions

Date: Nov 5, 2025
Res judicata reaffirmed: Second Circuit bars fourth federal suit challenging NYC Campaign Finance Board clawback and cautions vexatious filers with potential leave‑to‑file sanctions Introduction In a...
Post-Filing Assignment Does Not Moot, Redundant Conspiracy Claims Are Dismissable, and “Actual Knowledge” Means Actual: The Second Circuit’s Summary Order in Fezzani v. Dweck

Post-Filing Assignment Does Not Moot, Redundant Conspiracy Claims Are Dismissable, and “Actual Knowledge” Means Actual: The Second Circuit’s Summary Order in Fezzani v. Dweck

Date: Nov 5, 2025
Post-Filing Assignment Does Not Moot, Redundant Conspiracy Claims Are Dismissable, and “Actual Knowledge” Means Actual: The Second Circuit’s Summary Order in Fezzani v. Dweck Decision: Fezzani v....
Second Circuit Summary Order Reaffirms Minimal Due Process for Short Student Suspensions: Doe & Roe v. Levittown Public Schools

Second Circuit Summary Order Reaffirms Minimal Due Process for Short Student Suspensions: Doe & Roe v. Levittown Public Schools

Date: Nov 5, 2025
Minimal Due Process for Ten-Day-or-Less Student Suspensions Reaffirmed; Evidence Sufficiency Review and Role-Separation Not Required (Doe & Roe v. Levittown Public Schools, 2d Cir. 2025) Case: John...
Unwilling or Unable Controls: Second Circuit Reaffirms Private-Actor Persecution Standard and Limits to the Administrative Record in Martinez‑Martinez v. Bondi

Unwilling or Unable Controls: Second Circuit Reaffirms Private-Actor Persecution Standard and Limits to the Administrative Record in Martinez‑Martinez v. Bondi

Date: Nov 5, 2025
Unwilling or Unable Controls: Second Circuit Reaffirms Private-Actor Persecution Standard and Limits to the Administrative Record in Martinez‑Martinez v. Bondi Introduction In Martinez‑Martinez v....
No “Ministerial” Shield from Section 5: Second Circuit Affirms “Necessary Participant” Liability, Scienter by Admissions, and Disgorgement Without Unsupported Expense Offsets (SEC v. Core Business One)

No “Ministerial” Shield from Section 5: Second Circuit Affirms “Necessary Participant” Liability, Scienter by Admissions, and Disgorgement Without Unsupported Expense Offsets (SEC v. Core Business One)

Date: Nov 5, 2025
No “Ministerial” Shield from Section 5: Second Circuit Affirms “Necessary Participant” Liability, Scienter by Admissions, and Disgorgement Without Unsupported Expense Offsets Case: SEC v. Core...
Reaffirming the Admissibility of Police Lay Identification Testimony and the Attempted Murder Cross-Reference in § 922(g) Sentencing: Commentary on United States v. King (2d Cir. 2025)

Reaffirming the Admissibility of Police Lay Identification Testimony and the Attempted Murder Cross-Reference in § 922(g) Sentencing: Commentary on United States v. King (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 5, 2025
Reaffirming the Admissibility of Police Lay Identification Testimony and the Attempted Murder Cross-Reference in § 922(g) Sentencing: Commentary on United States v. King (2d Cir. 2025) Introduction...
Minimal Explanation Suffices for Within-Range Revocation Sentences Under Plain Error Review: United States v. Lopez (2d Cir. 2025)

Minimal Explanation Suffices for Within-Range Revocation Sentences Under Plain Error Review: United States v. Lopez (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 5, 2025
Minimal Explanation Suffices for Within-Range Revocation Sentences Under Plain Error Review: United States v. Lopez (2d Cir. 2025) Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Date: November...
No Presumption from 18 U.S.C. § 1591(c): Second Circuit Confirms “Reasonable Opportunity to Observe” as a Standalone Path; Confrontation/Rule 15 Claim Resolved by Harmless Error in United States v. Paschal (Summary Order)

No Presumption from 18 U.S.C. § 1591(c): Second Circuit Confirms “Reasonable Opportunity to Observe” as a Standalone Path; Confrontation/Rule 15 Claim Resolved by Harmless Error in United States v. Paschal (Summary Order)

Date: Nov 5, 2025
No Presumption from 18 U.S.C. § 1591(c): Second Circuit Confirms “Reasonable Opportunity to Observe” as a Standalone Path; Confrontation/Rule 15 Claim Resolved by Harmless Error in United States v....
Second Circuit Reaffirms: Mere Derecognition Does Not Establish Injury-in-Fact; Student-Association “Legal Status” Conditions Are Viewpoint-Neutral, Reasonable Access Rules in a Limited Public Forum

Second Circuit Reaffirms: Mere Derecognition Does Not Establish Injury-in-Fact; Student-Association “Legal Status” Conditions Are Viewpoint-Neutral, Reasonable Access Rules in a Limited Public Forum

Date: Nov 5, 2025
Second Circuit Reaffirms: Mere Derecognition Does Not Establish Injury-in-Fact; Student-Association “Legal Status” Conditions Are Viewpoint-Neutral, Reasonable Access Rules in a Limited Public Forum...
Second Circuit Reaffirms Reliability Criteria for Credible Fear Interviews in Adverse Credibility Findings: Zafar v. Bondi

Second Circuit Reaffirms Reliability Criteria for Credible Fear Interviews in Adverse Credibility Findings: Zafar v. Bondi

Date: Nov 5, 2025
Second Circuit Reaffirms Reliability Criteria for Credible Fear Interviews in Adverse Credibility Findings: Zafar v. Bondi Introduction In Zafar v. Bondi (No. 23-6312, Nov. 3, 2025), a summary order...
Coleman v. Grand: Characterizing Conduct as “Sexual Harassment” Is Protected Opinion When Supported by Disclosed Facts Under New York Defamation Law

Coleman v. Grand: Characterizing Conduct as “Sexual Harassment” Is Protected Opinion When Supported by Disclosed Facts Under New York Defamation Law

Date: Nov 5, 2025
Coleman v. Grand: Characterizing Conduct as “Sexual Harassment” Is Protected Opinion When Supported by Disclosed Facts Under New York Defamation Law Introduction In Coleman v. Grand (No. 21-800,...
Incarceration Does Not Preclude a §3B1.1 Leadership Enhancement; Guidelines Counsel Consecutive Sentences for In‑Custody Offenses

Incarceration Does Not Preclude a §3B1.1 Leadership Enhancement; Guidelines Counsel Consecutive Sentences for In‑Custody Offenses

Date: Nov 5, 2025
Incarceration Does Not Preclude a §3B1.1 Leadership Enhancement; Guidelines Counsel Consecutive Sentences for In‑Custody Offenses Case: United States v. Antoine D. Wilson Court: U.S. Court of Appeals...
Tailored, Treatment-Gated Cohabitation Restrictions Upheld: Sixth Circuit Affirms Temporary Ban on Living with Women for a Domestic-Violence Recidivist

Tailored, Treatment-Gated Cohabitation Restrictions Upheld: Sixth Circuit Affirms Temporary Ban on Living with Women for a Domestic-Violence Recidivist

Date: Nov 5, 2025
Tailored, Treatment-Gated Cohabitation Restrictions Upheld: Sixth Circuit Affirms Temporary Ban on Living with Women for a Domestic-Violence Recidivist Introduction In United States v. Stephen...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert