Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

retrospective-application-of-prehire-labor-agreements:-laborers& Case Commentaries

United States v. McLain: Seventh Circuit Narrows Admissibility of Neuropsychological Evidence Offered to Negate Specific Intent

United States v. McLain: Seventh Circuit Narrows Admissibility of Neuropsychological Evidence Offered to Negate Specific Intent

Date: Jul 31, 2025
United States v. McLain Seventh Circuit Narrows Admissibility of Neuropsychological Evidence Offered to Negate Specific Intent Introduction United States v. Auston McLain, No. 23-3384 (decided...
“Any” Means “Any”: Eleventh Circuit Removes Temporal Citizenship Barriers in Helms-Burton Title III Actions

“Any” Means “Any”: Eleventh Circuit Removes Temporal Citizenship Barriers in Helms-Burton Title III Actions

Date: Jul 31, 2025
“Any” Means “Any”: Eleventh Circuit Removes Temporal Citizenship Barriers in Helms-Burton Title III Actions Introduction The Eleventh Circuit’s opinion in José Ramón López Regueiro v. American...
“The Oral-Presentation Cure” – Hill v. State of Wyoming (2025 WY 86) and the New Standard for Last-Minute Mitigating Evidence at Sentencing

“The Oral-Presentation Cure” – Hill v. State of Wyoming (2025 WY 86) and the New Standard for Last-Minute Mitigating Evidence at Sentencing

Date: Jul 31, 2025
“The Oral-Presentation Cure” – Hill v. State of Wyoming (2025 WY 86) and the New Standard for Last-Minute Mitigating Evidence at Sentencing Introduction In Tyler James Hill v. The State of Wyoming,...
Clarifying the Limits of an Appellate Mandate: Wyoming Supreme Court Restricts Post-Judgment Revival of Un-pleaded Claims in Trust Litigation

Clarifying the Limits of an Appellate Mandate: Wyoming Supreme Court Restricts Post-Judgment Revival of Un-pleaded Claims in Trust Litigation

Date: Jul 31, 2025
Clarifying the Limits of an Appellate Mandate: Wyoming Supreme Court Restricts Post-Judgment Revival of Un-pleaded Claims in Trust Litigation Introduction The decision in Redland v. Kimsey, 2025 WY...
Goetz Jurisdictional Rule: Wyoming Supreme Court Declares Rule 801 Sanctions for Attorney Tardiness to be Indirect Criminal Contempt Requiring Separate Proceedings

Goetz Jurisdictional Rule: Wyoming Supreme Court Declares Rule 801 Sanctions for Attorney Tardiness to be Indirect Criminal Contempt Requiring Separate Proceedings

Date: Jul 31, 2025
Goetz Jurisdictional Rule: Wyoming Supreme Court Declares Rule 801 Sanctions for Attorney Tardiness to be Indirect Criminal Contempt Requiring Separate Proceedings 1. Introduction Case: In the Matter...
Reaffirming Timeliness & Proper Service as Preconditions for Prisoner-Transport in TPR Trials – Commentary on Mitch J. v. State of Alaska, DFCS/OCS

Reaffirming Timeliness & Proper Service as Preconditions for Prisoner-Transport in TPR Trials – Commentary on Mitch J. v. State of Alaska, DFCS/OCS

Date: Jul 31, 2025
Reaffirming Timeliness & Proper Service as Preconditions for Prisoner-Transport in Termination of Parental Rights Trials Comprehensive Commentary on Mitch J. v. State of Alaska, DFCS, OCS (Supreme...
Airey v. Feliciano: The “No-Candidate, No-Primary” Rule – Connecticut Supreme Court Clarifies the Limits of § 9-329a(b)(3)

Airey v. Feliciano: The “No-Candidate, No-Primary” Rule – Connecticut Supreme Court Clarifies the Limits of § 9-329a(b)(3)

Date: Jul 31, 2025
Airey v. Feliciano: The “No-Candidate, No-Primary” Rule – Connecticut Supreme Court Clarifies the Limits of § 9-329a(b)(3) Introduction On 29 July 2025 the Connecticut Supreme Court delivered its...
State v. Parris: A Heightened Intolerance for Prosecutorial Misstatements on Affirmative Defenses

State v. Parris: A Heightened Intolerance for Prosecutorial Misstatements on Affirmative Defenses

Date: Jul 31, 2025
State v. Parris: A Heightened Intolerance for Prosecutorial Misstatements on Affirmative Defenses Introduction In State v. Parris, the Connecticut Supreme Court addressed whether repeated...
State v. Parris: A New Guard-Rail for Prosecutorial Summations on Extreme Emotional Disturbance

State v. Parris: A New Guard-Rail for Prosecutorial Summations on Extreme Emotional Disturbance

Date: Jul 31, 2025
State v. Parris: A New Guard-Rail for Prosecutorial Summations on Extreme Emotional Disturbance Introduction State v. Parris (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2025) is a landmark decision that...
“Best-Judgment” as an Enforceable Contractual Duty and the Limits of Exculpatory Clauses: A Commentary on Clinton v. Aspinwall (Conn. 2025)

“Best-Judgment” as an Enforceable Contractual Duty and the Limits of Exculpatory Clauses: A Commentary on Clinton v. Aspinwall (Conn. 2025)

Date: Jul 31, 2025
“Best-Judgment” as an Enforceable Contractual Duty and the Limits of Exculpatory Clauses: Commentary on Clinton v. Aspinwall, Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2025 1. Introduction Parties & Setting....
Managerial “Good-Faith” Is Not a Contractual Duty: Clinton v. Aspinwall and the Boundary Between Exculpation and Obligation

Managerial “Good-Faith” Is Not a Contractual Duty: Clinton v. Aspinwall and the Boundary Between Exculpation and Obligation

Date: Jul 31, 2025
Managerial “Good-Faith” Is Not a Contractual Duty: Clinton v. Aspinwall and the Boundary Between Exculpation and Obligation Introduction In Clinton v. Aspinwall, 352 Conn. 597 (2025), the Connecticut...
Haque v. Bondi: Re-affirming that Future-Persecution Claims Fail When Tethered to Discredited Testimony

Haque v. Bondi: Re-affirming that Future-Persecution Claims Fail When Tethered to Discredited Testimony

Date: Jul 31, 2025
Haque v. Bondi: Re-affirming that Future-Persecution Claims Fail When Tethered to Discredited Testimony 1. Introduction Enamul Haque, a Bangladeshi national and self-proclaimed supporter of the...
Second Circuit Fortifies Authors’ Termination Power: Exclusive Rights in Underlying Works Do Not Survive under § 304(c)(6)(A)

Second Circuit Fortifies Authors’ Termination Power: Exclusive Rights in Underlying Works Do Not Survive under § 304(c)(6)(A)

Date: Jul 31, 2025
Second Circuit Fortifies Authors’ Termination Power: Exclusive Rights in Underlying Works Do Not Survive under § 304(c)(6)(A) Introduction In Atticus Ltd. Liability Co. v. The Dramatic Publishing Co....
Nautilus v. Captain Pip’s – Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Colorado River, not Wilton/Brillhart, Governs Abstention Over Coercive Rescission Claims in Mixed Federal-State Coverage Actions

Nautilus v. Captain Pip’s – Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Colorado River, not Wilton/Brillhart, Governs Abstention Over Coercive Rescission Claims in Mixed Federal-State Coverage Actions

Date: Jul 31, 2025
Nautilus v. Captain Pip’s – Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Colorado River, not Wilton/Brillhart, Governs Abstention Over Coercive Rescission Claims in Mixed Federal-State Coverage Actions...
Reaffirming the Objective-Nexus Requirement and the Preservation Doctrine in Family-Association Asylum Claims: Commentary on Olivier St. Simon v. U.S. Attorney General

Reaffirming the Objective-Nexus Requirement and the Preservation Doctrine in Family-Association Asylum Claims: Commentary on Olivier St. Simon v. U.S. Attorney General

Date: Jul 31, 2025
Reaffirming the Objective-Nexus Requirement and the Preservation Doctrine in Family-Association Asylum Claims: Commentary on Olivier St. Simon v. U.S. Attorney General Introduction On 29 July 2025,...
Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms Absolute Legislative Immunity for County Commissioners Enacting Generally Applicable Employment Policies

Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms Absolute Legislative Immunity for County Commissioners Enacting Generally Applicable Employment Policies

Date: Jul 31, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms Absolute Legislative Immunity for County Commissioners Enacting Generally Applicable Employment Policies Introduction In Robert Kelly & Ricky Blalock v. Marvin Arrington,...
Definite Medical Leave as a Viable ADA Accommodation: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies “Qualified Individual” Status

Definite Medical Leave as a Viable ADA Accommodation: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies “Qualified Individual” Status

Date: Jul 31, 2025
Definite Medical Leave as a Viable ADA Accommodation: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies “Qualified Individual” Status Introduction In Spencer Bueno v. Arhaus, LLC, the United States Court of Appeals for the...
“Beyond the Score”: Eleventh Circuit Confirms that Extensive Un-Scored Criminal History Alone May Support a Major Upward Variance – Commentary on United States v. Damian Brown (11th Cir. 2025)

“Beyond the Score”: Eleventh Circuit Confirms that Extensive Un-Scored Criminal History Alone May Support a Major Upward Variance – Commentary on United States v. Damian Brown (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 31, 2025
“Beyond the Score”: Eleventh Circuit Confirms that Extensive Un-Scored Criminal History Alone May Support a Major Upward Variance – Commentary on United States v. Damian Brown (11th Cir. 2025)...
“Discretion First” – The Eleventh Circuit’s Clarification of § 3553(a)-Based Denials in Compassionate-Release Cases (United States v. Portillo Holguin, 2025)

“Discretion First” – The Eleventh Circuit’s Clarification of § 3553(a)-Based Denials in Compassionate-Release Cases (United States v. Portillo Holguin, 2025)

Date: Jul 31, 2025
“Discretion First” – The Eleventh Circuit’s Clarification of § 3553(a)-Based Denials in Compassionate-Release Cases Commentary on United States v. Juan Carlos Portillo Holguin, No. 24-12468 (11th...
Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms § 922(g)(1) Constitutionality 
            and State-Law Predicate Rule After Rahimi: 
            A Commentary on United States v. Shamonte Virgil (2025)

Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms § 922(g)(1) Constitutionality and State-Law Predicate Rule After Rahimi: A Commentary on United States v. Shamonte Virgil (2025)

Date: Jul 31, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms § 922(g)(1) Constitutionality and State-Law Predicate Rule After Rahimi: Commentary on United States v. Virgil (11th Cir. 2025) Introduction United States v. Shamonte...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert