Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

reinforcing-the-implied-covenant-of-good-faith-in-commercial-development-contracts:-anthony& Case Commentaries

Fourth Circuit Holds that the First-Amendment “Unfettered-Discretion” Doctrine Does Not Constrain a Governor’s Clemency Power to Restore Voting Rights – A Commentary on George Hawkins v. Glenn Youngkin (2025)

Fourth Circuit Holds that the First-Amendment “Unfettered-Discretion” Doctrine Does Not Constrain a Governor’s Clemency Power to Restore Voting Rights – A Commentary on George Hawkins v. Glenn Youngkin (2025)

Date: Aug 25, 2025
First Amendment Licensing Rules Stop at the Executive Door: A Comprehensive Commentary on George Hawkins v. Glenn Youngkin, 92 F.4th ___ (4th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction In George Hawkins v. Glenn...
Shumate v. Lynchburg: Fourth Circuit Clarifies the Non-Applicability of Eleventh-Amendment Immunity to Municipal Officials and Reinforces § 1367 Discretion

Shumate v. Lynchburg: Fourth Circuit Clarifies the Non-Applicability of Eleventh-Amendment Immunity to Municipal Officials and Reinforces § 1367 Discretion

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Shumate v. Lynchburg: Fourth Circuit Clarifies the Non-Applicability of Eleventh-Amendment Immunity to Municipal Officials and Reinforces § 1367 Discretion Introduction Mary Lynn Shumate, a veteran...
Glover v. EQT – The Fourth Circuit’s New Standard on Class Certification for Uniform Royalty-Payment Practices

Glover v. EQT – The Fourth Circuit’s New Standard on Class Certification for Uniform Royalty-Payment Practices

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“One Scheme, One Class” – Glover v. EQT and the Fourth Circuit’s Clarification that a Uniform Royalty-Payment Methodology Can Sustain Class Certification Despite Lease Variations Introduction William...
“Unlawful User” Redefined: Possession-Based Drug Use as a Firearm Disability under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3) — Commentary on United States v. Davey (10th Cir. 2025)

“Unlawful User” Redefined: Possession-Based Drug Use as a Firearm Disability under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3) — Commentary on United States v. Davey (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“Unlawful User” Redefined: Possession-Based Drug Use as a Firearm Disability under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3) Commentary on United States v. Davey, 92 F.4th ___ (10th Cir. 2025) Introduction United States...
“Neutral-Factor” COVID-19 Delays and Mandatory Specificity: United States v. Flynn’s Clarification of Waiver Doctrine under the Speedy Trial Act and Rule 12

“Neutral-Factor” COVID-19 Delays and Mandatory Specificity: United States v. Flynn’s Clarification of Waiver Doctrine under the Speedy Trial Act and Rule 12

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“Neutral-Factor” COVID-19 Delays and Mandatory Specificity: United States v. Flynn’s Clarification of Waiver Doctrine under the Speedy Trial Act and Rule 12 Introduction United States v. Flynn, No....

        United States v. Ingram: Confirming Broad District-Court Discretion to Impose
        Upward Variances Beyond Criminal-History Category VI When Guidelines Understate
        Recidivism and Danger

United States v. Ingram: Confirming Broad District-Court Discretion to Impose Upward Variances Beyond Criminal-History Category VI When Guidelines Understate Recidivism and Danger

Date: Aug 25, 2025
United States v. Ingram: Confirming Broad District-Court Discretion to Impose Upward Variances Beyond Criminal-History Category VI When Guidelines Understate Recidivism and Danger 1. Introduction The...
“Unremembered” Strategy Is Not Enough: Brown v. State (2025) and Nevada’s Refined Ineffective-Assistance Doctrine

“Unremembered” Strategy Is Not Enough: Brown v. State (2025) and Nevada’s Refined Ineffective-Assistance Doctrine

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“Unremembered” Strategy Is Not Enough: Brown v. State (2025) and Nevada’s Refined Ineffective-Assistance Doctrine 1. Introduction Brown v. State, No. 88860 (Nev. Aug. 19, 2025) is a Supreme Court of...

        DeKlotz v. NS Support, LLC – Medical Liens Under I.C. § 45-704B Are
        “Extraordinary Collection Actions” Requiring Full Compliance with the Idaho Patient Act

DeKlotz v. NS Support, LLC – Medical Liens Under I.C. § 45-704B Are “Extraordinary Collection Actions” Requiring Full Compliance with the Idaho Patient Act

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Medical Liens Under I.C. § 45-704B Are “Extraordinary Collection Actions”: Commentary on DeKlotz v. NS Support, LLC, 174 Idaho ___ (2025) 1. Introduction In DeKlotz v. NS Support, LLC the Idaho...

        Idaho Supreme Court Abandons Statute-of-Limitations Bar for Easements by Necessity 
        and Expands Discretion to Revisit “Law-of-the-Case”:  Easterling v. Clark (“Easterling II”)

Idaho Supreme Court Abandons Statute-of-Limitations Bar for Easements by Necessity and Expands Discretion to Revisit “Law-of-the-Case”: Easterling v. Clark (“Easterling II”)

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Idaho Supreme Court Abandons Statute-of-Limitations Bar for Easements by Necessity and Expands Discretion to Revisit “Law-of-the-Case” Doctrine: Detailed Commentary on Easterling v. Clark (2025) 1....
“No Shortcuts to Summary Judgment” –  Rupp v. City of Pocatello and the Idaho Supreme Court’s Dual Message on Discovery Diligence and Rule 56 Analysis

“No Shortcuts to Summary Judgment” – Rupp v. City of Pocatello and the Idaho Supreme Court’s Dual Message on Discovery Diligence and Rule 56 Analysis

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“No Shortcuts to Summary Judgment” – Rupp v. City of Pocatello and the Idaho Supreme Court’s Dual Message on Discovery Diligence and Rule 56 Analysis Introduction Rupp v. City of Pocatello, 174 Idaho...
The Temple Clarification on Cross-Jurisdiction Brady Obligations

The Temple Clarification on Cross-Jurisdiction Brady Obligations

Date: Aug 25, 2025
The Temple Clarification on Cross-Jurisdiction Brady Obligations Introduction In G. Temple v. State, 2025 MT 185, the Supreme Court of Montana addressed whether a state prosecutor’s constitutional...
Boeshans v. Boeshans: Conditioning Parenting Rights on Court-Ordered Evaluations and Clarifying Ownership of Professional Limited Liability Companies

Boeshans v. Boeshans: Conditioning Parenting Rights on Court-Ordered Evaluations and Clarifying Ownership of Professional Limited Liability Companies

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Boeshans v. Boeshans: Conditioning Parenting Rights on Court-Ordered Evaluations and Clarifying Ownership of Professional Limited Liability Companies Introduction The Supreme Court of Montana, in In...
Silence Isn’t Golden: Waiver of the Right to Compel Arbitration When Setting-Aside a Default — Commentary on Monarch Heating & Cooling, LLC v. Petra, Inc.

Silence Isn’t Golden: Waiver of the Right to Compel Arbitration When Setting-Aside a Default — Commentary on Monarch Heating & Cooling, LLC v. Petra, Inc.

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Silence Isn’t Golden: Waiver of the Right to Compel Arbitration When Setting-Aside a Default — Commentary on Monarch Heating & Cooling, LLC v. Petra, Inc. I. Introduction The Supreme Court of...
State v. Barrus: Distinguishing “Knowing” from “Appreciating” Criminality in Post-Conviction Mental-Health Sentencing

State v. Barrus: Distinguishing “Knowing” from “Appreciating” Criminality in Post-Conviction Mental-Health Sentencing

Date: Aug 25, 2025
State v. Barrus: Distinguishing “Knowing” from “Appreciating” Criminality in Post-Conviction Mental-Health Sentencing 1. Introduction State v. L. Barrus (2025 MT 183) required the Supreme Court of...
State v. Walton ‑ Prosecutorial Limits on Parole-Restriction Recommendations When Plea Agreements Are Asymmetrical

State v. Walton ‑ Prosecutorial Limits on Parole-Restriction Recommendations When Plea Agreements Are Asymmetrical

Date: Aug 25, 2025
State v. Walton (2025 MT 186): Prosecutorial Limits on Parole-Restriction Recommendations When Plea Agreements Are Asymmetrical Introduction In State v. M. Walton the Supreme Court of Montana...
“Written-Consent Rule” for Reinstated Bail:  Commonwealth v. Rondon (Pa. 2025)

“Written-Consent Rule” for Reinstated Bail: Commonwealth v. Rondon (Pa. 2025)

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“Written-Consent Rule” for Reinstated Bail Commonwealth v. Rondon, 294 A.3d ___ (Pa. 2025) 1. Introduction Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (Middle District) — Decided 19 Aug 2025 Majority: McCaffery,...
Commonwealth v. Walker (2025): Re-defining the Limits of Voir Dire Questions on Legal Principles in Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Walker (2025): Re-defining the Limits of Voir Dire Questions on Legal Principles in Pennsylvania

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Commonwealth v. Walker (Pa. 2025): Re-defining the Limits of Voir Dire Questions on Legal Principles Introduction In Commonwealth v. Walker, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania—Western...
“No Unity Destroyed, No Severance Achieved” – The Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rejects Self-Conveyance as a Means of Terminating Joint Tenancy

“No Unity Destroyed, No Severance Achieved” – The Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rejects Self-Conveyance as a Means of Terminating Joint Tenancy

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“No Unity Destroyed, No Severance Achieved” – The Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rejects Self-Conveyance as a Means of Terminating Joint Tenancy 1. Introduction Grant v. Grant (Pa. 2025) tackles a...
Defining Agency Records in the Social-Media Age: The “Penncrest Factors” under Pennsylvania’s Right-to-Know Law

Defining Agency Records in the Social-Media Age: The “Penncrest Factors” under Pennsylvania’s Right-to-Know Law

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Defining Agency Records in the Social-Media Age: The “Penncrest Factors” under Pennsylvania’s Right-to-Know Law 1. Introduction Penncrest School District v. Cagle is the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s...
Distinct Constitutional Treatment of Insanity Acquittees Confirmed: Commentary on State v. Foster (Conn. 2025)

Distinct Constitutional Treatment of Insanity Acquittees Confirmed: Commentary on State v. Foster (Conn. 2025)

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“A Special Class that Should Be Treated Differently”: The Connecticut Supreme Court Re-aligns Equal-Protection Doctrine for Insanity Acquittees – State v. Foster, 353 Conn. 1 (2025) 1. Introduction...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert