Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

reinforcing-the-implied-covenant-of-good-faith-in-commercial-development-contracts:-anthony& Case Commentaries

United States v. Ray: Permissible Coercive Control Expert Testimony and Reinforced RICO Enterprise Doctrine

United States v. Ray: Permissible Coercive Control Expert Testimony and Reinforced RICO Enterprise Doctrine

Date: Jun 3, 2025
United States v. Ray: Permissible Coercive Control Expert Testimony and Reinforced RICO Enterprise Doctrine Introduction In United States v. Ray, 23-6114-cr (2d Cir. June 2, 2025), the Second Circuit...
Felony–Murder Rule Refined: Reckless Indifference Requirement for Non-Killer Accomplices

Felony–Murder Rule Refined: Reckless Indifference Requirement for Non-Killer Accomplices

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Felony–Murder Rule Refined: Reckless Indifference Requirement for Non-Killer Accomplices Introduction In People v. Emanuel (S280551), the Supreme Court of California re-examined the contours of the...
Binding Promissory Sentence Reductions Upon YOTP Completion

Binding Promissory Sentence Reductions Upon YOTP Completion

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Binding Promissory Sentence Reductions Upon YOTP Completion Introduction In David Ray Herrera, Jr. v. The State of Wyoming (2025 WY 62), the Wyoming Supreme Court addressed whether a district court’s...
Strict Adherence to 21 U.S.C. § 851: Predicate‐Conviction Notice Rule and Its Mandatory Enforcement

Strict Adherence to 21 U.S.C. § 851: Predicate‐Conviction Notice Rule and Its Mandatory Enforcement

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Strict Adherence to 21 U.S.C. § 851: Predicate-Conviction Notice Rule and Its Mandatory Enforcement 1. Introduction United States v. Thomas Wilkinson, IV is a Seventh Circuit decision clarifying the...
Discretionary Revocation of Visa Petitions Immune from Judicial Review under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii)

Discretionary Revocation of Visa Petitions Immune from Judicial Review under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii)

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Discretionary Revocation of Visa Petitions Immune from Judicial Review under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii) Introduction This commentary examines the Fourth Circuit’s decision in MD Islam v. Director...
Standards for Counsel Appointment and §3582(c)(1)(A) Compassionate Release in the Tenth Circuit: United States v. Read-Forbes

Standards for Counsel Appointment and §3582(c)(1)(A) Compassionate Release in the Tenth Circuit: United States v. Read-Forbes

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Standards for Counsel Appointment and §3582(c)(1)(A) Compassionate Release in the Tenth Circuit: United States v. Read-Forbes Introduction This commentary examines the Tenth Circuit’s June 2, 2025...
Wage Increase Threats as Coercion: Defining Employer Speech Boundaries under Sections 8(a)(1) and 8(c)

Wage Increase Threats as Coercion: Defining Employer Speech Boundaries under Sections 8(a)(1) and 8(c)

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Wage Increase Threats as Coercion: Defining Employer Speech Boundaries under Sections 8(a)(1) and 8(c) Introduction Garten Trucking LC v. NLRB is a Fourth Circuit decision issued on June 2, 2025,...
Clarification of Review and Application of the Well-Settled Exception under the Hague Convention

Clarification of Review and Application of the Well-Settled Exception under the Hague Convention

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Clarification of Review and Application of the Well-Settled Exception under the Hague Convention Introduction This commentary examines the Fifth Circuit’s June 2, 2025 decision in Brito Guevara v....
The Possession Requirement for Brady Material and Authentication Standards for Digital Evidence Confirmed in United States v. Gonzalez

The Possession Requirement for Brady Material and Authentication Standards for Digital Evidence Confirmed in United States v. Gonzalez

Date: Jun 3, 2025
The Possession Requirement for Brady Material and Authentication Standards for Digital Evidence Confirmed in United States v. Gonzalez 1. Introduction In United States v. Mauricio Gonzalez (11th Cir....
The Snope Clarification: Reinforcing the “Common-Use / Burden-Shifting” Doctrine under the Second Amendment

The Snope Clarification: Reinforcing the “Common-Use / Burden-Shifting” Doctrine under the Second Amendment

Date: Jun 3, 2025
The Snope Clarification: Reinforcing the “Common-Use / Burden-Shifting” Doctrine under the Second Amendment 1. Introduction In Snope v. Brown, No. 24-203 (Jun. 2, 2025), the Supreme Court denied...
Clarifying the Face-to-Face Sales Exemption under the Telemarketing Sales Rule: CFPB v. Stratfs

Clarifying the Face-to-Face Sales Exemption under the Telemarketing Sales Rule: CFPB v. Stratfs

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Clarifying the Face-to-Face Sales Exemption under the Telemarketing Sales Rule: CFPB v. Stratfs Introduction Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Stratfs, LLC (f/k/a Strategic Financial Solutions,...
Circumstantial Proof of Knowledge in Aggravated Identity Theft: United States v. Aceituno

Circumstantial Proof of Knowledge in Aggravated Identity Theft: United States v. Aceituno

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Circumstantial Proof of Knowledge in Aggravated Identity Theft: United States v. Aceituno Introduction United States v. Aceituno (1st Cir. June 2, 2025) addresses the sufficiency of evidence required...
Presumption of Verity in Plea Colloquies and Deference to District Courts in §2255 Ineffective‐Assistance Claims

Presumption of Verity in Plea Colloquies and Deference to District Courts in §2255 Ineffective‐Assistance Claims

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Presumption of Verity in Plea Colloquies and Deference to District Courts in §2255 Ineffective‐Assistance Claims Introduction This commentary examines the Seventh Circuit’s decision in Helen Caldwell...
Non-Assignability of Statutory Surviving Spouse Benefits in Incorporated Divorce Settlements

Non-Assignability of Statutory Surviving Spouse Benefits in Incorporated Divorce Settlements

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Non-Assignability of Statutory Surviving Spouse Benefits in Incorporated Divorce Settlements Introduction This commentary examines the Rhode Island Supreme Court’s decision in Marilyn L. Wilson v....
Coercive Versus Persuasive Employer Speech: Clarifying Section 8(c) Boundaries in NLRB v. Garten Trucking

Coercive Versus Persuasive Employer Speech: Clarifying Section 8(c) Boundaries in NLRB v. Garten Trucking

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Coercive Versus Persuasive Employer Speech: Clarifying Section 8(c) Boundaries in NLRB v. Garten Trucking Introduction NLRB v. Garten Trucking LC arises from a union‐organizing campaign at Garten...
Clarifying the Limits of Bivens and Section 1985(3) Private Entity Liability Absent State Action

Clarifying the Limits of Bivens and Section 1985(3) Private Entity Liability Absent State Action

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Clarifying the Limits of Bivens and Section 1985(3) Private Entity Liability Absent State Action Introduction Fernandez v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. is a June 2, 2025 decision of the United States Court...
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Jurisdictional Boundaries in Mixed Actions: Mandatory Exercise for Coercive Claims and Limited Abstention for Declaratory Relief

Sixth Circuit Clarifies Jurisdictional Boundaries in Mixed Actions: Mandatory Exercise for Coercive Claims and Limited Abstention for Declaratory Relief

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Jurisdictional Boundaries in Mixed Actions: Mandatory Exercise for Coercive Claims and Limited Abstention for Declaratory Relief Introduction Fire-Dex, LLC v. Admiral...
Clarifying the Scope of Aggravated Identity Theft Post-Dubin: United States v. Jason Weigand

Clarifying the Scope of Aggravated Identity Theft Post-Dubin: United States v. Jason Weigand

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Clarifying the Scope of Aggravated Identity Theft Post-Dubin: United States v. Jason Weigand Introduction This commentary examines the Third Circuit’s decision in United States v. Jason C. Weigand,...
Forfeiture of Claims-Processing Challenges to Defective NTAs: Espinoza v. U.S. Attorney General

Forfeiture of Claims-Processing Challenges to Defective NTAs: Espinoza v. U.S. Attorney General

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Forfeiture of Claims-Processing Challenges to Defective Notices to Appear in Immigration Proceedings Introduction This commentary examines the Eleventh Circuit’s decision in Santa I. Espinoza v. U.S....
United States v. Novis (Denkberg): Advice-of-Counsel Does Not Obviate Fraudulent Intent in Mail and Wire Fraud Schemes

United States v. Novis (Denkberg): Advice-of-Counsel Does Not Obviate Fraudulent Intent in Mail and Wire Fraud Schemes

Date: Jun 3, 2025
United States v. Novis (Denkberg): Advice-of-Counsel Does Not Obviate Fraudulent Intent in Mail and Wire Fraud Schemes Introduction United States v. Novis (Denkberg), 23-6877-cr (2d Cir. June 2,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert