Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

reinforcing-the-implied-covenant-of-good-faith-in-commercial-development-contracts:-anthony& Case Commentaries

“Let the Doctors Speak” – State v. Soto and the New Mandate Against Undue Restriction of Expert Medical Testimony in Child-Abuse Homicide Trials

“Let the Doctors Speak” – State v. Soto and the New Mandate Against Undue Restriction of Expert Medical Testimony in Child-Abuse Homicide Trials

Date: Jun 4, 2025
“Let the Doctors Speak” – State v. Soto and the New Mandate Against Undue Restriction of Expert Medical Testimony in Child-Abuse Homicide Trials 1. Introduction Court & Date: New Mexico Supreme...
Reaffirming Colton: The Strict Test for Double Jeopardy Based on Prosecutorial Intent in Connecticut

Reaffirming Colton: The Strict Test for Double Jeopardy Based on Prosecutorial Intent in Connecticut

Date: Jun 4, 2025
Reaffirming Colton: The Strict Test for Double Jeopardy Based on Prosecutorial Intent in Connecticut Introduction State v. Patrick M. (Supreme Court of Connecticut, officially released 3 June 2025)...
“The Walsh Protocol”: Judicial Duties When a Plea Agreement Is Ambiguous at Sentencing

“The Walsh Protocol”: Judicial Duties When a Plea Agreement Is Ambiguous at Sentencing

Date: Jun 4, 2025
“The Walsh Protocol”: Judicial Duties When a Plea Agreement Is Ambiguous at Sentencing Introduction State v. Walsh, 373 Or 714 (2025), confronts a recurring but seldom-resolved problem: what must a...
Reaffirmation of Mens Rea Requirements under 18 U.S.C. § 875(c) in True Threat Prosecutions

Reaffirmation of Mens Rea Requirements under 18 U.S.C. § 875(c) in True Threat Prosecutions

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Reaffirmation of Mens Rea Requirements under 18 U.S.C. § 875(c) in True Threat Prosecutions Introduction In United States v. Bedell, No. 24-1783 (2d Cir. June 2, 2025), the Second Circuit addressed...
Fay v. Barbera: Recognizing Personal §1983 Liability for Gender-Based Disparate Treatment by Supervisory Officials

Fay v. Barbera: Recognizing Personal §1983 Liability for Gender-Based Disparate Treatment by Supervisory Officials

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Fay v. Barbera: Recognizing Personal §1983 Liability for Gender-Based Disparate Treatment by Supervisory Officials Introduction Fay v. Barbera, decided June 2, 2025 by the Second Circuit, clarifies...
Defendant’s Burden and Prosecutorial Storytelling: Clarifications under the Plain Error Doctrine

Defendant’s Burden and Prosecutorial Storytelling: Clarifications under the Plain Error Doctrine

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Defendant’s Burden and Prosecutorial Storytelling: Clarifications under the Plain Error Doctrine Introduction This commentary examines the concurring opinion in State of West Virginia v. David Hunter...
Establishing Limits on Victim Character Evidence Under the Plain Error Doctrine

Establishing Limits on Victim Character Evidence Under the Plain Error Doctrine

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Establishing Limits on Victim Character Evidence Under the Plain Error Doctrine Introduction The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia’s decision in State of West Virginia v. David Hunter Lewis...
“A New Clock for Every Act” – The Supreme Court’s (Non-)Decision in Nicholson v. W. L. York, Inc. and the Reaffirmation of Discrete-Act Accrual Under 42 U.S.C. § 1981

“A New Clock for Every Act” – The Supreme Court’s (Non-)Decision in Nicholson v. W. L. York, Inc. and the Reaffirmation of Discrete-Act Accrual Under 42 U.S.C. § 1981

Date: Jun 3, 2025
“A New Clock for Every Act” – The Supreme Court’s (Non-)Decision in Nicholson v. W. L. York, Inc. and the Reaffirmation of Discrete-Act Accrual Under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Introduction In Nicholson v. W....
Preservation of Judicial Immunity for Public Bodies Under the New Mexico Civil Rights Act

Preservation of Judicial Immunity for Public Bodies Under the New Mexico Civil Rights Act

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Preservation of Judicial Immunity for Public Bodies Under the New Mexico Civil Rights Act 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of New Mexico’s decision in Bolen v. New Mexico Racing Commission (2025)...
Issuer Repurchases Outside the Reach of Section 16(b): No Short-Swing Liability for Treasury Stock Buybacks

Issuer Repurchases Outside the Reach of Section 16(b): No Short-Swing Liability for Treasury Stock Buybacks

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Issuer Repurchases Outside the Reach of Section 16(b): No Short-Swing Liability for Treasury Stock Buybacks Introduction This commentary examines the Eleventh Circuit’s June 2, 2025 per curiam...
New Precedent: Ohio’s Two-Year Personal-Injury Statute Governs Title IX Claims

New Precedent: Ohio’s Two-Year Personal-Injury Statute Governs Title IX Claims

Date: Jun 3, 2025
New Precedent: Ohio’s Two-Year Personal-Injury Statute Governs Title IX Claims 1. Introduction In Eszter Pryor v. The Ohio State University, No. 24-3812 (6th Cir. Jun. 2, 2025), the Sixth Circuit...
Establishing the Threshold for “Extraordinary Circumstances” Under Younger Abstention in Federal Challenges to Ongoing State Criminal Proceedings

Establishing the Threshold for “Extraordinary Circumstances” Under Younger Abstention in Federal Challenges to Ongoing State Criminal Proceedings

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Establishing the Threshold for “Extraordinary Circumstances” Under Younger Abstention in Federal Challenges to Ongoing State Criminal Proceedings Introduction This commentary examines the Third...
United States v. Lawrence: Affirming District Court Discretion in Crack/Powder Cocaine Sentencing and PSR-Adopted Search Conditions

United States v. Lawrence: Affirming District Court Discretion in Crack/Powder Cocaine Sentencing and PSR-Adopted Search Conditions

Date: Jun 3, 2025
United States v. Lawrence: Affirming District Court Discretion in Crack/Powder Cocaine Sentencing and PSR-Adopted Search Conditions Introduction In United States v. Lawrence (2d Cir. June 2, 2025),...
O'Neill v. Newburgh: Reinforcing the Comparator Requirement in Title VII Disparate Treatment Claims

O'Neill v. Newburgh: Reinforcing the Comparator Requirement in Title VII Disparate Treatment Claims

Date: Jun 3, 2025
O'Neill v. Newburgh: Reinforcing the Comparator Requirement in Title VII Disparate Treatment Claims Introduction In O’Neill v. Newburgh Enlarged City School District, the Second Circuit reviewed a...
Duty of Complete Disclosure in Securities Offers: Material Omissions and Loss Causation Affirmed

Duty of Complete Disclosure in Securities Offers: Material Omissions and Loss Causation Affirmed

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Duty of Complete Disclosure in Securities Offers: Material Omissions and Loss Causation Affirmed Introduction In Maher v. Global Factors, LLC, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second...
Affirmation of General Duty of Reasonable Care in Prison Workline Injuries and Prohibition of Cost Awards Against Indigent Plaintiffs

Affirmation of General Duty of Reasonable Care in Prison Workline Injuries and Prohibition of Cost Awards Against Indigent Plaintiffs

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Affirmation of General Duty of Reasonable Care in Prison Workline Injuries and Prohibition of Cost Awards Against Indigent Plaintiffs Introduction In Belford v. State, the Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi...
Core Fiduciary Duty and Harmless-Error Review in Honest-Services Wire Fraud: United States v. Pullman (1st Cir. 2025)

Core Fiduciary Duty and Harmless-Error Review in Honest-Services Wire Fraud: United States v. Pullman (1st Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Core Fiduciary Duty and Harmless-Error Review in Honest-Services Wire Fraud: United States v. Pullman (1st Cir. 2025) Introduction United States v. Pullman is a consolidated appeal of two related...
Establishing Sufficient Evidence for Officer’s Actual Belief of Imminent Battery in Aggravated Assault Cases

Establishing Sufficient Evidence for Officer’s Actual Belief of Imminent Battery in Aggravated Assault Cases

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Establishing Sufficient Evidence for Officer’s Actual Belief of Imminent Battery in Aggravated Assault Cases Introduction In State v. Johnson, 2025-NMCA-39827, the Supreme Court of New Mexico...
Congress’s Authority to Disarm Felons Upheld: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms § 922(g)(1) Post-Rahimi Remand

Congress’s Authority to Disarm Felons Upheld: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms § 922(g)(1) Post-Rahimi Remand

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Congress’s Authority to Disarm Felons Upheld: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms § 922(g)(1) Post-Rahimi Remand 1. Introduction In United States v. André Michael Dubois (11th Cir. June 2, 2025), the Eleventh...
Scope of Liability Limitations in Sale of Goods: Direct versus Consequential Damages

Scope of Liability Limitations in Sale of Goods: Direct versus Consequential Damages

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Scope of Liability Limitations in Sale of Goods: Direct versus Consequential Damages Introduction This commentary examines the Eleventh Circuit’s decision in Sweet Additions Ingredient Processors,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert