Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

reaffirming-tellabs:-sixth-circuit-establishes-correct-& Case Commentaries

Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Reaffirms Non-Appealability of Orders Vacating Arbitration Awards with Rehearing; Clarifies Final-Judgment Protocols in Special Proceedings

Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Reaffirms Non-Appealability of Orders Vacating Arbitration Awards with Rehearing; Clarifies Final-Judgment Protocols in Special Proceedings

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Reaffirming the Non-Appealability of Orders Vacating Arbitration Awards with Rehearing under HRS § 658A-28 and Mandating “In Aid of Jurisdiction” Remands for Final Judgments in Special Proceedings...
Baltas v. Chapdelaine: No Qualified Immunity for Blanket Denial of Access to Existing Congregate Religious Services Absent Penological Justification

Baltas v. Chapdelaine: No Qualified Immunity for Blanket Denial of Access to Existing Congregate Religious Services Absent Penological Justification

Date: Sep 8, 2025
No Qualified Immunity for Blanket Denial of Access to Existing Congregate Religious Services Absent Penological Justification Introduction In Baltas v. Chapdelaine, No. 22-2813-cv (2d Cir. Sept. 3,...
“Direct and Significant” Means What It Says: Second Circuit Clarifies CEA § 2(i)(1) Extraterritorial Reach and Confirms No Artificial-Price Element for Rule 180.1 Fraud

“Direct and Significant” Means What It Says: Second Circuit Clarifies CEA § 2(i)(1) Extraterritorial Reach and Confirms No Artificial-Price Element for Rule 180.1 Fraud

Date: Sep 8, 2025
“Direct and Significant” Means What It Says: Second Circuit Clarifies CEA § 2(i)(1) Extraterritorial Reach and Confirms No Artificial-Price Element for Rule 180.1 Fraud Introduction United States v....
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies ALJ Articulation Duties and Appeals Council’s Materiality Review of New Evidence under the 2017 Regulations

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies ALJ Articulation Duties and Appeals Council’s Materiality Review of New Evidence under the 2017 Regulations

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies ALJ Articulation Duties and Appeals Council’s Materiality Review of New Evidence under the 2017 Regulations Introduction In Bryan Dubose v. Commissioner of Social Security,...
Surplus-or-Standing: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that a Chapter 7 Debtor’s “Party in Interest” Status Under § 502 Does Not Bypass Article III Redressability

Surplus-or-Standing: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that a Chapter 7 Debtor’s “Party in Interest” Status Under § 502 Does Not Bypass Article III Redressability

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Surplus-or-Standing: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that a Chapter 7 Debtor’s “Party in Interest” Status Under § 502 Does Not Bypass Article III Redressability Introduction This commentary analyzes the...
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA Reach into Foreign EEZs, No Nexus Requirement, and Denial of Minor‑Role Reductions for Go‑Fast Crews

Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA Reach into Foreign EEZs, No Nexus Requirement, and Denial of Minor‑Role Reductions for Go‑Fast Crews

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA Reach into Foreign EEZs, No Nexus Requirement, and Denial of Minor‑Role Reductions for Go‑Fast Crews Introduction This commentary analyzes the Eleventh Circuit’s...
Jones-Stage Objections Preserve Challenges to Supervised-Release Conditions; Minor-Contact Restrictions Upheld in SORNA Failure-to-Register Sentences (United States v. Louis‑Jean, 11th Cir. 2025)

Jones-Stage Objections Preserve Challenges to Supervised-Release Conditions; Minor-Contact Restrictions Upheld in SORNA Failure-to-Register Sentences (United States v. Louis‑Jean, 11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Jones-Stage Objections Preserve Challenges to Supervised-Release Conditions; Minor-Contact Restrictions Upheld in SORNA Failure-to-Register Sentences Introduction This commentary analyzes the...
EEZ as “High Seas,” No U.S. Nexus Required, and Narrow Minor‑Role Relief for Go‑Fast Crews: Eleventh Circuit’s Consolidated MDLEA Ruling in United States v. Jhon Henry Alvarado‑Valencia (and Codefendants)

EEZ as “High Seas,” No U.S. Nexus Required, and Narrow Minor‑Role Relief for Go‑Fast Crews: Eleventh Circuit’s Consolidated MDLEA Ruling in United States v. Jhon Henry Alvarado‑Valencia (and Codefendants)

Date: Sep 8, 2025
EEZ as “High Seas,” No U.S. Nexus Required, and Narrow Minor‑Role Relief for Go‑Fast Crews: Eleventh Circuit’s Consolidated MDLEA Ruling in United States v. Jhon Henry Alvarado‑Valencia (and...
EEZ-as-High-Seas, No-Nexus Requirement, and a Narrow Minor-Role Inquiry Under the MDLEA: Commentary on United States v. Quijije‑Mero (11th Cir. 2025)

EEZ-as-High-Seas, No-Nexus Requirement, and a Narrow Minor-Role Inquiry Under the MDLEA: Commentary on United States v. Quijije‑Mero (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 8, 2025
EEZ-as-High-Seas, No-Nexus Requirement, and a Narrow Minor-Role Inquiry Under the MDLEA: Commentary on United States v. Quijije‑Mero (11th Cir. 2025) Introduction In United States v. Jhon Yandry...
EEZ Equals “High Seas” for Felonies Clause: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA’s Extraterritorial Reach and No‑Nexus Rule; Minor‑Role Reductions Narrow for Go‑Fast Couriers

EEZ Equals “High Seas” for Felonies Clause: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA’s Extraterritorial Reach and No‑Nexus Rule; Minor‑Role Reductions Narrow for Go‑Fast Couriers

Date: Sep 8, 2025
EEZ Equals “High Seas” for Felonies Clause: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA’s Extraterritorial Reach and No‑Nexus Rule; Minor‑Role Reductions Narrow for Go‑Fast Couriers Introduction In a...
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA’s Reach Into Foreign EEZs and Rejects Nexus Requirement; Affirms Denial of Minor‑Role Adjustments for Go‑Fast Crew

Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA’s Reach Into Foreign EEZs and Rejects Nexus Requirement; Affirms Denial of Minor‑Role Adjustments for Go‑Fast Crew

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA’s Reach Into Foreign EEZs and Rejects Nexus Requirement; Affirms Denial of Minor‑Role Adjustments for Go‑Fast Crew Introduction In United States v. Juan Manuel...
EEZ Is “High Seas” for Felonies Clause; No Nexus Requirement Under the MDLEA; and Role Reductions Must Be Gauged Against Relevant Conduct: Commentary on United States v. Lauro Aguilar-Gomez (11th Cir. Sept. 3, 2025)

EEZ Is “High Seas” for Felonies Clause; No Nexus Requirement Under the MDLEA; and Role Reductions Must Be Gauged Against Relevant Conduct: Commentary on United States v. Lauro Aguilar-Gomez (11th Cir. Sept. 3, 2025)

Date: Sep 8, 2025
EEZ Is “High Seas” for Felonies Clause; No Nexus Requirement Under the MDLEA; and Role Reductions Must Be Gauged Against Relevant Conduct Case: United States v. Lauro Aguilar-Gomez (consolidated with...
Uncharged Conduct, Officer Video Identification, and the Departure/Variance Label: Eleventh Circuit Affirms a Major Upward Sentence in United States v. White

Uncharged Conduct, Officer Video Identification, and the Departure/Variance Label: Eleventh Circuit Affirms a Major Upward Sentence in United States v. White

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Uncharged Conduct, Officer Video Identification, and the Departure/Variance Label: Eleventh Circuit Affirms a Major Upward Sentence in United States v. White Introduction In United States v. Narada...
EFIN Responsibility, Circumstantial Mens Rea, and the Zero‑Point Offender Carve‑Out: The Eleventh Circuit Affirms Managerial Role Enhancement and Loss Extrapolation in Tax‑Preparer Fraud

EFIN Responsibility, Circumstantial Mens Rea, and the Zero‑Point Offender Carve‑Out: The Eleventh Circuit Affirms Managerial Role Enhancement and Loss Extrapolation in Tax‑Preparer Fraud

Date: Sep 8, 2025
EFIN Responsibility, Circumstantial Mens Rea, and the Zero‑Point Offender Carve‑Out: The Eleventh Circuit Affirms Managerial Role Enhancement and Loss Extrapolation in Tax‑Preparer Fraud Case: United...
No “Naked” Remands in Social Security Appeals: Third Circuit Reaffirms that § 405(g) Remands Must Be Either a Merits Judgment under Sentence Four or a Good‑Cause Remand under Sentence Six

No “Naked” Remands in Social Security Appeals: Third Circuit Reaffirms that § 405(g) Remands Must Be Either a Merits Judgment under Sentence Four or a Good‑Cause Remand under Sentence Six

Date: Sep 8, 2025
No “Naked” Remands in Social Security Appeals: Third Circuit Reaffirms that § 405(g) Remands Must Be Either a Merits Judgment under Sentence Four or a Good‑Cause Remand under Sentence Six...
Preclusion, Not Rooker‑Feldman, Governs Post‑Foreclosure Bankruptcy Litigation: Third Circuit’s Two‑Part Clarification for When Rooker‑Feldman Applies in Bankruptcy

Preclusion, Not Rooker‑Feldman, Governs Post‑Foreclosure Bankruptcy Litigation: Third Circuit’s Two‑Part Clarification for When Rooker‑Feldman Applies in Bankruptcy

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Preclusion, Not Rooker‑Feldman, Governs Post‑Foreclosure Bankruptcy Litigation: Third Circuit’s Two‑Part Clarification for When Rooker‑Feldman Applies in Bankruptcy Introduction In a precedential...
Harmless Error, Moderate Social Limits, and Post‑2017 Opinion Articulation: The Fifth Circuit’s Clarification in Madkins v. Bisignano

Harmless Error, Moderate Social Limits, and Post‑2017 Opinion Articulation: The Fifth Circuit’s Clarification in Madkins v. Bisignano

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Harmless Error, Moderate Social Limits, and Post‑2017 Opinion Articulation: The Fifth Circuit’s Clarification in Madkins v. Bisignano Introduction In Madkins v. Bisignano (5th Cir. Sept. 3, 2025),...
Reinstatement Need Not Be Immediate: Fifth Circuit Requires “Next Available Position” Relief in Title VII/§1981 Retaliatory Discharge Cases

Reinstatement Need Not Be Immediate: Fifth Circuit Requires “Next Available Position” Relief in Title VII/§1981 Retaliatory Discharge Cases

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Reinstatement Need Not Be Immediate: Fifth Circuit Requires “Next Available Position” Relief in Title VII/§1981 Retaliatory Discharge Cases Introduction This Fifth Circuit decision in McMillian v....
McNair v. Pratt (6th Cir. 2025): No Clearly Established Eighth Amendment Violation for a Ground Takedown of a Handcuffed, Noncompliant Inmate When the Officer Is Alone—And a Sharp Reminder on Record-Handling at Summary Judgment

McNair v. Pratt (6th Cir. 2025): No Clearly Established Eighth Amendment Violation for a Ground Takedown of a Handcuffed, Noncompliant Inmate When the Officer Is Alone—And a Sharp Reminder on Record-Handling at Summary Judgment

Date: Sep 8, 2025
McNair v. Pratt (6th Cir. 2025): No Clearly Established Eighth Amendment Violation for a Ground Takedown of a Handcuffed, Noncompliant Inmate When the Officer Is Alone—And a Sharp Reminder on...
Reasonableness and “Good Faith for Cause” Reaffirmed: Louisiana Supreme Court Limits Judicial Power to Alter Civil Service Board Sanctions and Clarifies the Board’s Discretion to Modify Unreasonable Discipline

Reasonableness and “Good Faith for Cause” Reaffirmed: Louisiana Supreme Court Limits Judicial Power to Alter Civil Service Board Sanctions and Clarifies the Board’s Discretion to Modify Unreasonable Discipline

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Reasonableness and “Good Faith for Cause” Reaffirmed: Louisiana Supreme Court Limits Judicial Power to Alter Civil Service Board Sanctions and Clarifies the Board’s Discretion to Modify Unreasonable...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert