Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

preserving-public-trial-rights-during-a-pandemic:-the-iowa-supreme-court Case Commentaries

Expert Testimony Is Required to Prove Non-Negligible Risk in Massachusetts Informed-Consent Claims: The First Circuit’s Clarification in Meka v. Haddad

Expert Testimony Is Required to Prove Non-Negligible Risk in Massachusetts Informed-Consent Claims: The First Circuit’s Clarification in Meka v. Haddad

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Expert Testimony Is Required to Prove Non-Negligible Risk in Massachusetts Informed-Consent Claims: The First Circuit’s Clarification in Meka v. Haddad Introduction In Meka v. Haddad, the United...
Errato v. Seder (2d Cir. 2025): No Federal Do‑Over of Divorce Judgments; Independent Fraud Claims May Evade the Domestic Relations Exception but Are Precluded After Prior Litigation

Errato v. Seder (2d Cir. 2025): No Federal Do‑Over of Divorce Judgments; Independent Fraud Claims May Evade the Domestic Relations Exception but Are Precluded After Prior Litigation

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Errato v. Seder (2d Cir. 2025): No Federal Do‑Over of Divorce Judgments; Independent Fraud Claims May Evade the Domestic Relations Exception but Are Precluded After Prior Litigation Court: U.S. Court...
Second Circuit confirms: Seven-figure emotional distress awards in attempted workplace rape need no medical proof; amounts exceeding the Title VII cap properly ride on NYCHRL/NYSHRL

Second Circuit confirms: Seven-figure emotional distress awards in attempted workplace rape need no medical proof; amounts exceeding the Title VII cap properly ride on NYCHRL/NYSHRL

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Second Circuit confirms: Seven-figure emotional distress awards in attempted workplace rape need no medical proof; amounts exceeding the Title VII cap properly ride on NYCHRL/NYSHRL Introduction In...
Reaffirming Broad District Court Discretion in § 3582(c)(2) Motions After Amendment 821: Emphasis on Unchanged Criminal History Is Permissible

Reaffirming Broad District Court Discretion in § 3582(c)(2) Motions After Amendment 821: Emphasis on Unchanged Criminal History Is Permissible

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Reaffirming Broad District Court Discretion in § 3582(c)(2) Motions After Amendment 821: Emphasis on Unchanged Criminal History Is Permissible Introduction In United States v. Ahmed (No. 24-2629),...
Short Orders, Broad Discretion: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Denial of Amendment 821 “Zero‑Point Offender” Reductions Based on § 3553(a) Factors

Short Orders, Broad Discretion: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Denial of Amendment 821 “Zero‑Point Offender” Reductions Based on § 3553(a) Factors

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Short Orders, Broad Discretion: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Denial of Amendment 821 “Zero‑Point Offender” Reductions Based on § 3553(a) Factors Introduction In United States v. Jose Rogelio...
Marginian’s Shield Extends to Group Captives: No Ohio Bad‑Faith Claim When Insurer Settles Within Policy Limits Despite Captive Reimbursement

Marginian’s Shield Extends to Group Captives: No Ohio Bad‑Faith Claim When Insurer Settles Within Policy Limits Despite Captive Reimbursement

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Marginian’s Shield Extends to Group Captives: No Ohio Bad‑Faith Claim When Insurer Settles Within Policy Limits Despite Captive Reimbursement Introduction In Chemical Solvents, Inc. v. Greenwich...
Breach of Contract as Concrete Injury and Classwide Challenges to “Negotiation” Adjustments: Sixth Circuit Affirms Certification in Clippinger v. State Farm

Breach of Contract as Concrete Injury and Classwide Challenges to “Negotiation” Adjustments: Sixth Circuit Affirms Certification in Clippinger v. State Farm

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Breach of Contract as Concrete Injury and Classwide Challenges to “Negotiation” Adjustments: Sixth Circuit Affirms Certification in Clippinger v. State Farm Introduction This published decision from...
Habeas Courts Retain Jurisdiction to Sanction Pre‑Compliance Violations of Conditional and Unconditional Writs, Even After Belated State Compliance; “Penalty Bar” Reserved for Substantial Inequitable Conduct

Habeas Courts Retain Jurisdiction to Sanction Pre‑Compliance Violations of Conditional and Unconditional Writs, Even After Belated State Compliance; “Penalty Bar” Reserved for Substantial Inequitable Conduct

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Habeas Courts Retain Jurisdiction to Sanction Pre‑Compliance Violations of Conditional and Unconditional Writs, Even After Belated State Compliance; “Penalty Bar” Reserved for Substantial Inequitable...
United States v. Riley: Pro se allegations that counsel entered a sentencing stipulation without client consent trigger a mandatory judicial inquiry; the hybrid-representation bar does not apply

United States v. Riley: Pro se allegations that counsel entered a sentencing stipulation without client consent trigger a mandatory judicial inquiry; the hybrid-representation bar does not apply

Date: Oct 11, 2025
United States v. Riley: Pro se allegations that counsel entered a sentencing stipulation without client consent trigger a mandatory judicial inquiry; the hybrid-representation bar does not apply...
Frericks v. Department of the Navy: Tenth Circuit Clarifies that Motive and Timing May Inform “Reasonable Belief” Under the WPA and Endorses Disclosure-by-Disclosure Contributing-Factor Analysis

Frericks v. Department of the Navy: Tenth Circuit Clarifies that Motive and Timing May Inform “Reasonable Belief” Under the WPA and Endorses Disclosure-by-Disclosure Contributing-Factor Analysis

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Frericks v. Department of the Navy: Tenth Circuit Clarifies that Motive and Timing May Inform “Reasonable Belief” Under the WPA and Endorses Disclosure-by-Disclosure Contributing-Factor Analysis...
Tenth Circuit rejects categorical “hub” placements: Individualized placement determinations are required under IDEA, ADA, and Section 504; futility excuses Section 504 exhaustion when hearing officers lack jurisdiction

Tenth Circuit rejects categorical “hub” placements: Individualized placement determinations are required under IDEA, ADA, and Section 504; futility excuses Section 504 exhaustion when hearing officers lack jurisdiction

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Tenth Circuit rejects categorical “hub” placements: Individualized placement determinations are required under IDEA, ADA, and Section 504; futility excuses Section 504 exhaustion when hearing...
Unexplained VE Skill Labels Won’t Do: Tenth Circuit Requires Record Documentation of Transferable Skills Under SSR 82-41

Unexplained VE Skill Labels Won’t Do: Tenth Circuit Requires Record Documentation of Transferable Skills Under SSR 82-41

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Unexplained VE Skill Labels Won’t Do: Tenth Circuit Requires Record Documentation of Transferable Skills Under SSR 82-41 Introduction This commentary analyzes the Tenth Circuit’s unpublished order...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies: Mental-Health Progress Notes Without Functional Assessments Are Not “Medical Opinions” Under SSA’s Post-2017 Regulations

Tenth Circuit Clarifies: Mental-Health Progress Notes Without Functional Assessments Are Not “Medical Opinions” Under SSA’s Post-2017 Regulations

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Tenth Circuit Clarifies: Mental-Health Progress Notes Without Functional Assessments Are Not “Medical Opinions” Under SSA’s Post-2017 Regulations Introduction In Parsons v. Commissioner, SSA (10th...
Pre‑Enforcement Standing Demands a Proscribing Law: Tenth Circuit Rejects HCSM Challenge Based on New Mexico’s Insurance Definition

Pre‑Enforcement Standing Demands a Proscribing Law: Tenth Circuit Rejects HCSM Challenge Based on New Mexico’s Insurance Definition

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Pre‑Enforcement Standing Demands a Proscribing Law: Tenth Circuit Rejects HCSM Challenge Based on New Mexico’s Insurance Definition Introduction In Samaritan Ministries International v. Kane, No....
No State Action in Private Condemnation: Tenth Circuit Holds Private Landowners Using Oklahoma’s “Private Way of Necessity” Statutes Are Not § 1983 Actors

No State Action in Private Condemnation: Tenth Circuit Holds Private Landowners Using Oklahoma’s “Private Way of Necessity” Statutes Are Not § 1983 Actors

Date: Oct 11, 2025
No State Action in Private Condemnation: Tenth Circuit Holds Private Landowners Using Oklahoma’s “Private Way of Necessity” Statutes Are Not § 1983 Actors Introduction In Witherspoon v. Ince, the...
Acknowledgment-of-Receipt Not Required: Corroborated Sworn Statements Can Defeat Summary Judgment on PLRA Exhaustion, and District Courts Must Assess Perttu’s Jury-Trial Mandate Before Holding a Pavey Hearing

Acknowledgment-of-Receipt Not Required: Corroborated Sworn Statements Can Defeat Summary Judgment on PLRA Exhaustion, and District Courts Must Assess Perttu’s Jury-Trial Mandate Before Holding a Pavey Hearing

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Acknowledgment-of-Receipt Not Required: Corroborated Sworn Statements Can Defeat Summary Judgment on PLRA Exhaustion, and District Courts Must Assess Perttu’s Jury-Trial Mandate Before Holding a...
No § 4204 Carve-Out in § 4219 Installment Calculations: Seventh Circuit Clarifies That “the highest” Means the Highest

No § 4204 Carve-Out in § 4219 Installment Calculations: Seventh Circuit Clarifies That “the highest” Means the Highest

Date: Oct 11, 2025
No § 4204 Carve-Out in § 4219 Installment Calculations: Seventh Circuit Clarifies That “the highest” Means the Highest Case: SuperValu, Inc. v. United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Employers...
Hoff (2025 ND 164): Conclusory Crane Findings Are Insufficient—District Courts Must Articulate a Specific, Evidence-Based Nexus Between Disorder and Inability to Control

Hoff (2025 ND 164): Conclusory Crane Findings Are Insufficient—District Courts Must Articulate a Specific, Evidence-Based Nexus Between Disorder and Inability to Control

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Hoff (2025 ND 164): Conclusory Crane Findings Are Insufficient—District Courts Must Articulate a Specific, Evidence-Based Nexus Between Disorder and Inability to Control Introduction This North...
Waived Jury-Instruction Challenges Define the Elements for Sufficiency Review: State v. Guthmiller (2025 ND 162)

Waived Jury-Instruction Challenges Define the Elements for Sufficiency Review: State v. Guthmiller (2025 ND 162)

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Waived Jury-Instruction Challenges Define the Elements for Sufficiency Review: State v. Guthmiller (2025 ND 162) Introduction In State v. Guthmiller, 2025 ND 162, the North Dakota Supreme Court...
Remote Child Testimony Permissible Upon Presence‑Specific Trauma Impairing Communication: Commentary on State v. Moen, 2025 ND 163

Remote Child Testimony Permissible Upon Presence‑Specific Trauma Impairing Communication: Commentary on State v. Moen, 2025 ND 163

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Remote Child Testimony Permissible Upon Presence‑Specific Trauma Impairing Communication: State v. Moen, 2025 ND 163 Introduction In State v. Moen, 2025 ND 163, the North Dakota Supreme Court...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert