Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

juvenile-sentencing-guidelines:-iowa-supreme-court Case Commentaries

Reaffirming the Bail Reform Act’s Detention Presumption for Child Exploitation Offenses: United States v. Preston Creed-Boehm

Reaffirming the Bail Reform Act’s Detention Presumption for Child Exploitation Offenses: United States v. Preston Creed-Boehm

Date: Apr 19, 2025
Reaffirming the Bail Reform Act’s Detention Presumption for Child Exploitation Offenses: United States v. Preston Creed-Boehm Introduction United States v. Preston Creed-Boehm (6th Cir. 2025)...
Vanderlan v. Jackson HMA: Affirming Government’s Deference in Dismissing Qui Tam Actions under FCA §3730(c)(2)(A)

Vanderlan v. Jackson HMA: Affirming Government’s Deference in Dismissing Qui Tam Actions under FCA §3730(c)(2)(A)

Date: Apr 19, 2025
Vanderlan v. Jackson HMA: Affirming Government’s Deference in Dismissing Qui Tam Actions under FCA §3730(c)(2)(A) Introduction Vanderlan v. Jackson HMA, decided April 18, 2025 by the Fifth Circuit,...
Excludable Pretrial Motion Delays Under the Speedy Trial Act: United States v. Owens

Excludable Pretrial Motion Delays Under the Speedy Trial Act: United States v. Owens

Date: Apr 19, 2025
Excludable Pretrial Motion Delays Under the Speedy Trial Act: United States v. Owens Introduction United States v. Zachariah Owens (3d Cir. Apr. 18, 2025) addressed whether extended delays between...
Job-Related Medical Documentation Requirements Consistent with Business Necessity Under the ADA

Job-Related Medical Documentation Requirements Consistent with Business Necessity Under the ADA

Date: Apr 19, 2025
Job-Related Medical Documentation Requirements Consistent with Business Necessity Under the ADA Introduction This commentary examines the Third Circuit’s unpublished decision in James Chadwick v....
Restitution Burden Allocation in Attorney Discipline: Shifting the Burden When Restitution Is Not Reasonably Ascertainable

Restitution Burden Allocation in Attorney Discipline: Shifting the Burden When Restitution Is Not Reasonably Ascertainable

Date: Apr 19, 2025
Restitution Burden Allocation in Attorney Discipline: Shifting the Burden When Restitution Is Not Reasonably Ascertainable Introduction The Supreme Court of Wisconsin’s decision in Office of Lawyer...
Criminal Division Jurisdiction under 13 V.S.A. § 2658 for Vacating Convictions of Human Trafficking Victims

Criminal Division Jurisdiction under 13 V.S.A. § 2658 for Vacating Convictions of Human Trafficking Victims

Date: Apr 19, 2025
Criminal Division Jurisdiction under 13 V.S.A. § 2658 for Vacating Convictions of Human Trafficking Victims Introduction State v. Jessica L. Morrill, 2025 VT 19, is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Non-Exclusive Social Media License Bars User’s Copyright Claims

Non-Exclusive Social Media License Bars User’s Copyright Claims

Date: Apr 19, 2025
Non-Exclusive Social Media License Bars User’s Copyright Claims 1. Introduction In Sethunya v. TikTok, Inc., 10th Cir. No. 24-4045 (Apr. 18, 2025), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit...
Statutory Retroactive Parole Eligibility Does Not Constitute a Commutation: State ex rel. Hilgers v. Evnen

Statutory Retroactive Parole Eligibility Does Not Constitute a Commutation: State ex rel. Hilgers v. Evnen

Date: Apr 19, 2025
Statutory Retroactive Parole Eligibility Does Not Constitute a Commutation Introduction In State ex rel. Hilgers v. Evnen, 318 Neb. 803 (2025), the Nebraska Supreme Court addressed the...
Defining “Clear Liability”: Insurer’s Duty to Initiate Settlement Negotiations in Negligent Security Claims

Defining “Clear Liability”: Insurer’s Duty to Initiate Settlement Negotiations in Negligent Security Claims

Date: Apr 19, 2025
Defining “Clear Liability”: Insurer’s Duty to Initiate Settlement Negotiations in Negligent Security Claims Introduction Case Name: Kinsale Insurance Company v. Pride of St. Lucie Lodge 1189, Inc....
Clarification of Mitigating-Role Adjustments Under U.S.S.G. §3B1.2: Comparative Analysis of Defendants’ Culpability

Clarification of Mitigating-Role Adjustments Under U.S.S.G. §3B1.2: Comparative Analysis of Defendants’ Culpability

Date: Apr 19, 2025
Clarification of Mitigating-Role Adjustments Under U.S.S.G. §3B1.2: Comparative Analysis of Defendants’ Culpability Introduction United States v. Migdalia Matos Estrella, decided by the Sixth Circuit...
Clarifying Excludable Delay Under the Speedy Trial Act: From Filing to Hearing

Clarifying Excludable Delay Under the Speedy Trial Act: From Filing to Hearing

Date: Apr 19, 2025
Clarifying Excludable Delay Under the Speedy Trial Act: From Filing to Hearing Introduction United States v. Kayla Fair and Zachariah Owens (3d Cir. Apr. 18, 2025) presented the Third Circuit with...
Doctrine of Immediacy in Use of Deadly Force: Verbal Warnings Not Required Under Imminent Threat Circumstances – Pipkins v. City of Hoover

Doctrine of Immediacy in Use of Deadly Force: Verbal Warnings Not Required Under Imminent Threat Circumstances – Pipkins v. City of Hoover

Date: Apr 18, 2025
Doctrine of Immediacy in Use of Deadly Force: Verbal Warnings Not Required Under Imminent Threat Circumstances Introduction In April Pipkins v. City of Hoover, Alabama, the Eleventh Circuit addressed...
Clarifying the Nexus Requirement for § 924(c)(1) Guilty Pleas – United States v. Gray

Clarifying the Nexus Requirement for § 924(c)(1) Guilty Pleas – United States v. Gray

Date: Apr 18, 2025
Clarifying the Nexus Requirement for § 924(c)(1) Guilty Pleas – United States v. Gray Introduction United States v. Gray (10th Cir. Apr. 17, 2025) addresses the sufficiency of the factual basis a...
Dangerous-Persons Framework for Firearm Disarmament: Affirmation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) under Bruen in United States v. Williams

Dangerous-Persons Framework for Firearm Disarmament: Affirmation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) under Bruen in United States v. Williams

Date: Apr 18, 2025
Dangerous-Persons Framework for Firearm Disarmament: Affirmation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) under Bruen in United States v. Williams Introduction This commentary examines the Sixth Circuit’s April 17,...
Reaffirmation of Younger Abstention and the Narrow Scope of the Bad Faith Exception in Federal Pre‐Trial Injunctions

Reaffirmation of Younger Abstention and the Narrow Scope of the Bad Faith Exception in Federal Pre‐Trial Injunctions

Date: Apr 18, 2025
Reaffirmation of Younger Abstention and the Narrow Scope of the Bad Faith Exception in Federal Pre‐Trial Injunctions Introduction Frost v. Nessel, No. 24-1132 (6th Cir. Apr. 17, 2025), is a Sixth...
Legitimacy and Boundaries of Supervised Release Conditions Restricting Proximity to Minors

Legitimacy and Boundaries of Supervised Release Conditions Restricting Proximity to Minors

Date: Apr 18, 2025
Legitimacy and Boundaries of Supervised Release Conditions Restricting Proximity to Minors Introduction The Eleventh Circuit’s decision in United States v. Jeffrey Leonard Pybus, No. 24-10979 (11th...
Ensuring Equal Eligibility for Intradistrict and Interdistrict Transfer Students under Ark. Code § 6-18-1904(f)

Ensuring Equal Eligibility for Intradistrict and Interdistrict Transfer Students under Ark. Code § 6-18-1904(f)

Date: Apr 18, 2025
Ensuring Equal Eligibility for Intradistrict and Interdistrict Transfer Students under Ark. Code § 6-18-1904(f) Introduction In Vincent Standridge, on his own behalf and on behalf of his minor child...
Requirement of Degree-of-Success Adjustment in Lodestar Calculations for § 1988 Fee Awards

Requirement of Degree-of-Success Adjustment in Lodestar Calculations for § 1988 Fee Awards

Date: Apr 18, 2025
Requirement of Degree-of-Success Adjustment in Lodestar Calculations for § 1988 Fee Awards Introduction Toyota Lease Trust v. Village of Freeport, No. 24-488-cv (2d Cir. Apr. 17, 2025) arose from the...
Extension of Fiduciary Obligations Through Post-Closing Adjustment Period and Release Exception in Mergers

Extension of Fiduciary Obligations Through Post-Closing Adjustment Period and Release Exception in Mergers

Date: Apr 18, 2025
Extension of Fiduciary Obligations Through Post-Closing Adjustment Period and Release Exception in Mergers Introduction In Vincent P. Mona v. David F. McKay, the United States Court of Appeals for...
Clarification of Rule 23(g): Adequacy of Class Counsel and Limits on Preclusion Based on Counsel’s Conduct

Clarification of Rule 23(g): Adequacy of Class Counsel and Limits on Preclusion Based on Counsel’s Conduct

Date: Apr 18, 2025
Clarification of Rule 23(g): Adequacy of Class Counsel and Limits on Preclusion Based on Counsel’s Conduct Introduction Robertson v. Trinity Packaging Corp. was decided on April 17, 2025 by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert