Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

imputation-of-agent&amp Case Commentaries

File-Stamp Omissions on Criminal Informations Are Non‑Jurisdictional and Do Not Support Habeas Relief

File-Stamp Omissions on Criminal Informations Are Non‑Jurisdictional and Do Not Support Habeas Relief

Date: Nov 1, 2025
File-Stamp Omissions on Criminal Informations Are Non‑Jurisdictional and Do Not Support Habeas Relief Case: Edward Lee Carter v. Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction, 2025 Ark. 168...
Article 5, § 1 Controls: Arkansas Supreme Court Invalidates County Initiative Filing Statutes and Bars “Carryover” Certification of Untimely Petitions

Article 5, § 1 Controls: Arkansas Supreme Court Invalidates County Initiative Filing Statutes and Bars “Carryover” Certification of Untimely Petitions

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Article 5, § 1 Controls: Arkansas Supreme Court Invalidates County Initiative Filing Statutes and Bars “Carryover” Certification of Untimely Petitions Introduction This commentary examines the...
Utah Supreme Court Limits Past Medical Specials to Amounts Actually Incurred; Negotiated Rate Differential Is Not a Collateral Source

Utah Supreme Court Limits Past Medical Specials to Amounts Actually Incurred; Negotiated Rate Differential Is Not a Collateral Source

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Utah Supreme Court Limits Past Medical Specials to Amounts Actually Incurred; Negotiated Rate Differential Is Not a Collateral Source Introduction In Gardner v. Norman, 2025 UT 47, the Utah Supreme...
Leavitt v. OPC: Utah Supreme Court Equates “Reasonably Should Know” with Negligence Under Rule 3.6 and Affirms Public Reprimand for Prejudicial Prosecutorial Press Conference

Leavitt v. OPC: Utah Supreme Court Equates “Reasonably Should Know” with Negligence Under Rule 3.6 and Affirms Public Reprimand for Prejudicial Prosecutorial Press Conference

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Leavitt v. OPC: Utah Supreme Court Equates “Reasonably Should Know” with Negligence Under Rule 3.6 and Affirms Public Reprimand for Prejudicial Prosecutorial Press Conference Introduction This...
No Direct Appeal as of Right from Denial of Motion to Modify Pretrial Detention: Utah Supreme Court Narrows § 77-20-209 (State v. Harris, 2025 UT 48)

No Direct Appeal as of Right from Denial of Motion to Modify Pretrial Detention: Utah Supreme Court Narrows § 77-20-209 (State v. Harris, 2025 UT 48)

Date: Nov 1, 2025
No Direct Appeal as of Right from Denial of Motion to Modify Pretrial Detention: Utah Supreme Court Narrows § 77-20-209 Introduction In State v. Harris, 2025 UT 48, the Utah Supreme Court resolved a...
Stipulated Relocation Timelines Do Not Terminate UCCJEA Exclusive, Continuing Jurisdiction Absent RSA 458-A:13 Findings

Stipulated Relocation Timelines Do Not Terminate UCCJEA Exclusive, Continuing Jurisdiction Absent RSA 458-A:13 Findings

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Stipulated Relocation Timelines Do Not Terminate UCCJEA Exclusive, Continuing Jurisdiction Absent RSA 458-A:13 Findings Introduction In the Matter of Taylor Coyne and Ashley Blanchfield (N.H. Sup....
Erickson v. Pharmacia: WPLA Does Not Displace Washington’s Issue-by-Issue Choice-of-Law; Missouri Law Can Control Repose and Punitive Damages, and PCB Exposure Reconstruction Satisfies Frye

Erickson v. Pharmacia: WPLA Does Not Displace Washington’s Issue-by-Issue Choice-of-Law; Missouri Law Can Control Repose and Punitive Damages, and PCB Exposure Reconstruction Satisfies Frye

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Erickson v. Pharmacia: WPLA Does Not Displace Washington’s Issue-by-Issue Choice-of-Law; Missouri Law Can Control Repose and Punitive Damages, and PCB Exposure Reconstruction Satisfies Frye...
State v. Luna: Meaningful Youth Inquiry for Miranda Waivers, Prospective-Only Juvenile Consultation Statute, and a Narrowed Res Gestae Doctrine

State v. Luna: Meaningful Youth Inquiry for Miranda Waivers, Prospective-Only Juvenile Consultation Statute, and a Narrowed Res Gestae Doctrine

Date: Nov 1, 2025
State v. Luna: Meaningful Youth Inquiry for Miranda Waivers, Prospective-Only Juvenile Consultation Statute, and a Narrowed Res Gestae Doctrine Introduction In State v. Luna, No. 103251-0 (Wash. Oct....
Minimal FTCA Presentment and Marshals’ Duty to Assist IFP Service: The Third Circuit’s Freeman v. Lincalis Precedent

Minimal FTCA Presentment and Marshals’ Duty to Assist IFP Service: The Third Circuit’s Freeman v. Lincalis Precedent

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Minimal FTCA Presentment and Marshals’ Duty to Assist IFP Service: The Third Circuit’s Freeman v. Lincalis Precedent Introduction In a precedential opinion, the Third Circuit in Rocky L. Freeman v....
No Right to Vote on a Particular Schedule: The Fifth Circuit Upholds Mid‑Cycle Redistricting and Treats “Vote Postponement” as Non-Disenfranchisement

No Right to Vote on a Particular Schedule: The Fifth Circuit Upholds Mid‑Cycle Redistricting and Treats “Vote Postponement” as Non-Disenfranchisement

Date: Nov 1, 2025
No Right to Vote on a Particular Schedule: The Fifth Circuit Upholds Mid‑Cycle Redistricting and Treats “Vote Postponement” as Non-Disenfranchisement Introduction In Jackson v. Tarrant County, the...
No End-Run Around Louisiana’s LHEPA: Plaintiffs Must Plausibly Plead Gross Negligence or Willful Misconduct—and Relabeling as Contract Won’t Avoid the Shield (Ware v. Irving Place, 5th Cir. 2025)

No End-Run Around Louisiana’s LHEPA: Plaintiffs Must Plausibly Plead Gross Negligence or Willful Misconduct—and Relabeling as Contract Won’t Avoid the Shield (Ware v. Irving Place, 5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 1, 2025
No End-Run Around Louisiana’s LHEPA: Plaintiffs Must Plausibly Plead Gross Negligence or Willful Misconduct—and Relabeling as Contract Won’t Avoid the Shield Ware v. Irving Place (5th Cir. Oct. 29,...
No “Multiplicative” Preliminary Injunction Standard: Fourth Circuit Denies Shutdown-Based Extension to Fast-Track Clarification in AFT v. Bessent

No “Multiplicative” Preliminary Injunction Standard: Fourth Circuit Denies Shutdown-Based Extension to Fast-Track Clarification in AFT v. Bessent

Date: Nov 1, 2025
No “Multiplicative” Preliminary Injunction Standard: Fourth Circuit Denies Shutdown-Based Extension to Fast-Track Clarification in AFT v. Bessent Introduction In American Federation of Teachers v....
Clarifying “Ability to Pay” in Alimony Contempt: Assets and Borrowing Capacity Must Be Considered; Good‑Faith Career Changes Can Warrant Modification (Peery v. Peery, 2025 S.D. 57)

Clarifying “Ability to Pay” in Alimony Contempt: Assets and Borrowing Capacity Must Be Considered; Good‑Faith Career Changes Can Warrant Modification (Peery v. Peery, 2025 S.D. 57)

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Clarifying “Ability to Pay” in Alimony Contempt: Assets and Borrowing Capacity Must Be Considered; Good‑Faith Career Changes Can Warrant Modification Introduction In Peery v. Peery, 2025 S.D. 57, the...
Court, Not Arbitrator, Decides Compliance with Pre‑Arbitration Conditions; One‑Year Claim Limit in Home‑Inspection Agreements Enforced at Pleading Stage

Court, Not Arbitrator, Decides Compliance with Pre‑Arbitration Conditions; One‑Year Claim Limit in Home‑Inspection Agreements Enforced at Pleading Stage

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Court, Not Arbitrator, Decides Compliance with Pre‑Arbitration Conditions; One‑Year Claim Limit in Home‑Inspection Agreements Enforced at Pleading Stage Introduction This commentary examines the...
Second Department Clarifies: Referee Reports Must Rest on Produced Business Records; RPAPL 1301(3) Defense Fails Absent Prejudice

Second Department Clarifies: Referee Reports Must Rest on Produced Business Records; RPAPL 1301(3) Defense Fails Absent Prejudice

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Second Department Clarifies: Referee Reports Must Rest on Produced Business Records; RPAPL 1301(3) Defense Fails Absent Prejudice Introduction In Citimortgage, Inc. v. Hassanin (2025 NY Slip Op...
Insurer’s Denial ≠ Breach of Procurement Duty; Ambiguous Releases Won’t Bar Third‑Party Indemnity: Grala v. Structural Preservation Systems, LLC (2d Dep’t 2025)

Insurer’s Denial ≠ Breach of Procurement Duty; Ambiguous Releases Won’t Bar Third‑Party Indemnity: Grala v. Structural Preservation Systems, LLC (2d Dep’t 2025)

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Insurer’s Denial ≠ Breach of Procurement Duty; Ambiguous Releases Won’t Bar Third‑Party Indemnity: Grala v. Structural Preservation Systems, LLC (2d Dep’t 2025) Introduction This commentary analyzes...
Failure to Schedule Water-Meter Replacement Constitutes “Denial of Access” Under NYC Water Board Rate Schedule

Failure to Schedule Water-Meter Replacement Constitutes “Denial of Access” Under NYC Water Board Rate Schedule

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Failure to Schedule Water-Meter Replacement Constitutes “Denial of Access” Under NYC Water Board Rate Schedule Introduction In Matter of 29-76 Realty Co., LLC v. New York City Water Board, 2025 NY...
“Appearance of Impropriety” Is a Constitutionally Definite Recusal Standard in Local Ethics Codes: Commentary on Matter of Goldstein v. Village of Mamaroneck Board of Ethics

“Appearance of Impropriety” Is a Constitutionally Definite Recusal Standard in Local Ethics Codes: Commentary on Matter of Goldstein v. Village of Mamaroneck Board of Ethics

Date: Nov 1, 2025
“Appearance of Impropriety” Is a Constitutionally Definite Recusal Standard in Local Ethics Codes Commentary on Matter of Goldstein v. Village of Mamaroneck Board of Ethics, 2025 NY Slip Op 05950 (2d...
Adverse Possession Under Color of Title Defeats Unprobated Remainder Interests; After-Acquired Title Extends Mortgage to Entire Premises

Adverse Possession Under Color of Title Defeats Unprobated Remainder Interests; After-Acquired Title Extends Mortgage to Entire Premises

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Adverse Possession Under Color of Title Defeats Unprobated Remainder Interests; After-Acquired Title Extends Mortgage to Entire Premises Introduction In Walters v. O'Quinn, 2025 NY Slip Op 05988 (App...
Enforcing Civility and Fitness: The ODC’s Amended Disciplinary Complaint Against Mark E. Anderson Under MRPC 3.1, 3.5, and 8.4

Enforcing Civility and Fitness: The ODC’s Amended Disciplinary Complaint Against Mark E. Anderson Under MRPC 3.1, 3.5, and 8.4

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Enforcing Civility and Fitness: The ODC’s Amended Disciplinary Complaint Against Mark E. Anderson Under MRPC 3.1, 3.5, and 8.4 Important procedural note: Although the source is labeled as an...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert