Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

first-circuit-reinforces-first-amendment-protections-for-secret-audio-recording-of-police-in-public:-interpretation-of-massachusetts& Case Commentaries


        United States v. Sandiford: Post-Plea Misconduct as “Adverse Information”—
        Eleventh Circuit Holds Government May Revoke Acceptance-of-Responsibility
        Recommendations Without Breaching Plea Agreements

United States v. Sandiford: Post-Plea Misconduct as “Adverse Information”— Eleventh Circuit Holds Government May Revoke Acceptance-of-Responsibility Recommendations Without Breaching Plea Agreements

Date: Jul 3, 2025
United States v. Sandiford: Post-Plea Misconduct as “Adverse Information” — Eleventh Circuit Holds Government May Revoke Acceptance-of-Responsibility Recommendations Without Breaching Plea Agreements...
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms the Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) Post-Bruen and Rahimi

Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms the Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) Post-Bruen and Rahimi

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms the Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) Post-Bruen and Rahimi: United States v. Eric Dennard Parker (2025) Introduction In United States v. Eric Dennard Parker, the...
Brito-Arroyo v. United States: Eleventh Circuit Narrows Access to Evidentiary Hearings for Plea-Rejection Ineffective-Assistance Claims

Brito-Arroyo v. United States: Eleventh Circuit Narrows Access to Evidentiary Hearings for Plea-Rejection Ineffective-Assistance Claims

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Brito-Arroyo v. United States: Eleventh Circuit Narrows Access to Evidentiary Hearings for Plea-Rejection Ineffective-Assistance Claims Introduction Case: Zury Brito-Arroyo v. United States, No....
No Quasi-Contractual Duty to Pay “Full Value” of Out-of-Network Emergency Care – Commentary on AMISUB (SFH), Inc. v. Cigna Health & Life Ins. Co.

No Quasi-Contractual Duty to Pay “Full Value” of Out-of-Network Emergency Care – Commentary on AMISUB (SFH), Inc. v. Cigna Health & Life Ins. Co.

Date: Jul 3, 2025
No Quasi-Contractual Duty to Pay “Full Value” of Out-of-Network Emergency Care: The Sixth Circuit Clarifies the Limits of Quantum Meruit in AMISUB (SFH), Inc. v. Cigna Health & Life Insurance Co. 1....
No Harm, No Causation, No Standing: Hudson v. The Boppy Company Reinforces Traceability in Benefit-of-the-Bargain Class Actions

No Harm, No Causation, No Standing: Hudson v. The Boppy Company Reinforces Traceability in Benefit-of-the-Bargain Class Actions

Date: Jul 3, 2025
No Harm, No Causation, No Standing: Hudson v. The Boppy Company Reinforces Traceability in Benefit-of-the-Bargain Class Actions 1. Introduction The Tenth Circuit’s decision in Hudson v. The Boppy...
From Recklessness to Intent: The “Moore Standard” for Inferring Intent under U.S.S.G. § 2A2.2(b)(2)(B)

From Recklessness to Intent: The “Moore Standard” for Inferring Intent under U.S.S.G. § 2A2.2(b)(2)(B)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
From Recklessness to Intent: The “Moore Standard” for Inferring Intent under U.S.S.G. § 2A2.2(b)(2)(B) Introduction United States v. Moore, No. 24-2161 (10th Cir. 2025) presented the Court of Appeals...
“Proxy-Testing” Fraud Claims after Wertymer v. Walmart:
The Seventh Circuit Demands Non-Speculative Allegations When Alternative Explanations Exist

“Proxy-Testing” Fraud Claims after Wertymer v. Walmart: The Seventh Circuit Demands Non-Speculative Allegations When Alternative Explanations Exist

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“Proxy-Testing” Fraud Claims after Wertymer v. Walmart: The Seventh Circuit Demands Non-Speculative Allegations When Alternative Explanations Exist Introduction In John Wertymer v. Walmart Inc. (No....

        No Right Without Eligibility: Seventh Circuit Rejects “Anticipatory” FMLA Retaliation 
        and Re-Affirms the High Bar for Constructive Discharge – Commentary on
        Melissa Myers v. Sunman-Dearborn Community Schools (7th Cir. 2025)

No Right Without Eligibility: Seventh Circuit Rejects “Anticipatory” FMLA Retaliation and Re-Affirms the High Bar for Constructive Discharge – Commentary on Melissa Myers v. Sunman-Dearborn Community Schools (7th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
No Right Without Eligibility: Seventh Circuit Rejects “Anticipatory” FMLA Retaliation and Re-Affirms the High Bar for Constructive Discharge 1. Introduction Melissa Myers, a veteran instructional...
“Big‐Number, Simple Math” – Seventh Circuit Clarifies that Voluminous Calculations Alone Do Not Convert a Lay Summary Witness into an Expert (United States v. Fenner & Birkley, 2025)

“Big‐Number, Simple Math” – Seventh Circuit Clarifies that Voluminous Calculations Alone Do Not Convert a Lay Summary Witness into an Expert (United States v. Fenner & Birkley, 2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“Big‐Number, Simple Math” – Seventh Circuit Clarifies that Voluminous Calculations Alone Do Not Convert a Lay Summary Witness into an Expert Commentary on United States v. Brian Fenner & Dennis...
“The Curtin Principle”: Express Agreement as Waiver and the ‘Commonsense’ Test for Expert Testimony under Rule 702

“The Curtin Principle”: Express Agreement as Waiver and the ‘Commonsense’ Test for Expert Testimony under Rule 702

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“The Curtin Principle”: Express Agreement as Waiver and the ‘Commonsense’ Test for Expert Testimony under Rule 702 1. Introduction United States v. Dana Curtin, No. 23-3368 (7th Cir. July 1, 2025),...
The “Fenner-Birkley Framework” – Seventh Circuit Clarifies Bruton, Lay-Summary Testimony, and Restitution in Complex Fraud Cases

The “Fenner-Birkley Framework” – Seventh Circuit Clarifies Bruton, Lay-Summary Testimony, and Restitution in Complex Fraud Cases

Date: Jul 3, 2025
The “Fenner-Birkley Framework” – Seventh Circuit Clarifies Bruton, Lay-Summary Testimony, and Restitution in Complex Fraud Cases Introduction United States v. Dennis Birkley (consolidated with United...
First Circuit Holds that Maine Dealers Act § 1173 Does Not Abrogate Res Judicata Effect of Motor Vehicle Franchise Board Orders – Commentary on Better Way Ford, LLC v. Ford Motor Company

First Circuit Holds that Maine Dealers Act § 1173 Does Not Abrogate Res Judicata Effect of Motor Vehicle Franchise Board Orders – Commentary on Better Way Ford, LLC v. Ford Motor Company

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“Prima Facie” ≠ “Only”: The First Circuit Confirms That § 1173 of the Maine Dealers Act Does Not Bar the Res Judicata Effect of Franchise Board Decisions I. Introduction Better Way Ford, LLC v. Ford...
Affidavit of Sale as Constructive Notice: Tran v. Citizens Bank, N.A.

Affidavit of Sale as Constructive Notice: Tran v. Citizens Bank, N.A.

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Affidavit of Sale as Constructive Notice: First Circuit Confirms Extinguishment of Equity of Redemption Cannot Be Avoided under §544(a)(3) I. Introduction In Tran v. Citizens Bank, N.A., No. 24-1101...
Heightened Evidentiary Requirement for § 666 “Benefits”: A Commentary on United States v. Evans (1st Cir. 2025)

Heightened Evidentiary Requirement for § 666 “Benefits”: A Commentary on United States v. Evans (1st Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Heightened Evidentiary Requirement for 18 U.S.C. § 666 “Benefits”: A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Evans, 92 F.4th ___ (1st Cir. 2025) I. Introduction The First Circuit’s decision in...
State v. Hamilton: Foundation Requirements for Uncooperative Witnesses and the Inclusion of Adopted Statements Under the Whelan Doctrine

State v. Hamilton: Foundation Requirements for Uncooperative Witnesses and the Inclusion of Adopted Statements Under the Whelan Doctrine

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Clarifying Whelan: Foundation for Inconsistency and the Admissibility of Witness-Adopted Statements – A Commentary on State v. Hamilton (Conn. 2025) Introduction On 1 July 2025 the Supreme Court of...
Steffen Precedent Commentary – Retroactive License Revocation for Prosecutorial Sexual Misconduct

Steffen Precedent Commentary – Retroactive License Revocation for Prosecutorial Sexual Misconduct

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Retroactive License Revocation for Prosecutorial Sexual Misconduct: A Commentary on Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel P. Steffen, 2025 WI 31 1. Introduction Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel...
“One Case, One Conviction … Eventually” – State v. McAdory and the Reinstatement Power under Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(c)

“One Case, One Conviction … Eventually” – State v. McAdory and the Reinstatement Power under Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(c)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“One Case, One Conviction … Eventually” – State v. McAdory and the Reinstatement Power under Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(c) Introduction State v. Carl Lee McAdory, 2025 WI 30, presented the Supreme Court...
Adams v. State: Georgia Supreme Court Re-Enforces the Edge Limits—Felon-in-Possession Felony-Murder Stands Outside the Modified Merger Rule and Sets Fresh Guidance on Plain-Error Review

Adams v. State: Georgia Supreme Court Re-Enforces the Edge Limits—Felon-in-Possession Felony-Murder Stands Outside the Modified Merger Rule and Sets Fresh Guidance on Plain-Error Review

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Adams v. State: Georgia Supreme Court Re-Enforces the Edge Limits—Felon-in-Possession Felony-Murder Stands Outside the Modified Merger Rule and Sets Fresh Guidance on Plain-Error Review 1....
Chapman v. State (2025): Clarifying Judicial Commentary under OCGA § 17-8-57 and Witness-Based Authentication of Firearm Evidence

Chapman v. State (2025): Clarifying Judicial Commentary under OCGA § 17-8-57 and Witness-Based Authentication of Firearm Evidence

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Chapman v. State (2025): Clarifying Judicial Commentary under OCGA § 17-8-57 and Witness-Based Authentication of Firearm Evidence 1. Introduction In Chapman v. The State and its companion case Watson...
Clarifying Waiver of the Defendant’s Right to be Present During Jury Viewings: A Commentary on Jacobs v. State (Ga. 2025)

Clarifying Waiver of the Defendant’s Right to be Present During Jury Viewings: A Commentary on Jacobs v. State (Ga. 2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Clarifying Waiver of the Defendant’s Right to be Present During Jury Viewings: A Commentary on Jacobs v. State (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2025) Case: Jacobs v. State, S25A0570, Supreme Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert