Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

first-circuit-reinforces-first-amendment-protections-for-secret-audio-recording-of-police-in-public:-interpretation-of-massachusetts& Case Commentaries

“No Bootstrap through Mathis” – The First Circuit Narrows Johnson II Relief in United States v. Capozzi

“No Bootstrap through Mathis” – The First Circuit Narrows Johnson II Relief in United States v. Capozzi

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“No Bootstrap through Mathis” – The First Circuit Narrows Johnson II Relief in United States v. Capozzi 1. Introduction United States v. Capozzi, No. 22-1243 (1st Cir. July 2, 2025) clarifies the...
“No Substance, No Violation” – The First Circuit Confirms that Replacing Pseudonyms with Actual Victim Names Is a Permissible Formal Amendment (United States v. De Souza Prado, 1st Cir. 2025)

“No Substance, No Violation” – The First Circuit Confirms that Replacing Pseudonyms with Actual Victim Names Is a Permissible Formal Amendment (United States v. De Souza Prado, 1st Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“No Substance, No Violation” – The First Circuit Confirms that Replacing Pseudonyms with Actual Victim Names Is a Permissible Formal Amendment Commentary on United States v. De Souza Prado, 93 F.4th...
“Co-Conspirator Liability and Cooperative-Witness Authentication” — A Comment on United States v. Reyes-Rosario (1st Cir. 2025)

“Co-Conspirator Liability and Cooperative-Witness Authentication” — A Comment on United States v. Reyes-Rosario (1st Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“Co-Conspirator Liability and Cooperative-Witness Authentication” Commentary on United States v. Reyes-Rosario, 79 F.4th ___ (1st Cir. 2025) I. Introduction United States v. Reyes-Rosario is a...
Hackman v. InductEV: The Third Circuit Reinforces Evidentiary Specificity and Record-Citation Duties in Pro Se Employment Discrimination Appeals

Hackman v. InductEV: The Third Circuit Reinforces Evidentiary Specificity and Record-Citation Duties in Pro Se Employment Discrimination Appeals

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Hackman v. InductEV: The Third Circuit Reinforces Evidentiary Specificity and Record-Citation Duties in Pro Se Employment Discrimination Appeals 1. Introduction Assata Acey Hackman, a former...

        “Deceit by Definition” – Third Circuit Holds that a Conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 287 Is
        Categorically an Aggravated Felony Involving Deceit and Bars a Retroactive INA § 212(h) Waiver

“Deceit by Definition” – Third Circuit Holds that a Conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 287 Is Categorically an Aggravated Felony Involving Deceit and Bars a Retroactive INA § 212(h) Waiver

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“Deceit by Definition” – Third Circuit Holds that a Conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 287 Is Categorically an Aggravated Felony Involving Deceit and Bars a Retroactive INA § 212(h) Waiver 1. Introduction...
No-Virtual-Prohibition Test – Fifth Circuit Re-defines the Threshold for Pre-emption Challenges to Home-Rule Ordinances

No-Virtual-Prohibition Test – Fifth Circuit Re-defines the Threshold for Pre-emption Challenges to Home-Rule Ordinances

Date: Jul 3, 2025
No-Virtual-Prohibition Test: TitleMax of Texas v. City of Dallas Clarifies Pre-emption and Due-Course Limits on Challenges to Municipal Lending Ordinances Introduction TitleMax of Texas v. City of...
“Exclusive-Causation” under the Vaccine Act: A Commentary on Amanda Watts v. Maryland CVS Pharmacy, LLC

“Exclusive-Causation” under the Vaccine Act: A Commentary on Amanda Watts v. Maryland CVS Pharmacy, LLC

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“Exclusive-Causation” under the Vaccine Act: A Commentary on Amanda Watts v. Maryland CVS Pharmacy, LLC 1. Introduction In Amanda Watts v. Maryland CVS Pharmacy, LLC, the United States Court of...
Fourth Circuit Affirms “Good-Faith Belief” Shield Against § 523(a)(4) Embezzlement Nondischargeability

Fourth Circuit Affirms “Good-Faith Belief” Shield Against § 523(a)(4) Embezzlement Nondischargeability

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Fourth Circuit Affirms “Good-Faith Belief” Shield Against § 523(a)(4) Embezzlement Nondischargeability Introduction In Deborah Parker v. Dan Martin, No. 23-2084 (4th Cir. 2025), the United States...
Brown v. Stapleton: Due-Process Protection for Prison Trust-Account Funds and the Limits of Sandin

Brown v. Stapleton: Due-Process Protection for Prison Trust-Account Funds and the Limits of Sandin

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Brown v. Stapleton: Due-Process Protection for Prison Trust-Account Funds and the Limits of Sandin 1. Introduction In Demmerick Eric Brown v. Karen Stapleton, the United States Court of Appeals for...
Younger-Based Dismissals Are NOT § 1915(g) “Strikes” & Strikes Are Counted Only as of the Filing Date: Burrell v. Shirley (4th Cir. 2025)

Younger-Based Dismissals Are NOT § 1915(g) “Strikes” & Strikes Are Counted Only as of the Filing Date: Burrell v. Shirley (4th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Younger-Based Dismissals Are NOT § 1915(g) “Strikes” & Strikes Are Counted Only as of the Filing Date: Burrell v. Shirley, 4th Cir. 2025 1. Introduction In Burrell v. Shirley, No. 23-6791 (4th Cir....
“But-For” Means “One Of,” Not “The Only”: The Fourth Circuit’s Clarification of Causation in Title VII Retaliation – Commentary on LaShaun Curry v. South Carolina State Election Commission (4th Cir. 2025)

“But-For” Means “One Of,” Not “The Only”: The Fourth Circuit’s Clarification of Causation in Title VII Retaliation – Commentary on LaShaun Curry v. South Carolina State Election Commission (4th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“But-For” Means “One Of,” Not “The Only”: The Fourth Circuit’s Clarification of Causation in Title VII Retaliation Commentary on LaShaun Curry v. South Carolina State Election Commission (4th Cir....
When the LLC Speaks: Fourth Circuit Holds That a Single-Member LLC—Not Its Owner—Is the Contracting Party for Arbitration Purposes

When the LLC Speaks: Fourth Circuit Holds That a Single-Member LLC—Not Its Owner—Is the Contracting Party for Arbitration Purposes

Date: Jul 3, 2025
When the LLC Speaks: Fourth Circuit Holds That a Single-Member LLC—Not Its Owner—Is the Contracting Party for Arbitration Purposes Introduction In Randy Luna v. Tug Hill Operating, LLC, No. 24-1281...
“When a Written Judgment Conflicts with the Oral Pronouncement: Clarifying District Courts’ Duties in § 2255 Sentence Corrections – A Commentary on United States v. Barrow (2d Cir. 2025)”

“When a Written Judgment Conflicts with the Oral Pronouncement: Clarifying District Courts’ Duties in § 2255 Sentence Corrections – A Commentary on United States v. Barrow (2d Cir. 2025)”

Date: Jul 3, 2025
When a Written Judgment Conflicts with the Oral Pronouncement: Clarifying District Courts’ Duties in § 2255 Sentence Corrections – A Commentary on United States v. Barrow (2d Cir. 2025) 1....
Kurtz v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.: Second Circuit Requires Proportionality Review of Attorney’s Fees and Class Relief Under Rule 23(e)

Kurtz v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.: Second Circuit Requires Proportionality Review of Attorney’s Fees and Class Relief Under Rule 23(e)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Kurtz v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.: Second Circuit Requires Proportionality Review of Attorney’s Fees and Class Relief Under Rule 23(e) Introduction In Kurtz v. Kimberly-Clark Corp., Nos. 24-425 & 24-454...

    Medical Bills Covered by Workers’ Compensation Are “Consumer Debts” – Narrowing the Bona-Fide-Error Defense
    (Commentary on Abdul Crawford v. North American Credit Services, Inc., 11th Cir. 2025)

Medical Bills Covered by Workers’ Compensation Are “Consumer Debts” – Narrowing the Bona-Fide-Error Defense (Commentary on Abdul Crawford v. North American Credit Services, Inc., 11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Medical Bills Covered by Workers’ Compensation Are “Consumer Debts” – Narrowing the Bona-Fide-Error Defense Comprehensive Commentary on Abdul Crawford v. North American Credit Services, Inc., No....

Re-affirming the Anti-Circularity Rule for “Particular Social Groups” and the Consequences of Waiver under CAT: A Comprehensive Commentary on
Aleyda Evelyn Vanegas Hernandez v. U.S. Attorney General (11th Cir. 2025)

Re-affirming the Anti-Circularity Rule for “Particular Social Groups” and the Consequences of Waiver under CAT: A Comprehensive Commentary on Aleyda Evelyn Vanegas Hernandez v. U.S. Attorney General (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Re-affirming the Anti-Circularity Rule for “Particular Social Groups” and the Consequences of Waiver under CAT: Commentary on Vanegas Hernandez v. U.S. Attorney General Introduction The Eleventh...
“Good-Cause Flexibility” & Res Judicata Reinforced: A Commentary on Saunders v. Neighborhood Restaurant Partners, LLC

“Good-Cause Flexibility” & Res Judicata Reinforced: A Commentary on Saunders v. Neighborhood Restaurant Partners, LLC

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“Good-Cause Flexibility” & Res Judicata Reinforced: A Comprehensive Commentary on Charmaine Saunders v. Neighborhood Restaurant Partners, LLC (11th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction In Saunders v....

        Fannies Cabaret v. City of South Fulton (11th Cir. 2025):
        Re-affirming the Secondary-Effects Doctrine and
        Tightening the Irreparable-Harm Gate for First-Amendment Injunctions

Fannies Cabaret v. City of South Fulton (11th Cir. 2025): Re-affirming the Secondary-Effects Doctrine and Tightening the Irreparable-Harm Gate for First-Amendment Injunctions

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Fannies Cabaret v. City of South Fulton (11th Cir. 2025): Re-affirming the Secondary-Effects Doctrine and Tightening the Irreparable-Harm Gate for First-Amendment Injunctions Introduction In Fannies...
MidAmerica C2L Inc. v. Siemens Energy Inc. – Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Warranty-Disclaimer Enforceability and the Scope of Florida’s Independent Tort Doctrine

MidAmerica C2L Inc. v. Siemens Energy Inc. – Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Warranty-Disclaimer Enforceability and the Scope of Florida’s Independent Tort Doctrine

Date: Jul 3, 2025
MidAmerica C2L Inc. v. Siemens Energy Inc. Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Warranty-Disclaimer Enforceability and the Scope of Florida’s Independent Tort Doctrine 1. Introduction This decision, the third...
The “Single-New-Judgment” Doctrine: Resentencing on Any Count Restarts AEDPA’s Limitation Period for the Entire Conviction

The “Single-New-Judgment” Doctrine: Resentencing on Any Count Restarts AEDPA’s Limitation Period for the Entire Conviction

Date: Jul 3, 2025
The “Single-New-Judgment” Doctrine Resentencing on Any Count Restarts AEDPA’s Limitation Period for the Entire Conviction Introduction In Robert Kleckley v. State of Florida, No. 23-10887 (11th Cir....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert