Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
No Continuing Violation for FDCPA Suits Based on Debt-Collection Litigation; Post-Complaint Filings Do Not Restart the One-Year Clock Case: Helisha Moore v. Cohn, Lifland, Pearlman, Hermann & Knoph...
Continuing Court‑Martial Jurisdiction After ETS and the Strict Dodson Gatekeeper for Military Habeas Review: Commentary on Davis v. Curtis (10th Cir. Sept. 25, 2025) Introduction In Davis v. Curtis,...
No Interlocutory Appeal From Denial of Motion to Dismiss Criminal Contempt: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms “Substance Over Form” and the Narrow Reach of the Collateral-Order Doctrine and 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)...
Financing Is Not “Labor or Material” Under Subcontract Payment Bonds; Oklahoma’s Parol‑Evidence Stranger Exception Applies; Prevailing Defendants May Recover Fees Under § 936 Based on the Suit’s...
Limited Pearce Presumption in Nevada Parole Proceedings: No Vindictiveness Presumed When the Parole Board Self‑Corrects Introduction This commentary analyzes the Nevada Supreme Court’s decision in...
Gatekeeping the Three‑Judge Panel: Wisconsin Supreme Court Requires Threshold Showing that a Redistricting Suit Is an “Apportionment” Challenge Before § 751.035 Is Triggered Introduction In a...
Gatekeeping Before Appointing Three‑Judge Redistricting Panels: Wisconsin Supreme Court to Decide What Counts as an “Apportionment” Challenge Under Wis. Stat. § 801.50(4m) Introduction In Wisconsin...
No Initial Nonschedule Award, No Bar to SLU: Third Department Confirms SLU Eligibility and Retroactive Reopening Post‑Taher Case: Matter of Romero v. Akorn Inc., 2025 NY Slip Op 05128 (App Div, 3d...
Reaffirming the NMPRC’s Discretion: Partial Imprudence Disallowances, Recovery of Undepreciated Nuclear Lease Investments, Deferral of Decommissioning Allocations, and Ratepayer Recovery of Board...
Campbell v. State: No State Duty to Collect Third‑Party Digital Evidence and the Primacy of Strickland Prejudice in Postconviction Review Introduction In Campbell v. State, 2025 ND 152, the North...
Kraft v. State: Substance Over Label—Invoking Summary Disposition Standards Triggers a 30‑Day Response Period in North Dakota Postconviction Proceedings Introduction This commentary examines the...
Continuing Jurisdiction to Correct Jail‑Time Credit During Appeal: The Ohio Supreme Court’s Clarification in Krouskoupf v. Anderson Introduction In Krouskoupf v. Anderson, Slip Opinion No....
County Auditors Have No Discretion to Withhold Listing of Voter‑Approved Bond Levies While Bonds Remain Outstanding Case: State ex rel. Springfield City School District Board of Education v....
Nexus-Based Duty for Off‑Campus Abuse and Pleading-Stage Punitive Damages in CVA School Cases: C.R. v. Episcopal Diocese of N.Y. Introduction In C.R. v. Episcopal Diocese of New York, 2025 NY Slip Op...
"Entire Amount" Means Joint and Several: Utah Supreme Court Holds Comparative Fault Is Inapplicable to Criminal Restitution Under the Crime Victims Restitution Act Introduction In State v. Debrok,...
Express “Street and Sidewalk Appurtenance” Agreements Control Fixture Status: City Owns and May Remove Pike Plan Canopies Introduction In 306 Wall St. Owners, LLC v. City of Kingston, the Appellate...
No Guarantees Required: 90% Earnings Letters Satisfy “Reasonable Assurance” for Per Diem Substitutes under New York Labor Law § 590(10) Introduction In Matter of Caruso (Shenendehowa Cent. Sch....
Schoenhals: Monschke Is a Retroactive, Substantive Change; Mandatory LWOP for 18–20-Year-Olds Is Unconstitutional; Per Se Prejudice and Facial Invalidity Provide Two Paths Around the PRP Time Bar...
Summary Contempt Narrowed: Personal Observation Must Establish Voluntary Intoxication Beyond a Reasonable Doubt, and Findings Must Match the Record — Orndoff v. Commonwealth (Va. 2025) Introduction...