Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Commonwealth v. Lewis: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Retains “High‑Crime Area” as a Terry Factor, Offers Non‑Mandatory Guideposts; Justice Wecht Urges Its Abandonment Under Article I, Section 8 Court:...
Post-Strunk Application of §6318: Verbal Pre‑Assault Commands as “Communication” — Justice Mundy’s Concurrence/Dissent in Commonwealth v. Smith (Pa. 2025) Introduction This commentary examines...
Post-Strunk Application of 18 Pa.C.S. § 6318: Verbal Commands as “Communication” for Unlawful Contact with a Minor — Justice Mundy’s Concurrence/Dissent in Commonwealth v. Smith Introduction In...
Context Over Text: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Upholds DOH’s Two‑Lab Testing Rule Under the Medical Marijuana Act (Wecht, J., dissenting) Introduction In Green Analytics North, LLC v. Department of...
Limiting “Other Person Under the Tenant’s Control” to the Initial Invitation Onto the Premises: Justice Wecht’s Dissent in Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburgh v. Nash Introduction This...
On‑Bill Billing and the Limits of Section 1502: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Holds Non‑Electric Add‑Ons Fall Outside “Service”; Scope of “All Electric Services” Reserved Introduction In Interstate Gas...
Uniformity in Effect, Not Form: Denial of Local Tax Credits to Nonresidents Renders Pittsburgh’s Facility Fee Unconstitutional under Pennsylvania’s Uniformity Clause Introduction In National Hockey...
Tranter v. Z&D Tour: Pennsylvania High Court Rejects “Key Witness” Requirement and Articulates a 100‑Mile Benchmark in Forum Non Conveniens Analysis Introduction In a set of consolidated appeals...
Rule 33.1 Specificity Controls: Self-Defense Sufficiency Not Preserved by Intent-Only Motion; Figurative, Non‑Matching Threats Are Admissible to Prove Intent; 4‑3(a) Review Permitted on State’s...
Stand-Your-Ground’s Initial-Aggressor Limit Clarified; Voir Dire on Lesser Burdens May Be Curtailed: Collins v. State, 2025 Ark. 137 Introduction In Dylan Collins v. State of Arkansas, 2025 Ark. 137,...
Pleading Specific Conviction Dates Is Required to Overcome Sovereign Immunity in Arkansas Parole-Eligibility Challenges Case: Jeremy Kennedy v. Arkansas Parole Board and Arkansas Division of...
Full Interview Recordings Can Cure Suppression-Hearing Playback Gaps: Arkansas Supreme Court Clarifies Record-Settlement Sufficiency and Reaffirms Purposeful-Discharge Mens Rea for Drive-By Capital...
Good-Faith Reliance on an Unrecorded Oral Nexus for a Cell-Phone Warrant; Character-Impeachment Missteps Held Harmless Case: Santiago Vasquez, Jr. v. State of Arkansas, 2025 Ark. 134 (Supreme Court...
No Contested Hearing Required to Accept Tribal Customary Adoption: Oregon Supreme Court Clarifies ORS 419B.656 and Affirms Tribal–State Shared Roles under ORICWA Introduction In Dept. of Human...
ORS 12.125 Contains No Discovery Rule: One-Year Limit for ORLTA and Rental Agreement Claims Runs from Breach or Violation Introduction In Hathaway v. B & J Property Investments, Inc., 374 Or 212...
In re Abel: Oregon Supreme Court Clarifies “Actual Knowledge” for RPC 8.4(a)(3) and Uses Objective Indicators to Prove It; False Criminal Threats in Demand Letters Merit Suspension Citation: In re...
No Asportation Without Increased Isolation or Control: State v. Anderson Refines Oregon’s Kidnapping Standard and Confirms Property-Directed Violence Can Constitute Menacing Introduction In State v....
Mandatory Relief Upon a Case‑Specific Showing of Prejudice from Joinder: The Oregon Supreme Court’s Clarification of ORS 132.560(3) in State v. Hernandez‑Esteban Introduction In State v....
WRME Eligibility Turns on Insurer’s Current Reliance on an IME: Oregon Supreme Court Adopts a “Time-of-Decision” Test in Teitelman v. SAIF Introduction In Teitelman v. SAIF, 374 Or 271 (2025), the...
From Schedules to Standards: Florida Supreme Court Mandates Consideration of Statutory Factors, Authorizes Pre–First Appearance Release, and Permits Bail Reconsideration for Inability to Pay under...