Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

battery-claims-excluded-under-ftca&amp Case Commentaries

Plain Meaning over Liberal Construction: Tennessee Supreme Court Defines “Unexpected” in Municipal PTSD Pension Policies and Clarifies UAPA Review of Non‑Contested Civil Service Decisions

Plain Meaning over Liberal Construction: Tennessee Supreme Court Defines “Unexpected” in Municipal PTSD Pension Policies and Clarifies UAPA Review of Non‑Contested Civil Service Decisions

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Plain Meaning over Liberal Construction: “Unexpected” Means Not Anticipated Within the Normal Course of Duties; UAPA Judicial Review Applies Even When the Administrative Hearing Is Not a Contested...
People v. James: In Bench Trials, Improper 404(b) Other‑Acts Evidence Is Not Harmless When the Factfinder Relies on It to Resolve a One‑on‑One Credibility Contest

People v. James: In Bench Trials, Improper 404(b) Other‑Acts Evidence Is Not Harmless When the Factfinder Relies on It to Resolve a One‑on‑One Credibility Contest

Date: Oct 16, 2025
People v. James: In Bench Trials, Improper 404(b) Other‑Acts Evidence Is Not Harmless When the Factfinder Relies on It to Resolve a One‑on‑One Credibility Contest Court: Supreme Court of Michigan...
Relabeling Benefits as “Equity” Won’t Save a § 502(a)(3) Claim; § 105(a) Statements Need Not Include Vesting Date for Terminated Participants

Relabeling Benefits as “Equity” Won’t Save a § 502(a)(3) Claim; § 105(a) Statements Need Not Include Vesting Date for Terminated Participants

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Relabeling Benefits as “Equity” Won’t Save a § 502(a)(3) Claim; § 105(a) Statements Need Not Include Vesting Date for Terminated Participants Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third...
Adequacy of Foreign Forums After OSR v. REE: Uncertainty Over Extraterritorial Injunctions and Witness Self‑Incrimination Does Not Defeat Forum Non Conveniens

Adequacy of Foreign Forums After OSR v. REE: Uncertainty Over Extraterritorial Injunctions and Witness Self‑Incrimination Does Not Defeat Forum Non Conveniens

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Adequacy of Foreign Forums After OSR v. REE: Uncertainty Over Extraterritorial Injunctions and Witness Self‑Incrimination Does Not Defeat Forum Non Conveniens Introduction This commentary analyzes...
Tenth Circuit clarifies: No immediate appeal from a magistrate judge’s denial of IFP service pending § 1915(e)(2) screening; collateral-order, § 1292, and access-to-courts theories rejected

Tenth Circuit clarifies: No immediate appeal from a magistrate judge’s denial of IFP service pending § 1915(e)(2) screening; collateral-order, § 1292, and access-to-courts theories rejected

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Tenth Circuit clarifies: No immediate appeal from a magistrate judge’s denial of IFP service pending § 1915(e)(2) screening; collateral-order, § 1292, and access-to-courts theories rejected...
Drug Identity Is Not an Element of N.J. Stat. § 2C:35-5(b)(1): Second Circuit Bars the Modified Categorical Approach in Aggravated-Felony Removal

Drug Identity Is Not an Element of N.J. Stat. § 2C:35-5(b)(1): Second Circuit Bars the Modified Categorical Approach in Aggravated-Felony Removal

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Drug Identity Is Not an Element of N.J. Stat. § 2C:35-5(b)(1): Second Circuit Bars the Modified Categorical Approach in Aggravated-Felony Removal Case: Amaro Luna v. Bondi, No. 22-6399 (2d Cir. Oct....
Harmless-Error Controls § 1324 “Reckless Disregard” Instruction Disputes: United States v. Adames-Ramos (2d Cir. 2025)

Harmless-Error Controls § 1324 “Reckless Disregard” Instruction Disputes: United States v. Adames-Ramos (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Harmless-Error Controls § 1324 “Reckless Disregard” Instruction Disputes: United States v. Adames-Ramos (2d Cir. 2025) Note: This is a Second Circuit Summary Order. Under FRAP 32.1 and Local Rule...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies § 1927 Sanctions: Fees Must Be Tied to Excess Proceedings Caused by Bad-Faith Discovery Conduct—not Pleading Defects

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies § 1927 Sanctions: Fees Must Be Tied to Excess Proceedings Caused by Bad-Faith Discovery Conduct—not Pleading Defects

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies § 1927 Sanctions: Fees Must Be Tied to Excess Proceedings Caused by Bad-Faith Discovery Conduct—not Pleading Defects Introduction This commentary analyzes the Eleventh...
Conflicts Are Not Misappropriation: Eleventh Circuit Limits “Relate-To” Exclusions and Cabins Deemer Clauses to First‑Made Timing, Holding Duty to Defend Exists and Indemnity Is Unripe (Georgia Law)

Conflicts Are Not Misappropriation: Eleventh Circuit Limits “Relate-To” Exclusions and Cabins Deemer Clauses to First‑Made Timing, Holding Duty to Defend Exists and Indemnity Is Unripe (Georgia Law)

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Conflicts Are Not Misappropriation: Eleventh Circuit Limits “Relate-To” Exclusions and Cabins Deemer Clauses to First‑Made Timing, Holding Duty to Defend Exists and Indemnity Is Unripe (Georgia Law)...
No Claim-Splitting Without Jurisdiction; One Nondiverse LLC Member Defeats Diversity — Eleventh Circuit’s Guidance in Sound Around, Inc. v. O’Donnell

No Claim-Splitting Without Jurisdiction; One Nondiverse LLC Member Defeats Diversity — Eleventh Circuit’s Guidance in Sound Around, Inc. v. O’Donnell

Date: Oct 16, 2025
No Claim-Splitting Without Jurisdiction; One Nondiverse LLC Member Defeats Diversity — Eleventh Circuit’s Guidance in Sound Around, Inc. v. O’Donnell Introduction In these consolidated, unpublished,...
Claim-Splitting Cannot Bar a Second Suit When the First Lacked Jurisdiction; One Non‑Diverse LLC Member Ends Diversity on Limited Remand

Claim-Splitting Cannot Bar a Second Suit When the First Lacked Jurisdiction; One Non‑Diverse LLC Member Ends Diversity on Limited Remand

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Claim-Splitting Cannot Bar a Second Suit When the First Lacked Jurisdiction; One Non‑Diverse LLC Member Ends Diversity on Limited Remand Introduction In a per curiam, unpublished opinion dated...
Directness Rules the Day: Sixth Circuit Extends Illinois Brick to Indirect Sellers and Recasts Antitrust Standing as Antitrust Injury Plus Proximate Cause

Directness Rules the Day: Sixth Circuit Extends Illinois Brick to Indirect Sellers and Recasts Antitrust Standing as Antitrust Injury Plus Proximate Cause

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Directness Rules the Day: Sixth Circuit Extends Illinois Brick to Indirect Sellers and Recasts Antitrust Standing as Antitrust Injury Plus Proximate Cause Case: Academy of Allergy & Asthma in Primary...
No Clearly Established Bystander Liability for Backup Officers in DUI Arrests: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Prolonged-Stop, HGN, and Curtilage Rules

No Clearly Established Bystander Liability for Backup Officers in DUI Arrests: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Prolonged-Stop, HGN, and Curtilage Rules

Date: Oct 16, 2025
No Clearly Established Bystander Liability for Backup Officers in DUI Arrests: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Prolonged-Stop, HGN, and Curtilage Rules Introduction In Amanda Caton v. Jacob Salamon, No....
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Liberty-Deprivation for Fourth Amendment Malicious Prosecution: No Pretrial Restraints, No Seizure; Police Press Releases That Mirror Charging Documents Are Absolutely Privileged Under Kentucky Law

Sixth Circuit Clarifies Liberty-Deprivation for Fourth Amendment Malicious Prosecution: No Pretrial Restraints, No Seizure; Police Press Releases That Mirror Charging Documents Are Absolutely Privileged Under Kentucky Law

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Liberty-Deprivation for Fourth Amendment Malicious Prosecution: No Pretrial Restraints, No Seizure; Police Press Releases That Mirror Charging Documents Are Absolutely...
Dangerousness, Not Disability: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Williams—Felon-in-Possession Ban Constitutional As Applied Despite Paraplegia; No Remand Needed; Modest Upward Variance Upheld

Dangerousness, Not Disability: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Williams—Felon-in-Possession Ban Constitutional As Applied Despite Paraplegia; No Remand Needed; Modest Upward Variance Upheld

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Dangerousness, Not Disability: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Williams—Felon-in-Possession Ban Constitutional As Applied Despite Paraplegia; No Remand Needed; Modest Upward Variance Upheld Introduction In...
Sixth Circuit (Unpublished) Clarifies “Same Course of Conduct” for §1B1.3: Post-Indictment Drug-and-Gun Incident Nine Months Later Counts Toward §2K2.1(b)(1)(A) Firearms Enhancement

Sixth Circuit (Unpublished) Clarifies “Same Course of Conduct” for §1B1.3: Post-Indictment Drug-and-Gun Incident Nine Months Later Counts Toward §2K2.1(b)(1)(A) Firearms Enhancement

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Sixth Circuit (Unpublished) Clarifies “Same Course of Conduct” for §1B1.3: Post-Indictment Drug-and-Gun Incident Nine Months Later Counts Toward §2K2.1(b)(1)(A) Firearms Enhancement Introduction In...
Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Broad Discretion to Upwardly Vary Based on Criminal History and Risk-Enhancing Conduct: United States v. Simmons

Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Broad Discretion to Upwardly Vary Based on Criminal History and Risk-Enhancing Conduct: United States v. Simmons

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Reaffirmed Principle: District Courts May Heavily Weight Criminal History and Public-Safety Risks to Justify Above-Guidelines Sentences Introduction In United States v. Jemar Jeresse Simmons, the...
Circumstantial Proof of Predominant Profit Intent and Repetitiveness Suffices to Uphold Unlicensed Firearms-Dealing Conviction under § 922(a)(1)(A)

Circumstantial Proof of Predominant Profit Intent and Repetitiveness Suffices to Uphold Unlicensed Firearms-Dealing Conviction under § 922(a)(1)(A)

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Circumstantial Proof of Predominant Profit Intent and Repetitiveness Suffices to Uphold Unlicensed Firearms-Dealing Conviction under § 922(a)(1)(A) Introduction In United States v. Omar Shorter, Jr.,...
No Double Jeopardy in Denying Safety-Valve Relief When the Same Firearm Supports a § 924(c) Conviction: United States v. Dorelus (11th Cir. 2025)

No Double Jeopardy in Denying Safety-Valve Relief When the Same Firearm Supports a § 924(c) Conviction: United States v. Dorelus (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 16, 2025
No Double Jeopardy in Denying Safety-Valve Relief When the Same Firearm Supports a § 924(c) Conviction: United States v. Dorelus (11th Cir. 2025) Introduction In a published, per curiam decision, the...
Issue Preclusion and Failure to Mitigate Foreclose Contract Damages After Attorney Withdrawal for Nonpayment

Issue Preclusion and Failure to Mitigate Foreclose Contract Damages After Attorney Withdrawal for Nonpayment

Date: Oct 16, 2025
Issue Preclusion and Failure to Mitigate Foreclose Contract Damages After Attorney Withdrawal for Nonpayment Case: Barbara Simonson v. Thomas M. Olejniczak, et al., No. 25-1417 (7th Cir. Oct. 10,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert