Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

battery-claims-excluded-under-ftca& Case Commentaries

Borelli v. Bisignano: When Treating Sources Refuse, No Further Duty to Develop; Step-Four Denial May Rest on Ability to Perform the “Previous Specific Job”; Later Favorable Decisions Don’t Compel Remand

Borelli v. Bisignano: When Treating Sources Refuse, No Further Duty to Develop; Step-Four Denial May Rest on Ability to Perform the “Previous Specific Job”; Later Favorable Decisions Don’t Compel Remand

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Borelli v. Bisignano: When Treating Sources Refuse, No Further Duty to Develop; Step-Four Denial May Rest on Ability to Perform the “Previous Specific Job”; Later Favorable Decisions Don’t Compel...
Montana Supreme Court Authorizes Community Justice Workers to Provide Limited Legal Services in Justice and City Courts

Montana Supreme Court Authorizes Community Justice Workers to Provide Limited Legal Services in Justice and City Courts

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Montana Supreme Court Authorizes Community Justice Workers to Provide Limited Legal Services in Justice and City Courts Introduction In administrative docket AF 11-0765, the Supreme Court of Montana...
Concrete Plans and Overlapping Bans: Tenth Circuit Clarifies Standing for Pre‑Enforcement Second Amendment “Sensitive Places” Challenges

Concrete Plans and Overlapping Bans: Tenth Circuit Clarifies Standing for Pre‑Enforcement Second Amendment “Sensitive Places” Challenges

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Concrete Plans and Overlapping Bans: Tenth Circuit Clarifies Standing for Pre‑Enforcement Second Amendment “Sensitive Places” Challenges Introduction In Springer v. Grisham, Nos. 23‑2192 & 23‑2194...
Causation-by-Solicitation Confirmed: Eleventh Circuit Applies §2G2.1 Cross-Reference to a Buyer Who Prompted New Production; Harmless-Error Where Statutory Maximum Caps the Guidelines Range

Causation-by-Solicitation Confirmed: Eleventh Circuit Applies §2G2.1 Cross-Reference to a Buyer Who Prompted New Production; Harmless-Error Where Statutory Maximum Caps the Guidelines Range

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Causation-by-Solicitation Confirmed: Eleventh Circuit Applies §2G2.1 Cross-Reference to a Buyer Who Prompted New Production; Harmless-Error Where Statutory Maximum Caps the Guidelines Range...
Pending State Charges and Pretrial Misconduct Can Justify Major Upward Variances in Illegal Reentry Sentences; No Continuance Absent Specific, Non‑Speculative Prejudice

Pending State Charges and Pretrial Misconduct Can Justify Major Upward Variances in Illegal Reentry Sentences; No Continuance Absent Specific, Non‑Speculative Prejudice

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Pending State Charges and Pretrial Misconduct Can Justify Major Upward Variances in Illegal Reentry Sentences; No Continuance Absent Specific, Non‑Speculative Prejudice Case: United States v. Jorge...
Investigating Grand Jury Presentments Create Prima Facie Probable Cause in § 1983 False Arrest and Malicious Prosecution Claims—Omission of Exculpatory Evidence Does Not Rebut the Presumption

Investigating Grand Jury Presentments Create Prima Facie Probable Cause in § 1983 False Arrest and Malicious Prosecution Claims—Omission of Exculpatory Evidence Does Not Rebut the Presumption

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Investigating Grand Jury Presentments Create Prima Facie Probable Cause in § 1983 False Arrest and Malicious Prosecution Claims—Omission of Exculpatory Evidence Does Not Rebut the Presumption Case:...
Occasion Means More Than Time Stamps: Third Circuit Vacates §4B1.5(b) Pattern Enhancement and Remands to Assess Whether a Prior Assault Was a Separate Occasion

Occasion Means More Than Time Stamps: Third Circuit Vacates §4B1.5(b) Pattern Enhancement and Remands to Assess Whether a Prior Assault Was a Separate Occasion

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Occasion Means More Than Time Stamps: Third Circuit Vacates §4B1.5(b) Pattern Enhancement and Remands to Assess Whether a Prior Assault Was a Separate Occasion Case: United States v. Jeffrey Colin...
Hybrid Restitution Under the MVRA: Third Circuit Endorses Flexible Crediting and Rejects Blanket “Sheets” Rule in United States v. Shvets

Hybrid Restitution Under the MVRA: Third Circuit Endorses Flexible Crediting and Rejects Blanket “Sheets” Rule in United States v. Shvets

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Hybrid Restitution Under the MVRA: Third Circuit Endorses Flexible Crediting and Rejects Blanket “Sheets” Rule in United States v. Shvets Introduction In United States v. Natalya Shvets, the Third...
Explicit Warnings Suffice as “Lesser Sanctions”: Fifth Circuit Affirms Rule 41(b) Dismissal for Repeated Defiance of Deposition Orders in Lee v. Southwest Airlines

Explicit Warnings Suffice as “Lesser Sanctions”: Fifth Circuit Affirms Rule 41(b) Dismissal for Repeated Defiance of Deposition Orders in Lee v. Southwest Airlines

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Explicit Warnings Suffice as “Lesser Sanctions”: Fifth Circuit Affirms Rule 41(b) Dismissal for Repeated Defiance of Deposition Orders in Lee v. Southwest Airlines Introduction This commentary...
No Clearly Established Due Process Right in Inmate Craft‑Sale Proceeds: Fifth Circuit Grants Qualified Immunity in Savage v. Westcott

No Clearly Established Due Process Right in Inmate Craft‑Sale Proceeds: Fifth Circuit Grants Qualified Immunity in Savage v. Westcott

Date: Oct 1, 2025
No Clearly Established Due Process Right in Inmate Craft‑Sale Proceeds: Fifth Circuit Grants Qualified Immunity in Savage v. Westcott Introduction In Savage v. Westcott, the United States Court of...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies that Broad Habitability Exclusions Defeat the Duty to Defend Even When Claims Are Pleaded as Negligence

Tenth Circuit Clarifies that Broad Habitability Exclusions Defeat the Duty to Defend Even When Claims Are Pleaded as Negligence

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Tenth Circuit Clarifies that Broad Habitability Exclusions Defeat the Duty to Defend Even When Claims Are Pleaded as Negligence Case: Atain Specialty Insurance Company v. Eagle's Pointe, LLC, No....
Time-of-Decision Controls Qualifying-Child Status Under § 1229b(b)(1)(D); Post-Loper Bright, No Agency Deference; BIA’s Waiver Determinations Constrained by 8 C.F.R. § 1003.3(b)

Time-of-Decision Controls Qualifying-Child Status Under § 1229b(b)(1)(D); Post-Loper Bright, No Agency Deference; BIA’s Waiver Determinations Constrained by 8 C.F.R. § 1003.3(b)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Time-of-Decision Controls Qualifying-Child Status Under § 1229b(b)(1)(D); Post-Loper Bright, No Agency Deference; BIA’s Waiver Determinations Constrained by 8 C.F.R. § 1003.3(b) Introduction In...
Failure to Attend Successor Onboarding Is Not an Adverse Action by the Outgoing Employer: The Tenth Circuit’s ADA Baseline in Swepson v. Aimbridge

Failure to Attend Successor Onboarding Is Not an Adverse Action by the Outgoing Employer: The Tenth Circuit’s ADA Baseline in Swepson v. Aimbridge

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Failure to Attend Successor Onboarding Is Not an Adverse Action by the Outgoing Employer: The Tenth Circuit’s ADA Baseline in Swepson v. Aimbridge Introduction In Swepson v. Aimbridge Employee...
Tenth Circuit Confirms Materiality of Form 4473 Indictment Question: § 922(a)(6) Convictions Stand Because § 922(n) Is Facially Constitutional (United States v. Peavler)

Tenth Circuit Confirms Materiality of Form 4473 Indictment Question: § 922(a)(6) Convictions Stand Because § 922(n) Is Facially Constitutional (United States v. Peavler)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Tenth Circuit Confirms Materiality of Form 4473 Indictment Question: § 922(a)(6) Convictions Stand Because § 922(n) Is Facially Constitutional (United States v. Peavler) Note: This Order and Judgment...
No Right to Nullify Materiality: Tenth Circuit Holds False Denial of Felony Indictment on Form 4473 Is Actionable Because § 922(n) Is Facially Valid

No Right to Nullify Materiality: Tenth Circuit Holds False Denial of Felony Indictment on Form 4473 Is Actionable Because § 922(n) Is Facially Valid

Date: Oct 1, 2025
No Right to Nullify Materiality: Tenth Circuit Holds False Denial of Felony Indictment on Form 4473 Is Actionable Because § 922(n) Is Facially Valid Introduction In United States v. Reilly...
Noncompliance and Open‑Ended Incarceration: Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives and No Post‑Dispositional Improvement Period

Noncompliance and Open‑Ended Incarceration: Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives and No Post‑Dispositional Improvement Period

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Noncompliance and Open‑Ended Incarceration: Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives and No Post‑Dispositional Improvement Period Case: In re A.F. and H.J., No. 24-574 Court: Supreme Court...
Consent to Guardianship Is Not a Safe Harbor: West Virginia Affirms Termination Where No Reasonable Likelihood of Correction Exists

Consent to Guardianship Is Not a Safe Harbor: West Virginia Affirms Termination Where No Reasonable Likelihood of Correction Exists

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Consent to Guardianship Is Not a Safe Harbor: West Virginia Affirms Termination Where No Reasonable Likelihood of Correction Exists Case: In re A.A., K.A., and A.R., No. 24-474 (W. Va. Sept. 30,...
In re G.J.: Refusal to Engage in Services Justifies Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives and Supports Denial of Post‑Termination Visitation

In re G.J.: Refusal to Engage in Services Justifies Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives and Supports Denial of Post‑Termination Visitation

Date: Oct 1, 2025
In re G.J.: Refusal to Engage in Services Justifies Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives and Supports Denial of Post‑Termination Visitation Introduction In a memorandum decision dated...
In re G.A.: West Virginia High Court Reaffirms Written-Motion Prerequisite for Improvement Periods and Clarifies That Less Restrictive Alternatives Are Not Required When Statutory Termination Criteria Are Met

In re G.A.: West Virginia High Court Reaffirms Written-Motion Prerequisite for Improvement Periods and Clarifies That Less Restrictive Alternatives Are Not Required When Statutory Termination Criteria Are Met

Date: Oct 1, 2025
In re G.A.: Reaffirming the Written-Motion Requirement for Improvement Periods and the Permissibility of Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives Introduction In a memorandum decision issued...
Express Findings and Maximization Required to Deviate from West Virginia’s Statutory 50/50 Custody Presumption

Express Findings and Maximization Required to Deviate from West Virginia’s Statutory 50/50 Custody Presumption

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Express Findings and Maximization Required to Deviate from West Virginia’s Statutory 50/50 Custody Presumption Introduction In In re R.L., No. 24-395 (W. Va. Sept. 30, 2025), the Supreme Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert