Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
“When Accommodation Ends and Accountability Begins” – Eleventh Circuit Affirms Dismissal With Prejudice for Willful Non-Compliance by Overseas Pro Se Litigant Introduction Bozorgmehr Pouyeh v. Public...
United States v. Quintero: Eleventh Circuit Affirms MDLEA Jurisdiction in Exclusive Economic Zones and Upholds Broad Definition of “Vessel Without Nationality” Introduction The Eleventh Circuit’s...
Azer Scientific v. Quidel: Third Circuit Confirms that Definitive E-Mail Exchanges Can Form Binding Contracts under Pennsylvania Law Introduction The Third Circuit’s decision in Azer Scientific LLC...
“Follow the Form, or Be Formed into the Class” – Third Circuit Rejects the “Reasonable Indication” Opt-Out Standard under Rule 23 1. Introduction Perrigo Institutional Investor Group v. Papa, No....
United States v. Brown: Flight Equals Abandonment — A Passenger’s Loss of Standing to Challenge a Subsequent Vehicle Search Introduction United States v. Tylee Brown (3d Cir. Aug. 12, 2025) addresses...
“Post-Supervision Exhaustion” – Third Circuit Affirms that Completion of State Supervision Automatically Satisfies § 2254 Exhaustion Even After District-Court Dismissal I. Introduction Vamsidhar...
Sharpening the Lens of Ascertainability: B. v. Harrington and the Fifth Circuit’s Demand for Precision in Medicaid EPSDT Class Actions 1. Introduction B. v. Harrington, No. 24-30244 (5th Cir. Aug....
“Speculative Future Use” Is Not Enough: DM Arbor Court v. City of Houston and the Revitalisation of Lucas-Style Categorical Takings 1. Introduction Hurricane Harvey’s devastation of the Arbor Court...
“Real-World Operability” as the Touchstone of BACT in Texas Permitting Introduction In Port Arthur Community Action Network v. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, the United States Court of...
United States v. Brown: Re-affirming Judicial Control over Multiplicitous Convictions and Post-Verdict Rule 48(a) Dismissals 1. Introduction In United States v. Brown, No. 24-20095 (5th Cir. Aug. 12,...
Minor v. Commonwealth: Clarifying Kentucky’s Domestic-Violence Parole Exemption and the “In-Custody Video” Prejudice Test Introduction In Devin J. Minor v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, the Supreme Court...
The “Paintsville Standard”: Qualified Official Immunity Bars Vicarious-Liability and Special-Relationship Claims Against Kentucky Public Entities Introduction City of Paintsville v. Haney,...
Affirmation of Trial Courts’ Discretion to Amend Penalty-Phase Instructions Mid-Deliberation: Commentary on Bobby Anderson v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (Ky. 2025) Introduction The Supreme Court of...
Blaker v. Kroger – Reaffirming the Independence of Kentucky Workers’ Compensation Adjudications from Social-Security Disability Findings Introduction In Robert Blaker, Jr. v. The Kroger Company, the...
Restitution and Candor as Absolute Conditions for Bar Reinstatement – Supreme Court of Kentucky Defines the Outer Limits in In Re: Travis Olen Myles, Jr. 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of...
No Advantage Through Threats: Kentucky Supreme Court Re-Affirms that Subjective Belief Cannot Excuse Violations of SCR 3.130(3.4)(f) and 8.2(a) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of Kentucky’s opinion...
“When the Defendant Tells His Own Story” – Kentucky Clarifies the Scope of the “Inextricably Intertwined” Exception to KRE 404(b) Introduction In Damon R. Cruse v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (Supreme...
Granting Expert Funding Yet Denying a Continuance: The New Prohibition in Simpson v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Introduction In Ronald Simpson v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (Supreme Court of Kentucky,...