Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

affirmation-of-death-penalty-in-farris-genner-morris-jr.-for-heinous Case Commentaries

“Primarily Omissions” Re-Defined: Sixth Circuit’s Two-Step Test for Affiliated Ute and Rigorous Comcast Damages Review in Diane Owens v. FirstEnergy

“Primarily Omissions” Re-Defined: Sixth Circuit’s Two-Step Test for Affiliated Ute and Rigorous Comcast Damages Review in Diane Owens v. FirstEnergy

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“Primarily Omissions” Re-Defined: Sixth Circuit’s Two-Step Test for Affiliated Ute and Rigorous Comcast Damages Review in Diane Owens v. FirstEnergy 1. Introduction The United States Court of Appeals...
Reaffirming Exhaustion via Ginther Motions: Sixth Circuit Clarifies § 2254 Procedure in Fischer v. Nagy

Reaffirming Exhaustion via Ginther Motions: Sixth Circuit Clarifies § 2254 Procedure in Fischer v. Nagy

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Reaffirming Exhaustion via Ginther Motions: Sixth Circuit Clarifies § 2254 Procedure in Fischer v. Nagy 1 Introduction The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has once again...
Heiney v. Moore: Sixth Circuit Declines to Extend the Adams “Entire-Transcript” Rule to Trial Exhibits in § 2254 Habeas Review

Heiney v. Moore: Sixth Circuit Declines to Extend the Adams “Entire-Transcript” Rule to Trial Exhibits in § 2254 Habeas Review

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Heiney v. Moore: Sixth Circuit Declines to Extend the Adams “Entire-Transcript” Rule to Trial Exhibits in § 2254 Habeas Review Introduction Jake Paul Heiney, an orthopedic surgeon convicted in Ohio...
Beyond CPNI: Sixth Circuit Confirms FCC’s § 201(b) Power to Regulate PII Breach Reporting and Narrows the CRA “Substantially-the-Same” Bar

Beyond CPNI: Sixth Circuit Confirms FCC’s § 201(b) Power to Regulate PII Breach Reporting and Narrows the CRA “Substantially-the-Same” Bar

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Beyond CPNI: Sixth Circuit Confirms FCC’s § 201(b) Power to Regulate PII Breach Reporting and Narrows the CRA “Substantially-the-Same” Bar Introduction In Ohio Telecom Association v. FCC, Nos....
Re-affirming Nexus and Particular-Social-Group Precision: The Significance of Aguilar-Mejia v. Bondi (6th Cir. 2025)

Re-affirming Nexus and Particular-Social-Group Precision: The Significance of Aguilar-Mejia v. Bondi (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Re-affirming Nexus and Particular-Social-Group Precision: Aguilar-Mejia v. Bondi and the Sixth Circuit’s 2025 Guidance on Gang-Related Asylum Claims 1. Introduction Case: Pedro Aguilar-Mejia v....
Broad Authority Confirmed: Sixth Circuit Affirms FCC Power under § 201(b) to Mandate Data-Breach Reporting of PII

Broad Authority Confirmed: Sixth Circuit Affirms FCC Power under § 201(b) to Mandate Data-Breach Reporting of PII

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Broad Authority Confirmed: Sixth Circuit Affirms FCC Power under § 201(b) to Mandate Data-Breach Reporting of PII Introduction Texas Association of Business v. FCC consolidates three petitions for...
Sixth Circuit Clarifies that Umbrella Policies Do Not “Drop-Down” to Provide Underinsured-Motorist Coverage Absent Clear Incorporation Language

Sixth Circuit Clarifies that Umbrella Policies Do Not “Drop-Down” to Provide Underinsured-Motorist Coverage Absent Clear Incorporation Language

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Sixth Circuit Clarifies that Umbrella Policies Do Not “Drop-Down” to Provide Underinsured-Motorist Coverage Absent Clear Incorporation Language Introduction Thomas Rable, as administrator of the...
“The Mercer-Kinser Rule” –  Sixth Circuit Endorses Use of Bookmarks and Sexualized Texts to Prove Knowledge and Intent in Digital-Age Child-Pornography Prosecutions

“The Mercer-Kinser Rule” – Sixth Circuit Endorses Use of Bookmarks and Sexualized Texts to Prove Knowledge and Intent in Digital-Age Child-Pornography Prosecutions

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“The Mercer-Kinser Rule” – Sixth Circuit Endorses Use of Bookmarks and Sexualized Texts to Prove Knowledge and Intent in Digital-Age Child-Pornography Prosecutions 1. Introduction United States v....
United States v. Martinez: The Tenth Circuit’s Firm Line on Suppression-Motion Waiver and the Ongoing Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) After Rahimi

United States v. Martinez: The Tenth Circuit’s Firm Line on Suppression-Motion Waiver and the Ongoing Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) After Rahimi

Date: Aug 15, 2025
United States v. Martinez: The Tenth Circuit’s Firm Line on Suppression-Motion Waiver and the Ongoing Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) After Rahimi Introduction United States v. Martinez,...
Safeguarding the Residential Status Quo:  Byron v. Rainbow Estates HOA and the Stringent Application of Montana’s Preliminary-Injunction Test in Covenant–Enforcement Disputes

Safeguarding the Residential Status Quo: Byron v. Rainbow Estates HOA and the Stringent Application of Montana’s Preliminary-Injunction Test in Covenant–Enforcement Disputes

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Safeguarding the Residential Status Quo: Byron v. Rainbow Estates HOA and the Stringent Application of Montana’s Preliminary-Injunction Test in Covenant–Enforcement Disputes 1. Introduction Byron v....
Montana Supreme Court Clarifies Curative Effect of Post-Hearing Findings on Premature Ex Parte Third-Party Parenting Orders – Commentary on In re Parenting of D.C.S., 2025 MT 179

Montana Supreme Court Clarifies Curative Effect of Post-Hearing Findings on Premature Ex Parte Third-Party Parenting Orders – Commentary on In re Parenting of D.C.S., 2025 MT 179

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Montana Supreme Court Clarifies Curative Effect of Post-Hearing Findings on Premature Ex Parte Third-Party Parenting Orders A Commentary on In re Parenting of D.C.S., 2025 MT 179 (DA 24-0547) 1....
Jackson v. Jackson: Montana High Court Confirms Right to Discovery & Hearing Once “Changed Circumstances” Are Plausibly Alleged in Child-Support Modifications

Jackson v. Jackson: Montana High Court Confirms Right to Discovery & Hearing Once “Changed Circumstances” Are Plausibly Alleged in Child-Support Modifications

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Jackson v. Jackson: Montana High Court Confirms Right to Discovery & Hearing Once “Changed Circumstances” Are Plausibly Alleged in Child-Support Modifications 1. Introduction The Montana Supreme...
“Public-Interest Override” After the 2017 Amendments –  Matter of B.J.B. and the Court’s Discretion to Impose Lifetime Sex-Offender Registration on Juveniles

“Public-Interest Override” After the 2017 Amendments – Matter of B.J.B. and the Court’s Discretion to Impose Lifetime Sex-Offender Registration on Juveniles

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“Public-Interest Override” After the 2017 Amendments – Supreme Court of Montana Clarifies Judicial Discretion to Require Lifetime Sex-Offender Registration for Juveniles 1. Introduction The Supreme...
Matter of S.W. & D.W.: Clarifying Montana’s “No-Reunification Efforts” Exception Where Prior Terminations and Chronic, Severe Neglect Co-Exist

Matter of S.W. & D.W.: Clarifying Montana’s “No-Reunification Efforts” Exception Where Prior Terminations and Chronic, Severe Neglect Co-Exist

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Matter of S.W. & D.W. (2025 MT 178): Clarifying Montana’s “No-Reunification Efforts” Exception Where Prior Terminations and Chronic, Severe Neglect Co-Exist 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of...
2025 MT 178 – When “No Reasonable Efforts” Meets Prior Terminations: The Supreme Court of Montana Sharpens the Boundaries of § 41-3-423, MCA

2025 MT 178 – When “No Reasonable Efforts” Meets Prior Terminations: The Supreme Court of Montana Sharpens the Boundaries of § 41-3-423, MCA

Date: Aug 15, 2025
2025 MT 178 – When “No Reasonable Efforts” Meets Prior Terminations: Clarifying the Department’s Obligation and Defining “Chronic, Severe Neglect” Introduction In Matter of S.W. & D.W., 2025 MT 178,...
State v. Songer (2025 MT 176): Re-affirming the Unavailability Requirement for Remote Testimony and the Necessity of Re-Sentencing When Dependent Convictions Are Vacated

State v. Songer (2025 MT 176): Re-affirming the Unavailability Requirement for Remote Testimony and the Necessity of Re-Sentencing When Dependent Convictions Are Vacated

Date: Aug 15, 2025
State v. Songer (2025 MT 176): Re-affirming the Unavailability Requirement for Remote Testimony and the Necessity of Re-Sentencing When Dependent Convictions Are Vacated Introduction In State v. J....
The “Songer Standard” – Mandatory Proof of Witness Unavailability Before Playing Preserved Testimony

The “Songer Standard” – Mandatory Proof of Witness Unavailability Before Playing Preserved Testimony

Date: Aug 15, 2025
The “Songer Standard” – Mandatory Proof of Witness Unavailability Before Playing Preserved Testimony Introduction State v. J. Songer, 2025 MT 176, is a multi-issue decision from the Montana Supreme...
State v. Songer: Montana Supreme Court Demands Strict Proof of Witness “Unavailability” Before Video Testimony Is Admitted

State v. Songer: Montana Supreme Court Demands Strict Proof of Witness “Unavailability” Before Video Testimony Is Admitted

Date: Aug 15, 2025
State v. Songer: Montana Supreme Court Demands Strict Proof of Witness “Unavailability” Before Video Testimony Is Admitted Introduction In State v. Jory Jerae Songer, 2025 MT 176, the Supreme Court...
Assignment-as-Cancellation Doctrine: Montana Supreme Court Redefines Policy Transfers in Victory Insurance v. State (2025 MT 180)

Assignment-as-Cancellation Doctrine: Montana Supreme Court Redefines Policy Transfers in Victory Insurance v. State (2025 MT 180)

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Assignment-as-Cancellation Doctrine: Montana Supreme Court Redefines Policy Transfers in Victory Insurance v. State (2025 MT 180) 1. Introduction Victory Insurance Company (“Victory”), a Montana...
Extending the Dormant Commerce Clause to Federally-Prohibited Markets:  A Commentary on Variscite NY Four, LLC v. New York State Cannabis Control Board

Extending the Dormant Commerce Clause to Federally-Prohibited Markets: A Commentary on Variscite NY Four, LLC v. New York State Cannabis Control Board

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Extending the Dormant Commerce Clause to Federally-Prohibited Markets: A Commentary on Variscite NY Four, LLC v. New York State Cannabis Control Board (2d Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction Variscite NY...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert