Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

affirmation-of-death-penalty-in-farris-genner-morris-jr.-for-heinous Case Commentaries

Collateral Estoppel and the Finality of Court-Approved Settlement Agreements:  A Commentary on Martha C. Harris v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Collateral Estoppel and the Finality of Court-Approved Settlement Agreements: A Commentary on Martha C. Harris v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Date: Jul 8, 2025
Collateral Estoppel and the Finality of Court-Approved Settlement Agreements: A Commentary on Martha C. Harris v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Introduction The Eleventh Circuit’s unpublished per curiam...
“Time-of-State-Conviction” Reaffirmed: Career-Offender Predicates and United States v. Alacaliph Woodard

“Time-of-State-Conviction” Reaffirmed: Career-Offender Predicates and United States v. Alacaliph Woodard

Date: Jul 8, 2025
“Time-of-State-Conviction” Reaffirmed: Career-Offender Predicates and United States v. Alacaliph Woodard 1. Introduction The Eleventh Circuit’s unpublished decision in United States v. Alacaliph...
United States v. Angelo Williams: Terse Sentencing Explanations Suffice for Within-Guidelines Sentences under Steiger

United States v. Angelo Williams: Terse Sentencing Explanations Suffice for Within-Guidelines Sentences under Steiger

Date: Jul 8, 2025
United States v. Angelo Williams: Terse Sentencing Explanations Suffice for Within-Guidelines Sentences under Steiger Introduction United States v. Angelo Williams, No. 24-11023 (11th Cir. July 7,...
United States v. Whidden – Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms Kushmaul and Clarifies the Categorical Test for § 2252A Recidivist Enhancements

United States v. Whidden – Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms Kushmaul and Clarifies the Categorical Test for § 2252A Recidivist Enhancements

Date: Jul 8, 2025
United States v. Whidden – Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms Kushmaul and Clarifies the Categorical Test for § 2252A Recidivist Enhancements Introduction In United States v. Donovan E. Whidden, the...
Re-affirming Deferential Appellate Review of Career-Offender Sentences: United States v. Parker

Re-affirming Deferential Appellate Review of Career-Offender Sentences: United States v. Parker

Date: Jul 8, 2025
Re-affirming Deferential Appellate Review of Career-Offender Sentences: United States v. Jessie Anthony Parker Introduction United States v. Jessie Anthony Parker, No. 24-11140 (11th Cir. July 7...
United States v. Andrews – Elevating the “Bona-Fide Doubt” Standard and Closing the Door on Extra-Record Evidence

United States v. Andrews – Elevating the “Bona-Fide Doubt” Standard and Closing the Door on Extra-Record Evidence

Date: Jul 8, 2025
United States v. Andrews – Elevating the “Bona-Fide Doubt” Standard and Closing the Door on Extra-Record Evidence 1. Introduction In United States v. Lonnise Andrews, No. 24-10334 (11th Cir. 2025)...
“Standing, Not Merits”: Sixth Circuit Re-affirms the Wall between Article III Standing and State-Law Causes of Action in Stewart v. Martin

“Standing, Not Merits”: Sixth Circuit Re-affirms the Wall between Article III Standing and State-Law Causes of Action in Stewart v. Martin

Date: Jul 8, 2025
“Standing, Not Merits”: Sixth Circuit Re-affirms the Wall between Article III Standing and State-Law Causes of Action in Stewart v. Martin 1. Introduction Court & Date: United States Court of Appeals...
“Standing Without a Cause?” – Sixth Circuit Re-Affirms the Firewall between Article III Standing and State-Law Causes of Action (Commentary on Stewart v. Martin, 25 F.4th ___ (6th Cir. 2025))

“Standing Without a Cause?” – Sixth Circuit Re-Affirms the Firewall between Article III Standing and State-Law Causes of Action (Commentary on Stewart v. Martin, 25 F.4th ___ (6th Cir. 2025))

Date: Jul 8, 2025
“Standing Without a Cause?” – Sixth Circuit Re-Affirms the Firewall between Article III Standing and State-Law Causes of Action Comprehensive Commentary on Stewart v. Martin, Nos. 24-3648/3708 (6th...
Livingston v. Livingston Music: Preclusive Effect of State Probate Orders on §203 Copyright-Termination Challenges

Livingston v. Livingston Music: Preclusive Effect of State Probate Orders on §203 Copyright-Termination Challenges

Date: Jul 8, 2025
Livingston v. Livingston Music: Preclusive Effect of State Probate Orders on §203 Copyright-Termination Challenges Introduction The decision in Tammy Livingston v. Jay Livingston Music, Inc.,...
“Beyond the Score”: Sixth Circuit Re-Affirms Broad Sentencing Discretion to Up-Variance on Recidivism Grounds — Commentary on United States v. Timothy Noble, No. 24-5186 (6th Cir. 2025)

“Beyond the Score”: Sixth Circuit Re-Affirms Broad Sentencing Discretion to Up-Variance on Recidivism Grounds — Commentary on United States v. Timothy Noble, No. 24-5186 (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 8, 2025
“Beyond the Score”: Sixth Circuit Re-Affirms Broad Sentencing Discretion to Up-Variance on Recidivism Grounds Commentary on United States v. Timothy Noble, No. 24-5186 (6th Cir. July 7 2025) I....
Beach v. Wyoming DOC: Tenth Circuit Re-Affirms Limits on the Continuing-Wrong Doctrine, PLRA Injunctive Relief, and Threat-Only Eighth Amendment Claims

Beach v. Wyoming DOC: Tenth Circuit Re-Affirms Limits on the Continuing-Wrong Doctrine, PLRA Injunctive Relief, and Threat-Only Eighth Amendment Claims

Date: Jul 8, 2025
Beach v. Wyoming DOC: Tenth Circuit Re-Affirms Limits on the Continuing-Wrong Doctrine, PLRA Injunctive Relief, and Threat-Only Eighth Amendment Claims 1. Introduction Jesse Allan Jewett Beach, an...
“The Adaptive Accommodation Doctrine” – Seventh Circuit Clarifies Employers’ Right to Alter Disability Accommodations When Circumstances Materially Change

“The Adaptive Accommodation Doctrine” – Seventh Circuit Clarifies Employers’ Right to Alter Disability Accommodations When Circumstances Materially Change

Date: Jul 8, 2025
“The Adaptive Accommodation Doctrine” – Seventh Circuit Clarifies Employers’ Right to Alter Disability Accommodations When Circumstances Materially Change Introduction In David P. Bourke v. Douglas...

        Misclassification of ACCA Predicates Does Not Trigger the Actual-Innocence Gateway: 
        Seventh Circuit Tightens §2255 Time-Bar Rules and Requires Hearings on Equitable Tolling

Misclassification of ACCA Predicates Does Not Trigger the Actual-Innocence Gateway: Seventh Circuit Tightens §2255 Time-Bar Rules and Requires Hearings on Equitable Tolling

Date: Jul 8, 2025
Misclassification of ACCA Predicates Does Not Trigger the Actual-Innocence Gateway: Seventh Circuit Tightens § 2255 Time-Bar Rules and Requires Hearings on Equitable Tolling Introduction Michael...
Re-Drawing the Line on Certified Questions: The Michigan Supreme Court’s Clarification in In re Certified Question (Beaubien v. Trivedi)

Re-Drawing the Line on Certified Questions: The Michigan Supreme Court’s Clarification in In re Certified Question (Beaubien v. Trivedi)

Date: Jul 8, 2025
Re-Drawing the Line on Certified Questions: The Michigan Supreme Court’s Clarification in In re Certified Question (Beaubien v. Trivedi) Introduction On 3 July 2025, the Michigan Supreme Court...
People v. Brownfield and the Refined Test for Michigan Offense Variable 7: “Similarly Egregious” Conduct Coupled with Intent to Heighten Fear

People v. Brownfield and the Refined Test for Michigan Offense Variable 7: “Similarly Egregious” Conduct Coupled with Intent to Heighten Fear

Date: Jul 8, 2025
People v. Brownfield and the Refined Test for Michigan Offense Variable 7: “Similarly Egregious” Conduct Coupled with Intent to Heighten Fear Introduction The Michigan Supreme Court’s order in People...
Curing “Real-Party-in-Interest” Defects After Filing: The New Michigan Rule for No-Fault PIP Litigation

Curing “Real-Party-in-Interest” Defects After Filing: The New Michigan Rule for No-Fault PIP Litigation

Date: Jul 8, 2025
Curing “Real-Party-in-Interest” Defects After Filing: The New Michigan Rule for No-Fault PIP Litigation Introduction In C-Spine Orthopedics, PLLC v. Progressive Michigan Insurance Co. and its...
Curing Real-Party-in-Interest Defects Post-Filing through Equitable Remedies: The Wallace / C-Spine Doctrine

Curing Real-Party-in-Interest Defects Post-Filing through Equitable Remedies: The Wallace / C-Spine Doctrine

Date: Jul 8, 2025
Curing Real-Party-in-Interest Defects Post-Filing through Equitable Remedies: The Michigan Supreme Court’s Wallace / C-Spine Doctrine Introduction In a consolidated opinion released 3 July...
Urbonas v. Gullison: Rhode Island Supreme Court Re-defines the Reach of the Acquiescence Doctrine and Affirms Appellate Re-Characterisation Power

Urbonas v. Gullison: Rhode Island Supreme Court Re-defines the Reach of the Acquiescence Doctrine and Affirms Appellate Re-Characterisation Power

Date: Jul 8, 2025
Urbonas v. Gullison: Rhode Island Supreme Court Re-defines the Reach of the Acquiescence Doctrine and Affirms Appellate Re-Characterisation Power 1. Introduction In Kristina Urbonas v. John Gullison,...
Stratoberdha v. Clements Properties, LLC –  
           Finality of Un-Appealed Family Court Orders and the
           Extension of § 9-24-7 Interlocutory-Appeal Rights

Stratoberdha v. Clements Properties, LLC – Finality of Un-Appealed Family Court Orders and the Extension of § 9-24-7 Interlocutory-Appeal Rights

Date: Jul 8, 2025
Stratoberdha v. Clements Properties, LLC (R.I. 2025) Finality of Un-Appealed Family Court Orders and the Extension of § 9-24-7 Interlocutory-Appeal Rights 1. Introduction Robert and Etleva...
Precision in Objections: State v. Lantigua Establishes a Specificity Requirement for Challenging Expert “Bolstering” Testimony in Rhode Island

Precision in Objections: State v. Lantigua Establishes a Specificity Requirement for Challenging Expert “Bolstering” Testimony in Rhode Island

Date: Jul 8, 2025
Precision in Objections: State v. Jose Lantigua (R.I. 2025) Establishes a Specificity Requirement for Challenging Expert “Bolstering” Testimony 1. Introduction State v. Lantigua, decided by the Rhode...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert