Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Mug Shots as Identifiable Descriptions Under CHRIA – County Dissemination Prohibited Introduction In Mezzacappa v. Northampton County, 2025 PA 40 MAP and 41 MAP, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania...
Interdependency Requirement for Aggregating Noncontiguous Parcels Under Section 705 of the Eminent Domain Code Introduction In Pignetti, G. & J. h/w, Aplts. v. PennDOT, No. 26 & 27 EAP 2023 (Pa. Apr....
Clarifying “Used Together for a Unified Purpose”: Interdependency Requirement under Section 705 of the Eminent Domain Code Introduction This commentary examines the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania’s...
Clarifying the Voluntary-Inpatient Threshold under Pennsylvania’s MHPA Introduction In Estate of Frederick v. Geisinger Medical Center, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court addressed whether a patient’s...
Mug Shots as “Identifiable Descriptions” under CHRIA: Police-Only Dissemination Rule Introduction In Mezzacappa v. Northampton County, 2025 PA 40 MAP 2024, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania resolved...
New Due Process Safeguards for Juvenile Bench Warrants Under Pennsylvania Rules 140 & 141 Introduction On April 25, 2025, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania entered an order amending Rules 140 and 141...
Reaffirmation of Formal Application Prerequisites for Voluntary Inpatient Admission Under Pennsylvania’s Mental Health Procedures Act Introduction Estate of Frederick v. Alley Medical Center is a...
In re Huff: Traditional Domicile Test, Not Election Code §704(d), Governs Judicial Candidate Eligibility Introduction In In re Nomination Petition of Huff; Appeal of Huff, 2025 PA 24 (Pa. 2025), the...
Totality-of-Circumstances Domicile Rule and Inapplicability of Election Code §704(d) for Judicial Candidate Eligibility 1. Introduction This commentary examines the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania’s...
PLCAA Preemption of Civil Actions Against Firearms Manufacturers and Sellers Introduction In Mark and Leah Gustafson, individually and as administrators of the estate of James Robert “J.R.” Gustafson...
Reaffirming Clear and Convincing Evidence Standards in Parental Rights Termination Introduction This commentary examines the dissenting opinion in In the Interest of E.D.A. III, et al., 23-27 MAP...
Reaffirming the Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard in Termination of Parental Rights 1. Introduction In In the Interest of A.B.A., a Minor; Appeal of T.W.A. et al. (Nos. 15–24 MAP 2024), the...
Ensuring Clear and Convincing Evidence: Specificity and Corroboration in Parental‐Rights Termination Introduction In the consolidated appeals In the Interest of E.D.A., et al. (Nos. 15–24 MAP 2024),...
Enforcement of Pa.R.C.L.E. 111(b): Administrative Suspension for CLE Non-Compliance Introduction On March 26, 2025, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania issued an administrative order in In Re:...
Clear and Convincing Evidence, Not Credibility Alone: Justice Donohue’s Dissent on Termination of Parental Rights in In the Interest of E.D.A. III I. Introduction This commentary examines Justice...
Ensuring Clear‐and‐Convincing Evidence in Termination of Parental Rights 1. Introduction In In the Interest of B.W., a Minor; Appeal of E.A., Jr. et al., Nos. 15–24 MAP 2024, the Supreme Court of...
"Credibility Is Not a Substitute for Competency": Justice Donohue’s Dissent on the Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard in Pennsylvania Termination-of-Parental-Rights Cases 1. Introduction This...
Clarifying the Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard in Parental-Rights Termination Introduction In In the Interest of E.J.A., a Minor; Appeal of T.M.A. (Nos. 15–24 MAP 2024), the Supreme Court of...
Preserving Parental Rights: The Imperative of Clear and Convincing Evidence in Termination Proceedings Introduction The consolidated appeals in In the Interest of E.D.A., III; B.W.; A.B.A.; R.M.A.;...