Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Nevada Case Commentaries


Galvin v. State (Nev. 2025):  Non-Disclosure of Witness Emails Is Non-Structural Error Subject to Harmless-Error Review

Galvin v. State (Nev. 2025): Non-Disclosure of Witness Emails Is Non-Structural Error Subject to Harmless-Error Review

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Galvin v. State (Nev. 2025): Non-Disclosure of Witness Emails Is Non-Structural Error Subject to Harmless-Error Review 1. Introduction In Galvin v. State, 86927 (Nev. Aug. 21, 2025), the Supreme...
End of COVID-19 Tolling and Non-Revival of Terminated Directives: A Commentary on Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc. v. District Court (Campbell)

End of COVID-19 Tolling and Non-Revival of Terminated Directives: A Commentary on Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc. v. District Court (Campbell)

Date: Aug 25, 2025
End of COVID-19 Tolling and Non-Revival of Terminated Directives: Supreme Court of Nevada Clarifies Statute-of-Limitations Computation in Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc. v. District Court (Campbell)...
Reyes v. State: Nevada Supreme Court Clarifies that “Intent Not to Return” Is NOT a Separate Element of the Duty-to-Stop Statute

Reyes v. State: Nevada Supreme Court Clarifies that “Intent Not to Return” Is NOT a Separate Element of the Duty-to-Stop Statute

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Reyes v. State: Nevada Supreme Court Clarifies that “Intent Not to Return” Is NOT a Separate Element of the Duty-to-Stop Statute Introduction In Reyes (Fernando) v. State, No. 88011 (Nev. Aug. 21,...
Royal Essex v. Azteca (2025):  Disgorgement as a Fiduciary-Duty Remedy and the Limited Effect of Charter Revocation on LLC Membership Rights

Royal Essex v. Azteca (2025): Disgorgement as a Fiduciary-Duty Remedy and the Limited Effect of Charter Revocation on LLC Membership Rights

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Royal Essex, LLC v. Azteca Real Estate Partners, LLC Nevada Supreme Court, 21 August 2025 Introduction Royal Essex, LLC (“Essex”) was conceived in 2007 to purchase and develop land in the Inspirada...
“Unremembered” Strategy Is Not Enough: Brown v. State (2025) and Nevada’s Refined Ineffective-Assistance Doctrine

“Unremembered” Strategy Is Not Enough: Brown v. State (2025) and Nevada’s Refined Ineffective-Assistance Doctrine

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“Unremembered” Strategy Is Not Enough: Brown v. State (2025) and Nevada’s Refined Ineffective-Assistance Doctrine 1. Introduction Brown v. State, No. 88860 (Nev. Aug. 19, 2025) is a Supreme Court of...
“Pending-Litigation Abeyance” Doctrine: Sullivan v. Baker Ranches and the State Engineer’s Discretion to Suspend Water-Rights Investigations

“Pending-Litigation Abeyance” Doctrine: Sullivan v. Baker Ranches and the State Engineer’s Discretion to Suspend Water-Rights Investigations

Date: Aug 19, 2025
“Pending-Litigation Abeyance” Doctrine: Sullivan v. Baker Ranches and the State Engineer’s Discretion to Suspend Water-Rights Investigations 1. Introduction Case: Sullivan, P.E. v. Baker Ranches,...

        “Hedging Is Not a Concession” – The Nevada Supreme Court Clarifies When Trial Counsel’s Reference to a Lesser-Included Offence Triggers McCoy-Type Error

“Hedging Is Not a Concession” – The Nevada Supreme Court Clarifies When Trial Counsel’s Reference to a Lesser-Included Offence Triggers McCoy-Type Error

Date: Aug 19, 2025
“Hedging Is Not a Concession” – The Nevada Supreme Court Clarifies When Trial Counsel’s Reference to a Lesser-Included Offence Triggers McCoy-Type Error Introduction In Coddington (Ryan) v. Warden,...
Reaffirming the Regulatory Safe Harbor & Contractual Limitations on Utility Customers: Commentary on Garmong v. Sierra Pacific Power Co., Inc.

Reaffirming the Regulatory Safe Harbor & Contractual Limitations on Utility Customers: Commentary on Garmong v. Sierra Pacific Power Co., Inc.

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Reaffirming the Regulatory Safe Harbor & Contractual Limitations on Utility Customers: Commentary on Garmong v. Sierra Pacific Power Company, Inc., Supreme Court of Nevada (2025) 1. Introduction The...
“Water as an Assessment” – The New Rule from Maxwell Trust v. Saticoy Bay LLC (Nev. 2025)

“Water as an Assessment” – The New Rule from Maxwell Trust v. Saticoy Bay LLC (Nev. 2025)

Date: Aug 19, 2025
“Water as an Assessment”: The Supreme Court of Nevada Recognizes Utility Charges as Lien-Triggering Assessments under NRS 116.3116 Introduction Maxwell Trust v. Saticoy Bay LLC Series 3414 Big Sur,...
Valjo v. Euphoria Wellness: Nevada Supreme Court Bars Revival of Time-Barred Claims Through Post-Hoc Ownership Agreements

Valjo v. Euphoria Wellness: Nevada Supreme Court Bars Revival of Time-Barred Claims Through Post-Hoc Ownership Agreements

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Valjo v. Euphoria Wellness – Nevada Supreme Court Bars Revival of Time-Barred Claims Through Post-Hoc Ownership Agreements 1. Introduction In Valjo, Inc. v. Euphoria Wellness, LLC (Nos. 87929 &...
“No Second Bite at the Apple” – Nevada Supreme Court Bars Renewal of Statute-of-Limitations Period by Later Assignment (Valjo, Inc. v. Euphoria Wellness, LLC)

“No Second Bite at the Apple” – Nevada Supreme Court Bars Renewal of Statute-of-Limitations Period by Later Assignment (Valjo, Inc. v. Euphoria Wellness, LLC)

Date: Aug 19, 2025
“No Second Bite at the Apple” – Nevada Supreme Court Bars Renewal of Statute-of-Limitations Period by Later Assignment Commentary on Valjo, Inc. v. Euphoria Wellness, LLC, Nos. 87929 & 88137 (Nev....
“Beyond the Final Whistle” – Nevada Clarifies Post-Employment Arbitrability and Unconscionability in The National Football League v. Gruden

“Beyond the Final Whistle” – Nevada Clarifies Post-Employment Arbitrability and Unconscionability in The National Football League v. Gruden

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Beyond the Final Whistle” – Nevada Clarifies Post-Employment Arbitrability and Unconscionability in The National Football League v. Gruden I. Introduction On 11 August 2025 the Supreme Court of...
A Cab v. Murray: Nevada Supreme Court Confirms District Courts’ Authority to Award Appellate Attorney Fees under the Minimum Wage Amendment

A Cab v. Murray: Nevada Supreme Court Confirms District Courts’ Authority to Award Appellate Attorney Fees under the Minimum Wage Amendment

Date: Aug 13, 2025
A Cab v. Murray: Nevada Supreme Court Confirms District Courts’ Authority to Award Appellate Attorney Fees under the Minimum Wage Amendment Introduction In A Cab Series, LLC f/k/a A Cab, LLC v....
“The Davis Doctrine” – Post-Verdict Juror Statements Are Inadmissible Under NRS 50.065(2)(a)

“The Davis Doctrine” – Post-Verdict Juror Statements Are Inadmissible Under NRS 50.065(2)(a)

Date: Jul 5, 2025
“The Davis Doctrine” – Post-Verdict Juror Statements Are Inadmissible Under NRS 50.065(2)(a) Introduction Davis (Laron) v. State, decided by the Supreme Court of Nevada on 2 July 2025, concerns the...
Expanding the Scope of Res Gestae in Nevada: Lessons from Sanchez-Ramirez v. State (2025)

Expanding the Scope of Res Gestae in Nevada: Lessons from Sanchez-Ramirez v. State (2025)

Date: Jun 29, 2025
Expanding the Scope of Res Gestae in Nevada: Lessons from Sanchez-Ramirez v. State (2025) 1. Introduction In Sanchez-Ramirez v. State, the Supreme Court of Nevada reviewed multiple challenges arising...
Kosor v. Southern Highlands: Nevada Supreme Court Holds NRS 38.310’s ADR Requirement is a Waivable Claim-Processing Rule, Not a Jurisdictional Bar

Kosor v. Southern Highlands: Nevada Supreme Court Holds NRS 38.310’s ADR Requirement is a Waivable Claim-Processing Rule, Not a Jurisdictional Bar

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Kosor v. Southern Highlands: Nevada Supreme Court Holds NRS 38.310’s ADR Requirement is a Waivable Claim-Processing Rule, Not a Jurisdictional Bar Introduction The Supreme Court of Nevada, in Kosor,...
Whitley v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.: Nevada Supreme Court Limits the Calder “Effects” Test to Intentional Torts

Whitley v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.: Nevada Supreme Court Limits the Calder “Effects” Test to Intentional Torts

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Whitley v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.: Nevada Supreme Court Limits the Calder “Effects” Test to Intentional Torts Introduction In Whitley v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 141 Nev., Adv. Op. 33 (2025), the...
“Conflict-Based Recusal as Good Cause” – The New Standard for Extending Time to Serve the Nevada Attorney General in Petitions for Judicial Review

“Conflict-Based Recusal as Good Cause” – The New Standard for Extending Time to Serve the Nevada Attorney General in Petitions for Judicial Review

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“Conflict-Based Recusal as Good Cause” – The New Standard for Extending Time to Serve the Nevada Attorney General in Petitions for Judicial Review 1. Introduction In Lombardo v. Nevada Commission on...
Ponder v. State: Nevada Supreme Court Clarifies that Temporary Bruising Constitutes “Disfigurement” and that Foreseeability, not Intent, Defines “Non-Accidental” Injury under NRS 432B

Ponder v. State: Nevada Supreme Court Clarifies that Temporary Bruising Constitutes “Disfigurement” and that Foreseeability, not Intent, Defines “Non-Accidental” Injury under NRS 432B

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Ponder v. State: Nevada Supreme Court Clarifies that Temporary Bruising Constitutes “Disfigurement” and that Foreseeability, not Intent, Defines “Non-Accidental” Injury under NRS 432B Introduction In...
Wills v. Collins Capital, LLC: Clarifying Nevada Courts’ Power to Impose Case-Terminating Discovery Sanctions Without an Evidentiary Hearing

Wills v. Collins Capital, LLC: Clarifying Nevada Courts’ Power to Impose Case-Terminating Discovery Sanctions Without an Evidentiary Hearing

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Wills v. Collins Capital, LLC: Clarifying Nevada Courts’ Power to Impose Case-Terminating Discovery Sanctions Without an Evidentiary Hearing Introduction Wills v. Collins Capital, LLC, decided by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert