Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Nevada Case Commentaries

Fortunet, Inc. v. Rosten: No Prejudgment Interest on NRS 18.010(2)(b) Attorney‑Fee Sanctions and Clarified Standards for Impracticable Apportionment

Fortunet, Inc. v. Rosten: No Prejudgment Interest on NRS 18.010(2)(b) Attorney‑Fee Sanctions and Clarified Standards for Impracticable Apportionment

Date: Nov 5, 2025
Fortunet, Inc. v. Rosten: No Prejudgment Interest on NRS 18.010(2)(b) Attorney‑Fee Sanctions and Clarified Standards for Impracticable Apportionment I. Introduction This commentary analyzes the...
Fortunet, Inc. v. Coronel: No Prejudgment Interest on Sanction-Based Attorney Fees and Strict Limits on Duplicative Fee Awards

Fortunet, Inc. v. Coronel: No Prejudgment Interest on Sanction-Based Attorney Fees and Strict Limits on Duplicative Fee Awards

Date: Nov 5, 2025
Fortunet, Inc. v. Coronel: No Prejudgment Interest on Sanction-Based Attorney Fees and Strict Limits on Duplicative Fee Awards I. Introduction The Nevada Supreme Court’s order in Fortunet, Inc. v....
Ruelas v. State: Nevada Clarifies that Motive-to-Lie Inquiries Are Not Vouching and Endorses Mid‑Trial Date‑Range Amendments Absent Prejudice

Ruelas v. State: Nevada Clarifies that Motive-to-Lie Inquiries Are Not Vouching and Endorses Mid‑Trial Date‑Range Amendments Absent Prejudice

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Ruelas v. State: Nevada Clarifies that Motive-to-Lie Inquiries Are Not Vouching and Endorses Mid‑Trial Date‑Range Amendments Absent Prejudice Court: Supreme Court of Nevada Date: October 30, 2025...
Shelton v. State: Nevada Supreme Court narrows res gestae to same‑transaction events and reaffirms mandatory limiting instructions for identity-based other‑acts evidence (harmless error applied)

Shelton v. State: Nevada Supreme Court narrows res gestae to same‑transaction events and reaffirms mandatory limiting instructions for identity-based other‑acts evidence (harmless error applied)

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Shelton v. State: Nevada Supreme Court narrows res gestae to same‑transaction events and reaffirms mandatory limiting instructions for identity-based other‑acts evidence (harmless error applied)...
Nevada Rejects Portal-to-Portal Act Exceptions: PPA’s Preliminary/Postliminary Carveouts Are Not Incorporated into Nevada Wage-Hour Law

Nevada Rejects Portal-to-Portal Act Exceptions: PPA’s Preliminary/Postliminary Carveouts Are Not Incorporated into Nevada Wage-Hour Law

Date: Nov 1, 2025
Nevada Rejects Portal-to-Portal Act Exceptions: PPA’s Preliminary/Postliminary Carveouts Are Not Incorporated into Nevada Wage-Hour Law Introduction In an en banc opinion answering a certified...
Confidentiality Breaches Do Not Justify Dismissal in Bar Discipline; Fifth Amendment Adverse Inferences Allowed — In re Discipline of Sandy Van

Confidentiality Breaches Do Not Justify Dismissal in Bar Discipline; Fifth Amendment Adverse Inferences Allowed — In re Discipline of Sandy Van

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Confidentiality Breaches Do Not Justify Dismissal in Bar Discipline; Fifth Amendment Adverse Inferences Allowed — In re Discipline of Sandy Van Introduction In this automatic review of a disciplinary...
Recantations Alone Are Insufficient: Nevada Clarifies Clear-and-Convincing, Total-Evidence Review and Deferential Credibility Findings in Factual Innocence Petitions

Recantations Alone Are Insufficient: Nevada Clarifies Clear-and-Convincing, Total-Evidence Review and Deferential Credibility Findings in Factual Innocence Petitions

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Recantations Alone Are Insufficient: Nevada Clarifies Clear-and-Convincing, Total-Evidence Review and Deferential Credibility Findings in Factual Innocence Petitions Introduction In this order of...
Nevada Supreme Court Clarifies Enforceability of Sole-Discretion Gaming Suitability Termination Clauses and Treats Undisclosed Vendor Kickbacks as Bad Faith and Fraud

Nevada Supreme Court Clarifies Enforceability of Sole-Discretion Gaming Suitability Termination Clauses and Treats Undisclosed Vendor Kickbacks as Bad Faith and Fraud

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Nevada Supreme Court Clarifies Enforceability of Sole-Discretion Gaming Suitability Termination Clauses and Treats Undisclosed Vendor Kickbacks as Bad Faith and Fraud Introduction In Seibel v. PHWLV,...
Inherent Judicial Authority Controls Court Security: Nevada Supreme Court Holds EJDC Deputy Marshals Are Judicial Employees Despite Peace Officer Powers, and NRS 289 Does Not Apply

Inherent Judicial Authority Controls Court Security: Nevada Supreme Court Holds EJDC Deputy Marshals Are Judicial Employees Despite Peace Officer Powers, and NRS 289 Does Not Apply

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Inherent Judicial Authority Controls Court Security: Nevada Supreme Court Holds EJDC Deputy Marshals Are Judicial Employees Despite Peace Officer Powers, and NRS 289 Does Not Apply Introduction In...
Area Identification Signs Are Distinct from Billboards; Deference to Municipal Land-Use Interpretations and Beneficial-Interest Standing Clarified

Area Identification Signs Are Distinct from Billboards; Deference to Municipal Land-Use Interpretations and Beneficial-Interest Standing Clarified

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Area Identification Signs Are Distinct from Billboards; Deference to Municipal Land-Use Interpretations and Beneficial-Interest Standing Clarified Introduction In Reno Real Estate Development, LLC v....
Young v. State: Nevada Adopts a Unified Juror-Bias Standard Under NRS 16.050 and NRCrP 17(6), Partially Overruling Sayedzada; Clarifies “Larceny from the Person” Instruction

Young v. State: Nevada Adopts a Unified Juror-Bias Standard Under NRS 16.050 and NRCrP 17(6), Partially Overruling Sayedzada; Clarifies “Larceny from the Person” Instruction

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Young v. State: Nevada Adopts a Unified Juror-Bias Standard Under NRS 16.050 and NRCrP 17(6), Partially Overruling Sayedzada; Clarifies “Larceny from the Person” Instruction Introduction In Young...
Disfavoring Token-Efforts-Only Terminations in Private Petitions and Rejecting Admissions by Silence: Nevada Supreme Court’s Guidance in In re Parental Rights as to S.A.T.

Disfavoring Token-Efforts-Only Terminations in Private Petitions and Rejecting Admissions by Silence: Nevada Supreme Court’s Guidance in In re Parental Rights as to S.A.T.

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Disfavoring Token-Efforts-Only Terminations in Private Petitions and Rejecting Admissions by Silence: Nevada Supreme Court’s Guidance in In re Parental Rights as to S.A.T. Introduction In In the...
Nevada Supreme Court Clarifies: Post‑Judgment Sealing Orders Are Not Appealable Unless They Affect Rights Embedded in the Final Judgment (Bloom v. Rodgers, 2025)

Nevada Supreme Court Clarifies: Post‑Judgment Sealing Orders Are Not Appealable Unless They Affect Rights Embedded in the Final Judgment (Bloom v. Rodgers, 2025)

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Nevada Supreme Court Clarifies: Post‑Judgment Sealing Orders Are Not Appealable Unless They Affect Rights Embedded in the Final Judgment Case Overview and Procedural Posture Case: Bloom v. Rodgers...
Limited Pearce Presumption in Nevada Parole Proceedings: No Vindictiveness Presumed When the Parole Board Self‑Corrects

Limited Pearce Presumption in Nevada Parole Proceedings: No Vindictiveness Presumed When the Parole Board Self‑Corrects

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Limited Pearce Presumption in Nevada Parole Proceedings: No Vindictiveness Presumed When the Parole Board Self‑Corrects Introduction This commentary analyzes the Nevada Supreme Court’s decision in...
“Substantial Opportunity to Use” Test for Late-Disclosed Evidence: Nevada Clarifies Prejudice and Continuance Cures in Lee v. State

“Substantial Opportunity to Use” Test for Late-Disclosed Evidence: Nevada Clarifies Prejudice and Continuance Cures in Lee v. State

Date: Sep 13, 2025
“Substantial Opportunity to Use” Test for Late-Disclosed Evidence: Nevada Clarifies Prejudice and Continuance Cures in Lee v. State Introduction In Lee (Michael) v. State, No. 85004 (Nev. Sept. 12,...
Misheard Confession, Independent Probable Cause, and Ligature Strangulation as a Deadly Weapon: Roginsky v. State (Nev. 2025)

Misheard Confession, Independent Probable Cause, and Ligature Strangulation as a Deadly Weapon: Roginsky v. State (Nev. 2025)

Date: Sep 13, 2025
Misheard Confession, Independent Probable Cause, and Ligature Strangulation as a Deadly Weapon: Roginsky v. State (Nev. 2025) Introduction In Roginsky (Robert) v. State, No. 89006 (Nev. Sept. 12,...
No Two‑Step Reconsideration Motions under WDCR 12(8)/DCR 13(7) and Sanctionable “Mediation‑as‑Pretext” Deception under RPC 4.1

No Two‑Step Reconsideration Motions under WDCR 12(8)/DCR 13(7) and Sanctionable “Mediation‑as‑Pretext” Deception under RPC 4.1

Date: Sep 12, 2025
No Two‑Step Reconsideration Motions under WDCR 12(8)/DCR 13(7) and Sanctionable “Mediation‑as‑Pretext” Deception under RPC 4.1 Case Controlled Contamination Services, LLC v. Dist. Ct. (Fredericks),...
Differential Diagnosis Endorsed for Abusive Head Trauma: Nevada Affirms Physician Causation Testimony Without Biomechanical Expertise and Clarifies Limits on Juror-Impeachment and Prosecutorial Comment

Differential Diagnosis Endorsed for Abusive Head Trauma: Nevada Affirms Physician Causation Testimony Without Biomechanical Expertise and Clarifies Limits on Juror-Impeachment and Prosecutorial Comment

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Differential Diagnosis Endorsed for Abusive Head Trauma: Nevada Affirms Physician Causation Testimony Without Biomechanical Expertise and Clarifies Limits on Juror-Impeachment and Prosecutorial...
Procedural Due Process and Permanency Timelines: Nevada Affirms the Constitutionality of NRS 128.109’s Rebuttable Presumptions in Termination of Parental Rights

Procedural Due Process and Permanency Timelines: Nevada Affirms the Constitutionality of NRS 128.109’s Rebuttable Presumptions in Termination of Parental Rights

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Procedural Due Process and Permanency Timelines: Nevada Affirms the Constitutionality of NRS 128.109’s Rebuttable Presumptions in Termination of Parental Rights Introduction In In re: Parental Rights...
Nevada Supreme Court Enforces Contractual Irreparable-Harm Presumptions to Support Mandatory Injunction and Specific Performance in Convertible Note Disputes

Nevada Supreme Court Enforces Contractual Irreparable-Harm Presumptions to Support Mandatory Injunction and Specific Performance in Convertible Note Disputes

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Nevada Supreme Court Enforces Contractual Irreparable-Harm Presumptions to Support Mandatory Injunction and Specific Performance in Convertible Note Disputes Introduction In Blackstar Enterprise...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert