Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Harmless Error Permits Reliance on a Dismissed Co‑Defendant’s Expert Disclosure Seventh Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment Where Opponent Had Notice and Opportunity to Respond Introduction In a...
Systemwide Conditions Are Not “Adverse Employment Actions” Absent Individualized Harm After Muldrow Commentary on Bowman v. City of Chicago Board of Education (7th Cir. Sept. 29, 2025) Introduction...
Reasonable Misperception of a Drawn Gun Supports Qualified Immunity Even with Inconclusive Bodycam Footage Introduction This commentary analyzes the Seventh Circuit’s decision in Earnise Pam v. City...
No Rule 408 Shield for Pre-Litigation Status Emails; Missing-Witness Instruction Narrowed for Foreign, Non-Employee Witnesses Case: NHC LLC v. Centaur Construction Company Inc., et al. Court: United...
No-Reasonable-Attorney Foreshadowing Standard: Seventh Circuit narrows Strickland deficiency for missed categorical-approach arguments Introduction In Otis R. Elion v. United States, No. 24-3014 (7th...
No Federal Do‑Over: Postconviction Counsel’s Inaction Bars § 2254 Evidentiary Development; State “Missing‑Evidence” Inference Not Cognizable Under § 2254(d)(1) Introduction This Seventh Circuit...
Upholding § 922(g)(3) After Bruen: Disarming Current Drug Users Is Analogous to Founding‑Era Limits on the Intoxicated and the Mentally Ill Introduction United States v. John P. Seiwert is the...
AMP Means Price Realized: Seventh Circuit Holds Wholesaler Clawbacks Must Be Included and Are Not Bona Fide Service Fees under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program Introduction In a sweeping False Claims...
“Price Realized Means Price Paid”: Seventh Circuit Requires AMP to Include Clawbacks and Clarifies FCA Falsity, Scienter, and Materiality Case: United States, et al., ex rel. Ronald J. Streck v. Eli...
“AMP Means the Price Actually Realized”: Seventh Circuit Requires Inclusion of Wholesaler Clawbacks and Clarifies Objective Falsity Under the FCA Introduction In United States, et al., ex rel. Ronald...
AMP Means the Price Realized: Post‑Sale “Clawbacks” Must Be Included and Are Not Bona Fide Service Fees United States ex rel. Streck v. Eli Lilly and Company (7th Cir. Sept. 11, 2025) Introduction...
AMP Must Include Price-Value Clawbacks: The Seventh Circuit’s plain-meaning rule for Medicaid rebate reporting and the limits of “reasonable assumptions” under the FCA Introduction In United States,...
“AMP Means the Price Actually Realized”: Seventh Circuit Rejects Bona Fide Service Fee Treatment of Price-Increase Clawbacks and Affirms FCA Liability Introduction In United States, et al., ex rel....
Refusal of OSHA Certified Mail Does Not Defeat Service: Alternative Delivery and Judicial Notice of Address Satisfy Due Process Introduction In Lori Chavez-DeRemer v. Elmer Miller d/b/a Miller...
Seventh Circuit Reaffirms High Bar for Reversal Based on Closing-Argument Misconduct and Clarifies Evidentiary Predicate for “Future Emotional Distress” Instructions under Illinois Law Introduction...
Missing a Ruth Categorical Challenge Is Not Per Se Ineffective Assistance: Stage‑Specific Limits and the “Clearly Stronger” Test in Neal v. United States (7th Cir. 2025) Introduction In Tyree M....
Reaffirming the “Verifying Medical Evidence” Rule and Expert Causation for Delay-Based Eighth Amendment Claims: Commentary on McMillen v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. (7th Cir. 2025) Introduction In...
Regulatory Complaints Are Not FCA Notice: Seventh Circuit Clarifies §3730(h) in Off‑Label Marketing and Third‑Party Causation Commentary on Jeffrey Lewis v. AbbVie Inc., Court of Appeals for the...
Reaffirming Key Sex‑Trafficking Sentencing Enhancements and Mandatory Restitution: Seventh Circuit Dismisses Appeal Under Anders in United States v. Arnold Introduction In United States v. Daryl S....