Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Principles Governing Dismissal for Want of Prosecution and Rule 60(b) Relief Introduction In Terri Griffiths v. Lorin Eggemeyer, 23-3253 & 24-1098 (7th Cir. May 29, 2025), the Seventh Circuit...
Addressing Statutory Safety Valve Relief as a Principal Mitigating Argument Introduction United States v. Kevin Hodge (7th Cir. 2025) clarifies a sentencing court’s obligation to engage with a...
Permissible Reliance on Specialist Diagnoses in §1983 Deliberate Indifference Claims Introduction In Matthew Doughty v. Karl Hoffmann, No. 24-2306 (7th Cir. May 27, 2025), the Seventh Circuit...
FOIA Timeliness and Remedies Clarified: Delay Does Not Merit Declaratory Relief, FOIA Bars APA Claims — Libarov v. ICE Introduction Sotir Libarov v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (No....
ALJ’s Discretion in Listing Determination and Substantial Evidence Standard in Disability Claims Introduction This commentary examines the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit’s...
Clarifying the Standard for Nonfrivolous Sentencing Guideline Objections in Anders Appeals Introduction United States v. Jamie Sullivan, decided May 20 2025 by the Seventh Circuit, addresses the...
Strict Compliance with PLRA Exhaustion: No “Sue-First, Exhaust-Later” Rule Introduction Bobby Tatum v. Russell Williams is a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit...
Reaffirming PLRA Exhaustion: Availability Period and Adequate Notice Requirements Introduction The Seventh Circuit’s May 19, 2025 decision in Anthony Martin v. Zarak Thompson addresses the contours...
Clarifying Pleading Standards for §1983, ADA, and FHA Claims Against Housing Authorities Introduction Curtis K. Jackson, Sr. (“Jackson”), a qualified person with disabilities, sued the Chicago...
Waiver of As-Applied Free Exercise Claims in Successive Appeals: Lukaszczyk v. Cook County Introduction In Barbara Lukaszczyk et al. v. Cook County, Illinois, the Seventh Circuit addressed whether...
Defining “Reasonable Time” For Rule 60(b)(6) Motions in Capital Habeas Cases: Ritchie v. Neal Introduction Benjamin Ritchie v. Ron Neal presents a late-stage attempt by a death-row inmate to reopen...
Reaffirmation of the Pretext Standard and Alignment of McDonnell Douglas and Ortiz Frameworks Under Title VII Introduction In James Napier v. Orchard School Foundation (7th Cir. No. 23-1659, decided...
Ferrari v. Link: Permissibility of Police‐Escort Requirements in Public Buildings Absent Viewpoint Discrimination Introduction In Patrick M. Ferrari v. Todd Link, the Seventh Circuit addressed...
Establishing Knowing Possession of Child Pornography Through Cached Thumbnails and Circumstantial Evidence 1. Introduction This commentary examines the Seventh Circuit’s decision in United States v....
Cached Thumbnails as Evidence of Knowing Possession in Child Pornography Prosecutions Introduction United States v. Edward C. Brown is a Seventh Circuit decision upholding a conviction for possession...
Consent Threshold for Eighth Amendment Prison Sexual Abuse Claims Introduction David C.L. Walton, a state prisoner in Wisconsin, sued prison nurse Ashley Nehls under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that...
Clarifying Attorney Disclosure Obligations and Proximate Cause in Legal Malpractice: Signal Funding v. Sugar Felsenthal Introduction Signal Funding, LLC (“Signal”) is a pre-settlement...
Clarifying Insurer Duty to Defend BIPA Claims: Access or Disclosure vs. Statutory Violations Exclusions Introduction This commentary examines Citizens Insurance Company of America v. Mullins Food...
Signal Funding v. Sugar Felsenthal: Clarifying Fraudulent Concealment and Disclosure Duties in Attorney-Client Relations Introduction In Signal Funding, LLC v. Sugar Felsenthal Grais & Helsinger LLP,...
Reaffirming Deference to Sentencing Guidelines Commentary under Stinson: Inclusion of Intended Loss in U.S.S.G. §2B1.1 Calculations Introduction United States v. Eric Upchurch is a Seventh Circuit...