Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Hermann Estoppel Revived and Provider Assignments Clarified: The Fifth Circuit’s Framework for Out‑of‑Network ERISA Claims in Angelina Emergency Med. v. Blue Cross

Hermann Estoppel Revived and Provider Assignments Clarified: The Fifth Circuit’s Framework for Out‑of‑Network ERISA Claims in Angelina Emergency Med. v. Blue Cross

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Hermann Estoppel Revived and Provider Assignments Clarified: The Fifth Circuit’s Framework for Out‑of‑Network ERISA Claims in Angelina Emergency Med. v. Blue Cross Introduction In Angelina Emergency...
No Statutory Lanham Act Damages Without a Registered Mark: Fifth Circuit Vacates Awards and Clarifies Limits on Attorney Immunity in Lewis Brisbois v. Bitgood

No Statutory Lanham Act Damages Without a Registered Mark: Fifth Circuit Vacates Awards and Clarifies Limits on Attorney Immunity in Lewis Brisbois v. Bitgood

Date: Oct 27, 2025
No Statutory Lanham Act Damages Without a Registered Mark: Fifth Circuit Vacates Awards and Clarifies Limits on Attorney Immunity in Lewis Brisbois v. Bitgood Introduction In an unpublished but...
No Post‑Termination Royalties Absent Express Language: “Developed and Manufactured During the Initial Term” Means What It Says

No Post‑Termination Royalties Absent Express Language: “Developed and Manufactured During the Initial Term” Means What It Says

Date: Oct 27, 2025
No Post‑Termination Royalties Absent Express Language: “Developed and Manufactured During the Initial Term” Means What It Says Case: Strategy and Execution, Inc. v. Black Rifle Coffee Company,...
Arzamendi v. Hegseth: Rescission of Federal Vaccine Mandate Does Not Moot Damages Claims; Religious Accommodation Pleadings Must Specifically Tie Beliefs to Testing/Masking Protocols

Arzamendi v. Hegseth: Rescission of Federal Vaccine Mandate Does Not Moot Damages Claims; Religious Accommodation Pleadings Must Specifically Tie Beliefs to Testing/Masking Protocols

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Arzamendi v. Hegseth: Rescission of Federal Vaccine Mandate Does Not Moot Damages Claims; Religious Accommodation Pleadings Must Specifically Tie Beliefs to Testing/Masking Protocols Introduction In...
Survival Clauses Cannot Create Post‑Termination Renewal Commission Rights Under Maryland Law: Sims Agency v. GEICO (5th Cir. 2025)

Survival Clauses Cannot Create Post‑Termination Renewal Commission Rights Under Maryland Law: Sims Agency v. GEICO (5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 25, 2025
Survival Clauses Cannot Create Post‑Termination Renewal Commission Rights Under Maryland Law: Sims Agency v. GEICO (5th Cir. 2025) Introduction In Sims Agency, L.L.C. v. Government Employees...
Torres v. Rubio: § 1503(a) Citizenship Suits Are De Novo and Not Bound by Passport “Primary/Secondary Evidence” Regulations

Torres v. Rubio: § 1503(a) Citizenship Suits Are De Novo and Not Bound by Passport “Primary/Secondary Evidence” Regulations

Date: Oct 25, 2025
Torres v. Rubio: § 1503(a) Citizenship Suits Are De Novo and Not Bound by Passport “Primary/Secondary Evidence” Regulations Introduction In Torres v. Rubio, No. 24-40685 (5th Cir. Oct. 21, 2025)...
Pattern-of-Coercion Suffices for § 1591; Social-Media “Pimping” Memes Are Admissible Under Rule 404(b): A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Lewis (5th Cir. 2025)

Pattern-of-Coercion Suffices for § 1591; Social-Media “Pimping” Memes Are Admissible Under Rule 404(b): A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Lewis (5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 25, 2025
Pattern-of-Coercion Suffices for § 1591; Social-Media “Pimping” Memes Are Admissible Under Rule 404(b) Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Lewis, No. 24-20235 (5th Cir. Oct. 21, 2025)...
Colorado River Controls Mixed Declaratory/Injunctive Actions; “Ready, Willing, and Able” for Texas Equitable Redemption Requires Conjunctive Proof: Commentary on All About Property, L.L.C. v. Midland Mortgage (5th Cir. 2025)

Colorado River Controls Mixed Declaratory/Injunctive Actions; “Ready, Willing, and Able” for Texas Equitable Redemption Requires Conjunctive Proof: Commentary on All About Property, L.L.C. v. Midland Mortgage (5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 23, 2025
Colorado River Controls Mixed Declaratory/Injunctive Actions; “Ready, Willing, and Able” for Texas Equitable Redemption Requires Conjunctive Proof: Commentary on All About Property, L.L.C. v. Midland...
Contractual Pre‑Suit ADR Can Trigger a CGL “Duty to Defend,” and Wrongful Denial Waives Consent-to-ADR; Bankruptcy Assignment Does Not Bar Indemnity Litigation

Contractual Pre‑Suit ADR Can Trigger a CGL “Duty to Defend,” and Wrongful Denial Waives Consent-to-ADR; Bankruptcy Assignment Does Not Bar Indemnity Litigation

Date: Oct 23, 2025
Contractual Pre‑Suit ADR Can Trigger a CGL “Duty to Defend,” and Wrongful Denial Waives Consent-to-ADR; Bankruptcy Assignment Does Not Bar Indemnity Litigation Case: BPX Prod. Co. v. Certain...
No Ex parte Young Path to “Just Compensation” for Texas Unclaimed Property: Fifth Circuit Bars Federal Takings Claim on Sovereign Immunity Grounds

No Ex parte Young Path to “Just Compensation” for Texas Unclaimed Property: Fifth Circuit Bars Federal Takings Claim on Sovereign Immunity Grounds

Date: Oct 22, 2025
No Ex parte Young Path to “Just Compensation” for Texas Unclaimed Property: Fifth Circuit Bars Federal Takings Claim on Sovereign Immunity Grounds Introduction In Ambriz v. Hancock, No. 23-50582 (5th...
Speculative Risk Is Not “Substantial Prejudice”: Fifth Circuit Tightens Sanctions Due Process and Bars Johnson Double-Counting in CEATS v. TicketNetwork

Speculative Risk Is Not “Substantial Prejudice”: Fifth Circuit Tightens Sanctions Due Process and Bars Johnson Double-Counting in CEATS v. TicketNetwork

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Speculative Risk Is Not “Substantial Prejudice”: Fifth Circuit Tightens Sanctions Due Process and Bars Johnson Double-Counting in CEATS v. TicketNetwork Introduction In this second trip to the Fifth...
Threatening to Retain Property Beyond a Possessory Lien Constitutes TTLA “Coercion”; Expectation Damages Must Net Avoided Costs — Rose v. Equis Equine (5th Cir. 2025)

Threatening to Retain Property Beyond a Possessory Lien Constitutes TTLA “Coercion”; Expectation Damages Must Net Avoided Costs — Rose v. Equis Equine (5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Threatening to Retain Property Beyond a Possessory Lien Constitutes TTLA “Coercion”; Expectation Damages Must Net Avoided Costs — Rose v. Equis Equine (5th Cir. 2025) Introduction In Rose v. Equis...
No Special Forfeiture Exception for Pro Se Appellants: Fifth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment and Flags Fabricated Citations in Scroggins v. City of Shreveport

No Special Forfeiture Exception for Pro Se Appellants: Fifth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment and Flags Fabricated Citations in Scroggins v. City of Shreveport

Date: Oct 22, 2025
No Special Forfeiture Exception for Pro Se Appellants: Fifth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment and Flags Fabricated Citations in Scroggins v. City of Shreveport Introduction This Fifth Circuit...
Material Omissions as “False Entries” Under 18 U.S.C. § 1005 When Context and Duty to Disclose Render Them Literally False: Fifth Circuit’s Post-Thompson Clarification in United States v. Ryan

Material Omissions as “False Entries” Under 18 U.S.C. § 1005 When Context and Duty to Disclose Render Them Literally False: Fifth Circuit’s Post-Thompson Clarification in United States v. Ryan

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Material Omissions as “False Entries” Under 18 U.S.C. § 1005 When Context and Duty to Disclose Render Them Literally False: Fifth Circuit’s Post-Thompson Clarification in United States v. Ryan...
Averaging Competing Expert Figures Is Not a Culver II Analysis: The Fifth Circuit Vacates a Future Wage-Loss Award and Reaffirms No Punitive Damages for Delayed Cure Absent Bad Faith

Averaging Competing Expert Figures Is Not a Culver II Analysis: The Fifth Circuit Vacates a Future Wage-Loss Award and Reaffirms No Punitive Damages for Delayed Cure Absent Bad Faith

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Averaging Competing Expert Figures Is Not a Culver II Analysis: The Fifth Circuit Vacates a Future Wage-Loss Award and Reaffirms No Punitive Damages for Delayed Cure Absent Bad Faith Introduction In...
No Count-by-Count Cure: Fifth Circuit Requires Dismissal of the Entire Indictment When Any Count Violates the Sixth Amendment Speedy Trial Right

No Count-by-Count Cure: Fifth Circuit Requires Dismissal of the Entire Indictment When Any Count Violates the Sixth Amendment Speedy Trial Right

Date: Oct 18, 2025
No Count-by-Count Cure: Fifth Circuit Requires Dismissal of the Entire Indictment When Any Count Violates the Sixth Amendment Speedy Trial Right Introduction In Berryman v. Huffman, No. 23-60627 (5th...
Predicate-Conviction-Specific Bruen Analysis: Fifth Circuit Remands § 922(g)(1) As-Applied Challenge in United States v. Smith

Predicate-Conviction-Specific Bruen Analysis: Fifth Circuit Remands § 922(g)(1) As-Applied Challenge in United States v. Smith

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Predicate-Conviction-Specific Bruen Analysis: Fifth Circuit Remands § 922(g)(1) As-Applied Challenge in United States v. Smith Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Date:...
Belief vs. Practice: Fifth Circuit Clarifies Title VII Religion Claims, Tightens RLA Access, and Polices Injunctions and Civil Contempt

Belief vs. Practice: Fifth Circuit Clarifies Title VII Religion Claims, Tightens RLA Access, and Polices Injunctions and Civil Contempt

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Belief vs. Practice: Fifth Circuit Clarifies Title VII Religion Claims, Tightens RLA Access, and Polices Injunctions and Civil Contempt Introduction Carter v. Local 556 (5th Cir. 2025) arises from...
Carter v. Southwest Airlines: The Fifth Circuit Draws a Bright Line Between Belief- and Practice-Based Title VII Claims, Clarifies Union Liability for “Attempting to Cause” Discrimination, Narrows Post-Certification RLA Suits, and Polices Overbroad Injunctions and Punitive Civil Contempt

Carter v. Southwest Airlines: The Fifth Circuit Draws a Bright Line Between Belief- and Practice-Based Title VII Claims, Clarifies Union Liability for “Attempting to Cause” Discrimination, Narrows Post-Certification RLA Suits, and Polices Overbroad Injunctions and Punitive Civil Contempt

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Carter v. Southwest Airlines: The Fifth Circuit Draws a Bright Line Between Belief- and Practice-Based Title VII Claims, Clarifies Union Liability for “Attempting to Cause” Discrimination, Narrows...
Belief vs. Practice: Fifth Circuit Clarifies Title VII Religion Doctrine, Affirms Groff Without Retrial, and Vacates “Obey‑the‑Law” Injunctions in Carter v. Southwest

Belief vs. Practice: Fifth Circuit Clarifies Title VII Religion Doctrine, Affirms Groff Without Retrial, and Vacates “Obey‑the‑Law” Injunctions in Carter v. Southwest

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Belief vs. Practice: Fifth Circuit Clarifies Title VII Religion Doctrine, Affirms Groff Without Retrial, and Vacates “Obey‑the‑Law” Injunctions in Carter v. Southwest Introduction In a sweeping...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert