Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

2d Circuit Case Commentaries

Oppedisano v. Zur: Second Circuit Reaffirms Loss‑Sharing as Indispensable to Implied Partnerships Under New York Law and Rejects Declaratory Workarounds to Unjust Enrichment Time Bars

Oppedisano v. Zur: Second Circuit Reaffirms Loss‑Sharing as Indispensable to Implied Partnerships Under New York Law and Rejects Declaratory Workarounds to Unjust Enrichment Time Bars

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Oppedisano v. Zur: Second Circuit Reaffirms Loss‑Sharing as Indispensable to Implied Partnerships Under New York Law and Rejects Declaratory Workarounds to Unjust Enrichment Time Bars Note: The...
Foreseeability of Co‑Conspirator Death Threats and Broad Electronic‑Device Search Conditions: The Second Circuit’s Summary Affirmance in United States v. Deloatch

Foreseeability of Co‑Conspirator Death Threats and Broad Electronic‑Device Search Conditions: The Second Circuit’s Summary Affirmance in United States v. Deloatch

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Foreseeability of Co‑Conspirator Death Threats and Broad Electronic‑Device Search Conditions: The Second Circuit’s Summary Affirmance in United States v. Deloatch Note: This decision is a Second...
“Sensitive Places” in the Modern City: Times Square and Public Transit Upheld; Open-Carry Bans and City-Specific Permits Presumptively Constitutional after Bruen

“Sensitive Places” in the Modern City: Times Square and Public Transit Upheld; Open-Carry Bans and City-Specific Permits Presumptively Constitutional after Bruen

Date: Sep 24, 2025
“Sensitive Places” in the Modern City: Times Square and Public Transit Upheld; Open-Carry Bans and City-Specific Permits Presumptively Constitutional after Bruen Introduction In Frey v. City of New...
Second Circuit Reaffirms Braswell’s Act‑of‑Production Bar at Trial and Imposes Single‑Recovery Rule for Co‑Conspirator Forfeiture Under § 981

Second Circuit Reaffirms Braswell’s Act‑of‑Production Bar at Trial and Imposes Single‑Recovery Rule for Co‑Conspirator Forfeiture Under § 981

Date: Sep 13, 2025
Second Circuit Reaffirms Braswell’s Act‑of‑Production Bar at Trial and Imposes Single‑Recovery Rule for Co‑Conspirator Forfeiture Under § 981 Introduction United States v. Costanzo is a Second...
United States v. Valdez: Oral Sentencing Controls Over Unpronounced Supervised-Release Conditions; Tailored Minor-Contact Restrictions Upheld

United States v. Valdez: Oral Sentencing Controls Over Unpronounced Supervised-Release Conditions; Tailored Minor-Contact Restrictions Upheld

Date: Sep 13, 2025
United States v. Valdez: Oral Sentencing Controls Over Unpronounced Supervised-Release Conditions; Tailored Minor-Contact Restrictions Upheld Introduction In United States v. Valdez, No. 23-6482 (2d...
No Bright-Line 30-Day Rule and Pre-Enforcement Standing for Training-Arrest Threats: The Second Circuit’s Post-Bruen Roadmap in Giambalvo v. Suffolk County

No Bright-Line 30-Day Rule and Pre-Enforcement Standing for Training-Arrest Threats: The Second Circuit’s Post-Bruen Roadmap in Giambalvo v. Suffolk County

Date: Sep 13, 2025
No Bright-Line 30-Day Rule and Pre-Enforcement Standing for Training-Arrest Threats: The Second Circuit’s Post-Bruen Roadmap in Giambalvo v. Suffolk County Introduction In Giambalvo v. Suffolk...
No Summons Before IFP Screening; Plausibility Requires Facts: Second Circuit Affirms § 1915(e) Dismissal in Lewis v. Redline Hockey

No Summons Before IFP Screening; Plausibility Requires Facts: Second Circuit Affirms § 1915(e) Dismissal in Lewis v. Redline Hockey

Date: Sep 13, 2025
No Summons Before IFP Screening; Plausibility Requires Facts: Second Circuit Affirms § 1915(e) Dismissal in Lewis v. Redline Hockey Introduction In Lewis v. Redline Hockey, LLC, No. 24-1342-cv (2d...
PLRA Grievances Must Signal Retaliation; Evidence Beyond Disagreement or Injury‑Free Delay Needed to Survive Summary Judgment on Prison Medical Claims

PLRA Grievances Must Signal Retaliation; Evidence Beyond Disagreement or Injury‑Free Delay Needed to Survive Summary Judgment on Prison Medical Claims

Date: Sep 13, 2025
PLRA Grievances Must Signal Retaliation; Evidence Beyond Disagreement or Injury‑Free Delay Needed to Survive Summary Judgment on Prison Medical Claims Editorial note: This is a Second Circuit summary...
Mootness of § 1443 Removal Appeals After State Discontinuance—and Vacatur as the Default Remedy: Commentary on Town of Newburgh v. Newburgh EOM LLC (2d Cir. 2025)

Mootness of § 1443 Removal Appeals After State Discontinuance—and Vacatur as the Default Remedy: Commentary on Town of Newburgh v. Newburgh EOM LLC (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Mootness of § 1443 Removal Appeals After State Discontinuance—and Vacatur as the Default Remedy Case: Town of Newburgh v. Newburgh EOM LLC (d/b/a Crossroads Hotels) Court: United States Court of...
Respondent Must Invoke Right to Review Evidence: Second Circuit Reads 8 C.F.R. § 1240.10(a)(4) as Advisory Only and Reaffirms Presumption of Competence in Removal Proceedings

Respondent Must Invoke Right to Review Evidence: Second Circuit Reads 8 C.F.R. § 1240.10(a)(4) as Advisory Only and Reaffirms Presumption of Competence in Removal Proceedings

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Respondent Must Invoke Right to Review Evidence: Second Circuit Reads 8 C.F.R. § 1240.10(a)(4) as Advisory Only and Reaffirms Presumption of Competence in Removal Proceedings Note: This is a summary...
Clarifying “Antitrust Injury” vs. Substantive Pleading and Reaffirming Rule‑of‑Reason Requirements for Vertical Restraints: Amigo Shuttle v. Port Authority (2d Cir. 2025)

Clarifying “Antitrust Injury” vs. Substantive Pleading and Reaffirming Rule‑of‑Reason Requirements for Vertical Restraints: Amigo Shuttle v. Port Authority (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Clarifying “Antitrust Injury” vs. Substantive Pleading and Reaffirming Rule‑of‑Reason Requirements for Vertical Restraints: Amigo Shuttle v. Port Authority (2d Cir. 2025) Court: U.S. Court of Appeals...
NCMEC Is a Governmental Entity for Fourth Amendment Purposes, But ESP Hash-Matching Alone Does Not Make Providers Government Agents: A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Guard (2d Cir. 2025)

NCMEC Is a Governmental Entity for Fourth Amendment Purposes, But ESP Hash-Matching Alone Does Not Make Providers Government Agents: A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Guard (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 11, 2025
NCMEC Is a Governmental Entity for Fourth Amendment Purposes, But ESP Hash-Matching Alone Does Not Make Providers Government Agents Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Guard, No. 23-6886 (2d...
Accommodation Cannot Compel Illegality: Second Circuit Reaffirms that Title VII Does Not Require Employers to Violate State Vaccination Rules, and Uniform Mandates Do Not Support ADA “Regarded As” Claims

Accommodation Cannot Compel Illegality: Second Circuit Reaffirms that Title VII Does Not Require Employers to Violate State Vaccination Rules, and Uniform Mandates Do Not Support ADA “Regarded As” Claims

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Accommodation Cannot Compel Illegality: Second Circuit Reaffirms that Title VII Does Not Require Employers to Violate State Vaccination Rules, and Uniform Mandates Do Not Support ADA “Regarded As”...
Device‑Location Data Is CPNI Under § 222: Second Circuit Upholds FCC Forfeiture and Clarifies Seventh Amendment Path via § 504(a)

Device‑Location Data Is CPNI Under § 222: Second Circuit Upholds FCC Forfeiture and Clarifies Seventh Amendment Path via § 504(a)

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Device‑Location Data Is CPNI Under § 222: Second Circuit Upholds FCC Forfeiture and Clarifies Seventh Amendment Path via § 504(a) Introduction This commentary analyzes the Second Circuit’s decision...
For Pre‑2021 Asylum Filings, Past Persecution Triggers a Presumption that Internal Relocation Is Unreasonable—Burden Rests with DHS (Sahni v. Bondi)

For Pre‑2021 Asylum Filings, Past Persecution Triggers a Presumption that Internal Relocation Is Unreasonable—Burden Rests with DHS (Sahni v. Bondi)

Date: Sep 11, 2025
For Pre‑2021 Asylum Filings, Past Persecution Triggers a Presumption that Internal Relocation Is Unreasonable—Burden Rests with DHS (Sahni v. Bondi) Introduction This commentary analyzes the Second...
Second Circuit: Rule 37(b) Attorney Sanctions—Including MDL Leadership Removal and Common Benefit Restrictions—Are Not Immediately Appealable Under the Collateral Order Doctrine

Second Circuit: Rule 37(b) Attorney Sanctions—Including MDL Leadership Removal and Common Benefit Restrictions—Are Not Immediately Appealable Under the Collateral Order Doctrine

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Second Circuit: Rule 37(b) Attorney Sanctions—Including MDL Leadership Removal and Common Benefit Restrictions—Are Not Immediately Appealable Under the Collateral Order Doctrine Introduction In In...
New York Claim Preclusion Reaffirmed: “Convenient Trial Unit” Is Non‑Dispositive; Different Contracts Do Not Avoid Res Judicata When Tied to the Same Transactional Nucleus

New York Claim Preclusion Reaffirmed: “Convenient Trial Unit” Is Non‑Dispositive; Different Contracts Do Not Avoid Res Judicata When Tied to the Same Transactional Nucleus

Date: Sep 11, 2025
New York Claim Preclusion Reaffirmed: “Convenient Trial Unit” Is Non‑Dispositive; Different Contracts Do Not Avoid Res Judicata When Tied to the Same Transactional Nucleus Introduction This...
Content-Neutral, Not Content-Based: Second Circuit Holds New York’s UPL Restrictions on One-to-One Legal Advice Are Subject to Intermediate Scrutiny

Content-Neutral, Not Content-Based: Second Circuit Holds New York’s UPL Restrictions on One-to-One Legal Advice Are Subject to Intermediate Scrutiny

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Content-Neutral, Not Content-Based: Second Circuit Holds New York’s UPL Restrictions on One-to-One Legal Advice Are Subject to Intermediate Scrutiny Introduction In Upsolve, Inc. v. James, the United...
Walton v. Comfort Systems: Fire Alarm Testing and Inspection Is Covered “Maintenance” Under NYLL § 220; Second Circuit Certifies Whether the Prevailing-Wage Promise Is Implied in All Public Works Contracts and Whether One‑Year Limitations Clauses Bind Workers

Walton v. Comfort Systems: Fire Alarm Testing and Inspection Is Covered “Maintenance” Under NYLL § 220; Second Circuit Certifies Whether the Prevailing-Wage Promise Is Implied in All Public Works Contracts and Whether One‑Year Limitations Clauses Bind Workers

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Walton v. Comfort Systems: Fire Alarm Testing and Inspection Is Covered “Maintenance” Under NYLL § 220; Second Circuit Certifies Whether the Prevailing-Wage Promise Is Implied in All Public Works...
Neutral Laws Require Neutral Enforcement: Second Circuit Holds that Hostility-Tainted Discipline by a State Athletics Association Violates the Free Exercise Clause

Neutral Laws Require Neutral Enforcement: Second Circuit Holds that Hostility-Tainted Discipline by a State Athletics Association Violates the Free Exercise Clause

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Neutral Laws Require Neutral Enforcement: Second Circuit Holds that Hostility-Tainted Discipline by a State Athletics Association Violates the Free Exercise Clause Introduction In Mid Vermont...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert