Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Supreme Court Case Commentaries

“Documentary Primacy & Finality”:  Supreme Court Clarifies Age-Determination and Review Powers under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015

“Documentary Primacy & Finality”: Supreme Court Clarifies Age-Determination and Review Powers under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015

Date: May 21, 2025
“Documentary Primacy & Finality” – Commentary on Rajni v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 2025 INSC 737 1. Introduction Rajni v. State of Uttar Pradesh presented the Supreme Court with two intertwined...
“From Classroom to Courtroom – Only After Practice”: Supreme Court Restores Bar-Practice Requirement and Expands LDCE Pathway in All India Judges Association v. Union of India (2025)

“From Classroom to Courtroom – Only After Practice”: Supreme Court Restores Bar-Practice Requirement and Expands LDCE Pathway in All India Judges Association v. Union of India (2025)

Date: May 20, 2025
“From Classroom to Courtroom – Only After Practice”: Supreme Court Restores Bar-Practice Requirement and Expands LDCE Pathway in All India Judges Association v. Union of India (2025) 1. Introduction...
Shaurabh Kumar Tripathi v. Vidhi Rawal (2025): Recognising High-Court Power to Quash Domestic-Violence Proceedings under § 482 CrPC

Shaurabh Kumar Tripathi v. Vidhi Rawal (2025): Recognising High-Court Power to Quash Domestic-Violence Proceedings under § 482 CrPC

Date: May 20, 2025
Shaurabh Kumar Tripathi v. Vidhi Rawal (2025 INSC 734): High Courts May Invoke § 482 CrPC / § 528 BNSS to Quash Applications under § 12 of the Domestic-Violence Act 1. Introduction In Shaurabh Kumar...
“Once Quashed, Forever Quiet”: Supreme Court Re-affirms the Near-Absolute Bar on High-Court Review of Criminal Orders under Section 362 Cr.P.C.

“Once Quashed, Forever Quiet”: Supreme Court Re-affirms the Near-Absolute Bar on High-Court Review of Criminal Orders under Section 362 Cr.P.C.

Date: May 20, 2025
“Once Quashed, Forever Quiet”: Supreme Court Re-affirms the Near-Absolute Bar on High-Court Review of Criminal Orders under Section 362 Cr.P.C. Introduction Raghunath Sharma v. State of Haryana (2025...
Encashment of Bank Guarantees Is Not “Payment of Duty”: Supreme Court Clarifies Inapplicability of Unjust Enrichment under Section 27 Customs Act

Encashment of Bank Guarantees Is Not “Payment of Duty”: Supreme Court Clarifies Inapplicability of Unjust Enrichment under Section 27 Customs Act

Date: May 20, 2025
Encashment of Bank Guarantees Is Not “Payment of Duty” – Supreme Court Clarifies Inapplicability of the Doctrine of Unjust Enrichment to Security Instruments (M/s Patanjali Foods Ltd. v. Union of...
Confessional & 161-CrPC Statements Cannot Be Relied Upon at Bail Stage – Commentary on P. Krishna Mohan Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2025)

Confessional & 161-CrPC Statements Cannot Be Relied Upon at Bail Stage – Commentary on P. Krishna Mohan Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2025)

Date: May 20, 2025
Confessional & 161-CrPC Statements Cannot Be Relied Upon at Bail Stage A Detailed Commentary on P. Krishna Mohan Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh, 2025 INSC 725 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s...
“The Sidhu Consolidation Doctrine” – Supreme Court’s New Rule on Intra-State Clubbing of Multiple FIRs and Their Treatment as §161 CrPC Statements

“The Sidhu Consolidation Doctrine” – Supreme Court’s New Rule on Intra-State Clubbing of Multiple FIRs and Their Treatment as §161 CrPC Statements

Date: May 20, 2025
“The Sidhu Consolidation Doctrine” – Supreme Court Introduces a Uniform Mechanism for Clubbing Multiple FIRs Within Each State and Deems Subsequent FIRs as Statements u/§161 CrPC 1. Introduction...
“One-Rank-One-Pension” for High Court Judges:  A Definitive Constitutional Mandate – Commentary on 2025 INSC 726

“One-Rank-One-Pension” for High Court Judges: A Definitive Constitutional Mandate – Commentary on 2025 INSC 726

Date: May 20, 2025
“One-Rank-One-Pension” for High Court Judges: A Definitive Constitutional Mandate – Commentary on In Re: Re-fixation of Pension… (2025 INSC 726) 1. Introduction For decades, the pension framework for...
Primacy of Foreigners Tribunal Declarations over Draft NRC Entries – Comment on Rofiqul Hoque v. Union of India (2025)

Primacy of Foreigners Tribunal Declarations over Draft NRC Entries – Comment on Rofiqul Hoque v. Union of India (2025)

Date: May 20, 2025
Primacy of Foreigners Tribunal Declarations over Draft NRC Entries Commentary on Supreme Court’s Judgment in Rofiqul Hoque v. Union of India (2025 INSC 730) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s...
Supreme Court Reinforces Primacy of the First Survey & the Proximate-Cause Test in Property-Insurance Claims – A Commentary on Gopal Dikshit v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. (2025)

Supreme Court Reinforces Primacy of the First Survey & the Proximate-Cause Test in Property-Insurance Claims – A Commentary on Gopal Dikshit v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. (2025)

Date: May 20, 2025
Supreme Court Reinforces Primacy of the First Survey & the Proximate-Cause Test in Property-Insurance Claims Commentary on Gopal Dikshit v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., (2025) INSC 731 1....
Sentencing Discretion under Section 326A IPC and Non-mandatory Status of Acid-Attack SOPs: Analysis of Hakim v. State of NCT of Delhi (2025 INSC 728)

Sentencing Discretion under Section 326A IPC and Non-mandatory Status of Acid-Attack SOPs: Analysis of Hakim v. State of NCT of Delhi (2025 INSC 728)

Date: May 20, 2025
Sentencing Discretion under Section 326A IPC and Non-mandatory Status of Acid-Attack SOPs: A Detailed Commentary on Hakim v. State of NCT of Delhi (2025 INSC 728) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s...
“Zero-Tolerance for Post-Facto Environmental Clearance” – A Commentary on Vanashakti v. Union of India (2025)

“Zero-Tolerance for Post-Facto Environmental Clearance” – A Commentary on Vanashakti v. Union of India (2025)

Date: May 17, 2025
“Zero-Tolerance for Post-Facto Environmental Clearance” – A Comprehensive Commentary on Vanashakti v. Union of India, 2025 INSC 718 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s decision in Vanashakti v. Union...
Supreme Court Re-defines the Fiscal Powers of Fee Regulatory Committees:  Statutory Authority Mandatory for Corpus-Fund Levies

Supreme Court Re-defines the Fiscal Powers of Fee Regulatory Committees: Statutory Authority Mandatory for Corpus-Fund Levies

Date: May 17, 2025
Supreme Court Re-defines the Fiscal Powers of Fee Regulatory Committees: Statutory Authority Mandatory for Corpus-Fund Levies Introduction The Supreme Court’s judgment in The State of Kerala v. The...
Primacy of Statutory Title: Supreme Court Clarifies that Allotment Made to a Registered Society Cannot Be Claimed by its “Parent” Trust – The ISKCON Bangalore v. ISKCON Mumbai Ruling

Primacy of Statutory Title: Supreme Court Clarifies that Allotment Made to a Registered Society Cannot Be Claimed by its “Parent” Trust – The ISKCON Bangalore v. ISKCON Mumbai Ruling

Date: May 17, 2025
Primacy of Statutory Title: Supreme Court Clarifies that Allotment Made to a Registered Society Cannot Be Claimed by its “Parent” Trust – The ISKCON Bangalore v. ISKCON Mumbai Ruling 1. Introduction...
The Necessity of Detailed Reasoning in Bail Orders: Supreme Court Reinforces Standards for Appellate Scrutiny

The Necessity of Detailed Reasoning in Bail Orders: Supreme Court Reinforces Standards for Appellate Scrutiny

Date: May 17, 2025
The Necessity of Detailed Reasoning in Bail Orders: Supreme Court Reinforces Standards for Appellate Scrutiny 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s decision in Baljinder Singh @ Aman v. State of Punjab...
“Uniform Cadre & Regularisation of Court Managers” – Commentary on All India Judges Association v. Union Of India (2025)

“Uniform Cadre & Regularisation of Court Managers” – Commentary on All India Judges Association v. Union Of India (2025)

Date: May 16, 2025
Supreme Court Mandates a Uniform Cadre and Regularisation Framework for Court Managers Across India Introduction On 16 May 2025, in All India Judges Association & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors., (2025...
Temple Receivership Re-Defined: Supreme Court Bars Routine Appointment of Advocate-Receivers and Allows Temple Funds for Public Infrastructure (Ishwar Chanda Sharma v. Devendra Kumar Sharma, 2025)

Temple Receivership Re-Defined: Supreme Court Bars Routine Appointment of Advocate-Receivers and Allows Temple Funds for Public Infrastructure (Ishwar Chanda Sharma v. Devendra Kumar Sharma, 2025)

Date: May 16, 2025
Temple Receivership Re-Defined: Supreme Court Bars Routine Appointment of Advocate-Receivers and Allows Temple Funds for Public Infrastructure Case Comment on Ishwar Chanda Sharma v. Devendra Kumar...
“From Piecemeal Orders to Predictable Parenting Time” – Supreme Court Abolishes the
        Re-filing Requirement for Interim Child-Custody in Eby Cherian v. Jerema John (2025)

“From Piecemeal Orders to Predictable Parenting Time” – Supreme Court Abolishes the Re-filing Requirement for Interim Child-Custody in Eby Cherian v. Jerema John (2025)

Date: May 16, 2025
“From Piecemeal Orders to Predictable Parenting Time” – Supreme Court Abolishes the Re-filing Requirement for Interim Child-Custody Applications 1. Introduction Case: Eby Cherian v. Jerema John,...

Supreme Court Clarifies Section 31(7) A&C Act: Arbitral Tribunals May
(i) Split Pre-reference and Pendente-lite Periods, and
(ii) Capitalise Past Interest for Post-award Interest
— Commentary on M/s Interstate Construction v. NPCC (2025)

Supreme Court Clarifies Section 31(7) A&C Act: Arbitral Tribunals May (i) Split Pre-reference and Pendente-lite Periods, and (ii) Capitalise Past Interest for Post-award Interest — Commentary on M/s Interstate Construction v. NPCC (2025)

Date: May 16, 2025
Supreme Court Clarifies Section 31(7) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996: Arbitral Tribunals May (a) Segment “Pre-reference” and “Pendente-lite” Interest Periods and (b) Capitalise Accrued...
Administrative Circulars Cannot Dilute Statutory Exemptions: 
            “Agricultural Products” Redefined in Noble Resources v. Union of India (2025)

Administrative Circulars Cannot Dilute Statutory Exemptions: “Agricultural Products” Redefined in Noble Resources v. Union of India (2025)

Date: May 16, 2025
Administrative Circulars Cannot Dilute Statutory Exemptions: Supreme Court Holds Crude Degummed Soyabean Oil is NOT an “Agricultural Product” — Commentary on Noble Resources & Trading India Pvt. Ltd....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert