Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Supreme Court Upholds Minimum-Service Bonds with Liquidated Damages in Public Sector Employment – Commentary on Vijaya Bank v. Prashant B. Narnaware (2025)

Supreme Court Upholds Minimum-Service Bonds with Liquidated Damages in Public Sector Employment – Commentary on Vijaya Bank v. Prashant B. Narnaware (2025)

Date: May 16, 2025
Supreme Court Upholds Minimum-Service Bonds with Liquidated Damages in Public Sector Employment Commentary on Vijaya Bank & Anr. v. Prashant B. Narnaware (2025 INSC 691) 1. Introduction Vijaya Bank...
“The Dock-Identification Mandate” – Commentary on Tukesh Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh (2025 INSC 683)

“The Dock-Identification Mandate” – Commentary on Tukesh Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh (2025 INSC 683)

Date: May 16, 2025
“The Dock-Identification Mandate” – A Comprehensive Commentary on Tukesh Singh & Ors. v. State of Chhattisgarh (2025 INSC 683) Introduction The Supreme Court of India’s decision in Tukesh Singh &...
“Seat Subservient to Statute” – The Supreme Court affirms the overriding effect of the MSMED Act on contractual arbitration clauses in M/S HARCHARAN DASS GUPTA v. Union of India (2025)

“Seat Subservient to Statute” – The Supreme Court affirms the overriding effect of the MSMED Act on contractual arbitration clauses in M/S HARCHARAN DASS GUPTA v. Union of India (2025)

Date: May 16, 2025
“Seat Subservient to Statute” – The Supreme Court affirms the overriding effect of the MSMED Act on contractual arbitration clauses in M/S HARCHARAN DASS GUPTA v. Union of India (2025) 1....
“Strict-Format Rule” for Reservation Certificates: The Mohit Kumar Principle

“Strict-Format Rule” for Reservation Certificates: The Mohit Kumar Principle

Date: May 16, 2025
“Strict-Format Rule” for Reservation Certificates in Public Employment: Supreme Court’s Decision in Mohit Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2025 INSC 704) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of India,...
“Employment-Cash Demands as Dowry” – A New Clarification on Section 304-B IPC in Virender Pal @ Vipin v. State of Haryana

“Employment-Cash Demands as Dowry” – A New Clarification on Section 304-B IPC in Virender Pal @ Vipin v. State of Haryana

Date: May 16, 2025
“Employment-Cash Demands as Dowry” – Supreme Court’s Clarification on Section 304-B IPC in Virender Pal @ Vipin v. State of Haryana (2025 INSC 710) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of India, in its...
Supreme Court Clarifies Non-Deductibility of Pension and Mandatory Addition of Future Prospects in Motor Accident Injury Claims – Commentary on Hanumantharaju B (Dead) by LR v. M. Akram Pasha (2025)

Supreme Court Clarifies Non-Deductibility of Pension and Mandatory Addition of Future Prospects in Motor Accident Injury Claims – Commentary on Hanumantharaju B (Dead) by LR v. M. Akram Pasha (2025)

Date: May 16, 2025
Supreme Court Clarifies Non-Deductibility of Pension and Mandatory Addition of Future Prospects in Motor Accident Injury Claims Commentary on Hanumantharaju B (Dead) by LR v. M. Akram Pasha & Anr.,...
Depositor Protection Prevails: Supreme Court Affirms Primacy of MPID Attachments over Secured Creditors and IBC Moratorium

Depositor Protection Prevails: Supreme Court Affirms Primacy of MPID Attachments over Secured Creditors and IBC Moratorium

Date: May 16, 2025
Depositor Protection Prevails: Supreme Court Affirms Primacy of MPID Attachments over Secured Creditors and IBC Moratorium 1. Introduction In National Spot Exchange Limited v. Union of India & Ors....
Supreme Court Clarifies Parity & Transparency in Confidential Military Reports: Brig Sandeep Chaudhary v. Union of India (2025)

Supreme Court Clarifies Parity & Transparency in Confidential Military Reports: Brig Sandeep Chaudhary v. Union of India (2025)

Date: May 16, 2025
Supreme Court Clarifies Parity & Transparency in Confidential Military Reports Commentary on Brig Sandeep Chaudhary v. Union of India, 2025 INSC 685 1. Introduction This Supreme Court decision...
Statutory Allotments, Not Sales: Supreme Court Declares Section 10 TPA Inapplicable to Conditional Grants of State Land

Statutory Allotments, Not Sales: Supreme Court Declares Section 10 TPA Inapplicable to Conditional Grants of State Land

Date: May 16, 2025
Statutory Allotments, Not Sales: Supreme Court Declares Section 10 TPA Inapplicable to Conditional Grants of State Land 1. Introduction Civil Appeal No. 5321 of 2025 (The State of Telangana v. Dr....
“Privity Prevails: Exclusive Liability of the Contracting Generator for Bay-Related Charges under the Electricity Act, 2003” – Comment on HPPTCL v. Brua Hydrowatt (2025 INSC 680)

“Privity Prevails: Exclusive Liability of the Contracting Generator for Bay-Related Charges under the Electricity Act, 2003” – Comment on HPPTCL v. Brua Hydrowatt (2025 INSC 680)

Date: May 16, 2025
“Privity Prevails: Exclusive Liability of the Contracting Generator for Bay-Related Charges under the Electricity Act, 2003” Commentary on Supreme Court’s Judgment in HP Power Transmission...
Broadening the Net: Supreme Court Re-affirms that Mens Rea Is Not a Pre-condition for Proceedings under the A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982

Broadening the Net: Supreme Court Re-affirms that Mens Rea Is Not a Pre-condition for Proceedings under the A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982

Date: May 16, 2025
Broadening the Net: Supreme Court Re-affirms that Mens Rea Is Not a Pre-condition for Proceedings under the A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of India, in...
Reaffirming the Essentials of an Arbitration Agreement: Supreme Court Outlaws “In-House Commissioner Clauses” as Arbitration

Reaffirming the Essentials of an Arbitration Agreement: Supreme Court Outlaws “In-House Commissioner Clauses” as Arbitration

Date: May 16, 2025
Reaffirming the Essentials of an Arbitration Agreement: Supreme Court Outlaws “In-House Commissioner Clauses” as Arbitration 1. Introduction On 15 May 2025, a two-judge Bench of the Supreme Court of...
CERC’s Ad-Hoc Regulatory Powers under Section 79: Writ Jurisdiction Barred when Statutory Appeal to APTEL Exists – Commentary on Power Grid Corp. v. MPPTCL (2025)

CERC’s Ad-Hoc Regulatory Powers under Section 79: Writ Jurisdiction Barred when Statutory Appeal to APTEL Exists – Commentary on Power Grid Corp. v. MPPTCL (2025)

Date: May 16, 2025
CERC’s Ad-Hoc Regulatory Powers under Section 79: Writ Jurisdiction Barred when Statutory Appeal to APTEL Exists – Commentary on Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. v. Madhya Pradesh Power...
“Jurisdictional Objections after the Award: Supreme Court Restricts Section 34 Challenges where MP Act 1983 Was Not Pleaded”

“Jurisdictional Objections after the Award: Supreme Court Restricts Section 34 Challenges where MP Act 1983 Was Not Pleaded”

Date: May 16, 2025
Jurisdictional Objections after the Award: Supreme Court Restricts Section 34 Challenges where MP Act 1983 Was Not Pleaded 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of India in M/s Gayatri Project Ltd. v....
“No Police-Involved Custodial Death Shall Be Investigated by the Same Police” – A New Mandate from Hansura Bai v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2025)

“No Police-Involved Custodial Death Shall Be Investigated by the Same Police” – A New Mandate from Hansura Bai v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2025)

Date: May 16, 2025
“No Police-Involved Custodial Death Shall Be Investigated by the Same Police” – Supreme Court’s New Mandate in Hansura Bai v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2025 INSC 711) 1. Introduction On 15 May 2025,...

“Prospective Enforcement” of Mandatory Pre-Institution Mediation:
Supreme Court’s Clarification in M/S Dhanbad Fuels (P) Ltd. v. Union of India, 2025 INSC 696

“Prospective Enforcement” of Mandatory Pre-Institution Mediation: Supreme Court’s Clarification in M/S Dhanbad Fuels (P) Ltd. v. Union of India, 2025 INSC 696

Date: May 16, 2025
“Prospective Enforcement” of Mandatory Pre-Institution Mediation under Section 12A: A Comprehensive Commentary on M/S Dhanbad Fuels Private Limited v. Union of India (2025 INSC 696) 1. Introduction...
Godavarman 2025: Supreme Court Orders Nationwide Transfer of Revenue-Held Forests & Re-Anchors the Public-Trust Doctrine

Godavarman 2025: Supreme Court Orders Nationwide Transfer of Revenue-Held Forests & Re-Anchors the Public-Trust Doctrine

Date: May 16, 2025
Godavarman 2025: Supreme Court Orders Nationwide Transfer of Revenue-Held Forests & Re-Anchors the Public-Trust Doctrine 1. Introduction The decision in In Re: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of...
Supreme Court Clarifies: No Probation or Sentence-Reduction for PoFA Offences Committed Between 1976-2006

Supreme Court Clarifies: No Probation or Sentence-Reduction for PoFA Offences Committed Between 1976-2006

Date: May 16, 2025
Supreme Court Clarifies: No Probation or Sentence-Reduction for PoFA Offences Committed Between 1976-2006 1. Introduction In Nagarajan v. State of Tamil Nadu; Naresh Chandra v. State of Uttar Pradesh...
Concealment of Disproportionate Assets in a Spouse’s Name Amounts to Abetment under Sec. 109 IPC r/w Sec. 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act – A Commentary on P. Shanthi Pugazhenthi v. State (2025 INSC 674)

Concealment of Disproportionate Assets in a Spouse’s Name Amounts to Abetment under Sec. 109 IPC r/w Sec. 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act – A Commentary on P. Shanthi Pugazhenthi v. State (2025 INSC 674)

Date: May 16, 2025
Concealment of Disproportionate Assets in a Spouse’s Name Amounts to Abetment under Sec. 109 IPC r/w Sec. 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act – A Commentary on P. Shanthi Pugazhenthi v....
“From Isolated Riot to Organised Crime?” – Supreme Court Clarifies that a Single, Unconnected Incident Cannot Justify Invocation of the U.P. Gangsters Act

“From Isolated Riot to Organised Crime?” – Supreme Court Clarifies that a Single, Unconnected Incident Cannot Justify Invocation of the U.P. Gangsters Act

Date: May 15, 2025
“From Isolated Riot to Organised Crime?” – Supreme Court Clarifies that a Single, Unconnected Incident Cannot Justify Invocation of the U.P. Gangsters Act 1. Introduction Lal Mohd. & Anr. v. State of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert