Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Doctrine of “Avoidable Remand” – Supreme Court reins-in Appellate Powers under Order XLI Rule 23-A CPC (Peter Augustine v. K.V. Xavier, 2025 INSC 771)

Doctrine of “Avoidable Remand” – Supreme Court reins-in Appellate Powers under Order XLI Rule 23-A CPC (Peter Augustine v. K.V. Xavier, 2025 INSC 771)

Date: May 23, 2025
Doctrine of “Avoidable Remand” – Supreme Court reins-in Appellate Powers under Order XLI Rule 23-A CPC Commentary on Peter Augustine v. K.V. Xavier & Ors., 2025 INSC 771 1. Introduction The Supreme...
“The Prospective-Benefit Rule for Late Pension Optees” – A Commentary on Reserve Bank of India v. M.T. Mani (2025 INSC 769)

“The Prospective-Benefit Rule for Late Pension Optees” – A Commentary on Reserve Bank of India v. M.T. Mani (2025 INSC 769)

Date: May 23, 2025
“The Prospective-Benefit Rule for Late Pension Optees” – A Commentary on Reserve Bank of India v. M.T. Mani (2025 INSC 769) 1. Introduction Reserve Bank of India v. M.T. Mani is a landmark...
Unchallenged Impleadment is Final – Subsequent Deletion Barred by Res Judicata : Commentary on Sulthan Said Ibrahim v. Prakasan (2025)

Unchallenged Impleadment is Final – Subsequent Deletion Barred by Res Judicata : Commentary on Sulthan Said Ibrahim v. Prakasan (2025)

Date: May 23, 2025
Unchallenged Impleadment is Final – Subsequent Deletion Barred by Res Judicata (Analysis of Supreme Court decision in Sulthan Said Ibrahim v. Prakasan & Ors., 2025 INSC 764) 1. Introduction The...
Contours of Contempt: Supreme Court Re-affirms Limited Jurisdiction and Allows Conditional Release of TDRs in Indrakashi Devi v. State of Karnataka

Contours of Contempt: Supreme Court Re-affirms Limited Jurisdiction and Allows Conditional Release of TDRs in Indrakashi Devi v. State of Karnataka

Date: May 23, 2025
Contours of Contempt: Supreme Court Re-affirms Limited Jurisdiction and Allows Conditional Release of TDRs in Indrakashi Devi v. State of Karnataka 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s judgment dated...
“Substance-over-Form” Standard for Vicarious Liability under Section 141 N.I. Act – A Commentary on HDFC Bank Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra (2025)

“Substance-over-Form” Standard for Vicarious Liability under Section 141 N.I. Act – A Commentary on HDFC Bank Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra (2025)

Date: May 22, 2025
“Substance-over-Form” Standard for Vicarious Liability under Section 141 N.I. Act Commentary on HDFC Bank Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra & Anr. (2025 INSC 759) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s...
From “Termination Simpliciter” to “Proportional Review” – Supreme Court Clarifies Limits on Discharging Judicial Probationers for Pre-Service Omissions

From “Termination Simpliciter” to “Proportional Review” – Supreme Court Clarifies Limits on Discharging Judicial Probationers for Pre-Service Omissions

Date: May 22, 2025
From “Termination Simpliciter” to “Proportional Review” – Supreme Court Clarifies Limits on Discharging Judicial Probationers for Pre-Service Omissions 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of India’s...
Clarificatory Fiscal Circulars Are Retrospective: Commentary on M/S Suraj Impex (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India, 2025 INSC 755

Clarificatory Fiscal Circulars Are Retrospective: Commentary on M/S Suraj Impex (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India, 2025 INSC 755

Date: May 22, 2025
Clarificatory Fiscal Circulars Operate Retrospectively when Benevolent and Non-Burdensome: Commentary on “M/S Suraj Impex (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India” (2025 INSC 755) 1. Introduction The...
“Twin-Aspect Taxation” – Supreme Court Upholds Co-existence of State Entertainment-Tax and Union Service-Tax on DTH & Cable Broadcasting

“Twin-Aspect Taxation” – Supreme Court Upholds Co-existence of State Entertainment-Tax and Union Service-Tax on DTH & Cable Broadcasting

Date: May 22, 2025
“Twin-Aspect Taxation” – Supreme Court Upholds Co-existence of State Entertainment-Tax and Union Service-Tax on DTH & Cable Broadcasting State of Kerala v. Asianet Satellite Communications Ltd. (and...
Re-affirming the Evidentiary Boundaries at the Pre-Charge Stage: State (CBI) v. Eluri Srinivasa Chakravarthi (2025)

Re-affirming the Evidentiary Boundaries at the Pre-Charge Stage: State (CBI) v. Eluri Srinivasa Chakravarthi (2025)

Date: May 22, 2025
Re-affirming the Evidentiary Boundaries at the Pre-Charge Stage: State (CBI) v. Eluri Srinivasa Chakravarthi & Ors., 2025 INSC 758 1. Introduction The Supreme Court’s decision in State rep. by...
“The Zudpi Jungle Exception” – Supreme Court’s New Framework for De-classifying Recorded Forests While Protecting Housing and Livelihood Rights

“The Zudpi Jungle Exception” – Supreme Court’s New Framework for De-classifying Recorded Forests While Protecting Housing and Livelihood Rights

Date: May 22, 2025
“The Zudpi Jungle Exception” – Supreme Court’s New Framework for De-classifying Recorded Forests While Protecting Housing and Livelihood Rights In re T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad – Zudpi Jungle Lands...
“Continuing Mandamus for Highway Safety” – Supreme Court’s New Framework for Removal of Encroachments on National Highways

“Continuing Mandamus for Highway Safety” – Supreme Court’s New Framework for Removal of Encroachments on National Highways

Date: May 22, 2025
“Continuing Mandamus for Highway Safety” – Supreme Court’s New Framework for Removal of Encroachments on National Highways 1. Introduction Case: Gyan Prakash v. Union of India & Ors. (W.P. (C)...
Ganeshkumar Selukar v. Limaye (2025) – Blueprint for Permanent Consumer Courts & Judicially-Dominated Selection Committees

Ganeshkumar Selukar v. Limaye (2025) – Blueprint for Permanent Consumer Courts & Judicially-Dominated Selection Committees

Date: May 22, 2025
Blueprint for Permanent Consumer Courts & Judicially-Dominated Selection Committees Commentary on Ganeshkumar Rajeshwarrao Selukar & Ors. v. Mahendra Bhaskar Limaye & Ors. (2025 INSC 752) 1....
Supreme Court Reinforces Limits of the “Last-Seen-Together” Doctrine – A Commentary on Padman Bibhar v. State of Odisha (2025)

Supreme Court Reinforces Limits of the “Last-Seen-Together” Doctrine – A Commentary on Padman Bibhar v. State of Odisha (2025)

Date: May 22, 2025
Supreme Court Reinforces Limits of the “Last-Seen-Together” Doctrine A Comprehensive Commentary on Padman Bibhar v. State of Odisha, 2025 INSC 751 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of India’s...
“Beyond the Runway: When Military-Aided Schools Are NOT ‘State’ under Article 12” – Commentary on Dileep Kumar Pandey v. Union of India (2025)

“Beyond the Runway: When Military-Aided Schools Are NOT ‘State’ under Article 12” – Commentary on Dileep Kumar Pandey v. Union of India (2025)

Date: May 22, 2025
“Beyond the Runway: When Military-Aided Schools Are NOT ‘State’ under Article 12” Commentary on Dileep Kumar Pandey v. Union of India, 2025 INSC 749 I. Introduction The Supreme Court’s split decision...
“Same-Service Superior” Rule Reaffirmed: Supreme Court Quashes Madhya Pradesh G.O. on IFS Performance Appraisals

“Same-Service Superior” Rule Reaffirmed: Supreme Court Quashes Madhya Pradesh G.O. on IFS Performance Appraisals

Date: May 22, 2025
“Same-Service Superior” Rule Reaffirmed: Supreme Court Quashes Madhya Pradesh G.O. on IFS Performance Appraisals 1. Introduction In In re T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India (2025 INSC...
The Prejudice Principle: Supreme Court Clarifies Natural-Justice Threshold in Disciplinary Inquiries – Comment on S. Janaki Iyer v. Union of India (2025 INSC 742)

The Prejudice Principle: Supreme Court Clarifies Natural-Justice Threshold in Disciplinary Inquiries – Comment on S. Janaki Iyer v. Union of India (2025 INSC 742)

Date: May 21, 2025
The Prejudice Principle: Supreme Court Clarifies Natural-Justice Threshold in Disciplinary Inquiries Commentary on S. Janaki Iyer v. Union of India & Ors. (Civil Appeal No. 10858 of 2024, 2025 INSC...

Consult-First, Charge-Later: Supreme Court makes pre-charge-sheet CVC consultation
binding once vigilance angle is admitted  —  Commentary on A.M. Kulshrestha v. Union Bank of India (2025)

Consult-First, Charge-Later: Supreme Court makes pre-charge-sheet CVC consultation binding once vigilance angle is admitted — Commentary on A.M. Kulshrestha v. Union Bank of India (2025)

Date: May 21, 2025
Consult-First, Charge-Later: Supreme Court makes pre-charge-sheet CVC consultation binding once vigilance angle is admitted Commentary on A.M. Kulshrestha v. Union Bank of India, 2025 INSC 744 1....
Section 80-IA(9) Caps Aggregate Deduction but Leaves Computation Intact – A Commentary on Shital Fibers Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax (2025)

Section 80-IA(9) Caps Aggregate Deduction but Leaves Computation Intact – A Commentary on Shital Fibers Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax (2025)

Date: May 21, 2025
Section 80-IA(9) Caps Aggregate Deduction but Leaves Computation Intact – Supreme Court settles conflict in Shital Fibers Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax (2025) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court...
“Due Process in Section 313 CrPC Examinations and Age-Based Protection: Supreme Court Affirms Substantive, Not Merely Formal, Compliance”

“Due Process in Section 313 CrPC Examinations and Age-Based Protection: Supreme Court Affirms Substantive, Not Merely Formal, Compliance”

Date: May 21, 2025
Due Process in Section 313 CrPC Examinations and Age-Based Protection: Supreme Court Affirms Substantive, Not Merely Formal, Compliance 1. Introduction In Ramji Prasad Jaiswal @ Ramjee Prasad Jaiswal...
Third-Party Purchasers Cannot Invoke Order VII Rule 11 to Defeat Joint-Family Partition Suits: A Commentary on Shaifali Gupta v. Vidya Devi Gupta (2025)

Third-Party Purchasers Cannot Invoke Order VII Rule 11 to Defeat Joint-Family Partition Suits: A Commentary on Shaifali Gupta v. Vidya Devi Gupta (2025)

Date: May 21, 2025
Third-Party Purchasers Cannot Invoke Order VII Rule 11 CPC to Defeat Joint-Family Partition Suits: A Detailed Commentary on Shaifali Gupta v. Vidya Devi Gupta (2025 INSC 739) 1. Introduction The...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert