Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

tenth-circuit-upholds-stringent-&amp Case Commentaries

“When Accommodation Ends and Accountability Begins” – Eleventh Circuit Affirms Dismissal With Prejudice for Willful Non-Compliance by Overseas Pro Se Litigant

“When Accommodation Ends and Accountability Begins” – Eleventh Circuit Affirms Dismissal With Prejudice for Willful Non-Compliance by Overseas Pro Se Litigant

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“When Accommodation Ends and Accountability Begins” – Eleventh Circuit Affirms Dismissal With Prejudice for Willful Non-Compliance by Overseas Pro Se Litigant Introduction Bozorgmehr Pouyeh v. Public...
United States v. Quintero: Eleventh Circuit Affirms MDLEA Jurisdiction in Exclusive Economic Zones and Upholds Broad Definition of “Vessel Without Nationality”

United States v. Quintero: Eleventh Circuit Affirms MDLEA Jurisdiction in Exclusive Economic Zones and Upholds Broad Definition of “Vessel Without Nationality”

Date: Aug 15, 2025
United States v. Quintero: Eleventh Circuit Affirms MDLEA Jurisdiction in Exclusive Economic Zones and Upholds Broad Definition of “Vessel Without Nationality” Introduction The Eleventh Circuit’s...
Azer Scientific v. Quidel: Third Circuit Confirms that Definitive E-Mail Exchanges Can Form Binding Contracts under Pennsylvania Law

Azer Scientific v. Quidel: Third Circuit Confirms that Definitive E-Mail Exchanges Can Form Binding Contracts under Pennsylvania Law

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Azer Scientific v. Quidel: Third Circuit Confirms that Definitive E-Mail Exchanges Can Form Binding Contracts under Pennsylvania Law Introduction The Third Circuit’s decision in Azer Scientific LLC...
“Follow the Form, or Be Formed into the Class” – The Third Circuit Abandons the “Reasonable-Indication” Opt-Out Theory in Perrigo Institutional Investor Group v. Papa

“Follow the Form, or Be Formed into the Class” – The Third Circuit Abandons the “Reasonable-Indication” Opt-Out Theory in Perrigo Institutional Investor Group v. Papa

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“Follow the Form, or Be Formed into the Class” – Third Circuit Rejects the “Reasonable Indication” Opt-Out Standard under Rule 23 1. Introduction Perrigo Institutional Investor Group v. Papa, No....
United States v. Brown: Flight Equals Abandonment — A Passenger’s Loss of Standing to Challenge a Subsequent Vehicle Search

United States v. Brown: Flight Equals Abandonment — A Passenger’s Loss of Standing to Challenge a Subsequent Vehicle Search

Date: Aug 15, 2025
United States v. Brown: Flight Equals Abandonment — A Passenger’s Loss of Standing to Challenge a Subsequent Vehicle Search Introduction United States v. Tylee Brown (3d Cir. Aug. 12, 2025) addresses...
“Post-Supervision Exhaustion” – Third Circuit Affirms that Completion of State Supervision Automatically Satisfies § 2254 Exhaustion Even After District-Court Dismissal

“Post-Supervision Exhaustion” – Third Circuit Affirms that Completion of State Supervision Automatically Satisfies § 2254 Exhaustion Even After District-Court Dismissal

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“Post-Supervision Exhaustion” – Third Circuit Affirms that Completion of State Supervision Automatically Satisfies § 2254 Exhaustion Even After District-Court Dismissal I. Introduction Vamsidhar...
Sharpening the Lens of Ascertainability: B. v. Harrington and the Fifth Circuit’s Demand for Precision in Medicaid EPSDT Class Actions

Sharpening the Lens of Ascertainability: B. v. Harrington and the Fifth Circuit’s Demand for Precision in Medicaid EPSDT Class Actions

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Sharpening the Lens of Ascertainability: B. v. Harrington and the Fifth Circuit’s Demand for Precision in Medicaid EPSDT Class Actions 1. Introduction B. v. Harrington, No. 24-30244 (5th Cir. Aug....
“Speculative Future Use” Is Not Enough:  DM Arbor Court v. City of Houston and the Revitalisation of Lucas-Style Categorical Takings

“Speculative Future Use” Is Not Enough: DM Arbor Court v. City of Houston and the Revitalisation of Lucas-Style Categorical Takings

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“Speculative Future Use” Is Not Enough: DM Arbor Court v. City of Houston and the Revitalisation of Lucas-Style Categorical Takings 1. Introduction Hurricane Harvey’s devastation of the Arbor Court...
“Real-World Operability” as the Touchstone of BACT in Texas Permitting

“Real-World Operability” as the Touchstone of BACT in Texas Permitting

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“Real-World Operability” as the Touchstone of BACT in Texas Permitting Introduction In Port Arthur Community Action Network v. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, the United States Court of...
United States v. Brown: Re-affirming Judicial Control over Multiplicitous Convictions and Post-Verdict Rule 48(a) Dismissals

United States v. Brown: Re-affirming Judicial Control over Multiplicitous Convictions and Post-Verdict Rule 48(a) Dismissals

Date: Aug 15, 2025
United States v. Brown: Re-affirming Judicial Control over Multiplicitous Convictions and Post-Verdict Rule 48(a) Dismissals 1. Introduction In United States v. Brown, No. 24-20095 (5th Cir. Aug. 12,...
Minor v. Commonwealth: Clarifying Kentucky’s Domestic-Violence Parole Exemption and the “In-Custody Video” Prejudice Test

Minor v. Commonwealth: Clarifying Kentucky’s Domestic-Violence Parole Exemption and the “In-Custody Video” Prejudice Test

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Minor v. Commonwealth: Clarifying Kentucky’s Domestic-Violence Parole Exemption and the “In-Custody Video” Prejudice Test Introduction In Devin J. Minor v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, the Supreme Court...

        The “Paintsville Standard”: Qualified Official Immunity Bars Vicarious-Liability and 
        Special-Relationship Claims Against Kentucky Public Entities

The “Paintsville Standard”: Qualified Official Immunity Bars Vicarious-Liability and Special-Relationship Claims Against Kentucky Public Entities

Date: Aug 15, 2025
The “Paintsville Standard”: Qualified Official Immunity Bars Vicarious-Liability and Special-Relationship Claims Against Kentucky Public Entities Introduction City of Paintsville v. Haney,...
Affirmation of Trial Courts’ Discretion to Amend Penalty-Phase Instructions Mid-Deliberation: Commentary on Bobby Anderson v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (2025)

Affirmation of Trial Courts’ Discretion to Amend Penalty-Phase Instructions Mid-Deliberation: Commentary on Bobby Anderson v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (2025)

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Affirmation of Trial Courts’ Discretion to Amend Penalty-Phase Instructions Mid-Deliberation: Commentary on Bobby Anderson v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (Ky. 2025) Introduction The Supreme Court of...
Blaker v. Kroger – Reaffirming the Independence of Kentucky Workers’ Compensation Adjudications from Social-Security Disability Findings

Blaker v. Kroger – Reaffirming the Independence of Kentucky Workers’ Compensation Adjudications from Social-Security Disability Findings

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Blaker v. Kroger – Reaffirming the Independence of Kentucky Workers’ Compensation Adjudications from Social-Security Disability Findings Introduction In Robert Blaker, Jr. v. The Kroger Company, the...
Affirmative Approval Equals Waiver: Kentucky Supreme Court Re-affirms that Explicit Agreement to Jury Instructions Waives Double-Jeopardy and Jury-Unanimity Claims

Affirmative Approval Equals Waiver: Kentucky Supreme Court Re-affirms that Explicit Agreement to Jury Instructions Waives Double-Jeopardy and Jury-Unanimity Claims

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Affirmative Approval Equals Waiver: Kentucky Supreme Court Re-affirms that Explicit Agreement to Jury Instructions Waives Double-Jeopardy and Jury-Unanimity Claims Introduction Michael Dodson, the...
Extended-Block Visitation and IDEA “Comparable Services” Under Tropea: First Department Affirms Out‑of‑State Relocation Without Requiring Economic Necessity (Matter of Jasmine M. v. Albert M., 2025)

Extended-Block Visitation and IDEA “Comparable Services” Under Tropea: First Department Affirms Out‑of‑State Relocation Without Requiring Economic Necessity (Matter of Jasmine M. v. Albert M., 2025)

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Extended-Block Visitation and IDEA “Comparable Services” Under Tropea: First Department Affirms Out‑of‑State Relocation Without Requiring Economic Necessity Introduction This commentary examines the...
“Disposal-Likelihood” & Fair-Market Valuation: The Ooten Clarification on Directed-Verdict Standards in Kentucky Theft and Criminal Mischief Cases

“Disposal-Likelihood” & Fair-Market Valuation: The Ooten Clarification on Directed-Verdict Standards in Kentucky Theft and Criminal Mischief Cases

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“Disposal-Likelihood” & Fair-Market Valuation: Ooten v. Commonwealth Clarifies Kentucky’s Directed-Verdict Thresholds in Theft and Criminal Mischief Cases 1. Introduction In Jesse Ooten v....
Restitution and Candor as Absolute Conditions for Bar Reinstatement – A Commentary on In Re: Travis Olen Myles, Jr.

Restitution and Candor as Absolute Conditions for Bar Reinstatement – A Commentary on In Re: Travis Olen Myles, Jr.

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Restitution and Candor as Absolute Conditions for Bar Reinstatement – Supreme Court of Kentucky Defines the Outer Limits in In Re: Travis Olen Myles, Jr. 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of...
No Advantage Through Threats: Kentucky Supreme Court Re-Affirms that Subjective Belief Cannot Excuse Violations of SCR 3.130(3.4)(f) and 8.2(a)

No Advantage Through Threats: Kentucky Supreme Court Re-Affirms that Subjective Belief Cannot Excuse Violations of SCR 3.130(3.4)(f) and 8.2(a)

Date: Aug 15, 2025
No Advantage Through Threats: Kentucky Supreme Court Re-Affirms that Subjective Belief Cannot Excuse Violations of SCR 3.130(3.4)(f) and 8.2(a) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of Kentucky’s opinion...
“When the Defendant Tells His Own Story” – Kentucky Clarifies the Scope of the
            “Inextricably Intertwined” Exception to KRE 404(b)

“When the Defendant Tells His Own Story” – Kentucky Clarifies the Scope of the “Inextricably Intertwined” Exception to KRE 404(b)

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“When the Defendant Tells His Own Story” – Kentucky Clarifies the Scope of the “Inextricably Intertwined” Exception to KRE 404(b) Introduction In Damon R. Cruse v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (Supreme...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert